NATION

PASSWORD

Are you in favor of Affirmative Action?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:32 pm

Patridam wrote:Now, these colleges still use "socioeconomic affirmative action"; that is, giving extra "points" towards poorer applicants, in their admissions processes, but they are required to be race blind. And they are seemingly going to stay that way after 500 Chinese-Americans protested outside the office of a senator who wanted to repeal 209.


If I were that senator, I'd have gone full steam ahead in attempting to repeal 209 anyways. Even if I would end up losing reelection, it'd be worth it to shove whatever agenda that can be managed down the people's throats.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:35 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Patridam wrote:Now, these colleges still use "socioeconomic affirmative action"; that is, giving extra "points" towards poorer applicants, in their admissions processes, but they are required to be race blind. And they are seemingly going to stay that way after 500 Chinese-Americans protested outside the office of a senator who wanted to repeal 209.


If I were that senator, I'd have gone full steam ahead in attempting to repeal 209 anyways. Even if I would end up losing reelection, it'd be worth it to shove whatever agenda that can be managed down the people's throats.

I don't see why he would lose reelection if we're talking about support for affirmative action. Because contrary to Patridam's claim that Asian-Americans are against affirmative action, they actually support it by a big damn margin.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:41 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Patridam wrote:Now, these colleges still use "socioeconomic affirmative action"; that is, giving extra "points" towards poorer applicants, in their admissions processes, but they are required to be race blind. And they are seemingly going to stay that way after 500 Chinese-Americans protested outside the office of a senator who wanted to repeal 209.


If I were that senator, I'd have gone full steam ahead in attempting to repeal 209 anyways. Even if I would end up losing reelection, it'd be worth it to shove whatever agenda that can be managed down the people's throats.


You sound like a good bit of Democrats here in America.

Mavorpen wrote:I don't see why he would lose reelection if we're talking about support for affirmative action. Because contrary to Patridam's claim that Asian-Americans are against affirmative action, they actually support it by a big damn margin.


Ah, the Huffinton Post. Because that's never ever shown any bias whatsoever. <sarcasm>

Mavorpen wrote:Because of underrepresentation as a result of racial discrimination.


Care to prove it's due to racial discrimination?
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:43 pm

Patridam wrote:Ah, the Huffinton Post. Because that's never ever shown any bias whatsoever. <sarcasm>

Why yes, articles written by human beings, who cannot help but let preconceived notions influence what they say, have bias in them. You act like this is some fucking new discovery.
Patridam wrote:
Care to prove it's due to racial discrimination?

Prove WHAT is due to racial discrimination?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:47 pm

Mavorpen wrote:I don't see why he would lose reelection if we're talking about support for affirmative action. Because contrary to Patridam's claim that Asian-Americans are against affirmative action, they actually support it by a big damn margin.


So wouldn't it be accurate to say that Asian Americans are voting against their own self interests? I'd use a word for this but I don't want to risk crossing any lines this time. I can't fathom why they want Latinos and Blacks to benefit more at their expense. Asians should pursue policies which ensure that they will be at the top of society.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:49 pm

Saiwania wrote:
So wouldn't it be accurate to say that Asian Americans are voting against their own self interests?

No. Asian Americans benefit immensely from affirmative action, especially in the workplace.
Saiwania wrote: I'd use a word for this but I don't want to risk crossing any lines this time. I can't fathom why they want Latinos and Blacks to benefit more at their expense. Asians should pursue policies which ensure that they will be at the top of society.

That would be idiotic. That power would be concentrated only in the hands of a select few, and they would be almost exclusively from a select few Asian nationalities. This is the problem with lumping Asians together without regard for consideration where they came from. Asians are one of the more diverse groups. Viewing them as a monolith is downright stupid.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:51 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Patridam wrote:
Care to prove it's due to racial discrimination?

Prove WHAT is due to racial discrimination?


What I quoted that you said. Don't tell me you don't know what you meant?
Put it this way: Provide proof that college admissions processes are still significantly influenced by racial discrimination, thereby necessitating affirmative action.

