NATION

PASSWORD

What is your ideal romantic partner?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Would/ do you prefer an introverted or extroverted partner?

Introverted
26
65%
Extroverted
14
35%
 
Total votes : 40

User avatar
The Batorys
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5703
Founded: Oct 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Batorys » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:42 pm

Text People wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes, I think that was enough to convince us we shouldn't take you seriously.

Oh, but you should, I'll be out there and with the same attitudes that you find unacceptable. A woman that can't show some restraint and dignity isn't an "ideal romantic partner"/wife/girlfriend. Only someone that is good to use and forget. I'm not obsessed with virginal women only worthy women with a little self-respect.

Clear now?

Explain how someone's sex life has anything to do with "self-respect" and "dignity."
Mallorea and Riva should resign
This is an alternate history version of Callisdrun.
Here is the (incomplete) Factbook
Ask me about The Forgotten Lands!
Pro: Feminism, environmentalism, BLM, LGBTQUILTBAG, BDSM, unions, hyphy, Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Oakland, old San Francisco, the Alliance to Restore the Republic, and fully automated gay luxury space communism
Anti: Misogyny, fossil fuels, racism, homophobia, kink-shaming, capitalism, LA, Silicon Valley, techies, Brezhnev, the Galactic Empire, and the "alt-right"

User avatar
Text People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Text People » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:42 pm

Manisdog!

dude, don't cheat yourself out of a full, satisfying sex life. Get what you can and find your dream of a good, clean girl you can love with all your heart later.

Sex is disposable. Real love isn't.

Separate the two.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:42 pm

Text People wrote:I've known a couple of male sluts, BTW. Men who would have sex with anyone that came along, conveniently, whether they were married or involved in a loving relationship or not. The women that also used them didn't get a man-hating tag attached to them.

Life is too short, damn't, if you can use a woman/man that has no scruples, then do it. Just don't allow yourself to become attached and invested in them. Love and commitment should have dignity and self-respect involved; sex is cheap when the person, male or female is cheap.

To paraphrase, badly, one is for fucking, one is for love.


Have you ever bothered to check your biases?

If a person is single and looks for sex that just means they are interested in casual sex only. Nobody is using anyone.

In the case of a relationship, it highly depends. Swinger is a lifestyle too, also open relationships and open marriages (which would be my ideal type of marriage now that I'm much older and less immature and jealous and all that shit is gone with time to reflect).

And well, not really. You can fuck and love someone who has had a lot of sex, it doesn't matter.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The Batorys
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5703
Founded: Oct 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Batorys » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:43 pm

Manisdog wrote:
The Batorys wrote:Again, diseases are really easy to avoid, and also to test for.

Your preoccupation with looser genitals shows you know nothing of female anatomy. Also, even if that bullshit (which it is) were true (which it isn't), wouldn't the person you marry eventually have "loose genitals" if you and your wife have an active sex life?

And again, chances of infidelity don't increase. Chances of infidelity are at possibly their highest if people have only had one partner (you) and thus are forever wondering what sex is like with other people.

You're not being rational, you're repeating tired old misogynist, sex-negative bullshit.


The two finger test is legally admissible by law

Then that is a shitty law based on idiotic myths rather than anything rational. And thus has no place in a civilized society.

I don't expect your love life to be rational, but the law absolutely should be.
Mallorea and Riva should resign
This is an alternate history version of Callisdrun.
Here is the (incomplete) Factbook
Ask me about The Forgotten Lands!
Pro: Feminism, environmentalism, BLM, LGBTQUILTBAG, BDSM, unions, hyphy, Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Oakland, old San Francisco, the Alliance to Restore the Republic, and fully automated gay luxury space communism
Anti: Misogyny, fossil fuels, racism, homophobia, kink-shaming, capitalism, LA, Silicon Valley, techies, Brezhnev, the Galactic Empire, and the "alt-right"

User avatar
Nazis in Space
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11714
Founded: Aug 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazis in Space » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:43 pm

-Ebola- wrote:
Nazis in Space wrote:I do have a certain preference for living creatures.


Does that include viruses or are you one of those "viruses aren't living things" people?
Well, that question is sort of undecided, and professional biologists have a very happy time arguing about the matter, without having come to a consensus at the present point in time.

As such, I cannot offer a definite opinion. Merely my own gut-feeling as a total and complete dilettante, and subject to revision.

But, with these restrictions, I'm in the 'Alive' camp, on account of virii being subject to Darwinian selection, and most likely being descendent from undisputably living organisms.
-Ebola- wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
You're hardly single. You're spreading yourself like a virus.

