Polyamory Thread: I Love You All!

[Digital Planets]

I am king's Solomon.
In other words you've misinterpreted my statement in which I referred you to traditional marriage and you went with King Solomon.

300 wives. 700 concubines. Just a wee correction.

OrgyFest 2014. This year's theme: The Ultimate Scandal.

[Basseemia]

The thought of being a cuckold does not sit well with me, and I could not in good conscious, engage in relations with a committed woman.

Being a cuckold and being apart of a polyamorist relationship are two different things. A cuckold consents to the wife/girlfriend being able to sleep with whomever she pleases but he doesn't while in a polyamorist relationship they both are able to pursue sexual and emotionally romantic relationships with each other along with anyone they want with consent of course.

[Manisdog]

You understood that I am referring to the class of people this thread is made on, good then lets carry on

In other words, I think you need to see this show for a while, because it's obvious your misinterpretations are fringing on my sayings.

for a change I am on the politically correct

we are talking about a bunch of people who want fuck like rabbits for Christ sake

so don't call me politically incorrect because i am not

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

In other words, I think you need to see this show for a while, because it's obvious your misinterpretations are fringing on my sayings.

for a change I am on the politically correct

we are talking about a bunch of people who want fuck like rabbits for Christ sake

so don't call me politically incorrect because i am not

Wrong, that would be zoophilic, not polygamous-interests.

Your logical fallacies prove you are not.

[New haven america]

A minority who could be disciplined follow the three-four member relationship system

Jesus, it's just people who love more than one person. They don't have to be fucking disciplined. Who the hell are you to tell others what kind of relationships they can have?

Well, he believes he's better than everyone because he doesn't trust any human relationship.

Guessing he's that kind of person.

[Archeuland and Baughistan]

Care to elaborate? I have my response cooked up but I just need to see your official stance on King Solomon's harem before I continue.

I am king's Solomon.
In other words you've misinterpreted my statement in which I referred you to traditional marriage and you went with King Solomon.

The Bible is a historical account, not a gentle fairy tale. There were sinful people in Biblical history. King Solomon was not supposed to take wives from amongst the Canaanites, Aramites, and so on, but he did so, and it led to his ruin. As punishment for worshiping pagan gods, his kingdom was split in two at his death. There's reason to believe, though, that Solomon, as David's son, would have repented. It is not specifically mentioned, but Solomon was a righteous king who sought after God despite his wild and never ending lust for women. God uses imperfect people - such as King Solomon or Nebuchadnezzar - to solve his purposes and fulfill his plan. Technically most everyone is involved in God's plan whether or not they want to be. The important choice is up to them - whether or not they will support God's plan or reject it.

Solomon, just like all others, is not holy or sinless - and he will have to give an account of his actions to Christ in the last judgment, as will everyone else. To dismiss any premonitions of self-righteousness, I too will be judged by Christ, and it is my hope that he will indeed overlook and forgive my faults as he has promised, and bring me into eternal life.

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

I am king's Solomon.
In other words you've misinterpreted my statement in which I referred you to traditional marriage and you went with King Solomon.

The Bible is a historical account, not a gentle fairy tale. There were sinful people in Biblical history. King Solomon was not supposed to take wives from amongst the Canaanites, Aramites, and so on, but he did so, and it led to his ruin. As punishment for worshiping pagan gods, his kingdom was split in two at his death. There's reason to believe, though, that Solomon, as David's son, would have repented. It is not specifically mentioned, but Solomon was a righteous king who sought after God despite his wild and never ending lust for women. God uses imperfect people - such as King Solomon or Nebuchadnezzar - to solve his purposes and fulfill his plan. Technically most everyone is involved in God's plan whether or not they want to be. The important choice is up to them - whether or not they will support God's plan or reject it.

Solomon, just like all others, is not holy or sinless - and he will have to give an account of his actions to Christ in the last judgment, as will everyone else. To dismiss any premonitions of self-righteousness, I too will be judged by Christ, and it is my hope that he will indeed overlook and forgive my faults as he has promised, and bring me into eternal life.

A: Fixed

B: Religion and Polygamy have nothing to do with what I was talking about at the moment.

[Threlizdun]

Your relationship, your business I guess. However, I do have one question: I am assuming that the woman mention in the OP is the only one in the relationship, so what happens if she has a baby? Would it make the situation even a little odd, or not? Just a passing thought.