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:I don't see why he would lose reelection if we're talking about support for affirmative action. Because contrary to Patridam's claim that Asian-Americans are against affirmative action, they actually support it by a big damn margin.


So wouldn't it be accurate to say that Asian Americans are voting against their own self interests? I'd use a word for this but I don't want to risk crossing any lines this time. I can't fathom why they want Latinos and Blacks to benefit more at their expense. Asians should pursue policies which ensure that they will be at the top of society.


Well, (most) liberal whites support affirmative action, which is also "shooting themselves in the foot", so to speak.

Mavorpen wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
So wouldn't it be accurate to say that Asian Americans are voting against their own self interests?

No. Asian Americans benefit immensely from affirmative action, especially in the workplace.


I can't speak to the workplace, but it does hinder them (more than it does whites, in fact) in college admissions.
Last edited by Patridam on Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:55 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:52 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:I don't see why he would lose reelection if we're talking about support for affirmative action. Because contrary to Patridam's claim that Asian-Americans are against affirmative action, they actually support it by a big damn margin.


So wouldn't it be accurate to say that Asian Americans are voting against their own self interests? I'd use a word for this but I don't want to risk crossing any lines this time. I can't fathom why they want Latinos and Blacks to benefit more at their expense. Asians should pursue policies which ensure that they will be at the top of society.


Maybe because they see themselves as people first? :)
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Escanthea
Envoy
 
Posts: 334
Founded: Aug 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Escanthea » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:54 pm

NONONONONONONONONONO!
BECAUSE IT IS STUPID!
HRH Justinian Ezkantion- Prince Consort of Ainulindale, Emperor of Escanthea, Sovereign of Dellenaria
"I see now that the circumstances of one's birth are irrelevant, it is what you do with the gift of life that determines who you are."
-Mewtwo

Senator of Ainur
Speaker for the Senate of Ainur
Foreign Minister of Ainur
Co-Minister of Internal Affairs of Ainur
Co-Regent of Ainur
Crown Prince of Ainur
Court Scribe of Wintreath
King of Ainur (claimant)

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:55 pm

Patridam wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Prove WHAT is due to racial discrimination?


What I quoted that you said. Don't tell me you don't know what you meant?
Put it this way: Provide proof that college admissions process are still significantly influenced by racial discrimination, thereby necessitating affirmative action.

When did I say college admissions processes are today significantly influenced by racial discrimination?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:55 pm

Escanthea wrote:NONONONONONONONONONO!
BECAUSE IT IS STUPID!


Calm down and explain your reasoning please.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:00 pm

Patridam wrote:I can't speak to the workplace, but it does hinder them (more than it does whites, in fact) in college admissions.

No, it doesn't. It hinders only a specific section of Asian Americans simply because of increased opportunities to the less successful Asian-Americans.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:14 pm

Mavorpen wrote:No, it doesn't. It hinders only a specific section of Asian Americans simply because of increased opportunities to the less successful Asian-Americans.


So which groups don't benefit from affirmative action overall, besides White males? I know for a fact that in order for targeted groups such as Blacks and Latinos to advance that another group has to be suppressed.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:16 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Patridam wrote:
What I quoted that you said. Don't tell me you don't know what you meant?
Put it this way: Provide proof that college admissions process are still significantly influenced by racial discrimination, thereby necessitating affirmative action.

When did I say college admissions processes are today significantly influenced by racial discrimination?


You didn't, directly; but when I tried to ask you to prove what you did say you were confused as to what I wanted you to prove. So I took what I thought was implied from your statement.

Mavorpen wrote:
Patridam wrote: Why do minorities so desperately need affirmative action?

Because of underrepresentation as a result of racial discrimination.


Just prove that this purported under-representation is a result of racial discrimination. If you can't, just say so; don't try to go around in circles. If you can, I'd like to hear it.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:16 pm

Saiwania wrote:So which groups don't benefit from affirmative action overall, besides White males?

None, as every group benefits from it. The gains from higher diversity are well known, and it's why most businesses and universities recognize the vetted interest in increasing it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Roherst
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Roherst » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:17 pm

Kosovo-Pristina wrote:Affirmative action has always seemed unfair to me. It's not my fault I was born white and I don't see why a black or Hispanic (although many Hispanics are actually white) person's college application should be treated with preference over mine. The injustices of the past are not mine to pay. I know I will be called a racist by so many people on here but I just want to express my opinion and see what others have to say about it.

