NATION

PASSWORD

Poppy seller burned

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Patriarch
Envoy
 
Posts: 243
Founded: Sep 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Poppy seller burned

Postby Patriarch » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:18 am

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-ma ... r-29870960

A 15-year-old Army cadet who was selling poppies for Remembrance Day suffered burns to his face in an attack with a lit aerosol can.

The boy, who was wearing his uniform, was at a bus stop near Manchester Art Gallery at 18:00 GMT on Saturday when he was attacked.

Police said a man lifted an aerosol can and a lighter and sprayed him with lit fumes.

The cadet suffered burns to his face and singed hairs, officers confirmed.

Greater Manchester Police said the offender, described as black or Asian, 5ft 8in tall and wearing a dark hooded top, then walked off without saying a word.

He appeared to be under the influence of alcohol and was staggering, the force added.

Det Insp Liam Boden said: "This is an absolutely appalling attack on a young man who was raising money to help remember all those who gave their lives fighting bravely for their country.

"Whatever his motivation, his violent actions could have scarred this young man for life.

"Although he has suffered some minor injuries, it is pure luck that he did not sustain more serious burns to his face and body.

"Understandably both he and his family are in a state of total shock and cannot believe someone would do this."


It seems a year can't go by without some sort of Remembrance Poppy based controversy. In the past it has at least been relegated mainly to protests or outraged groups. That I can deal with. This kind of unnecessary violence is crazy and I can only hope the perpetrator is caught and sent away for his crime. How do you lot feel about the Remembrance Poppy? Is it a good thing, a bad thing, or something that doesn't enter your mind at all? Do you wear on and, if your country doesn't use them, would you if given the chance?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_poppy

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163884
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:22 am

Maybe if you didn't jump to the conclusion that this attack had anything to do with Remembrance Poppies then you wouldn't have so much of a problem with Remembrance Poppy related controversies.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
European Socialist Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4844
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby European Socialist Republic » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:24 am

Patriarch wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29870960

It seems a year can't go by without some sort of Remembrance Poppy based controversy. In the past it has at least been relegated mainly to protests or outraged groups. That I can deal with. This kind of unnecessary violence is crazy and I can only hope the perpetrator is caught and sent away for his crime. How do you lot feel about the Remembrance Poppy? Is it a good thing, a bad thing, or something that doesn't enter your mind at all? Do you wear on and, if your country doesn't use them, would you if given the chance?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_poppy

Are we sure this attack had anything to do with the boy selling poppies?
Last edited by European Socialist Republic on Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -7
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.9
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 9.13
Libertarian: 2.62
Non-interventionalist: 7.34
Cultural liberal: 9.12
I am a Trotskyist.
Cosmopolitan: 71%
Secular: 80%
Visionary: 62%
Anarchistic: 43%
Communistic: 78%
Pacifist: 40%
Anthropocentric: 50%

Legalize Tyranny, Impeach the Twenty-second Amendment, Term Limits are Theft, Barack Obama 2016!
HOI4

User avatar
Mefpan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5872
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mefpan » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:26 am

Out of spite against Remembrance Day or not, who the fuck sprays fire into someone's face? That's...no, seriously. What the fuck.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Do you want to play a game of chess?
NationStates' umpteenth dirty ex-leftist class traitor.
I left the Left when it turned Right. Now I'm going back to the Right because it's all that's Left.
Yeah, Screw Realism!
Loyal Planet of Mankind

User avatar
Patriarch
Envoy
 
Posts: 243
Founded: Sep 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Patriarch » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:26 am

Ifreann wrote:Maybe if you didn't jump to the conclusion that this attack had anything to do with Remembrance Poppies then you wouldn't have so much of a problem with Remembrance Poppy related controversies.


An attacker from an ethnic background which has a much higher incidence, rightly or wrongly, of animosity towards the armed forces attacks an army cadet easily identified as such but no others in a busy street. I'm happy with this initial assumption which may or may not be later disproved.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:26 am

Mefpan wrote:Out of spite against Remembrance Day or not, who the fuck sprays fire into someone's face? That's...no, seriously. What the fuck.

He might have done it to himself.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Margno
Minister
 
Posts: 2357
Founded: Sep 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Margno » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:27 am

The unnecessary violence of the army is crazy and I can only hope the perpetrators are caught and put away for their crimes.
Last edited by Margno on Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well-being of a person is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way.
We have nothing to lose but the world. We have our souls to gain.
You!
Me.
Nothing you can possibly do can make God love you any more or any less.

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26711
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:29 am

Sounds more like a drunk guy being a complete and utter shitbag than someone actively trying to ruin Remembrance Day.
Biden-Santos Thought cadre

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:29 am

Patriarch wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Maybe if you didn't jump to the conclusion that this attack had anything to do with Remembrance Poppies then you wouldn't have so much of a problem with Remembrance Poppy related controversies.


An attacker from an ethnic background which has a much higher incidence, rightly or wrongly, of animosity towards the armed forces attacks an army cadet easily identified as such but no others in a busy street. I'm happy with this initial assumption which may or may not be later disproved.

And the fact that reports say he was drunk?

User avatar
Brillnuck
Diplomat
 
Posts: 815
Founded: Jan 22, 2012
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Brillnuck » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:30 am

Patriarch wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29870960

A 15-year-old Army cadet who was selling poppies for Remembrance Day suffered burns to his face in an attack with a lit aerosol can.

The boy, who was wearing his uniform, was at a bus stop near Manchester Art Gallery at 18:00 GMT on Saturday when he was attacked.

Police said a man lifted an aerosol can and a lighter and sprayed him with lit fumes.

The cadet suffered burns to his face and singed hairs, officers confirmed.

Greater Manchester Police said the offender, described as black or Asian, 5ft 8in tall and wearing a dark hooded top, then walked off without saying a word.

He appeared to be under the influence of alcohol and was staggering, the force added.

Det Insp Liam Boden said: "This is an absolutely appalling attack on a young man who was raising money to help remember all those who gave their lives fighting bravely for their country.

"Whatever his motivation, his violent actions could have scarred this young man for life.

"Although he has suffered some minor injuries, it is pure luck that he did not sustain more serious burns to his face and body.

"Understandably both he and his family are in a state of total shock and cannot believe someone would do this."


It seems a year can't go by without some sort of Remembrance Poppy based controversy. In the past it has at least been relegated mainly to protests or outraged groups. That I can deal with. This kind of unnecessary violence is crazy and I can only hope the perpetrator is caught and sent away for his crime. How do you lot feel about the Remembrance Poppy? Is it a good thing, a bad thing, or something that doesn't enter your mind at all? Do you wear on and, if your country doesn't use them, would you if given the chance?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_poppy


Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. I'd wear a white poppy (for peace).
I used to wear red poppies, but then I became Pacifist and learned that modern wars are fought only for oil and power, not for safety of people, not for beating oppression. Make peace, not war.
He/Him|British|Market Socialist|Internationalist
Brillnish Political Parties|Status of the Brillnish House of Commons
Pro: Democratic Socialism, Left-Libertarianism, EU, NATO, Humanitarian Interventionism
Anti: Capitalism, Monarchism, Tories, Corbyn, Leninism, Russia, China, Dictatorships, Authoritarianism

User avatar
Alexanda
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1640
Founded: May 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Alexanda » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:30 am

I have a broach for Remembrance Day and the time period leading up to it: It is essential that one remembers the casualties of the war, and the servicemen who came home.
As for the attack, it is terrible, wherever it was related to the fact the man was a soldier selling the poppies or not. If it was related, then this man ought to be given a severe punishment for disgracing those who die in wars, and, if not, this still a terrible, cruel crime that ought to be punished.
I do not use N.S Tracker.
PRO: Conservative Party, Christianity, Thatcherism, Margaret Thatcher, Privatisation, Capitalism, Monarchy, Democracy, British Commonwealth
ANTI: Socialism, Communism, Homosexual Marriage, Homophobia, E.U dominance of the U.K, State-owned industries, Terrorism
My condolences to those who were killed in the recent terror attacks, and may God help us defeat the twisted ideology which prompted such evil!

User avatar
Patriarch
Envoy
 
Posts: 243
Founded: Sep 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Patriarch » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:31 am

Merizoc wrote:
Patriarch wrote:
An attacker from an ethnic background which has a much higher incidence, rightly or wrongly, of animosity towards the armed forces attacks an army cadet easily identified as such but no others in a busy street. I'm happy with this initial assumption which may or may not be later disproved.

And the fact that reports say he was drunk?


Alcohol often is a factor in reducing self control, yes.

User avatar
Brillnuck
Diplomat
 
Posts: 815
Founded: Jan 22, 2012
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Brillnuck » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:31 am

Merizoc wrote:
Patriarch wrote:
An attacker from an ethnic background which has a much higher incidence, rightly or wrongly, of animosity towards the armed forces attacks an army cadet easily identified as such but no others in a busy street. I'm happy with this initial assumption which may or may not be later disproved.

And the fact that reports say he was drunk?

Mhm.

The report clearly states that the person was/might drunk. Ethnic backgrounds have nothing to do with attacks. The persons's mind does however.
He/Him|British|Market Socialist|Internationalist
Brillnish Political Parties|Status of the Brillnish House of Commons
Pro: Democratic Socialism, Left-Libertarianism, EU, NATO, Humanitarian Interventionism
Anti: Capitalism, Monarchism, Tories, Corbyn, Leninism, Russia, China, Dictatorships, Authoritarianism

User avatar
Patriarch
Envoy
 
Posts: 243
Founded: Sep 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Patriarch » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:33 am

Brillnuck wrote:Ethnic backgrounds have nothing to do with attacks.


You may want to dispute my interpretation of the events but by god don't just ignore reality. It may not have been a factor in this attack, as alcohol may not have been a factor, but ethnic background certainly has an effect on attacks.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163884
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:33 am

Patriarch wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Maybe if you didn't jump to the conclusion that this attack had anything to do with Remembrance Poppies then you wouldn't have so much of a problem with Remembrance Poppy related controversies.


An attacker from an ethnic background which has a much higher incidence, rightly or wrongly, of animosity towards the armed forces attacks an army cadet easily identified as such but no others in a busy street. I'm happy with this initial assumption which may or may not be later disproved.

So basically you're a racist.


Alexanda wrote:I have a broach for Remembrance Day and the time period leading up to it: It is essential that one remembers the casualties of the war, and the servicemen who came home.
As for the attack, it is terrible, wherever it was related to the fact the man was a soldier selling the poppies or not. If it was related, then this man ought to be given a severe punishment for disgracing those who die in wars, and, if not, this still a terrible, cruel crime that ought to be punished.

No, he ought to be given a severe punishment for trying to set fire to someone's face. "Disgracing those who die in wars" is not a crime.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ikania
Senator
 
Posts: 3692
Founded: Jun 28, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ikania » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:33 am

Patriarch wrote:described as black or Asian,

But definitely not white!
Ike Speardane
Executive Advisor in The League.
Proud soldier in the service of The Grey Wardens.
Three-time Defendervision winner. NSG Senate veteran.
Knuckle-dragging fuckstick from a backwater GCR. #SPRDNZ
Land Value Tax would fix this
СЛАВА УКРАЇНІ

User avatar
Patriarch
Envoy
 
Posts: 243
Founded: Sep 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Patriarch » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:34 am

Ifreann wrote:
Patriarch wrote:
An attacker from an ethnic background which has a much higher incidence, rightly or wrongly, of animosity towards the armed forces attacks an army cadet easily identified as such but no others in a busy street. I'm happy with this initial assumption which may or may not be later disproved.

So basically you're a racist.


No. Not at all. Do you dispute that certain ethnic groups have a higher incidence of animosity towards the armed forces?
Last edited by Patriarch on Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:34 am

Sounds like a motivated crime, but as tempting as it may be, I'm not going to jump to the conclusion simply because of who was attacked, and the ethnicity of the attacker.

described as black or Asian


Doesn't exactly narrow it down. Even if it is motivated, the armed forces have been involved in a lot of conflicts.
Last edited by Lordieth on Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:35 am

Patriarch wrote:
Brillnuck wrote:Ethnic backgrounds have nothing to do with attacks.