If she has a baby (which is unlikely but I'm not giving specifics), then it would be the business of her and the other parent what they chose to do. It wouldn't be the first time kids were raised in a polyamorous household though (I actually know a poly family with kids), so while it would certainly change things for all of is, I doubt it would end the relationship.

We're not swingers. Swingers just have sex and nothing more. Again, who the hell are you to tell others what relationship they could have. The majority of people believe that it is acceptable to have a polyamorous relationship.

source,

how many people would really want polyamory even this opinion poll here says majority don't want it

I didn't say most want it. I'm saying most don't mind that others have them. You are a minority in proposing you should be able to dictate whether more than two people are allowed to love each other.

[Manisdog]

Your relationship, your business I guess. However, I do have one question: I am assuming that the woman mention in the OP is the only one in the relationship, so what happens if she has a baby? Would it make the situation even a little odd, or not? Just a passing thought.

If she has a baby (which is unlikely but I'm not giving specifics), then it would be the business of her and the other parent what they chose to do. It wouldn't be the first time kids were raised in a polyamorous household though (I actually know a poly family with kids), so while it would certainly change things for all of is, I doubt it would end the relationship.

source,

how many people would really want polyamory even this opinion poll here says majority don't want it

I didn't say most want it. I'm saying most don't mind that others have them. You are a minority in proposing you should be able to dictate whether more than two people are allowed to love each other.

Tell me any government which would give legal recognition to this kind of relationship, any religious establishment or any ruling political party that endorses

and in any major country in the world

[Archeuland and Baughistan]

The Bible is a historical account, not a gentle fairy tale. There were sinful people in Biblical history. King Solomon was not supposed to take wives from amongst the Canaanites, Aramites, and so on, but he did so, and it led to his ruin. As punishment for worshiping pagan gods, his kingdom was split in two at his death. There's reason to believe, though, that Solomon, as David's son, would have repented. It is not specifically mentioned, but Solomon was a righteous king who sought after God despite his wild and never ending lust for women. God uses imperfect people - such as King Solomon or Nebuchadnezzar - to solve his purposes and fulfill his plan. Technically most everyone is involved in God's plan whether or not they want to be. The important choice is up to them - whether or not they will support God's plan or reject it.

Solomon, just like all others, is not holy or sinless - and he will have to give an account of his actions to Christ in the last judgment, as will everyone else. To dismiss any premonitions of self-righteousness, I too will be judged by Christ, and it is my hope that he will indeed overlook and forgive my faults as he has promised, and bring me into eternal life.

A: Fixed

B: Religion and Polygamy have nothing to do with what I was talking about at the moment.

I don't have a crystal ball, all that I can tell about what you are saying is what I see with my own eyes. I can clearly tell you were making a flawed attack on a righteous historical figure, King Solomon. If you Google '700 wives', you will see King Solomon in most every result. Logically, you were speaking of King Solomon.

[The Fascist American Empire]

Your relationship, your business I guess. However, I do have one question: I am assuming that the woman mention in the OP is the only one in the relationship, so what happens if she has a baby? Would it make the situation even a little odd, or not? Just a passing thought.

If she has a baby (which is unlikely but I'm not giving specifics), then it would be the business of her and the other parent what they chose to do. It wouldn't be the first time kids were raised in a polyamorous household though (I actually know a poly family with kids), so while it would certainly change things for all of is, I doubt it would end the relationship.

Okay, thank you. I was just wondering.

Say, would it count if I just don't care if my wife cheats on me, provided she doesn't leave me? I wouldn't partake another woman myself, of course. She'd have my utmost loyalty and love.

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

If she has a baby (which is unlikely but I'm not giving specifics), then it would be the business of her and the other parent what they chose to do. It wouldn't be the first time kids were raised in a polyamorous household though (I actually know a poly family with kids), so while it would certainly change things for all of is, I doubt it would end the relationship.
I didn't say most want it. I'm saying most don't mind that others have them. You are a minority in proposing you should be able to dictate whether more than two people are allowed to love each other.

Tell me any government which would give legal recognition to this kind of relationship, any religious establishment or any ruling political party that endorses

and in any major country in the world

The United States, Mexico and Canada.

[Threlizdun]

In other words, I think you need to see this show for a while, because it's obvious your misinterpretations are fringing on my sayings.

for a change I am on the politically correct

we are talking about a bunch of people who want fuck like rabbits for Christ sake

so don't call me politically incorrect because i am not

There are polyamorous relationships that don't even involve sex. There are polyamorous relationships that don't even involve sex. There are polyamorous relationships that don't even involve sex. There, I have said it many other points in the thread. Perhaps I didn't say it enough. I didn't start dating someone because I wanted sex; I started dating because I cared about that person.

