NATION

PASSWORD

Another Person Charged With Feeding The Poor In Florida

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Spoder
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7493
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Spoder » Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:55 pm

Florida is fucked up.

Tune in for more at our regular broadcasting hour.
Legalize gay weed
Time to get aesthetic.
I support insanely high tax rates, do you?

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:56 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Vamtrl wrote:
He prepared the food there and distributes it elsewhere.

He does that because he realizes they can't always get to the church.


Exactly. If you are only serving those able to make it to a church miles away from where they generally sleep, then what you're doing is feeding only the highest functioning element of the homeless population.

User avatar
Vamtrl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vamtrl » Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:58 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Vamtrl wrote:
As far as necessary so long as they can eat? Do you think they will sit still and starve to death because they might have to walk a bit? What do you think they do all day exactly? :unsure:


Speaking from experience, I mostly panhandled, checked the social services hotline to see if a shelter bed had opened up, and kept out of the sight of the police to the best of my ability. The aforementioned sores on my feet kept me from being able to walk too far. Others drank or did drugs to drive away their demons, or simply ranted at nothing that anyone else could see.


If you could walk to the shelter for the night, then you could have walked for the food right :eyebrow:

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:59 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:A 90 year old man this time, along with two pastors.

FT. LAUDERDALE, FL (WPLG/CNN) – It did not take long for City of Fort Lauderdale to make good on the promise to criminally charge those who violate a new ordinance that effectively outlaws groups from feeding the homeless in public.

On Sunday, the city charged three people, including two ministers and a 90-year-old homeless advocate, and they could face up to 60-days in jail for their so-called crime.

“I fully believe that I am my brother’s keeper. Love they neighbor as thy self,” explained Arnold Abbott.

90-year-old Abbott prepares hundreds of meals each week for the homeless in the kitchen of the Sanctuary Church.

“We serve two entrées at every feeding,” Abbott said.

But Abbott’s work now has him in trouble with the law.

He faces possible jail time and a $500 fine for feeding the homeless after he was charged Sunday with violating a new ordinance that virtually outlaws groups from sharing food with the hungry in the city.

“One of police officers came over and said ‘Drop that plate right now,’ as if I was carrying a weapon,” Abbott said.

Also charged was a minister from Coral Springs and Sanctuary Church pastor, Wayne Black.

“We believe very strongly that Jesus taught us that we are to feed his sheep,” said Pastor Black.

Mayor Jack Seiler warned arrests were coming.

“We enforce the laws here in Ft. Lauderdale,” said Mayor Seiler.

“It’s man’s inhumanity to man,” Abbott said.

Back in 1999, Abbott sued the city for banning him from feeding homeless on beach, a lawsuit he won.

“I’m going to have to go to court court again to sue the city of Fort Lauderdale, the beautiful city. These are the poorest of the poor. They have nothing. Don’t have a roof over their head, and who could turn them away?” Abbott asked.

Abbott is going to be firing up these stoves again on Wednesday when he has another food sharing plan for the beach. He says he doesn’t want to be arrested but he’s prepared for the possibility.


Another unjust law, three more brave folks willing to stand up to injustice in the name of humanity. If the city is so concerned with homeless people congregating, then the appropriate answer is more comprehensive services for the homeless population of the area, not shutting down those who are doing their best to help. Providing food for hungry people is the most basic form of charity, one recognized as an essential good by every major religion and culture that comes to mind. The existence of laws such as this seems to go against what it means to be human.

Thoughts?


No it should not be criminal. They're just helping people stay alive.

Also.

There should be no homeless people in America.

Its time to triple the social welfare funds and build free housing for all.

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:59 pm

This is...just...I can't even.

What the fuck?
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:15 pm

Vamtrl wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Speaking from experience, I mostly panhandled, checked the social services hotline to see if a shelter bed had opened up, and kept out of the sight of the police to the best of my ability. The aforementioned sores on my feet kept me from being able to walk too far. Others drank or did drugs to drive away their demons, or simply ranted at nothing that anyone else could see.


If you could walk to the shelter for the night, then you could have walked for the food right :eyebrow:


Shelter? Hah. What makes you think that there were shelter beds available? There are an estimated 36,000 to 54,000 homeless people in the city of Los Angeles. There are approximately 2,000 shelter beds. Even then, you have to be prepared to expose yourself to the untold dangers of Skid Row if you're "lucky" enough to find a bed in one.
Last edited by Yumyumsuppertime on Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:37 pm

Tbh, it's more the fact that it sort of adds on to the "fuck the poor" mantra when there really isn't any other option for them. Sure, it might be different, if there was quality emergency public housing, liveable welfare benefits, but in a country where homeless people are left to charity, charity shouldn't be illegal.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:40 pm

Geilinor wrote:
greed and death wrote:The problem is it creates pedestrian traffic issues when you do it out of a food truck. Officials prefer it be done in a gymnasium or cafeteria.

Is it a problem when selling food out of a food truck causes pedestrian traffic? Or only when you're giving the food away?

IT can be, which is why food sellers require permits.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Cetacea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6539
Founded: Apr 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cetacea » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:44 pm

So if I'm on the beach in Floriday eating and offer a homeless guy a burger I'm breaking a law?

Thats just wacko

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:46 pm

Fuck florida law. The lawmakers who made them, and any officer who enforces them is utterly despicable, and anyone who doesn't vote these lawmakers out of office should be ashamed of themselves. America's criminalization of the homeless is utterly disgusting.

User avatar
Clayton Island
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Nov 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Clayton Island » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:56 pm

Deleted.
Last edited by Clayton Island on Fri Nov 07, 2014 10:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Crimiea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: Feb 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Crimiea » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:59 pm

So, they are against the state providing food and water for those in desperate need, but they are also against private donations of food and water from individual civilians to the homeless? What, exactly, do they want in regards to the homeless?
We are this Crimea|Political Compass
Greatest political ad since 2011|¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Should've pick the Jew, Antisemitic Hillbots
University student, 22, American, Independent voter, ESTJ, aspiring professor.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:09 pm

Unsurprising. It's in the interest of the state to keep the poor weak.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Empire of Narnia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5577
Founded: Oct 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Empire of Narnia » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:16 pm

Another Liberal law created to attack their enemies-the religious and the poor.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:18 pm

Florida resident here. Florida is actually like this. Shit sucks, yo.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:19 pm

Crimiea wrote:So, they are against the state providing food and water for those in desperate need, but they are also against private donations of food and water from individual civilians to the homeless? What, exactly, do they want in regards to the homeless?

SOYLENT GREEN IS PEEEEOOOOOPLEEEEEE
Unreachable.

User avatar
The Grim Reaper
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10526
Founded: Oct 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grim Reaper » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:20 pm

Vamtrl wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Speaking from experience, I mostly panhandled, checked the social services hotline to see if a shelter bed had opened up, and kept out of the sight of the police to the best of my ability. The aforementioned sores on my feet kept me from being able to walk too far. Others drank or did drugs to drive away their demons, or simply ranted at nothing that anyone else could see.


If you could walk to the shelter for the night, then you could have walked for the food right :eyebrow:


If I repossess your house and everything you own, you would still walk for food, right?

There's nothing wrong with making life harder just because it lets me remove the responsibility of having to look at homeless people in public, right?
If I can't play bass, I don't want to be part of your revolution.
Melbourne, Australia

A & Ω

Is "not a blood diamond" a high enough bar for a wedding ring? Artificial gemstones are better-looking, more ethical, and made out of PURE SCIENCE™.

User avatar
Nord Amour
Diplomat
 
Posts: 872
Founded: Nov 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nord Amour » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:21 pm

Once again, people insist on legislating against such evils as kindness and empathy.

I commend this man for standing against such an idiotic law.

User avatar
Reploid Productions
Forum Admin
 
Posts: 29804
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Reploid Productions » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:22 pm

Empire of Narnia wrote:Another Liberal law created to attack their enemies-the religious and the poor.

I'm pretty sure if I were to look up the political affiliations of whoever approved this piece of garbage legislation, I'd not likely find that many liberals involved. :eyebrow:

EDIT TO ADD: And having just looked up the mayor, I am disappointed that a guy calling himself a Democrat is backing the thing.
Last edited by Reploid Productions on Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Forum mod since May 8, 2003 -- Game mod since May 19, 2003 -- Nation turned 20 on March 23, 2023!
Sunset's DoGA FAQ - For those using DoGA to make their NS military and such.
One Stop Rules Shop -- Reppy's Sig Workshop -- Getting Help Page
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Char Aznable/Giant Meteor 2024! - Forcing humanity to move into space and progress whether we goddamn want to or not!

User avatar
Nord Amour
Diplomat
 
Posts: 872
Founded: Nov 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nord Amour » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:24 pm

Empire of Narnia wrote:Another Liberal law created to attack their enemies-the religious and the poor.


And what is the evidence that this law is inherently "liberal?'

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:25 pm

Reploid Productions wrote:
Empire of Narnia wrote:Another Liberal law created to attack their enemies-the religious and the poor.

I'm pretty sure if I were to look up the political affiliations of whoever approved this piece of garbage legislation, I'd not likely find that many liberals involved. :eyebrow:

Well…..
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/fort-lauderdale/fl-homeless-feeding-citations-20141102-story.html

Mayor Jack Seiler defended the law and its intent. "I'm not satisfied with having a cycle of homeless in city of Fort Lauderdale," said Seiler. "Providing them with a meal and keeping them in that cycle on the street is not productive."


And he's a Dem.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:26 pm

Reploid Productions wrote:
Empire of Narnia wrote:Another Liberal law created to attack their enemies-the religious and the poor.

I'm pretty sure if I were to look up the political affiliations of whoever approved this piece of garbage legislation, I'd not likely find that many liberals involved. :eyebrow:

EDIT TO ADD: And having just looked up the mayor, I am disappointed that a guy calling himself a Democrat is backing the thing.

Ooh. Ninja'd. :p

User avatar
Ironbarrow
Envoy
 
Posts: 332
Founded: Oct 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Ironbarrow » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:26 pm

Lordieth wrote:
Vamtrl wrote:
Do it in a private place?


Exactly! The homeless should be fed in their own homes.

Ah.

The more distinguished ones reside in box castles, you have to speak to the raccoon butler before entering with your food.
FALL BACK

User avatar
Nord Amour
Diplomat
 
Posts: 872
Founded: Nov 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nord Amour » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:26 pm

Merizoc wrote:
Reploid Productions wrote:I'm pretty sure if I were to look up the political affiliations of whoever approved this piece of garbage legislation, I'd not likely find that many liberals involved. :eyebrow:

Well…..
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/fort-lauderdale/fl-homeless-feeding-citations-20141102-story.html

Mayor Jack Seiler defended the law and its intent. "I'm not satisfied with having a cycle of homeless in city of Fort Lauderdale," said Seiler. "Providing them with a meal and keeping them in that cycle on the street is not productive."


And he's a Dem.


He's not a very "liberal" Democrat.

Reploid Productions wrote:
Empire of Narnia wrote:Another Liberal law created to attack their enemies-the religious and the poor.

I'm pretty sure if I were to look up the political affiliations of whoever approved this piece of garbage legislation, I'd not likely find that many liberals involved. :eyebrow:

EDIT TO ADD: And having just looked up the mayor, I am disappointed that a guy calling himself a Democrat is backing the thing.


The Democrats are not the good guys. SURPRISE

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:26 pm

In Tampa (my city) they effectively criminalized homelessness by making it illegal to 'store personal property in public.' I.E. Sleeping in alleys, on benches, under bridges et cetera.
Last edited by Nirvash Type TheEND on Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Unreachable.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alternate Garza, Alvecia, Dayganistan, Eahland, Fahran, Grinning Dragon, Kenmoria, Leba non, Myrensis, The North Polish Union, Timemovee

Advertisement

Remove ads