You may want to dispute my interpretation of the events but by god don't just ignore reality. It may not have been a factor in this attack, as alcohol may not have been a factor, but ethnic background certainly has an effect on attacks.

In what sense?

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:35 am

Patriarch wrote:
Ifreann wrote:So basically you're a racist.


No. Not at all. Do you dispute that certain ethnic groups have a higher incidence of animosity towards the armed forces?

Could you show me numbers for that?

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26711
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:36 am

Patriarch wrote:
Brillnuck wrote:Ethnic backgrounds have nothing to do with attacks.


You may want to dispute my interpretation of the events but by god don't just ignore reality. It may not have been a factor in this attack, as alcohol may not have been a factor, but ethnic background certainly has an effect on attacks.

I don't think you know what you're talking about.
Biden-Santos Thought cadre

User avatar
European Socialist Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4844
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby European Socialist Republic » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:36 am

Patriarch wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Maybe if you didn't jump to the conclusion that this attack had anything to do with Remembrance Poppies then you wouldn't have so much of a problem with Remembrance Poppy related controversies.


An attacker from an ethnic background which has a much higher incidence, rightly or wrongly, of animosity towards the armed forces attacks an army cadet easily identified as such but no others in a busy street. I'm happy with this initial assumption which may or may not be later disproved.

Source?
Economic Left/Right: -7
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.9
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 9.13
Libertarian: 2.62
Non-interventionalist: 7.34
Cultural liberal: 9.12
I am a Trotskyist.
Cosmopolitan: 71%
Secular: 80%
Visionary: 62%
Anarchistic: 43%
Communistic: 78%
Pacifist: 40%
Anthropocentric: 50%

Legalize Tyranny, Impeach the Twenty-second Amendment, Term Limits are Theft, Barack Obama 2016!
HOI4

User avatar
Neo Rome Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5363
Founded: Dec 27, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Neo Rome Republic » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:36 am

Lowlife fucker, hope he suffers the same.
Ethical and Metaphysical: (Pan) Humanist and Naturalist.
Political Views Sum: Centrist on social issues, Market Socialist on economic, and Radical Civic universalist on political governance.
This nation DOES(for most part) represent my OOC views.
''A rich man complaining about regulation and taxes, is like the drunkard at a party, complaining about not having enough to drink.'',

"An empty mind is a mind without a filter, the mind of a gullible fool. A closed mind is the mind unwilling to look at the reality outside its bubble. An open mind is one that is cautious, flexible yet balanced; looking at both the reality and the possibility."
OOC Info Page Pros And Cons Political Ideology

User avatar
Alexanda
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1640
Founded: May 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Alexanda » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:36 am

Wasn't there an incident when a war memorial was damaged a few years ago?
All crimes related to discriminating Remembrance Day are terrible, and should be considered a form of high treason, in my opinion.
I do not use N.S Tracker.
PRO: Conservative Party, Christianity, Thatcherism, Margaret Thatcher, Privatisation, Capitalism, Monarchy, Democracy, British Commonwealth
ANTI: Socialism, Communism, Homosexual Marriage, Homophobia, E.U dominance of the U.K, State-owned industries, Terrorism
My condolences to those who were killed in the recent terror attacks, and may God help us defeat the twisted ideology which prompted such evil!

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:36 am

Patriarch wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Maybe if you didn't jump to the conclusion that this attack had anything to do with Remembrance Poppies then you wouldn't have so much of a problem with Remembrance Poppy related controversies.


An attacker from an ethnic background which has a much higher incidence, rightly or wrongly, of animosity towards the armed forces attacks an army cadet easily identified as such but no others in a busy street. I'm happy with this initial assumption which may or may not be later disproved.


Yeah, those damn ethnics! No respect for anything!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Europa Undivided, Google [Bot], Hrstrovokia, Nimzonia, Singaporen Empire, Terra Magnifica Gloria, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads