Advertisement

by Estado Nacional » Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:40 pm

by Utilitarian Garibaldi » Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:48 pm

by The Seleucids (Ancient) » Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:51 pm
Distruzio wrote:DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Why? What's wrong with prostitution, especially when legalized?
E: You talk about "change", but you do realize that those things you'd want sex workers to get away from will simply be inexistent or at the very least extremely reduced considering legalization?
E2: It's pretty much as with drugs. 99% of the problem isn't even inherently there, it's created by the government.
Whats wrong with prostitution? Morality. Humanity.
A mutually beneficial trade it is. But a mutually beneficial trade thats immoral and dehumanizes the participants it is nonetheless.
I realize the issues with it will be greatly diminished, yes. But diminished is not absent.

by Distruzio » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:08 pm
The Seleucids wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Whats wrong with prostitution? Morality. Humanity.
A mutually beneficial trade it is. But a mutually beneficial trade thats immoral and dehumanizes the participants it is nonetheless.
I realize the issues with it will be greatly diminished, yes. But diminished is not absent.
Explain to me how it is immoral and how it dehumanizes the participants.

by Frisiiland » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:10 pm
But state prostitution can be a lesser evil in the sense that it can reduce sodomy.Distruzio wrote:The Seleucids wrote:
Explain to me how it is immoral and how it dehumanizes the participants.
Its immoral in that it distorts the Image of God in individuals. Participants do not view one another as human beings but as objects for satisfaction. Thus they are dehumanized. Our Image, our propensity and desire for relationships, makes us human. Any action that results in the obscuring of that Image is immoral.

by Neo Philippine Empire » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:12 pm

by Distruzio » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:13 pm
Frisiiland wrote:But state prostitution can be a lesser evil in the sense that it can reduce sodomy.Distruzio wrote:
Its immoral in that it distorts the Image of God in individuals. Participants do not view one another as human beings but as objects for satisfaction. Thus they are dehumanized. Our Image, our propensity and desire for relationships, makes us human. Any action that results in the obscuring of that Image is immoral.

by Distruzio » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:14 pm
Frisiiland wrote:But state prostitution can be a lesser evil in the sense that it can reduce sodomy.Distruzio wrote:
Its immoral in that it distorts the Image of God in individuals. Participants do not view one another as human beings but as objects for satisfaction. Thus they are dehumanized. Our Image, our propensity and desire for relationships, makes us human. Any action that results in the obscuring of that Image is immoral.

by Czechanada » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:15 pm

by Planita » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:19 pm

by Frisiiland » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:24 pm
It's relevant because it's worse than mere fornification and worse than normal. A state monopoly on prostitution could somewhat control what sexual activities are done in the brothels instead of of pushing the entire prostitution underground by banning it or leaving it free. It's evil but it's a lesser evil.

by Distruzio » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:26 pm
Frisiiland wrote:It's relevant because it's worse than mere fornification and worse than normal. A state monopoly on prostitution could somewhat control what sexual activities are done in the brothels instead of of pushing the entire prostitution underground by banning it or leaving it free. It's evil but it's a lesser evil.

by Ethel mermania » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:26 pm

by Frisiiland » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:28 pm
Because it's a graver sin, ask any mainstream Roman Catholic theologian why. Or any mainstream pre-20th century Protestant or Orthodox Catholic Church theolgianDistruzio wrote:Frisiiland wrote: It's relevant because it's worse than mere fornification and worse than normal. A state monopoly on prostitution could somewhat control what sexual activities are done in the brothels instead of of pushing the entire prostitution underground by banning it or leaving it free. It's evil but it's a lesser evil.
And how is it worse?

by Ethel mermania » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:34 pm
Neo Philippine Empire wrote:I am disgusted by the sight of women selling their bodies.


by Great Kleomentia » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:36 pm
Neo Philippine Empire wrote:I am disgusted by the sight of women selling their bodies.

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:37 pm
Intelectual Atheists wrote:As far as I know, in Brazil, being a prostitute is considered a job. Make of that what you will.

by Ethel mermania » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:39 pm

by Fanosolia » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:43 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Intelectual Atheists wrote:As far as I know, in Brazil, being a prostitute is considered a job. Make of that what you will.
More or less. I think they might apply for worker services as "autonomous workers", but their activists say that this is not enough, and want it to be available as an officially-recognized profession.
Green: Prostitution legal and regulated
Blue: Prostitution legal and not regulated. Organised activities such as brothels and pimping illegal
Red: Prostitution illegal
Grey: No information

by Distruzio » Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:50 pm

by Frisiiland » Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:07 pm
Non-vaginal penetrative sex that between two or more persons, for example oral or anal.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bradfordville, Dayganistan, Diopolis, Dogmeat, Fartsniffage, Hurtful Thoughts, Major-Tom, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Ostroeuropa, Parti Ouvrier, Rusozak, Umeria, Valyxias
Advertisement