NATION

PASSWORD

Polyamory Thread: I Love You All!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Would you be comfortable with a polyamory

Yes, I've been in or currently am in a poly relationship and like it
10
5%
Yes, I'd like to be in a poly relationship
32
16%
Probably, but I'm not sure
24
12%
I don't know
6
3%
Probably not, but I'm not sure
12
6%
No, I've been in a poly relationship and it was t for me
3
2%
No, but I don't mind those who have them
61
31%
No, I disagree with poly relations
47
24%
 
Total votes : 195

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:34 pm

My personal preference: no, thank you. Although, I would consider an open relationship.
Last edited by Othelos on Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:47 pm

Manisdog wrote:just one small question nsg, How would you feel if your wife/girlfriend sleeps with 30 other men ?

Depends. Would she be sharing those 30 men with me?
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:51 pm

Manisdog wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:Okay. Are you going to provide any arguments for why you believe multiple people involved in a consenting relationship are wrong or should I just ignore you?

You know such a thing would just break the very moral fabric of society, you know society asks to adhere to very basic and very minimum things like the roles each gender has to play and such an arrangement would just ruin society

So what you're really saying is that society can't handle it because YOU can't handle it? Newsflash: you're not the center of the universe, kid.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:58 pm

Manisdog wrote:just one small question nsg, How would you feel if your wife/girlfriend sleeps with 30 other men ?

Woe to the context. :(

If we weren't in a polyamorous relationship (it is a mutual understanding), then I would of course be hurt by such a betrayal of my trust. However, that isn't the context of the thread, so the question isn't of much relevance.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:02 pm

Polyamory seems like a lot of work. And if it was universally practiced by both sexes, I think we'd need a chart to explain relationships.
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:03 pm

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Polyamory seems like a lot of work. And if it was universally practiced by both sexes, I think we'd need a chart to explain relationships.


its essentially a roadmap for disloyalty, heartbreaks, and suffering down the road...

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:05 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Polyamory seems like a lot of work. And if it was universally practiced by both sexes, I think we'd need a chart to explain relationships.


its essentially a roadmap for disloyalty, heartbreaks, and suffering down the road...

Monogamous relationships are already like that
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:05 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Polyamory seems like a lot of work. And if it was universally practiced by both sexes, I think we'd need a chart to explain relationships.


its essentially a roadmap for disloyalty, heartbreaks, and suffering down the road...

I guess I shouldn't tread on someone else's personal life if they're into that stuff.
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:05 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Polyamory seems like a lot of work. And if it was universally practiced by both sexes, I think we'd need a chart to explain relationships.


its essentially a roadmap for disloyalty, heartbreaks, and suffering down the road...

I take it you personally know every single polyamorous relationship on the face of the Earth? Otherwise, how could you make such a sweeping claim with a straight face?
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:05 pm

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Polyamory seems like a lot of work. And if it was universally practiced by both sexes, I think we'd need a chart to explain relationships.

It is sometimes practiced by the woman who dates two, such as one who's in my school.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:06 pm

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Polyamory seems like a lot of work. And if it was universally practiced by both sexes, I think we'd need a chart to explain relationships.

It is sometimes practiced by the woman who dates two, such as one who's in my school.

Dating =/= being in a relationship
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:08 pm

Othelos wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:It is sometimes practiced by the woman who dates two, such as one who's in my school.

Dating =/= being in a relationship

I worded that wrong.
She's about to go in a full relationship with the male, and she is in a relationship, though I see your point.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:10 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Polyamory seems like a lot of work. And if it was universally practiced by both sexes, I think we'd need a chart to explain relationships.


its essentially a roadmap for disloyalty, heartbreaks, and suffering down the road...

Actually I find it's much more honest. I can remark to my partners about if I'm attracted to someone and they seem much less prone to jealousy than my monogamous partners ever were.I have no idea why you'd think it made suffering or heartbreaks more likely though... You know your partners are going to be sleeping with each other sometimes, they tell you about it, and you accept that they love you just as much as if they only slept with you. Just like you know yourself that you love both of them as much as if you were only sleeping with one of them.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:21 pm

Olivaero wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
its essentially a roadmap for disloyalty, heartbreaks, and suffering down the road...

Actually I find it's much more honest. I can remark to my partners about if I'm attracted to someone and they seem much less prone to jealousy than my monogamous partners ever were.I have no idea why you'd think it made suffering or heartbreaks more likely though... You know your partners are going to be sleeping with each other sometimes, they tell you about it, and you accept that they love you just as much as if they only slept with you. Just like you know yourself that you love both of them as much as if you were only sleeping with one of them.


they have to find one person the most attractive at a given time though...

it can't be so perfectly balanced...

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36764
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:40 pm

Othelos wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
its essentially a roadmap for disloyalty, heartbreaks, and suffering down the road...

Monogamous relationships are already like that

Which is why they are for masochists :P.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:54 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Olivaero wrote:Actually I find it's much more honest. I can remark to my partners about if I'm attracted to someone and they seem much less prone to jealousy than my monogamous partners ever were.I have no idea why you'd think it made suffering or heartbreaks more likely though... You know your partners are going to be sleeping with each other sometimes, they tell you about it, and you accept that they love you just as much as if they only slept with you. Just like you know yourself that you love both of them as much as if you were only sleeping with one of them.


they have to find one person the most attractive at a given time though...

it can't be so perfectly balanced...

I certainly don't find only one person more attractive than all others after any given time... so I don't see why they would. Relationships generally exist in a state of flux in my experience anyway, the idea is to have deeper connections than skin deep admiration so that the relationship survives those fluxes.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Manisdog
Minister
 
Posts: 3453
Founded: Oct 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Manisdog » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:03 pm

Galloism wrote:
Manisdog wrote:moral fabric of society

You know, much like "protect the children" any argument based on maintaining/restoring the "moral fabric of society" instantly implies to me that the person has no good logical argument for their position.

As a default, I tend to line up on the other side of any argument that starts with that justification.


This kind of behavior is frowned upon by almost all people except maybe a few islands the Brazilian guy told us about, there must be a reason for it....


even the poll over here proves 54 % will not engage in them
Last edited by Manisdog on Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:04 pm

Manisdog wrote:
Galloism wrote:You know, much like "protect the children" any argument based on maintaining/restoring the "moral fabric of society" instantly implies to me that the person has no good logical argument for their position.

As a default, I tend to line up on the other side of any argument that starts with that justification.


This kind of behavior is frowned upon by almost all people except maybe a few islands the Brazilian guy told us about, there must be a reason for it....

That's not a credible source.
That's not even a source.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Manisdog
Minister
 
Posts: 3453
Founded: Oct 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Manisdog » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:05 pm

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Manisdog wrote:
This kind of behavior is frowned upon by almost all people except maybe a few islands the Brazilian guy told us about, there must be a reason for it....

That's not a credible source.
That's not even a source.


Trying living like that, such things don't need to sources its like asking for a source of why the earth is round

nearly everywhere there is monogamy, or in some extreme cases polygamy in which a man of status keeps 2 or more wives

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:07 pm

Manisdog wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:That's not a credible source.
That's not even a source.

Trying living like that, such things don't need to sources its like asking for a source of why the earth is round

nearly everywhere there is monogamy, or in some extreme cases polygamy in which a man of status keeps 2 or more wives

Actually, stereotyping people as in, "I don't like it" is not creditable to a random Brazilian man.
Last edited by Furry Alairia and Algeria on Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:08 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Polyamory seems like a lot of work. And if it was universally practiced by both sexes, I think we'd need a chart to explain relationships.


its essentially a roadmap for disloyalty, heartbreaks, and suffering down the road...

Most of them I've seen have been more stable than monogamous ones.
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Olivaero wrote:Actually I find it's much more honest. I can remark to my partners about if I'm attracted to someone and they seem much less prone to jealousy than my monogamous partners ever were.I have no idea why you'd think it made suffering or heartbreaks more likely though... You know your partners are going to be sleeping with each other sometimes, they tell you about it, and you accept that they love you just as much as if they only slept with you. Just like you know yourself that you love both of them as much as if you were only sleeping with one of them.


they have to find one person the most attractive at a given time though...

it can't be so perfectly balanced...
Every relationship is different, though I don't see why that would mean that much. Many monogamous people would concede that they find some people more attractive then their partners, but that doesn't mean they have any desire to leave their partner. People tend to form and maintain relationships because they mean something to them, not just because they are physically attracted to them.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Manisdog
Minister
 
Posts: 3453
Founded: Oct 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Manisdog » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:10 pm

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Manisdog wrote:Trying living like that, such things don't need to sources its like asking for a source of why the earth is round

nearly everywhere there is monogamy, or in some extreme cases polygamy in which a man of status keeps 2 or more wives

Actually, stereotyping people as in, "I don't like it" is not creditable to a random Brazilian man.


some Brazilian guy on nsg, don't remember his name but yeah he shared a link about an island with some really weird kind of culture now you would have to wait for him to come as I don't remember his name

my point is everyone follows monogamous and in some cases polygamous practices but only those who can afford to keep 2 or more wives ( i e arabs)

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:11 pm

Manisdog wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:Actually, stereotyping people as in, "I don't like it" is not creditable to a random Brazilian man.


some Brazilian guy on nsg, don't remember his name but yeah he shared a link about an island with some really weird kind of culture now you would have to wait for him to come as I don't remember his name

my point is everyone follows monogamous and in some cases polygamous practices but only those who can afford to keep 2 or more wives ( i e arabs)

Still not creditable, both statements.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:12 pm

Manisdog wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:That's not a credible source.
That's not even a source.


Trying living like that, such things don't need to sources its like asking for a source of why the earth is round

nearly everywhere there is monogamy, or in some extreme cases polygamy in which a man of status keeps 2 or more wives

Except for the many polyamorous relationships that exist around the world. The fact that they tend to be the minority doesn't negate the fact that they exist around the world and have not destroyed societies.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:13 pm

Manisdog wrote:my point is everyone follows monogamous and in some cases polygamous practices but only those who can afford to keep 2 or more wives ( i e arabs)

Arabians don't all have polygamous marriages.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, El Lazaro, Fractalnavel, Gnark, L van Beethoven, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Rio Cana, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Techocracy101010, The Jamesian Republic, TheKeyToJoy

Advertisement

Remove ads