http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/01/wa ... nts-on-tv/
Advertisement

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 11:45 am

by Vasileus » Sat May 02, 2015 11:45 am

by Dejanic » Sat May 02, 2015 11:46 am

by Conscentia » Sat May 02, 2015 11:46 am
Vasileus wrote:I'm watching clips from the leader's debate, and my god what a fucking little weezle Nick clegg is. Straight up saying he'll stab his current coalition partners in the back if it means the lib-dems will stay in power.
how can anyone vote for someone like that?
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 11:47 am
Vasileus wrote:I'm watching clips from the leader's debate, and my god what a fucking little weezle Nick clegg is. Straight up saying he'll stab his current coalition partners in the back if it means the lib-dems will stay in power.
how can anyone vote for someone like that?

by Miletos » Sat May 02, 2015 11:47 am
Vasileus wrote:I'm watching clips from the leader's debate, and my god what a fucking little weezle Nick clegg is. Straight up saying he'll stab his current coalition partners in the back if it means the lib-dems will stay in power.
how can anyone vote for someone like that?

by Geilinor » Sat May 02, 2015 11:48 am
Conscentia wrote:Vasileus wrote:I'm watching clips from the leader's debate, and my god what a fucking little weezle Nick clegg is. Straight up saying he'll stab his current coalition partners in the back if it means the lib-dems will stay in power.
how can anyone vote for someone like that?
The Liberal Democrats have no obligation to be loyal to the Conservatives.

by Vasileus » Sat May 02, 2015 11:48 am
Conscentia wrote:Vasileus wrote:I'm watching clips from the leader's debate, and my god what a fucking little weezle Nick clegg is. Straight up saying he'll stab his current coalition partners in the back if it means the lib-dems will stay in power.
how can anyone vote for someone like that?
The Liberal Democrats have no obligation to be loyal to the Conservatives.
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 11:49 am

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 11:49 am
Dejanic wrote:Marcurix wrote:
If the conservatives get the most seats, they'll have fist pick at a coalition.
If they can get one, we carry on as we have. If they don't they'll try for a minority gov.
Well statistics are showing that even with the lead that they'll have, they'll won't be able to form a government even with Lib Dem, UKIP, and even DUP backing. They'd need SNP support, which won't happen.
I can see the Tories collapsing here, even if they "win". Cameron certainly won't be leader for much longer.

by Vasileus » Sat May 02, 2015 11:50 am
Alyakia wrote:Vasileus wrote:I'm watching clips from the leader's debate, and my god what a fucking little weezle Nick clegg is. Straight up saying he'll stab his current coalition partners in the back if it means the lib-dems will stay in power.
how can anyone vote for someone like that?
it depends massively on what he said and how he said it
"w-w-we will only coalition with the party with the most seats" is probably passable

by Miletos » Sat May 02, 2015 11:50 am
Vasileus wrote:Conscentia wrote:The Liberal Democrats have no obligation to be loyal to the Conservatives.
But really, he's basically saying he'll do whatever it takes to stay in government. He shows no loyalty nor any caring for ideology in some quest to stay out of the unemployment insurance lines, or whatever.

by Arglorand » Sat May 02, 2015 11:51 am
Miletos wrote:Arglorand wrote:Not gonna lie, though, Labour has put me off. They were all too eager to jump into bed with the UMP during the referendum on Brittany's future.
I'm considering a vote for that Jeanne d'Arc, but I'm not sure she will appreciate my culturally Breton concerns within an independent France. If Mebyon Kernow put up candidates here, though, that would be great; that Dick Cole is sure one badass fellow.
I get where you're coming from, but in reality Paris is no closer to Kemper than Westminster is, and I can't see the Duchy doing well if it opts to side with Philip Augustus, much as John's premiership has had its problems. A vote for Henry II's brood is a vote for long-term stability, however chaotic the short term might seem, and besides - we need the English to invest in our brethren in Cornwall to develop the nascent mining sector and lift the people out of long-term smuggling.

by Conscentia » Sat May 02, 2015 11:51 am
Vasileus wrote:Conscentia wrote:The Liberal Democrats have no obligation to be loyal to the Conservatives.
But really, he's basically saying he'll do whatever it takes to stay in government. He shows no loyalty nor any caring for ideology in some quest to stay out of the unemployment insurance lines, or whatever.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 11:51 am
Vasileus wrote:I'm watching clips from the leader's debate, and my god what a fucking little weezle Nick clegg is. Straight up saying he'll stab his current coalition partners in the back if it means the lib-dems will stay in power.
how can anyone vote for someone like that?
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 11:51 am
Marcurix wrote:Dejanic wrote:Well statistics are showing that even with the lead that they'll have, they'll won't be able to form a government even with Lib Dem, UKIP, and even DUP backing. They'd need SNP support, which won't happen.
I can see the Tories collapsing here, even if they "win". Cameron certainly won't be leader for much longer.
That depends on a number of things, but i wouldn't say they collapse.
Problem is, if the Conservatives gain the most seats they gain a kind of legitimacy to be in government. If they are denied that by some parties banding together to prevent it, it may swing things in their favor and result in another election returning a greater number of seats to them at the expense of those seen to be doing a backroom deal.
It's part of the reason why the Lib dems went with them, rather than Labour, and if the SNP are seen to do it the backlash could be greater.

by Dejanic » Sat May 02, 2015 11:52 am
Marcurix wrote:Dejanic wrote:Well statistics are showing that even with the lead that they'll have, they'll won't be able to form a government even with Lib Dem, UKIP, and even DUP backing. They'd need SNP support, which won't happen.
I can see the Tories collapsing here, even if they "win". Cameron certainly won't be leader for much longer.
That depends on a number of things, but i wouldn't say they collapse.
Problem is, if the Conservatives gain the most seats they gain a kind of legitimacy to be in government. If they are denied that by some parties banding together to prevent it, it may swing things in their favor and result in another election returning a greater number of seats to them at the expense of those seen to be doing a backroom deal.
It's part of the reason why the Lib dems went with them, rather than Labour, and if the SNP are seen to do it the backlash could be greater.

by Conscentia » Sat May 02, 2015 11:53 am
Vasileus wrote:Alyakia wrote:it depends massively on what he said and how he said it
"w-w-we will only coalition with the party with the most seats" is probably passable
"We will add a heart to a Conservative Government and a brain to a Labour one."
Buddy's hedging his bets before he gets to the racetrack

| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 11:53 am
Alyakia wrote:Marcurix wrote:
That depends on a number of things, but i wouldn't say they collapse.
Problem is, if the Conservatives gain the most seats they gain a kind of legitimacy to be in government. If they are denied that by some parties banding together to prevent it, it may swing things in their favor and result in another election returning a greater number of seats to them at the expense of those seen to be doing a backroom deal.
It's part of the reason why the Lib dems went with them, rather than Labour, and if the SNP are seen to do it the backlash could be greater.
i think the idea that a party can get 36% of the votes and 45% of the seats people will say they have the legitimacy to be in government kinda bs

by Geilinor » Sat May 02, 2015 11:53 am
Alyakia wrote:Marcurix wrote:
That depends on a number of things, but i wouldn't say they collapse.
Problem is, if the Conservatives gain the most seats they gain a kind of legitimacy to be in government. If they are denied that by some parties banding together to prevent it, it may swing things in their favor and result in another election returning a greater number of seats to them at the expense of those seen to be doing a backroom deal.
It's part of the reason why the Lib dems went with them, rather than Labour, and if the SNP are seen to do it the backlash could be greater.
i think the idea that a party can get 36% of the votes and 45% of the seats people will say they have the legitimacy to be in government kinda bs
by Alyakia » Sat May 02, 2015 11:55 am
Marcurix wrote:Alyakia wrote:
i think the idea that a party can get 36% of the votes and 45% of the seats people will say they have the legitimacy to be in government kinda bs
It what happens because of the system we are in. It has happened.
If you try to screw over the party that got the most seats, it won't go well.

by Geilinor » Sat May 02, 2015 11:56 am

by Arglorand » Sat May 02, 2015 11:56 am
Alyakia wrote:Marcurix wrote:
That depends on a number of things, but i wouldn't say they collapse.
Problem is, if the Conservatives gain the most seats they gain a kind of legitimacy to be in government. If they are denied that by some parties banding together to prevent it, it may swing things in their favor and result in another election returning a greater number of seats to them at the expense of those seen to be doing a backroom deal.
It's part of the reason why the Lib dems went with them, rather than Labour, and if the SNP are seen to do it the backlash could be greater.
i think the idea that a party can get 36% of the votes and 45% of the seats people will say they have the legitimacy to be in government kinda bs

by Marcurix » Sat May 02, 2015 11:57 am

by Arglorand » Sat May 02, 2015 11:57 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, The peoples commune
Advertisement