Polyamory Thread: I Love You All!

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

P.S

Countries like the Czech Republic do not count, they are inconsequential countries

So basically you're just going to plug your ears and say LALALALALALA?
Argument won for Polygamy.

[The Fascist American Empire]

Okay, thank you. I was just wondering.

Say, would it count if I just don't care if my wife cheats on me, provided she doesn't leave me? I wouldn't partake another woman myself, of course. She'd have my utmost loyalty and love.

No, cheating by definition is not communicated or consensual on the part of all parties. If you gave her permission to have sex with others, then you would have an open marriage. Only if she were actually romantically involved with others would it be polyamory.

Oh. Alright thanks. Bye.

[Threlizdun]

There are polyamorous relationships that don't even involve sex. There are polyamorous relationships that don't even involve sex. There are polyamorous relationships that don't even involve sex. There, I have said it many other points in the thread. Perhaps I didn't say it enough. I didn't start dating someone because I wanted sex; I started dating because I cared about that person.

I care for so many people, does that make me in a polyamorous relationship with them ?

no

Are you in a romantic relationship with them? No? Then it isn't polyamory. If you are going to argue, at least know what topic is even being discussed.

[New haven america]

So you admit defeat.

Weak.

No Czech Republic has a monogamous relationship but it is not a major country in the world, more like an inconsequential nation like a blip on this earth, I am just using it as an example countries in the same class as it

"Tell me any government which would give legal recognition to this kind of relationship, any religious establishment or any ruling political party that endorses

and in any major country in the world"

Still a pathetic cop-out.

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

No Czech Republic has a monogamous relationship but it is not a major country in the world, more like an inconsequential nation like a blip on this earth, I am just using it as an example countries in the same class as it

"Tell me any government which would give legal recognition to this kind of relationship, any religious establishment or any ruling political party that endorses

and in any major country in the world"

Yet again, pathetic cop-out.

As I said:

[Manisdog]

No Czech Republic has a monogamous relationship but it is not a major country in the world, more like an inconsequential nation like a blip on this earth, I am just using it as an example countries in the same class as it

"Tell me any government which would give legal recognition to this kind of relationship, any religious establishment or any ruling political party that endorses

and in any major country in the world"

Still a pathetic cop-out.

No otherwise somebody would just link me a stupid island somewhere, majority of all the cultures are monogamous

lets just admit it


any major country

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

"Tell me any government which would give legal recognition to this kind of relationship, any religious establishment or any ruling political party that endorses

and in any major country in the world"

Still a pathetic cop-out.

No otherwise somebody would just link me a stupid island somewhere, majority of all the cultures are monogamous

lets just admit it

Admit that you're ignorant?
K

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

any major country

United States, Mexico, and Canada in the Americas.

[Manisdog]

any major country

United States, Mexico, and Canada in the Americas.

Would they legally recognize the rights of your multiple wives and husbands

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

United States, Mexico, and Canada in the Americas.

Would they legally recognize the rights of your multiple wives and husbands

Yes. They currently do.

[Manisdog]

Would they legally recognize the rights of your multiple wives and husbands

Yes. They currently do.

except maybe Utah I guess no

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

Yes. They currently do.

except maybe Utah I guess no

Then I guess you'll ignore your own country of India.
*Waves arms* I've said all I need to. The ignorance is pissy.

[Manisdog]

except maybe Utah I guess no

Then I guess you'll ignore your own country of India.
*Waves arms* I've said all I need to. The ignorance is pissy.

No except the muslims it is illegal to do so, even the muslims avoid it because they are not as rich as before

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

Then I guess you'll ignore your own country of India.
*Waves arms* I've said all I need to. The ignorance is pissy.

No except the muslims it is illegal to do so, even the muslims avoid it because they are not as rich as before

You missed Adivasis and Buddhists.

[Manisdog]

No except the muslims it is illegal to do so, even the muslims avoid it because they are not as rich as before

You missed Adivasis and Buddhists.

No they arent allowed to do so

unless you rewrote the hindu marriage act

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

You missed Adivasis and Buddhists.

No they arent allowed to do so

unless you rewrote the hindu marriage act

Adivasis are not religions. They are a heterogeneous set of ethnic and tribal groups considered the aboriginal population of India.

[Manisdog]

No they arent allowed to do so

unless you rewrote the hindu marriage act

Adivasis are not religions. They are a heterogeneous set of ethnic and tribal groups considered the aboriginal population of India.

I know that but they are all regulated under the hindu marriage act

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

Adivasis are not religions. They are a heterogeneous set of ethnic and tribal groups considered the aboriginal population of India.

I know that but they are all regulated under the hindu marriage act

Under which section?

[Benuty]

God has designed the social structure to be one man, one woman, monogamous and heretosexual. Thus this polyamory is not advisable.

Then explain Abraham?

[Manisdog]

I know that but they are all regulated under the hindu marriage act

Under which section?

section 2 c

to any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion, unless it is proved that any such person would not have been governed by the Hindu law or by any custom or usage as part of that law in respect of any of the matters dealt with herein if this Act had not been passed.

[United Marxist Nations]

That's not a credible source.
That's not even a source.

Trying living like that, such things don't need to sources its like asking for a source of why the earth is round

nearly everywhere there is monogamy, or in some extreme cases polygamy in which a man of status keeps 2 or more wives

Chinese Emperors.

[Benuty]

Bitch please, I had 700 wives, and 300 concubines back in my day.

Solomon, is that you?

That is one of my many forms, child among mortals.

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

Under which section?

section 2 c

to any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion, unless it is proved that any such person would not have been governed by the Hindu law or by any custom or usage as part of that law in respect of any of the matters dealt with herein if this Act had not been passed.

Not Applicable to:
The Goa State
Muslims
Christians
Parsi
Jews

[Manisdog]

section 2 c

to any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion, unless it is proved that any such person would not have been governed by the Hindu law or by any custom or usage as part of that law in respect of any of the matters dealt with herein if this Act had not been passed.

Not Applicable to:
The Goa State
Muslims
Christians
Parsi
Jews

Yes the christians have there own act and the muslims have there own shariah law

and the parsis marry there cousins and sisters

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

Not Applicable to:
The Goa State
Muslims
Christians
Parsi
Jews

Yes the christians have there own act and the muslims have there own shariah law

and the parsis marry there cousins and sisters

Please correct grammar. Christians, Muslims, or Parsis are not places.

In that, I'm not seeing any such acts.