by Neo Kervoskia » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:15 pm
by Rolamec » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:23 pm
Neo Kervoskia wrote:I don't usually make political topics, mostly because I don't care, but this one got me thinking. That's a lie -- I'm just curious:
Do you think the moderate/Rockefeller Republicans will ever make a comeback in the North?
I feel so dirty now. I'm going to make a thread about sex or beer just to even this out...
by Greed and Death » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:24 pm
by Rolamec » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:28 pm
greed and death wrote:George H.W. Bush was arguably a Rockefeller republican.
by South Lorenya » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:31 pm
by Greed and Death » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:31 pm
by Greed and Death » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:36 pm
by Rolamec » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:38 pm
by Ashmoria » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:40 pm
Neo Kervoskia wrote:I don't usually make political topics, mostly because I don't care, but this one got me thinking. That's a lie -- I'm just curious:
Do you think the moderate/Rockefeller Republicans will ever make a comeback in the North?
I feel so dirty now. I'm going to make a thread about sex or beer just to even this out...
by Greed and Death » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:12 pm
by Muravyets » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:31 pm
Ashmoria wrote:Neo Kervoskia wrote:I don't usually make political topics, mostly because I don't care, but this one got me thinking. That's a lie -- I'm just curious:
Do you think the moderate/Rockefeller Republicans will ever make a comeback in the North?
I feel so dirty now. I'm going to make a thread about sex or beer just to even this out...
yeah i think they will. the north isnt as interested in lunacy as the south is. if the republican party wants ANY influence is it going to have to run sane candidates. after they disillusion the teaparty types so they wont vote in primaries any more.
by The Lone Alliance » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:38 am
by Pope Joan » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:41 am
Neo Kervoskia wrote:I don't usually make political topics, mostly because I don't care, but this one got me thinking. That's a lie -- I'm just curious:
Do you think the moderate/Rockefeller Republicans will ever make a comeback in the North?
I feel so dirty now. I'm going to make a thread about sex or beer just to even this out...
by Pope Joan » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:43 am
The Lone Alliance wrote:Well according to some "Tea party" types and the large "Conservative" pundits all Rockefeller Republicans are RINOs who should be kicked out. So really the question is, when are the Rockefeller Republicans going to wise up and quit siding with a group that wants to exterminate their ideas?
by Panzerjaeger » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:45 am
The Lone Alliance wrote:Well according to some "Tea party" types and the large "Conservative" pundits all Rockefeller Republicans are RINOs who should be kicked out. So really the question is, when are the Rockefeller Republicans going to wise up and quit siding with a group that wants to exterminate their ideas?
Caninope wrote:Toyota: Keep moving forward, even when you don't want to!
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Timothy McVeigh casts... Pyrotechnics!
Greater Americania wrote:lol "No Comrade Ivan! Don't stick your head in there! That's the wood chi...!"
New Kereptica wrote:Fascism: because people are too smart nowadays.
by The Lone Alliance » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:09 pm
This has nothing to do with the topic. But if you are pathetic enough to play the "Baby Killer" card then you better accept the consequences.Pope Joan wrote:The Lone Alliance wrote:Well according to some "Tea party" types and the large "Conservative" pundits all Rockefeller Republicans are RINOs who should be kicked out. So really the question is, when are the Rockefeller Republicans going to wise up and quit siding with a group that wants to exterminate their ideas?
Really can you tell me where in the Dem Alliance rules is "Must Love baby killing"?Pope Joan wrote:Yes that is way over the line, but any Dem alliance would feel like that.
I'm fine with him also.Pope Joan wrote:I actually like Obama; he is such a moderate that his own party is dumping craploads of criticism on him.
by Buffett and Colbert » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:27 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Lackadaisical2 » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:32 pm
The Lone Alliance wrote:This has nothing to do with the topic. But if you are pathetic enough to play the "Baby Killer" card then you better accept the consequences.Pope Joan wrote:The Lone Alliance wrote:Well according to some "Tea party" types and the large "Conservative" pundits all Rockefeller Republicans are RINOs who should be kicked out. So really the question is, when are the Rockefeller Republicans going to wise up and quit siding with a group that wants to exterminate their ideas?
As for your made up policy first I'll counter with the policy of the past 8 years.
Borrow massive amounts of money then sending to corporate cronies while killing portions of the younger generation in war.
Yeah that's a better policy.
Really can you tell me where in the Dem Alliance rules is "Must Love baby killing"?Pope Joan wrote:Yes that is way over the line, but any Dem alliance would feel like that.
You do know the "Right" will never Ban Abortion, but they love to sucker people like you into believing that they "Care".
Yet they hate funding children's programs, they only care about "Children" up until they pop out, then the only time they care is if they want to censor something to 'protect them'.
I'm fine with him also.Pope Joan wrote:I actually like Obama; he is such a moderate that his own party is dumping craploads of criticism on him.
But I'm not fine with people who try and dodge the subject by playing the "Baby killer" card.
Admit that both parties must "Love killing babies" in your eyes and shut up about it.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Pope Joan » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:39 pm
The Lone Alliance wrote:This has nothing to do with the topic. But if you are pathetic enough to play the "Baby Killer" card then you better accept the consequences.Pope Joan wrote:The Lone Alliance wrote:Well according to some "Tea party" types and the large "Conservative" pundits all Rockefeller Republicans are RINOs who should be kicked out. So really the question is, when are the Rockefeller Republicans going to wise up and quit siding with a group that wants to exterminate their ideas?
As for your made up policy first I'll counter with the policy of the past 8 years.
Borrow massive amounts of money then sending to corporate cronies while killing portions of the younger generation in war.
Yeah that's a better policy.
Not a Rockefeller Republican policy or position. Read up on it.Really can you tell me where in the Dem Alliance rules is "Must Love baby killing"?Pope Joan wrote:Yes that is way over the line, but any Dem alliance would feel like that.
Can you tell me the Dems dare ignore NARLA? Have you heard the flak he is taking for not supporting their position more actively?
You do know the "Right" will never Ban Abortion, but they love to sucker people like you into believing that they "Care".
Yet they hate funding children's programs, they only care about "Children" up until they pop out, then the only time they care is if they want to censor something to 'protect them'.I'm fine with him also.Pope Joan wrote:I actually like Obama; he is such a moderate that his own party is dumping craploads of criticism on him.
But I'm not fine with people who try and dodge the subject by playing the "Baby killer" card.
Admit that both parties must "Love killing babies" in your eyes and shut up about it.
by You-Gi-Owe » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:12 pm
Neo Kervoskia wrote:I don't usually make political topics, mostly because I don't care, but this one got me thinking. That's a lie -- I'm just curious:
Do you think the moderate/Rockefeller Republicans will ever make a comeback in the North?
I feel so dirty now. I'm going to make a thread about sex or beer just to even this out...
by Inertina » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:17 pm
by The Lone Alliance » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:47 pm
"Baby killing" is not a Democratic Policy but you had some reason to put it in.Pope Joan wrote:Not a Rockefeller Republican policy or position. Read up on it.
The group who's blog has a rant about the "Darwinist agenda" on the front page?Pope Joan wrote:Can you tell me the Dems dare ignore NARLA? Have you heard the flak he is taking for not supporting their position more actively?
[/quote]Pope Joan wrote:No, you shut up. I didn't want to get into a flame war. I made it clear that I was overstating deliberately, that this was a depiction of a gut reaction, not a rational statement of policy. But you ignored that disclaimer.
by Robustian » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:30 pm
Neo Kervoskia wrote:I don't usually make political topics, mostly because I don't care, but this one got me thinking. That's a lie -- I'm just curious:
Do you think the moderate/Rockefeller Republicans will ever make a comeback in the North?
I feel so dirty now. I'm going to make a thread about sex or beer just to even this out...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Caem, Eahland, Hungary Principality, Korouse, Kubra, Likhinia, Neu California, Ohnoh, Orifna, Shearoa, Spirit of Hope, The Black Forrest, The United Colonies of Earth
Advertisement