He is not worth your time, ignore him. It is clear who he really is, so it's useless to beat any form of logic into him.
Advertisement

by Senyosu » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:11 pm

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:12 pm

Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:12 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:13 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:13 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:14 pm
Czechanada wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=289779&p=21805055#p21805055
That's one of them, taken not too long ago.
There's others of me in that thread if you look hard enough (or, alternatively, the "search" function).
You are the most aesthetically-pleasing male I've seen in a while, and I've seen plenty.

Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Senyosu » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:15 pm

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:15 pm

Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Calimera II » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:15 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Calimera II wrote:I prefer to write "got the D" instead of "How many girls did you fuck..." I find it more subtle and polite.
Seems legit, but the first time I learned about that phrase was when I was confronted with this whole bro thing that is apparently huge in the USA. Personally I like what Van Halen did when they called one of their albums 'For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge'. If you ask me, a new question should be made popular for asking people if they got lucky. Something like... Have you shared any carnal knowledge recently?

by Meryuma » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:18 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Obviously it's impossible to find any rewarding connections with anyone because I can't properly conceptualize social situations and the stuff everyone assumes is automatic takes conscious effort and a knowledge of what it actually even is to do it. Just gonna sleep now, lock myself in my room. Bye.
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

by Novia Soviet Socialist Republic » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:18 pm

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:18 pm
Calimera II wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:Seems legit, but the first time I learned about that phrase was when I was confronted with this whole bro thing that is apparently huge in the USA. Personally I like what Van Halen did when they called one of their albums 'For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge'. If you ask me, a new question should be made popular for asking people if they got lucky. Something like... Have you shared any carnal knowledge recently?
Meh, my friends use that word and I don't associate it with the whole bro thing in the US. But you are totally right "Have you shared any carnal knowledge recently?" is way better.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Calimera II » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:19 pm

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:19 pm
Meryuma wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:Obviously it's impossible to find any rewarding connections with anyone because I can't properly conceptualize social situations and the stuff everyone assumes is automatic takes conscious effort and a knowledge of what it actually even is to do it. Just gonna sleep now, lock myself in my room. Bye.
It'll get better, man. For real; I'm speaking as an autistic guy and I know exactly the feeling you're talking about. Don't give up hope.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Calimera II » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:21 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Calimera II wrote:Meh, my friends use that word and I don't associate it with the whole bro thing in the US. But you are totally right "Have you shared any carnal knowledge recently?" is way better.
I find it oddly satisfying to be a bit prosaic when describing rather mechanical sexual interactions. It gives you the luxury of speaking about rather explicit things without becoming vulgar.

by Text People » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:21 pm

by Senyosu » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:22 pm
Calimera II wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:I find it oddly satisfying to be a bit prosaic when describing rather mechanical sexual interactions. It gives you the luxury of speaking about rather explicit things without becoming vulgar.
Your are opfuscating and I find that highly untoward to be honest with you. Nevertheless, I like your anti-vulgarness, you must have pretty intellectual intercourse.
by Calimera II » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:23 pm
by Calimera II » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:24 pm


by Senyosu » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:26 pm

by The Batorys » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:26 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Obviously it's impossible to find any rewarding connections with anyone because I can't properly conceptualize social situations and the stuff everyone assumes is automatic takes conscious effort and a knowledge of what it actually even is to do it. Just gonna sleep now, lock myself in my room. Bye.

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:26 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:26 pm
Calimera II wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:I find it oddly satisfying to be a bit prosaic when describing rather mechanical sexual interactions. It gives you the luxury of speaking about rather explicit things without becoming vulgar.
Your are opfuscating and I find that highly untoward to be honest with you. Nevertheless, I like your anti-vulgarness, you must have pretty intellectual intercourse.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:27 pm
Text People wrote:You know how to ingratiate yourself, Soldati, you're a master at that.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Des-Bal, Dreria, Elejamie, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Ifreann, Juansonia, Kashimura, L van Beethoven, Myrensis, Paddy O Fernature, Tarsonis, The Astral Mandate, TheKeyToJoy, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement