NATION

PASSWORD

British 2015 general election poll

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who would you vote for?

Labour
342
20%
Conservatives
346
20%
Ukip
394
23%
Greens
246
14%
Liberal Democrats
149
9%
SNP
77
5%
Plaid Cymru
32
2%
Respect
35
2%
Other (please state)
79
5%
 
Total votes : 1700

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:12 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:No? well good news, Absolute poverty is up too and is expected to keep going up.

(Image)


Of course absolute poverty is up since the start of literally the worst ever recession since 1930, but

a) you made a claim about poverty since 1979
b) your graph is a forecast from 2009, not the actual numbers... :sibirsky:

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:13 pm

And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:14 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.

The economy has grown, but average wages have not grown very much.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:16 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.


We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
British Home Counties
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 364
Founded: Mar 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby British Home Counties » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:17 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.

The economy has grown, but average wages have not grown very much.


Key Points
Employees aged 21 in 1995 earned 40% more after adjusting for inflation by the age of 39 than those aged 21 in 1975 did up to the age of 39

Average hourly earnings peaked at older ages in 2013 compared to 1975

The difference between male and female average pay for the under 30s has decreased dramatically since 1975.

Since 2011 the top 10% of full-time earners have had the largest falls in wages after adjusting for inflation.

Since 1975 average earnings for full-time employees have more than doubled after accounting for inflation.

Since the introduction of the National Minimum Wage, wage growth at the bottom of the earnings distribution has been strong for both full and part-time employees.

Almost a third (32.6%) of those in the top 10% of earners worked in London in 2013 while 12.3% of the bottom 10% of earners worked in the North West

Hourly wage inequality has fallen across the regions and devolved countries of the UK since 1998

Office for National Statistics Key Points http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/lmac/uk-w ... cades.html

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/wages

Change the chart to "2000". These are most definitely not equal to or below inflation.
Participants of Frankfurt Riots who do not pay taxes should have their welfare stripped from them for 5 years as a punishment for destroying tax-funded projects.

"Everyone wants to cut down on government, provided that those things he has an interest in are maintained."
A student from Polonia who lives in the UK. Came here in 2004 when Nigel Farage personally gave me flowers (sc). Economics: Friedmanomics. Religion: Bill Maherism. Social: Arizonian Libertarianism (but by god do not call me a liberal, that's an insult.)

Calling Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary "Eastern European" is an insult.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:19 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.


We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.

Scandinavia had to make difficult economic reforms in the 1980's and 1990's to do that.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Lunas Legion
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31093
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Lunas Legion » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:21 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.


We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.


Scandanavia isn't as good as it's made out to be.
Last edited by William Slim Wed Dec 14 1970 10:35 pm, edited 35 times in total.

Confirmed member of Kyloominati, Destroyers of Worlds Membership can be applied for here

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:21 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Hydesland wrote:
That's an exceptionally terrible way to measure poverty.

That's how the UK measures poverty.


What do you mean the UK? The UK government provides a broad range of statistics. It's notably very difficult to measure poverty accurately and to provide reliable statistics, there's so many factors and even absolute inflation adjusted monetary measures are not adequate, when you take into account changes in quality of goods and services at comparative prices etc...

User avatar
British Home Counties
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 364
Founded: Mar 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby British Home Counties » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:26 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.


We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.


yeah that glorious danish nation where there is x1.5 as much debt as there is output

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... nk-warning
Participants of Frankfurt Riots who do not pay taxes should have their welfare stripped from them for 5 years as a punishment for destroying tax-funded projects.

"Everyone wants to cut down on government, provided that those things he has an interest in are maintained."
A student from Polonia who lives in the UK. Came here in 2004 when Nigel Farage personally gave me flowers (sc). Economics: Friedmanomics. Religion: Bill Maherism. Social: Arizonian Libertarianism (but by god do not call me a liberal, that's an insult.)

Calling Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary "Eastern European" is an insult.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:28 pm

Lunas Legion wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.


Scandanavia isn't as good as it's made out to be.


Sounds like a paradise.

Hydesland wrote:
Geilinor wrote:That's how the UK measures poverty.


What do you mean the UK? The UK government provides a broad range of statistics. It's notably very difficult to measure poverty accurately and to provide reliable statistics, there's so many factors and even absolute inflation adjusted monetary measures are not adequate, when you take into account changes in quality of goods and services at comparative prices etc...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in ... d_measured

There is no one definition of poverty. The most common measure, as used in the Child Poverty Act 2010, is ‘household income below 60 percent of median income’. The median is such an income that exactly a half of households earn more than that and the other half earns less.


Geilinor wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.

Scandinavia had to make difficult economic reforms in the 1980's and 1990's to do that.


Right, I'm just saying, we had our difficult economic reforms, so wheres my fucking scandanavian paradise?
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
British Home Counties
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 364
Founded: Mar 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby British Home Counties » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:30 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:Right, I'm just saying, we had our difficult economic reforms, so wheres my fucking scandanavian paradise?


Oh please. This is nothing.

If you want a nation that succeeded with their economic reforms go to Singapore, Hong Kong or Monaco.

"Difficult". How cute. Bet you had no food on the table as well right?
Last edited by British Home Counties on Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Participants of Frankfurt Riots who do not pay taxes should have their welfare stripped from them for 5 years as a punishment for destroying tax-funded projects.

"Everyone wants to cut down on government, provided that those things he has an interest in are maintained."
A student from Polonia who lives in the UK. Came here in 2004 when Nigel Farage personally gave me flowers (sc). Economics: Friedmanomics. Religion: Bill Maherism. Social: Arizonian Libertarianism (but by god do not call me a liberal, that's an insult.)

Calling Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary "Eastern European" is an insult.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:37 pm

British Home Counties wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:Right, I'm just saying, we had our difficult economic reforms, so wheres my fucking scandanavian paradise?


Oh please. This is nothing.

If you want a nation that succeeded with their economic reforms go to Singapore, Hong Kong or Monaco.

"Difficult". How cute. Bet you had no food on the table as well right?


I'm sure Hong Kong, Singapore and Monaco's success has nothing to do with being small city states practicing regulatory arbitrage against vast neighbours who provide for their security, defence and immigration policy.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:41 pm

Geilinor wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in ... d_measured

There is no one definition of poverty. The most common measure, as used in the Child Poverty Act 2010, is ‘household income below 60 percent of median income’. The median is such an income that exactly a half of households earn more than that and the other half earns less.



The source wiki uses for that claim seems to agree there is no consensus in the literature on how to accurately measure poverty, or what poverty even means.

"There is no single, universally accepted definition of ‘poverty’. Indeed, in his study of how governments in ten countries set minimum income standards, Professor John Veit -Wilson identified no fewer than seven different ways of conceptualising poverty. The fact that there are so many different ways of thinking about poverty means that debates – even between experts in the field – often generate more heat than light. There is also a political dimension since, as Professor David Piachaud noted, the term ‘poverty’ carries with it ‘…an implication and moral imperative that something should be done about it.’"

Regarding measuring based on a proportion of average income:


The main problem with using a poverty threshold based on a proportion of mean or median income is that any such threshold is essentially arbitrary. There is no inherent reason why any particular proportion should be considered the threshold below which people can be said to be in poverty.


Even worse, it's absolutely possible for the poor to experience a substantial increase in living standards and even real income while at the same time a nation increases the proportion of people below average income, it lacks important informative content about the actual conditions of the poor and how society has changed over time, it's more accurately a proxy measure of inequality than it is of poverty, in my opinion.
Last edited by Hydesland on Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:43 pm

Besides, the UK likes to change its definition (levels of income etc) of poverty each year.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:53 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.


you wanna talk alternate history hypotheticals?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCrone_report
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:00 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.


you wanna talk alternate history hypotheticals?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCrone_report


This is an interesting sentence from there:

" though this was balanced somewhat by the opinion that Scotland could risk "disaster" if the oil price collapsed"

Oil prices actually did collapse after the seventies oil crisis, and didn't surge up again until the 2000s, and has now collapsed again.

User avatar
British Home Counties
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 364
Founded: Mar 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby British Home Counties » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:01 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
British Home Counties wrote:
Oh please. This is nothing.

If you want a nation that succeeded with their economic reforms go to Singapore, Hong Kong or Monaco.

"Difficult". How cute. Bet you had no food on the table as well right?


I'm sure Hong Kong, Singapore and Monaco's success has nothing to do with being small city states practicing regulatory arbitrage against vast neighbours who provide for their security, defence and immigration policy.


Hong Kong is bigger than London, population and size wise, and since London runs the UK, Hong Kong isn't far from the UK. Hong Kong has a GDP bigger than Sweden, by the way.

And if it wasn't for the fact that Singapore is a major military power in South-eastern Asia and is the biggest importer of Leopard A2 tanks on the continent, perhaps your point would make sense?
Participants of Frankfurt Riots who do not pay taxes should have their welfare stripped from them for 5 years as a punishment for destroying tax-funded projects.

"Everyone wants to cut down on government, provided that those things he has an interest in are maintained."
A student from Polonia who lives in the UK. Came here in 2004 when Nigel Farage personally gave me flowers (sc). Economics: Friedmanomics. Religion: Bill Maherism. Social: Arizonian Libertarianism (but by god do not call me a liberal, that's an insult.)

Calling Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary "Eastern European" is an insult.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:07 pm

British Home Counties wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
I'm sure Hong Kong, Singapore and Monaco's success has nothing to do with being small city states practicing regulatory arbitrage against vast neighbours who provide for their security, defence and immigration policy.


Hong Kong is bigger than London, population and size wise, and since London runs the UK, Hong Kong isn't far from the UK. Hong Kong has a GDP bigger than Sweden, by the way.

And if it wasn't for the fact that Singapore is a major military power in South-eastern Asia and is the biggest importer of Leopard A2 tanks on the continent, perhaps your point would make sense?


Not just the biggest, the only! 1st out of one countries.

Hong Kong is in fact 400 sqkm smaller than London and 1 Million people smaller. But hey, don't let facts get in the way, the one about Leopard tanks was pretty cool.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:30 pm

https://uk.isidewith.com/results/801533096

Why are the Lib Dems so fucking useless? I want to vote for them, but they're shite nationally and will probably elect Tim Farron as leader after the election, which acts as another deterrent.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:49 pm

Lunas Legion wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.


Scandanavia isn't as good as it's made out to be.


Sounds great to me.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Dunbia
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Mar 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

UK Poll.

Postby Dunbia » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:53 pm

How anyone could bring them selves to vote other than Conservative baffles me.
You'd be pushing the UK into default as soon as you tick the labour box.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:56 pm

Dunbia wrote:How anyone could bring them selves to vote other than Conservative baffles me.
You'd be pushing the UK into default as soon as you tick the labour box.


how anyone could bring themselves to vote conservatives baffle me
you're basically pushing the UK into non-existence as soon as you tick the tory box
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:56 pm

Dunbia wrote:How anyone could bring them selves to vote other than Conservative baffles me.
You'd be pushing the UK into default as soon as you tick the labour box.


would you be shocked i said there were parties other than labour and tories
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:27 pm

Lunas Legion wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.


Scandanavia isn't as good as it's made out to be.

While no country or system is perfect, there's a lot of exaggeration and humor in the article.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:30 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Dunbia wrote:How anyone could bring them selves to vote other than Conservative baffles me.
You'd be pushing the UK into default as soon as you tick the labour box.


how anyone could bring themselves to vote conservatives baffle me
you're basically pushing the UK into non-existence as soon as you tick the tory box

No, that's SNP. The last I recall, they were the ones pushing so hard to leave.
Last edited by Geilinor on Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Singaporen Empire, The Huskar Social Union

Advertisement

Remove ads