Literally.


Yes, but I am not having sex or dating or getting married.[...]
Uh.

You actively penetrate cells and pour your genetic information into them.

If that's not sex, nothing is.

User avatar
The Batorys
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5703
Founded: Oct 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Batorys » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:44 pm

Manisdog wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Riley, is that you?



Yes you have to pay up in some form or another, you need to buy her affections

If you have to buy anyone's affection, it's because you're completely unappealing otherwise.
Mallorea and Riva should resign
This is an alternate history version of Callisdrun.
Here is the (incomplete) Factbook
Ask me about The Forgotten Lands!
Pro: Feminism, environmentalism, BLM, LGBTQUILTBAG, BDSM, unions, hyphy, Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Oakland, old San Francisco, the Alliance to Restore the Republic, and fully automated gay luxury space communism
Anti: Misogyny, fossil fuels, racism, homophobia, kink-shaming, capitalism, LA, Silicon Valley, techies, Brezhnev, the Galactic Empire, and the "alt-right"

User avatar
Manisdog
Minister
 
Posts: 3453
Founded: Oct 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Manisdog » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:44 pm

Basseemia wrote:
Manisdog wrote:
Consider this you need to the girl out for a date,women are picky and would not go to any random restaurant, a minimum of a 4 star restaurant would be required ( Dinner for two: 4000Rs)

You than would have to buy her gifts, ( jewelry and misc gift minimum = Rs 15,000)

You then have to take her shopping ( Trip at the mall = 5000Rs)

When you would want get intimate, a hotel room would cost (Rs8000)

It would take you 522 usd to get laid

Are you kidding me? Are you really saying that you absolutely have to do all of that for a girl to get laid? You are calling every girl a gold digger.



I know but that is what it takes, I was disgusted for a while too, but then lets just accept the world as it is and go on with our lives. I did not want it to be this way but I have seen too much, I personally know what women do when you're not having anything or bankrupt, I have seen this with three of my closest friends. Kinda sucks but this world is a very cruel place. I think the eight points I stated are ideal. that way atleast I can fulfill my obligations to society and to my parents by marrying and at least live with another person
Last edited by Manisdog on Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126443
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:44 pm

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Manisdog wrote:Consider this you need to the girl out for a date,women are picky and would not go to any random restaurant, a minimum of a 4 star restaurant would be required ( Dinner for two: 4000Rs)
You than would have to buy her gifts, ( jewelry and misc gift minimum = Rs 15,000)
You then have to take her shopping ( Trip at the mall = 5000Rs)
When you would want get intimate, a hotel room would cost (Rs8000)
It would take you 522 usd to get laid


wut? :blink:

Just so you know, I am a much cheaper date, just a two star restaurant, and a souvineer t-shirt for me.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62657
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:44 pm

Nazis in Space wrote:
-Ebola- wrote:
Does that include viruses or are you one of those "viruses aren't living things" people?
Well, that question is sort of undecided, and professional biologists have a very happy time arguing about the matter, without having come to a consensus at the present point in time.

As such, I cannot offer a definite opinion. Merely my own gut-feeling as a total and complete dilettante, and subject to revision.

But, with these restrictions, I'm in the 'Alive' camp, on account of virii being subject to Darwinian selection, and most likely being descendent from undisputably living organisms.
-Ebola- wrote:
Yes, but I am not having sex or dating or getting married.[...]
Uh.

You actively penetrate cells and pour your genetic information into them.

If that's not sex, nothing is.


I just had sex *sneezes*
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
The Batorys
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5703
Founded: Oct 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Batorys » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:45 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Basseemia wrote:You just made it a whole lot worse. Just stop. There's so many things wrong with this statement that I can't even bring myself the energy to reply to all of them.


If all men were like this I'd be scared for any daughters I might have in the future.

Fortunately, they're not. Despite how depressingly common sexist douchebaggery is, most dudes are decent fellows.
Mallorea and Riva should resign
This is an alternate history version of Callisdrun.
Here is the (incomplete) Factbook
Ask me about The Forgotten Lands!
Pro: Feminism, environmentalism, BLM, LGBTQUILTBAG, BDSM, unions, hyphy, Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Oakland, old San Francisco, the Alliance to Restore the Republic, and fully automated gay luxury space communism
Anti: Misogyny, fossil fuels, racism, homophobia, kink-shaming, capitalism, LA, Silicon Valley, techies, Brezhnev, the Galactic Empire, and the "alt-right"

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:45 pm

Novia Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
I know, 522 dollars to get laid.

I honestly don't see how.


They call people that demand all that gold diggers I think.


Still though, if you have to spend 522 dollars just to fuck then you must be really desperate.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Text People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Text People » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:45 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
How does sex violate someone's self respect and dignity?
And nice misogyny there with the "someone who has a lot of sex is only good to use and forget".


That's not necedssarily mosogynist, maybe he has sex with boys?

Boys with soft skin, breasts, and vaginas, yes.

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Calimera II » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:46 pm

Manisdog wrote:
Basseemia wrote:Are you kidding me? Are you really saying that you absolutely have to do all of that for a girl to get laid? You are calling every girl a gold digger.



I know but that is what it takes, I was disgusted for a while too, but then lets just accept the world as it is and go on with out lives. I did not want it to be this way but I have seen too much, I personally know what women do when you're not having anything or bankrupt, I have seen this with three of my closest friends. Kinda sucks but this world is a very cruel place. I think the eight points I stated are ideal. that way atleast I can fulfill my obligations to society and to my parents by marrying and at least live with another person


Well.. If you are handsome you don't need money.

User avatar
Manisdog
Minister
 
Posts: 3453
Founded: Oct 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Manisdog » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:46 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Novia Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
They call people that demand all that gold diggers I think.


Still though, if you have to spend 522 dollars just to fuck then you must be really desperate.

I was 18 back then now i am 24

I used to "love" this girl lol
Last edited by Manisdog on Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126443
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:46 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:I don't know what the words are. Nobody has them written down.There's some stuff you have to say to get anyone to ever dsee you again and don't know what it is. There's these steps between "that person is a stranger" and "I know and like that person"


It tends to start with "hi".

Too complicated

User avatar
Flaxxony
Diplomat
 
Posts: 789
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Flaxxony » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:47 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Text People wrote:I've known a couple of male sluts, BTW. Men who would have sex with anyone that came along, conveniently, whether they were married or involved in a loving relationship or not. The women that also used them didn't get a man-hating tag attached to them.

Life is too short, damn't, if you can use a woman/man that has no scruples, then do it. Just don't allow yourself to become attached and invested in them. Love and commitment should have dignity and self-respect involved; sex is cheap when the person, male or female is cheap.

To paraphrase, badly, one is for fucking, one is for love.


Have you ever bothered to check your biases?

If a person is single and looks for sex that just means they are interested in casual sex only. Nobody is using anyone.

In the case of a relationship, it highly depends. Swinger is a lifestyle too, also open relationships and open marriages (which would be my ideal type of marriage now that I'm much older and less immature and jealous and all that shit is gone with time to reflect).

And well, not really. You can fuck and love someone who has had a lot of sex, it doesn't matter.


This is where I'm at. Sadly, I am 18. And every woman that likes that is at least 30

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:47 pm

The Batorys wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:If all men were like this I'd be scared for any daughters I might have in the future.

Fortunately, they're not. Despite how depressingly common sexist douchebaggery is, most dudes are decent fellows.

And hey, maybe Soldi's hypothetical daughters will find nice girls to bring home to meet their parents, which would solve the situation quite elegantly.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62657
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:47 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
It tends to start with "hi".

Too complicated


Yeah, that's how we do things these days. The decades of free love are over, we're more hard to get now :(
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
The Batorys
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5703
Founded: Oct 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Batorys » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:48 pm

Manisdog wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
I don't see how.


Consider this you need to the girl out for a date,women are picky and would not go to any random restaurant, a minimum of a 4 star restaurant would be required ( Dinner for two: 4000Rs)

You than would have to buy her gifts, ( jewelry and misc gift minimum = Rs 15,000)

You then have to take her shopping ( Trip at the mall = 5000Rs)

When you would want get intimate, a hotel room would cost (Rs8000)

It would take you 522 usd to get laid

Maybe for you.

Maybe because there's nothing about you that appeals besides your high spending.

You keep thinking of a woman as a "thing" that you buy, essentially. That's not how it works.
Mallorea and Riva should resign
This is an alternate history version of Callisdrun.
Here is the (incomplete) Factbook
Ask me about The Forgotten Lands!
Pro: Feminism, environmentalism, BLM, LGBTQUILTBAG, BDSM, unions, hyphy, Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Oakland, old San Francisco, the Alliance to Restore the Republic, and fully automated gay luxury space communism
Anti: Misogyny, fossil fuels, racism, homophobia, kink-shaming, capitalism, LA, Silicon Valley, techies, Brezhnev, the Galactic Empire, and the "alt-right"

User avatar
Basseemia
Minister
 
Posts: 2226
Founded: Sep 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Basseemia » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:48 pm

Manisdog wrote:
Basseemia wrote:Are you kidding me? Are you really saying that you absolutely have to do all of that for a girl to get laid? You are calling every girl a gold digger.



I know but that is what it takes, I was disgusted for a while too, but then lets just accept the world as it is and go on with our lives. I did not want it to be this way but I have seen too much, I personally know what women do when you're not having anything or bankrupt, I have seen this with three of my closest friends. Kinda sucks but this world is a very cruel place. I think the eight points I stated are ideal. that way atleast I can fulfill my obligations to society and to my parents by marrying and at least live with another person

No it does not take that. It means you're ugly and desperate.
leftist. radical tree hugger. aries.
Name: Ramona
Political Affiliation: Leftist
Ethnicity: Palestinian/Egyptian
Likes: Socialism, UBI, Armed revolution against the United States government
Dislikes: Capitalism, America, Western Imperialism, Neocolonialism, Military-Industrial Complex

Economic Left/Right: -7.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.87

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126443
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:48 pm

The Batorys wrote:
Text People wrote:Oh, but you should, I'll be out there and with the same attitudes that you find unacceptable. A woman that can't show some restraint and dignity isn't an "ideal romantic partner"/wife/girlfriend. Only someone that is good to use and forget. I'm not obsessed with virginal women only worthy women with a little self-respect.

Clear now?

Explain how someone's sex life has anything to do with "self-respect" and "dignity."

I am a great lay, and I am damm proud of it.

User avatar
The Batorys
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5703
Founded: Oct 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Batorys » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:49 pm

Basseemia wrote:
Manisdog wrote:
Consider this you need to the girl out for a date,women are picky and would not go to any random restaurant, a minimum of a 4 star restaurant would be required ( Dinner for two: 4000Rs)

You than would have to buy her gifts, ( jewelry and misc gift minimum = Rs 15,000)

You then have to take her shopping ( Trip at the mall = 5000Rs)

When you would want get intimate, a hotel room would cost (Rs8000)

It would take you 522 usd to get laid

Are you kidding me? Are you really saying that you absolutely have to do all of that for a girl to get laid? You are calling every girl a gold digger.

Nah, it just means that women hate him so much he has to spend half a grand to get them to even talk to him.
Mallorea and Riva should resign
This is an alternate history version of Callisdrun.
Here is the (incomplete) Factbook
Ask me about The Forgotten Lands!
Pro: Feminism, environmentalism, BLM, LGBTQUILTBAG, BDSM, unions, hyphy, Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Oakland, old San Francisco, the Alliance to Restore the Republic, and fully automated gay luxury space communism
Anti: Misogyny, fossil fuels, racism, homophobia, kink-shaming, capitalism, LA, Silicon Valley, techies, Brezhnev, the Galactic Empire, and the "alt-right"

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:49 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:It tends to start with "hi".

Too complicated

Game over, man! Game over!

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:Too complicated

Yeah, that's how we do things these days. The decades of free love are over, we're more hard to get now :(

Our parents had it easy in comparison, but hopefully our clones shall be more lucky in love.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Ragnarum
Senator
 
Posts: 3889
Founded: Dec 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ragnarum » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:50 pm

Gender: Female, male if cute enough.

Aesthetic traits
-White
-Dark Black hair
-Any colour eyes
-Kind of thinner than me
-Height doesn't bother me, roughly the same is good though.
-Cuteness is good.
Apparel
-Footwear, meh. Don't care.
-Don't really care about clothing too much
Personality/Interests
-Intelligent
-Rather heavily dominant, but still nice otherwise. (And yes, in that way)
-Interested in some of the same things, shares at least some of the same opinions
-Same sense of humour as me; this is a serious must for anyone who even comes near me, let alone is in a relationship
-Likes music at least vaguely similar to my tastes (Not as difficult as it sounds)
-Atheist (Again, not difficult)
-Not scared of sexual stuff
Last edited by Ragnarum on Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Don't copy and paste anything you see in a sig you fucking normie scrub
I deliberately made the star asymmetrical.
AUF GEHTS KAMERADEN
Here are my factbooks (Lots of WIP)

Ragnarum is not communist or even particularly socialist, just so you know.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126443
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:50 pm

Text People wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:
That's not necedssarily mosogynist, maybe he has sex with boys?

Boys with soft skin, breasts, and vaginas, yes.

We do in fact have a few ofv those here, but I will go with the
"Yeah right"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Ellese, Greater Rostoria, Point Blob, TheEndOfHistory, Tillania

Advertisement

Remove ads