Advertisement

by Constantinopolis » Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:26 pm

by Clayton Island » Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:28 pm

by The Neo-Confederate States of America » Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:29 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:A 90 year old man this time, along with two pastors.FT. LAUDERDALE, FL (WPLG/CNN) – It did not take long for City of Fort Lauderdale to make good on the promise to criminally charge those who violate a new ordinance that effectively outlaws groups from feeding the homeless in public.
On Sunday, the city charged three people, including two ministers and a 90-year-old homeless advocate, and they could face up to 60-days in jail for their so-called crime.
“I fully believe that I am my brother’s keeper. Love they neighbor as thy self,” explained Arnold Abbott.
90-year-old Abbott prepares hundreds of meals each week for the homeless in the kitchen of the Sanctuary Church.
“We serve two entrées at every feeding,” Abbott said.
But Abbott’s work now has him in trouble with the law.
He faces possible jail time and a $500 fine for feeding the homeless after he was charged Sunday with violating a new ordinance that virtually outlaws groups from sharing food with the hungry in the city.
“One of police officers came over and said ‘Drop that plate right now,’ as if I was carrying a weapon,” Abbott said.
Also charged was a minister from Coral Springs and Sanctuary Church pastor, Wayne Black.
“We believe very strongly that Jesus taught us that we are to feed his sheep,” said Pastor Black.
Mayor Jack Seiler warned arrests were coming.
“We enforce the laws here in Ft. Lauderdale,” said Mayor Seiler.
“It’s man’s inhumanity to man,” Abbott said.
Back in 1999, Abbott sued the city for banning him from feeding homeless on beach, a lawsuit he won.
“I’m going to have to go to court court again to sue the city of Fort Lauderdale, the beautiful city. These are the poorest of the poor. They have nothing. Don’t have a roof over their head, and who could turn them away?” Abbott asked.
Abbott is going to be firing up these stoves again on Wednesday when he has another food sharing plan for the beach. He says he doesn’t want to be arrested but he’s prepared for the possibility.
Another unjust law, three more brave folks willing to stand up to injustice in the name of humanity. If the city is so concerned with homeless people congregating, then the appropriate answer is more comprehensive services for the homeless population of the area, not shutting down those who are doing their best to help. Providing food for hungry people is the most basic form of charity, one recognized as an essential good by every major religion and culture that comes to mind. The existence of laws such as this seems to go against what it means to be human.
Thoughts?

by True American States » Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:34 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:i don't know you, but I suspect on some level, you're an actual conservative, not one of the ragbag of gun nuts, arch-reactionaries, fringe politics aficionados, and anarcho-capitalists hijacking the term nowadays.
Terstotzka wrote:Bit fancy, bit cool, But still pretty American :p

by Constantinopolis » Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:39 pm
True American States wrote:Also isn't Floriduh part of the Bible Belt? The darn Holy Land Experience is at Orlando. Why aren't all Christians up in arms over this? This is a offensive to Christians and it shows you that the Politicians over at that little city or town or whoever vote this ordinance in will use religion to whatever advantage they have and drop it on a dime when its against their policies.
FOR SHAME!!!

by Torsiedelle » Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:39 pm

by Clayton Island » Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:41 pm

by True American States » Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:43 pm
Constantinopolis wrote:True American States wrote:Also isn't Floriduh part of the Bible Belt? The darn Holy Land Experience is at Orlando. Why aren't all Christians up in arms over this? This is a offensive to Christians and it shows you that the Politicians over at that little city or town or whoever vote this ordinance in will use religion to whatever advantage they have and drop it on a dime when its against their policies.
FOR SHAME!!!
AMEN!
Seriously, why isn't there a storm of uproar so massive that the mayor is forced to resign?
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:i don't know you, but I suspect on some level, you're an actual conservative, not one of the ragbag of gun nuts, arch-reactionaries, fringe politics aficionados, and anarcho-capitalists hijacking the term nowadays.
Terstotzka wrote:Bit fancy, bit cool, But still pretty American :p

by Reploid Productions » Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:50 pm
True American States wrote:Floriduh
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.

by True American States » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:00 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:True American States wrote:Floriduh
Let's lay off on the flamebaity/trollish nicknaming, plz. Llet's keep in mind that the 5 members of the City Commission of Ft. Lauderdale that voted for the law, the mayor who supports it, and the law enforcement that carry it out are not representative of the entire state population and that we probably have plenty of perfectly sane, reasonable Floridians on the site, including those who agree with you that the law is stupid.
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:i don't know you, but I suspect on some level, you're an actual conservative, not one of the ragbag of gun nuts, arch-reactionaries, fringe politics aficionados, and anarcho-capitalists hijacking the term nowadays.
Terstotzka wrote:Bit fancy, bit cool, But still pretty American :p

by Nazi Flower Power » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:03 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:06 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:They shouldn't have arrested him for that.

by Nazi Flower Power » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:10 pm

by True American States » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:13 pm
Ieperithem wrote:If the city is so concerned with homeless people congregating, then the appropriate answer is more comprehensive services for the homeless population of the area
And how's that working out for California? Come to think of it, how's the macro scale implementation of that policy working out for Sweden?
On topic, while people should be allowed to give food to the homeless, one can see the reasoning behind the law. Soup kitchens and the like are a vastly more efficient form of charity than begging. If you want to help feed the poor, donate to one of those or volunteer your time, rather than handing out whatever extra food is on your person to a beggar you happen to like. It's fairer, safer, and better for the community, and it only requires that you show a little extra commitment as a person.
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:i don't know you, but I suspect on some level, you're an actual conservative, not one of the ragbag of gun nuts, arch-reactionaries, fringe politics aficionados, and anarcho-capitalists hijacking the term nowadays.
Terstotzka wrote:Bit fancy, bit cool, But still pretty American :p


by Risottia » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:41 pm
Espresso and Insanity wrote:Why the fuck is this law in place?

by Donut Dynasty » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:44 pm

by Donut Dynasty » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:47 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:Cyrisnia wrote:Whats wrong with feeding the homeless?
It encourages those no-good moochers who should just go get a job already to hang around and bring their icky homeless germs into the public space where the hardworking elite have to see them, and heaven forbid, maybe feel uncomfortable seeing those welfare queens actually getting to eat real food!
Really, it sounds to me like the law is an attempt at making the area so inhospitable that the homeless population migrates elsewhere. Instead of, oh, say, taking steps to help get the homeless off the streets? Y'know, housing, job development, that sort of thing?

by West Aurelia » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:50 pm
_REPUBLIC OF WEST AURELIA_
Official factbook
#Valaransofab

by Nazi Flower Power » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:53 pm
Ieperithem wrote:If the city is so concerned with homeless people congregating, then the appropriate answer is more comprehensive services for the homeless population of the area
And how's that working out for California? Come to think of it, how's the macro scale implementation of that policy working out for Sweden?
On topic, while people should be allowed to give food to the homeless, one can see the reasoning behind the law. Soup kitchens and the like are a vastly more efficient form of charity than begging. If you want to help feed the poor, donate to one of those or volunteer your time, rather than handing out whatever extra food is on your person to a beggar you happen to like. It's fairer, safer, and better for the community, and it only requires that you show a little extra commitment as a person.

by Occupied Deutschland » Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:05 am

by Costa Fierro » Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:09 am

by Cata Larga » Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:11 am
Capital: Puerte-de-Liberete | Largest City: Kapa-Trinieta | Population: 97,370,679

by Costa Fierro » Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:11 am
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Obviously the city is in the right.
These supposedly 'charitable' people could well have been handing out poisoned food, were doing so without a license to transport or distribute that food, probably made that food in a non-commercial kitchen, and handed it out in an unhygenic area that creates a public nuisance.
Just like any children with lemonade stands, this represents a serious threat to the public that must be stopped.

by The Grim Reaper » Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:12 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Lemonade stands essentially use child labour to make their products. They also don't pay taxes, pay minimum wage or provide healthcare plans for their workers.
Clearly they are a menace to the American worker by undercutting Big Soda and must be stopped at all costs.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alternate Garza, Alvecia, Dayganistan, Eahland, Fahran, Grinning Dragon, Kenmoria, Leba non, Myrensis, The North Polish Union, Timemovee
Advertisement