the SNP are extremely unlikely to form a coalition because 1) it's a bad idea 2) everyone has told the SNP to fuck off
Advertisement
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 11:57 am

by Geilinor » Sat May 02, 2015 11:57 am
Alyakia wrote:Marcurix wrote:
It what happens because of the system we are in. It has happened.
If you try to screw over the party that got the most seats, it won't go well.
actually it sorta reminds me of gordon brown and the "he wasn't elected" fiasco
sure it makes people angry but that doesn't change the fact that that's not how the country actually works
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 11:58 am

by Dejanic » Sat May 02, 2015 11:59 am

by Miletos » Sat May 02, 2015 12:00 pm
Dejanic wrote:Geilinor wrote:The largest party was elected to be the largest party.
Doesn't mean they have a god given right to be in government. The Social Democrats were consistently elected as the largest party in Sweden, yet the moderate led coalition still ruled for years. This is European politics coming to Britain.

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 12:02 pm
Och Aye wrote:Marcurix wrote:
Lol no.
They've been bashing Labour day one of the election.
This is politics, and the SNP can play the popular brand like a well tuned harp, but you're kidding yourself if you think the SNP are different in the tactics they use.
They haven't chosen the power at any cost route given their repetition that the Tories are a no go partner

by Arglorand » Sat May 02, 2015 12:02 pm
Miletos wrote:Dejanic wrote:Doesn't mean they have a god given right to be in government. The Social Democrats were consistently elected as the largest party in Sweden, yet the moderate led coalition still ruled for years. This is European politics coming to Britain.
We'll 'ave none of that foreign muck over 'ere, mate! You can take yer bloody "coalitions" and yer "minorities" - BLOODY MINORITIES - and bugger off back to Brussels Sprouts and Yourup with 'em and all. This is Britun, and in Britun we only ever 'ave strong, stable majority governments. Always 'ave done (except all the times we 'aven't, like currently) and always will!
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 12:03 pm
Marcurix wrote:Och Aye wrote:
They haven't chosen the power at any cost route given their repetition that the Tories are a no go partner
Neither did the Lib Dems.
But now the SNP are saying they'll go with a party they dubbed "the red Tories", the party that has been their enemy in this election. That trident red line? Gone, so they can partner with a pro-nuclear party.
Does that get them power? Yes, yes it does. A lot of power, depending on who you listen to.

by Dejanic » Sat May 02, 2015 12:03 pm
Marcurix wrote:Och Aye wrote:
They haven't chosen the power at any cost route given their repetition that the Tories are a no go partner
Neither did the Lib Dems.
But now the SNP are saying they'll go with a party they dubbed "the red Tories", the party that has been their enemy in this election. That trident red line? Gone, so they can partner with a pro-nuclear party.
Does that get them power? Yes, yes it does. A lot of power, depending on who you listen to.

by Geilinor » Sat May 02, 2015 12:04 pm
Arglorand wrote:Alyakia wrote:
i think the idea that a party can get 36% of the votes and 45% of the seats people will say they have the legitimacy to be in government kinda bs
shush alyakia
only the SNP has no democratic right to be considered a legitimate political force, even if they get the support of 70%+ of the scottish electorate
the tories have an inborn right to rule
... *nods*

by Arglorand » Sat May 02, 2015 12:04 pm
Marcurix wrote:Och Aye wrote:
They haven't chosen the power at any cost route given their repetition that the Tories are a no go partner
Neither did the Lib Dems.
But now the SNP are saying they'll go with a party they dubbed "the red Tories", the party that has been their enemy in this election. That trident red line? Gone, so they can partner with a pro-nuclear party.
Does that get them power? Yes, yes it does. A lot of power, depending on who you listen to.
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 12:05 pm
Geilinor wrote:Arglorand wrote:shush alyakia
only the SNP has no democratic right to be considered a legitimate political force, even if they get the support of 70%+ of the scottish electorate
the tories have an inborn right to rule
... *nods*
According to you, the SNP will let the Tories form a government anyway. More likely, Sturgeon and Miliband will sell out on their promises to not make any form of agreement.

by Arglorand » Sat May 02, 2015 12:06 pm
Geilinor wrote:Arglorand wrote:shush alyakia
only the SNP has no democratic right to be considered a legitimate political force, even if they get the support of 70%+ of the scottish electorate
the tories have an inborn right to rule
... *nods*
According to you, the SNP will let the Tories form a government anyway. More likely, Sturgeon and Miliband will sell out on their promises to not make any form of agreement.

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 12:07 pm
Alyakia wrote:Marcurix wrote:
Neither did the Lib Dems.
But now the SNP are saying they'll go with a party they dubbed "the red Tories", the party that has been their enemy in this election. That trident red line? Gone, so they can partner with a pro-nuclear party.
Does that get them power? Yes, yes it does. A lot of power, depending on who you listen to.
how does it get them power though? it keeps the tories out at the expense of getting labour in. sturgeon can't be PM so.
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 12:08 pm
Marcurix wrote:Alyakia wrote:
how does it get them power though? it keeps the tories out at the expense of getting labour in. sturgeon can't be PM so.
Neither could Clegg.
But i'm simply pointing out that this idea the SNP are somehow different to the Lib Dems is false.
The SNP will compromise for power. They have, and will continue to do so to achieve the goals they wish. Whether that be keeping out the Tories or whatever else.
All they have to do is not cross that blue line and they don't get demonized.

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 12:09 pm
Dejanic wrote:Marcurix wrote:
Neither did the Lib Dems.
But now the SNP are saying they'll go with a party they dubbed "the red Tories", the party that has been their enemy in this election. That trident red line? Gone, so they can partner with a pro-nuclear party.
Does that get them power? Yes, yes it does. A lot of power, depending on who you listen to.
You're twisting the facts. They've said they'll vote with or against Labour on a vote by vote basis, so confidence and supply. No one, SNP or Labour, has suggested a coalition.

by Geilinor » Sat May 02, 2015 12:11 pm
Dejanic wrote:Geilinor wrote:The largest party was elected to be the largest party.
Doesn't mean they have a god given right to be in government. The Social Democrats were consistently elected as the largest party in Sweden, yet the moderate led coalition still ruled for years. This is European politics coming to Britain.

by Arglorand » Sat May 02, 2015 12:11 pm
Geilinor wrote:Dejanic wrote:Doesn't mean they have a god given right to be in government. The Social Democrats were consistently elected as the largest party in Sweden, yet the moderate led coalition still ruled for years. This is European politics coming to Britain.
Continental European politics isn't inherently bad.

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 12:11 pm
Alyakia wrote:Marcurix wrote:
Neither could Clegg.
But i'm simply pointing out that this idea the SNP are somehow different to the Lib Dems is false.
The SNP will compromise for power. They have, and will continue to do so to achieve the goals they wish. Whether that be keeping out the Tories or whatever else.
All they have to do is not cross that blue line and they don't get demonized.
i need to check do you legitimately think there will be a coalition
if not, exactly how are they going to get power?
e: the SNP are different from the lib dems because they are smart enough to see that, for example, a coalition with the tories is literal suicide
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 12:13 pm
Marcurix wrote:Alyakia wrote:
i need to check do you legitimately think there will be a coalition
if not, exactly how are they going to get power?
e: the SNP are different from the lib dems because they are smart enough to see that, for example, a coalition with the tories is literal suicide
Why is it that when i say power, people seem to jump to coalition?
You're all smart enough to know that you don't have to be in a coalition to have power in this system.

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 12:13 pm
Arglorand wrote:Marcurix wrote:
Neither did the Lib Dems.
But now the SNP are saying they'll go with a party they dubbed "the red Tories", the party that has been their enemy in this election. That trident red line? Gone, so they can partner with a pro-nuclear party.
Does that get them power? Yes, yes it does. A lot of power, depending on who you listen to.
They stated that Trident was a red line for any potential coalition, something they said was unlikely already from the start. Now they're talking about a supply and confidence deal at best, because they can't get Labour to agree on that red line.

by Dejanic » Sat May 02, 2015 12:15 pm
Geilinor wrote:Dejanic wrote:Doesn't mean they have a god given right to be in government. The Social Democrats were consistently elected as the largest party in Sweden, yet the moderate led coalition still ruled for years. This is European politics coming to Britain.
Continental European politics isn't inherently bad.
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 12:15 pm
Arglorand wrote:Marcurix wrote:
Neither did the Lib Dems.
But now the SNP are saying they'll go with a party they dubbed "the red Tories", the party that has been their enemy in this election. That trident red line? Gone, so they can partner with a pro-nuclear party.
Does that get them power? Yes, yes it does. A lot of power, depending on who you listen to.
They stated that Trident was a red line for any potential coalition, something they said was unlikely already from the start. Now they're talking about a supply and confidence deal at best, because they can't get Labour to agree on that red line.

by Arglorand » Sat May 02, 2015 12:16 pm
Alyakia wrote:Arglorand wrote:They stated that Trident was a red line for any potential coalition, something they said was unlikely already from the start. Now they're talking about a supply and confidence deal at best, because they can't get Labour to agree on that red line.
it doesn't matter if they agree on trident or not. ed told them to fuck off because they want to break up the country and that's that. if he goes back on this there will be hell to pay in the english seats and the tories will literally explode in simultaneous orgasm.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, The peoples commune
Advertisement