Advertisement
by Threlizdun » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:36 am
by Manisdog » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:36 am
Olthar wrote:No. I don't care to go into the details, but my childhood has left me with abandonment issues and way too much insecurity. If someone ever agrees to date me (an unlikely occurrence), she would have to be a one woman girl. If she ever cheated on me, I'd probably snap and attempt suicide. I absolutely would not be able to handle polyamory. It would destroy me.
by Corrian » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:37 am
Manisdog wrote:Such a thing would be a breeding ground promiscuity, I mean imagine what would happen we would be creating like a generation of sluts like what happened in the 1960's, if anything we need enforce that such kind of relationships are not socially acceptable
Manisdog wrote:society does, the norms, traditions and cultures of a society, and the beliefs of majority of the populace
by Manisdog » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:38 am
Corrian wrote:Manisdog wrote:Such a thing would be a breeding ground promiscuity, I mean imagine what would happen we would be creating like a generation of sluts like what happened in the 1960's, if anything we need enforce that such kind of relationships are not socially acceptable
Ah, slut shaming. A great way to make a point...Manisdog wrote:society does, the norms, traditions and cultures of a society, and the beliefs of majority of the populace
Screw the norm. Normal is boring. Embrace the different!
by Corrian » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:38 am
Manisdog wrote:Well no, it would just be a cesspool for disease, adultery and unhappiness
by Corrian » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:40 am
Manisdog wrote:and norms are needed to keep society functioning
by Olthar » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:40 am
Threlizdun wrote:I'm sorry you've had to deal with that. Please don't sell yourself short though. Anyone would be lucky to have our Lesbian Queen.Olthar wrote:No. I don't care to go into the details, but my childhood has left me with abandonment issues and way too much insecurity. If someone ever agrees to date me (an unlikely occurrence), she would have to be a one woman girl. If she ever cheated on me, I'd probably snap and attempt suicide. I absolutely would not be able to handle polyamory. It would destroy me.
by Meridiani Planum » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:41 am
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:42 am
Olthar wrote:Threlizdun wrote: I'm sorry you've had to deal with that. Please don't sell yourself short though. Anyone would be lucky to have our Lesbian Queen.
Tell that to the rest of the world. Only one person has ever admitted to having a crush on me: a guy on these forums. Hell, none of my real life "friends" even so much as bothered to wish me a happy birthday two months ago. So it's clear that no one really cares much about me.
by Threlizdun » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:43 am
Republic of Coldwater wrote:I am pretty neutral when it comes to the law, and individual institutions for marriage should decide whether they will allow or disallow polygamy. Personally, I wouldn't want to enter a relationship with two people, and it baffles me on how a romantic relationship with more than one person works and how it is sustained.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:45 am
Manisdog wrote:women need a strong man, they would just get unhappy sleeping with so many men
by Corrian » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:45 am
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:45 am
Manisdog wrote:Norms govern polite society
by Manisdog » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:47 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Manisdog wrote:women need a strong man, they would just get unhappy sleeping with so many men
"Women" is no magic formula for "second standard of human psyche we all know its needs and working because it comes in a single homogeneous form".
Please grow a little bit of knowledge and sensibility.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:49 am
Manisdog wrote:they require much more investment in the process of reproduction as they need to rear the child, they would be upset if they catch a man who sleeps with a gazzlion girls because in our primitive heads she would be thinking that the man's resources will be divided among all of the harem.
by Republic of Coldwater » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:49 am
Threlizdun wrote:Republic of Coldwater wrote:I am pretty neutral when it comes to the law, and individual institutions for marriage should decide whether they will allow or disallow polygamy. Personally, I wouldn't want to enter a relationship with two people, and it baffles me on how a romantic relationship with more than one person works and how it is sustained.
All of them work differently, just like any relationship. Communication is extremely important though, even more so than in monogamous ones. My girlfriend lives with one of her spouses relatively close by. Her other spouse is involved with someone else and alternates their time between cities, with her saying that they are deeply in love but that they require space at times. She had a boyfriend in a nearby city that she sees rather regularly. I was with her and her husband tonight, have a date with her Thursday, and them she is going to see her boyfriend this weekend. Polyamory takes a hell of a lot of organization and communication, but I would say it is well worth it.
by Ancient Magmia » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:50 am
Meridiani Planum wrote:As for me, polyamory is definitely not what I would be comfortable with emotionally. I need a little more focus and exclusivity.
Dear Diary, I'm Having a Little ProblemWise men speak because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. - Plato
by Manisdog » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:51 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Manisdog wrote:they require much more investment in the process of reproduction as they need to rear the child, they would be upset if they catch a man who sleeps with a gazzlion girls because in our primitive heads she would be thinking that the man's resources will be divided among all of the harem.
People long left "primitive heads". Urban societies by the 21st century are very different from the savannahs, even if you gave an accurate description of how we were in the Paleolithic, Mesolithic and Upper Neolithic - you did not.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:51 am
Republic of Coldwater wrote:So you, in the end of the day only have a small portion of one's love?
by Manisdog » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:52 am
Republic of Coldwater wrote:Threlizdun wrote:All of them work differently, just like any relationship. Communication is extremely important though, even more so than in monogamous ones. My girlfriend lives with one of her spouses relatively close by. Her other spouse is involved with someone else and alternates their time between cities, with her saying that they are deeply in love but that they require space at times. She had a boyfriend in a nearby city that she sees rather regularly. I was with her and her husband tonight, have a date with her Thursday, and them she is going to see her boyfriend this weekend. Polyamory takes a hell of a lot of organization and communication, but I would say it is well worth it.
So you, in the end of the day only have a small portion of one's love?
by Corrian » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:52 am
Ancient Magmia wrote:Meridiani Planum wrote:As for me, polyamory is definitely not what I would be comfortable with emotionally. I need a little more focus and exclusivity.
^This.
That being said, I don't have a problem with polyamory. If it works for some people and they're happy with it, then who am I to say it's somehow wrong?
by Saiwania » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:53 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ameriganastan, Corrian, El Lazaro, Eremocyma, Floofybit, Google [Bot], HISPIDA, Keltionialang, Locmor, McNernia, Nu Elysium, Ors Might, Pasong Tirad, Shrillland, Statesburg, Tarsonis, Torisakia, Trollgaard, Trump Almighty, Tsardom of Alaska, Vrbo, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement