Of course absolute poverty is up since the start of literally the worst ever recession since 1930, but
a) you made a claim about poverty since 1979
b) your graph is a forecast from 2009, not the actual numbers... :sibirsky:
Advertisement
by Hydesland » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:12 pm
by Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:13 pm
by Geilinor » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:14 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.
by The UK in Exile » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:16 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.
by British Home Counties » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:17 pm
Geilinor wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.
The economy has grown, but average wages have not grown very much.
by Geilinor » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:19 pm
The UK in Exile wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.
by Lunas Legion » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:21 pm
The UK in Exile wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.
by Hydesland » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:21 pm
by British Home Counties » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:26 pm
The UK in Exile wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.
by The UK in Exile » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:28 pm
Lunas Legion wrote:The UK in Exile wrote:
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.
Scandanavia isn't as good as it's made out to be.
Hydesland wrote:Geilinor wrote:That's how the UK measures poverty.
What do you mean the UK? The UK government provides a broad range of statistics. It's notably very difficult to measure poverty accurately and to provide reliable statistics, there's so many factors and even absolute inflation adjusted monetary measures are not adequate, when you take into account changes in quality of goods and services at comparative prices etc...
There is no one definition of poverty. The most common measure, as used in the Child Poverty Act 2010, is ‘household income below 60 percent of median income’. The median is such an income that exactly a half of households earn more than that and the other half earns less.
by British Home Counties » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:30 pm
The UK in Exile wrote:Right, I'm just saying, we had our difficult economic reforms, so wheres my fucking scandanavian paradise?
by The UK in Exile » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:37 pm
British Home Counties wrote:The UK in Exile wrote:Right, I'm just saying, we had our difficult economic reforms, so wheres my fucking scandanavian paradise?
Oh please. This is nothing.
If you want a nation that succeeded with their economic reforms go to Singapore, Hong Kong or Monaco.
"Difficult". How cute. Bet you had no food on the table as well right?
by Hydesland » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:41 pm
Geilinor wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in ... d_measuredThere is no one definition of poverty. The most common measure, as used in the Child Poverty Act 2010, is ‘household income below 60 percent of median income’. The median is such an income that exactly a half of households earn more than that and the other half earns less.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:43 pm
by Alyakia » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:53 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.
by Hydesland » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:00 pm
Alyakia wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:And how would the UK be doing if Thatcher hadn't turned it around? What with the previous way (the 3 day work week, bodies not being buried), the economy was about as stagnant as is possible.
you wanna talk alternate history hypotheticals?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCrone_report
by British Home Counties » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:01 pm
The UK in Exile wrote:British Home Counties wrote:
Oh please. This is nothing.
If you want a nation that succeeded with their economic reforms go to Singapore, Hong Kong or Monaco.
"Difficult". How cute. Bet you had no food on the table as well right?
I'm sure Hong Kong, Singapore and Monaco's success has nothing to do with being small city states practicing regulatory arbitrage against vast neighbours who provide for their security, defence and immigration policy.
by The UK in Exile » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:07 pm
British Home Counties wrote:The UK in Exile wrote:
I'm sure Hong Kong, Singapore and Monaco's success has nothing to do with being small city states practicing regulatory arbitrage against vast neighbours who provide for their security, defence and immigration policy.
Hong Kong is bigger than London, population and size wise, and since London runs the UK, Hong Kong isn't far from the UK. Hong Kong has a GDP bigger than Sweden, by the way.
And if it wasn't for the fact that Singapore is a major military power in South-eastern Asia and is the biggest importer of Leopard A2 tanks on the continent, perhaps your point would make sense?
by Britanno » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:30 pm
by Angleter » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:49 pm
Lunas Legion wrote:The UK in Exile wrote:
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.
Scandanavia isn't as good as it's made out to be.
by Alyakia » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:56 pm
Dunbia wrote:How anyone could bring them selves to vote other than Conservative baffles me.
You'd be pushing the UK into default as soon as you tick the labour box.
by Alyakia » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:56 pm
Dunbia wrote:How anyone could bring them selves to vote other than Conservative baffles me.
You'd be pushing the UK into default as soon as you tick the labour box.
by Geilinor » Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:27 pm
Lunas Legion wrote:The UK in Exile wrote:
We'd be a glorious social democratic paradise, like sweden.
Scandanavia isn't as good as it's made out to be.
by Geilinor » Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:30 pm
Alyakia wrote:Dunbia wrote:How anyone could bring them selves to vote other than Conservative baffles me.
You'd be pushing the UK into default as soon as you tick the labour box.
how anyone could bring themselves to vote conservatives baffle me
you're basically pushing the UK into non-existence as soon as you tick the tory box
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Singaporen Empire, The Huskar Social Union
Advertisement