British 2015 general election poll

[Alyakia]

this is your daily reminder that half of the conservatives policies were based on mathematical errors and that the OCED and IMF literally came in and said "what the fuck are you doing? this is really stupid. we usually support this kind of shit but come on. you'll just slow down recovery." (later statistics showed they had indeed slowed down recovery) and any economic recovery is in spite of them not because of them

[Lunas Legion]

this is your daily reminder that half of the conservatives policies were based on mathematical errors and that the OCED and IMF literally came in and said "what the fuck are you doing? this is really stupid. we usually support this kind of shit but come on. you'll just slow down recovery." (later statistics showed they had indeed slowed down recovery) and any economic recovery is in spite of them not because of them

Evidence?

[Alyakia]

this is your daily reminder that half of the conservatives policies were based on mathematical errors and that the OCED and IMF literally came in and said "what the fuck are you doing? this is really stupid. we usually support this kind of shit but come on. you'll just slow down recovery." (later statistics showed they had indeed slowed down recovery) and any economic recovery is in spite of them not because of them

Evidence?

i cant find the original sources but this should cover it

This week, economists have been astonished to find that a famous academic paper often used to make the case for austerity cuts contains major errors.
IMF: Austerity is much worse for the economy than we thought
UK austerity measures likely to hurt society's poorest, OECD warns
Government spending cuts may be going too fast, OECD warns
George Osborne insists he will press ahead with the government's austerity plans despite a warning from the International Monetary Fund that the chancellor should slow the pace of cuts.
Britain has underperformed all the world's leading economies over the past year except tsunami-hit Japan, figures from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) show.

[The UK in Exile]

Evidence?

i cant find the original sources but this should cover it

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22223190
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/won ... e-thought/
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014 ... ts-uk-oecd
http://www.theguardian.com/business/201 ... -cuts-oecd
http://www.theguardian.com/business/201 ... ion-fiscal
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/econ ... omies.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/budg ... laims.html

For the avoidance of doubt, I think it is important to point out that every forecast published by the OBR since the June 2010 Budget has incorporated the widely held assumption that tax increases and spending cuts reduce economic growth in the short term.

[Calimera II]

Evidence?

i cant find the original sources but this should cover it

-snip-

''Let's go crazy and go the Venezuelan way''.

[Britanno]

this is your daily reminder that half of the conservatives policies were based on mathematical errors and that the OCED and IMF literally came in and said "what the fuck are you doing? this is really stupid. we usually support this kind of shit but come on. you'll just slow down recovery." (later statistics showed they had indeed slowed down recovery) and any economic recovery is in spite of them not because of them

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-0 ... onomy.html

[Alyakia]

i cant find the original sources but this should cover it

-snip-

''Let's go crazy and go the Venezuelan way''.

"let's do something that actually works"

[Alyakia]

this is your daily reminder that half of the conservatives policies were based on mathematical errors and that the OCED and IMF literally came in and said "what the fuck are you doing? this is really stupid. we usually support this kind of shit but come on. you'll just slow down recovery." (later statistics showed they had indeed slowed down recovery) and any economic recovery is in spite of them not because of them

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-0 ... onomy.html

being a stubborn idiot arsehole and managing to luck your way out doesn't excuse being a stubborn idiot arsehole. a lesson for all for the ages.

[Britanno]

being a stubborn idiot arsehole and managing to luck your way out doesn't excuse being a stubborn idiot arsehole. a lesson for all for the ages.

[Murkwood]

Really tells you something about UKIP.

No it tells me something about you when you think a party what would make it illegal for minors to have contraception is less Wacko than UKIP.

That's a policy I happen to agree with. The CP best match my views.

[Calimera II]

No it tells me something about you when you think a party what would make it illegal for minors to have contraception is less Wacko than UKIP.

That's a policy I happen to agree with. The CP best match my views.

"AIDS and babies for everyone"

[Alyakia]

No it tells me something about you when you think a party what would make it illegal for minors to have contraception is less Wacko than UKIP.

That's a policy I happen to agree with. The CP best match my views.

and why would you agree with that kind of thing, exactly?

[Utilitarian Garibaldi]

atleast you guys don't have to worry about Ron Paul.

[Murkwood]

That's a policy I happen to agree with. The CP best match my views.

and why would you agree with that kind of thing, exactly?

They are still minors. Their parents should be able to make that call.

[Dumb Ideologies]

atleast you guys don't have to worry about Ron Paul.

We sent off for one in the post. The delivery plane had a whoopsie and he bumped his head up due to too little bubble wrap. For some reason he's now calling himself Nigel Farage.

[DesAnges]

and why would you agree with that kind of thing, exactly?

They are still minors. Their parents should be able to make that call.

Why on earth should it be the parents' decision? The parents are not going to be able to stop the kids having sex if they really want to have it without committing a crime.

atleast you guys don't have to worry about Ron Paul.

No we have Nigel Farage. Much scarier because he has a valid chance of gaining some power.

[Martean]

and why would you agree with that kind of thing, exactly?

They are still minors. Their parents should be able to make that call.

Of course they shouldn't, the human species is designed to have sex way before 18, and it's unnatural to try to prevent that to happen just because you feel it's 'immoral' (a VERY subjective thing, btw)

And, anw, kids are human beings and if when they reach 14 they can hold civil resposabilities for their crimes, why they can't have sex?

[Geilinor]

and why would you agree with that kind of thing, exactly?

They are still minors. Their parents should be able to make that call.

Not if their call leads to STD's spreading.

[The Nihilistic view]

Evidence?

i cant find the original sources but this should cover it

This week, economists have been astonished to find that a famous academic paper often used to make the case for austerity cuts contains major errors.
IMF: Austerity is much worse for the economy than we thought
UK austerity measures likely to hurt society's poorest, OECD warns
Government spending cuts may be going too fast, OECD warns
George Osborne insists he will press ahead with the government's austerity plans despite a warning from the International Monetary Fund that the chancellor should slow the pace of cuts.
Britain has underperformed all the world's leading economies over the past year except tsunami-hit Japan, figures from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) show.

The IMF came out an apologised earlier this year for getting it wrong. So using sources that are 18 months to 3 years old that later turn out to be wrong is not what I call great research. They get a lot of things wrong but it's not surprising. The IMF is filled with French political rejects so obviously to them the only right way is the French way even when it's wrong.

We shall see what happens with the much more recent OECD predictions in a year or so.

[Utilitarian Garibaldi]

"http://www.newsweek.com/ukip-supporters-more-likely-believe-ghosts-poll-finds-281788"

[Marcurix]

"http://www.newsweek.com/ukip-supporters-more-likely-believe-ghosts-poll-finds-281788"

And?

[The Neo-Confederate States of America]

UKIP FTW!

[Sebastianbourg]

They are still minors. Their parents should be able to make that call.

Of course they shouldn't, the human species is designed to have sex way before 18, and it's unnatural to try to prevent that to happen just because you feel it's 'immoral' (a VERY subjective thing, btw)

And, anw, kids are human beings and if when they reach 14 they can hold civil resposabilities for their crimes, why they can't have sex?

I never thought I would say this but I agree with you on this.

[Braberbourg]

I'm going for Labour since it improves European power over England and Wales, which is very gut for the European Union.

[Braberbourg]

"http://www.newsweek.com/ukip-supporters-more-likely-believe-ghosts-poll-finds-281788"

The majority of American adults believe in Jaysus and the Angels of imagination.