[Manisdog]

P.S

Countries like the Czech Republic do not count, they are inconsequential countries

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

A: Fixed

B: Religion and Polygamy have nothing to do with what I was talking about at the moment.

I don't have a crystal ball, all that I can tell about what you are saying is what I see with my own eyes. I can clearly tell you were making a flawed attack on a righteous historical figure, King Solomon. If you Google '700 wives', you will see King Solomon in most every result. Logically, you were speaking of King Solomon.

Traditional Marriage.
I'm surprised you didn't catch that
Scratch that.

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

P.S

Countries like the Czech Republic do not count, they are inconsequential countries

So basically you're just going to plug your ears and say LALALALALALA?
Argument won for Polygamy.

[The Fascist American Empire]

If she has a baby (which is unlikely but I'm not giving specifics), then it would be the business of her and the other parent what they chose to do. It wouldn't be the first time kids were raised in a polyamorous household though (I actually know a poly family with kids), so while it would certainly change things for all of is, I doubt it would end the relationship.
I didn't say most want it. I'm saying most don't mind that others have them. You are a minority in proposing you should be able to dictate whether more than two people are allowed to love each other.

Tell me any government which would give legal recognition to this kind of relationship, any religious establishment or any ruling political party that endorses

and in any major country in the world

Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Iran...


Islam, very very very very very Ancient Judaism (Jacob/Israel had four wives, remember). I think Hinduism too, but I'm not sure, I'm not an expert.

[New haven america]

P.S

Countries like the Czech Republic do not count, they are inconsequential countries

So you admit defeat?

Weak.

[Manisdog]

for a change I am on the politically correct

we are talking about a bunch of people who want fuck like rabbits for Christ sake

so don't call me politically incorrect because i am not

There are polyamorous relationships that don't even involve sex. There are polyamorous relationships that don't even involve sex. There are polyamorous relationships that don't even involve sex. There, I have said it many other points in the thread. Perhaps I didn't say it enough. I didn't start dating someone because I wanted sex; I started dating because I cared about that person.

I care for so many people, does that make me in a polyamorous relationship with them ?

no

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

Tell me any government which would give legal recognition to this kind of relationship, any religious establishment or any ruling political party that endorses

and in any major country in the world

Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Iran...


Islam, very very very very very Ancient Judaism (Jacob/Israel had four wives, remember). I think Hinduism too, but I'm not sure, I'm not an expert.

You forgot Los Estados Unidos, Estados Unidos Mexicanos, y Canada

[The Fascist American Empire]

Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Iran...


Islam, very very very very very Ancient Judaism (Jacob/Israel had four wives, remember). I think Hinduism too, but I'm not sure, I'm not an expert.

You forgot Los Estados Unidos, Estados Unidos Mexicanos, y Canada

Me no speak Italiano. Français, English, or עברית please.

[Manisdog]

P.S

Countries like the Czech Republic do not count, they are inconsequential countries

So you admit defeat.

Weak.

No Czech Republic has a monogamous relationship but it is not a major country in the world, more like an inconsequential nation like a blip on this earth, I am just using it as an example countries in the same class as it

[Threlizdun]

If she has a baby (which is unlikely but I'm not giving specifics), then it would be the business of her and the other parent what they chose to do. It wouldn't be the first time kids were raised in a polyamorous household though (I actually know a poly family with kids), so while it would certainly change things for all of is, I doubt it would end the relationship.

Okay, thank you. I was just wondering.

Say, would it count if I just don't care if my wife cheats on me, provided she doesn't leave me? I wouldn't partake another woman myself, of course. She'd have my utmost loyalty and love.

No, cheating by definition is not communicated or consensual on the part of all parties. If you gave her permission to have sex with others, then you would have an open marriage. Only if she were actually romantically involved with others would it be polyamory.

[New haven america]

You forgot Los Estados Unidos, Estados Unidos Mexicanos, y Canada

Me no speak Italiano.

It's spanish.

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

You forgot Los Estados Unidos, Estados Unidos Mexicanos, y Canada

Me no speak Italiano.

You speak a Spanish.

So you admit defeat.

Weak.

No Czech Republic has a monogamous relationship but it is not a major country in the world, more like an inconsequential nation like a blip on this earth, I am just using it as an example countries in the same class as it

United States, Mexico, Canada.