Reddogkeno101 wrote:I said they should. They wanted to come to Australia and we shouldn't detain them and take them elsewhere if they want to come here and they are refugees. We don't take enough for what we can take.
1.Notice the mention of the headline and this: "The United Nations refugee agency has warned Australia that its decision to send asylum seekers to Papua New Guinea could breach international law and its human rights obligations."
2. Yep, which means we can't take them back to wherever they came from. They would be persecuted in PNG on account of race and religion.
3. It was to address your point on evidence for stuff. I thought you wanted it.
4. kk
5. Yeah-nah. There's no real difference.
- Okay.
- If that is the case (it has yet to be proven) resettle them elsewhere.
- It's certainly very interesting; I thought the foreign-born population was much smaller but I don't think it proves or disproves the legality of Oz's immigration policy.
- Let's just ignore this point and the first point too; we'll have to recur to exponents if we continue.
- Explain yourself.
