Marcurix wrote:Alyakia wrote:
the pro-separation party whose power is the result of the exercising of the will of the scottish people. telling the party that the scottish people voted for they can fuck off is to me functionally the same as telling scotland to fuck off unless it votes for the right kind of party.
Like places voting for the Tories?
Because there really isn't a difference between wanting to keep the SNP or the Tories out.Alyakia wrote:
it's the same difference between revolution and civil war/rebellion. i can't think of a single separatist that actually calls themselves a separatist and the reason for this is that it has a negative connotation.
why do i have a feeling i've just opened myself up for another tedious debate about how words mean things and in particular political words are chosen very carefully with someone that fundamentally knows this is true but in their particular case won't admit it
They want to leave the UK, whether you want to make that negative or positive that is where the root of the problem lies. Not because it was they were Scottish.
the difference is that england didn't just vote to stay in the UK under the promise they will get more participation only to get told to fuck off by proxy when they vote for the english national party for most if not all of the seats in england. indeed, one could conclude they are very different scenarios.