Are you in favor of Affirmative Action?

Why or why not?

Also, if you're not from the U.S. does your country have its own version of Affirmative Action?


I completely agree with you

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:18 pm

Patridam wrote:You didn't, directly; but when I tried to ask you to prove what you did say you were confused as to what I wanted you to prove. So I took what I thought was implied from your statement.

I don't see that implication from my statement.
Patridam wrote:
Just prove that this purported under-representation is a result of racial discrimination.

Again, what the fuck are you talking about? What is "this" you're talking about? You're using language as though you're referring to a specific instance, which is odd because I sure as hell haven't referred to anything specific.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:19 pm

Roherst wrote:
Kosovo-Pristina wrote:Affirmative action has always seemed unfair to me. It's not my fault I was born white and I don't see why a black or Hispanic (although many Hispanics are actually white) person's college application should be treated with preference over mine. The injustices of the past are not mine to pay. I know I will be called a racist by so many people on here but I just want to express my opinion and see what others have to say about it.

Are you in favor of Affirmative Action?

Why or why not?

Also, if you're not from the U.S. does your country have its own version of Affirmative Action?


I completely agree with you


As do I and many others. The proponents seem to be a somewhat of a vocal minority.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:20 pm

Mavorpen wrote:None, as every group benefits from it. The gains from higher diversity are well known, and it's why most businesses and universities recognize the vetted interest in increasing it.


Whites can't benefit from affirmative action, because they are the majority group in the US. Therefore, it does not benefit every group.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:21 pm

Patridam wrote:
Roherst wrote:
I completely agree with you


As do I and many others. The proponents seem to be a somewhat of a vocal minority.

No, it's the opposite. The opponents are the vocal minority if national polls are any indication.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:21 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:None, as every group benefits from it. The gains from higher diversity are well known, and it's why most businesses and universities recognize the vetted interest in increasing it.


Whites can't benefit from affirmative action, because they are the majority group in the US.

They can, and they do. Especially white females.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:24 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Patridam wrote:Just prove that this purported under-representation is a result of racial discrimination.

Again, what the fuck are you talking about? What is "this" you're talking about? You're using language as though you're referring to a specific instance, which is odd because I sure as hell haven't referred to anything specific.


I asked: Why is Affirmative Action necessary?
You answered: Because of underrepresentation as a result of of racial discrimination.

I would like for you to provide evidence backing up that claim that racial discrimination is the cause of cases of underrepresentation. It should not be difficult to understand.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:29 pm

Patridam wrote:
I asked: Why is Affirmative Action necessary?
You answered: Because of underrepresentation as a result of of racial discrimination.

Yes.
Patridam wrote:I would like for you to provide evidence backing up that claim that racial discrimination is the cause of cases of underrepresentation. It should not be difficult to understand.

No such claim was made. At fucking all. Not ALL cases of underrepresentation are due to discrimination. Blacks making up 12% of employees in a local business where they make up 14% of the general local population is underrepresentation. That doesn't mean that it's inherently because of racial discrimination.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:32 pm

Mavorpen wrote:They can, and they do. Especially white females.


Even if you aren't willing to admit that Whites in general don't benefit from affirmative action, it could be accurately said that they are the group least likely to ever be helped by affirmative action as the racial majority in the US.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:34 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:They can, and they do. Especially white females.


Even if you aren't willing to admit that Whites in general don't benefit from affirmative action, it could be accurately said that they are the group least likely to ever be helped by affirmative action as the racial majority in the US.

That entirely depends on what you mean by "help." And honestly, I don't very much take your opinion on that seriously.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Atlantic Isles, Candesia, Ethel mermania, Floofybit, Great United States, Grinning Dragon, Hiram Land, Ifreann, Improper Classifications, Kubra, Likhinia, North American Imperial State, Northern Seleucia, The Republic of Western Sol, Valles Marineris Mining co, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads