You sure? Seems pretty anomalously odd. I say the SCP Foundation should take it. The reason why 106 is always grinning is because he's laughing at that quote.
Advertisement

by Cyrisnia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:47 pm

by Grenartia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:48 pm

by Divergia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:48 pm

by Great Kleomentia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:48 pm
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:Seno Zhou Varada wrote:He couldn't have stopped all this by I don't know... using his powers to make the Pharaoh let them all go and make Ice Cream for them? No? Ok
God could also force people to not watch pornography or tell white lies, 'small stuff' like that. But he doesn't; it's a matter of free will. God does not have zombies serving him.

by Othelos » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:48 pm
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:Seno Zhou Varada wrote:He couldn't have stopped all this by I don't know... using his powers to make the Pharaoh let them all go and make Ice Cream for them? No? Ok
God could also force people to not watch pornography or tell white lies, 'small stuff' like that. But he doesn't; it's a matter of free will. God does not have zombies serving him.

by Inzijard » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:48 pm
Seno Zhou Varada wrote:Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
I believe the Bible hints that the people killed in the Great Flood were part-Nephillim. I believe it was Pharaoh who 'genocided' (?) the Hebrew boys because he didn't like them, and it was also Pharaoh who put the Hebrews into slavery, having them beat, and taking away their straw to make bricks (forcing them to find straw themselves, and still make the same amount). God politely had Noah go to Pharaoah and ask him to let the people go. Pharaoh denied God at least ten times. That forced God to do the punishment where all firstborn -- man and animal -- who did not have the blood of a lamb on their door -- to die.
Source: Genesis and Exodus
The Biblical laws applied to everyone. If you were a slave, they taught you how to act. If you found yourselves with slaves, they taught you what to do. They weren't condoning slavery. The Bible never encourages rebellion, which, even against slavemasters, is wrong (unless God explicitly allows it, which he did in the case of the Exodus).
He couldn't have stopped all this by I don't know... using his powers to make the Pharaoh let them all go and make Ice Cream for them? No? Ok



by Seno Zhou Varada » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:49 pm
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:Seno Zhou Varada wrote:He couldn't have stopped all this by I don't know... using his powers to make the Pharaoh let them all go and make Ice Cream for them? No? Ok
God could also force people to not watch pornography or tell white lies, 'small stuff' like that. But he doesn't; it's a matter of free will. God does not have zombies serving him.

by Cyrisnia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:49 pm
Othelos wrote:Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
God could also force people to not watch pornography or tell white lies, 'small stuff' like that. But he doesn't; it's a matter of free will. God does not have zombies serving him.
So then who are you to supporting restricting others' personal lives? When gay people marry, it isn't hurting anyone, so why do you care?

by Benuty » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:49 pm


by The New Sea Territory » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:49 pm
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:I really don't think, sir, that millions of gay and lesbian people have been hiding out for the last six thousand years 'in the closet'.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:I suspect that they have begun to rapidly increase in population
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:(1) due to the pro-gay culture we live in
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:(2) due to the desire for attention
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:(3) the attention lavished on gay people, particularly in the media
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:(4) God 'giving us up' over to our sins due to our continued rebellion
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:(5) Satanic attacks
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:(6) Sinful culture in general and
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:(7) the lack of a strong Christian influence in America today (as a result of the last six points).
| Ⓐ ☭ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᚨ ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

by Draica » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:50 pm
Nord Amour wrote:Draica wrote:The majority of North Carolinians voted against gay marriage. The majority spoke. The Judges that are doing this are doing so under the SCOTUS's decision to not speak on Gay marriage. Judges in Idaho and Nevada have been knocking down laws left and right under the guise of the laws being "unconstituional" when the very body that decides that has not spoken.
This is an ideological move. Last year, the Court ruled that state attorneys general could simply refuse to defend state laws in favor of traditional marriage, thereby allowing the executive branch of state government to completely destroy law it doesn’t like. The Court furthermore set the predicate for future same-sex marriage rulings in United States v. Windsor, in which, as Scalia summarized, the Court declared “anyone opposed to same-sex marriage an enemy of human decency.”
Instead of upholding their duty to decide the constitutionality of laws, the Supreme court uses a political and ideological move and redirects the authority to the Appeals courts and the district courts. Judges are single-handedly using their "power" to strike down laws that have been upheld as constituional because of their personal ideological vendettas. They have no concern for the people in the states(WHO WERE IN THE MAJORITY) who voted against gay marriage and succeeded in 11 additional states.
Now judges will be going outside of their bounds and striking down laws. How dissipointing, first the Supreme Court abandoning it's duty to atleast give a ruling on this and now the forced acceptance of Gay marriage.
You know, I'm beginning to think the LGBT's motto is "tolerance and love-..If you agree with us, and if you don't you're a homophobe."
It's sad. This is sad. Our legislature needs to stand up and demand the SCOTUS do something.
Basic human rights are more valuable than political freedom. The courts are simply preventing an ignorant majority from reverting to the Bronze Age.
Hail Satan.

by Othelos » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:50 pm

by Divergia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:50 pm

by The balkens » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:51 pm

by Great Kleomentia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:51 pm

by Othelos » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:51 pm
Draica wrote:Nord Amour wrote:
Basic human rights are more valuable than political freedom. The courts are simply preventing an ignorant majority from reverting to the Bronze Age.
Hail Satan.
You have not refuted a single point in my argument, infact you've proved that you have a profound lack of knowledge on constitutional law. I'm making the legal argument, and it is not within the duty for the SCOTUS to disregard their duty to rule on this stuff and give it to idealougs who seek to rip apart what legislatures have passed.
That's not how it works.

by Grenartia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:51 pm
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:The New Sea Territory wrote:
Right. Being threatened with death for hundreds of years isn't oppression.
I really don't think, sir, that millions of gay and lesbian people have been hiding out for the last six thousand years 'in the closet'. I suspect that they have begun to rapidly increase in population (1) due to the pro-gay culture we live in (2) due to the desire for attention (3) the attention lavished on gay people, particularly in the media (4) God 'giving us up' over to our sins due to our continued rebellion (5) Satanic attacks (6) Sinful culture in general and (7) the lack of a strong Christian influence in America today (as a result of the last six points).

by Olerand » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:51 pm
Draica wrote:The majority of North Carolinians voted against gay marriage. The majority spoke. The Judges that are doing this are doing so under the SCOTUS's decision to not speak on Gay marriage. Judges in Idaho and Nevada have been knocking down laws left and right under the guise of the laws being "unconstituional" when the very body that decides that has not spoken.
This is an ideological move. Last year, the Court ruled that state attorneys general could simply refuse to defend state laws in favor of traditional marriage, thereby allowing the executive branch of state government to completely destroy law it doesn’t like. The Court furthermore set the predicate for future same-sex marriage rulings in United States v. Windsor, in which, as Scalia summarized, the Court declared “anyone opposed to same-sex marriage an enemy of human decency.”
Instead of upholding their duty to decide the constitutionality of laws, the Supreme court uses a political and ideological move and redirects the authority to the Appeals courts and the district courts. Judges are single-handedly using their "power" to strike down laws that have been upheld as constituional because of their personal ideological vendettas. They have no concern for the people in the states(WHO WERE IN THE MAJORITY) who voted against gay marriage and succeeded in 11 additional states.
Now judges will be going outside of their bounds and striking down laws. How dissipointing, first the Supreme Court abandoning it's duty to atleast give a ruling on this and now the forced acceptance of Gay marriage.
You know, I'm beginning to think the LGBT's motto is "tolerance and love-..If you agree with us, and if you don't you're a homophobe."
It's sad. This is sad. Our legislature needs to stand up and demand the SCOTUS do something.
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by Socialist Abania » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:52 pm
Othelos wrote:Draica wrote:
You have not refuted a single point in my argument, infact you've proved that you have a profound lack of knowledge on constitutional law. I'm making the legal argument, and it is not within the duty for the SCOTUS to disregard their duty to rule on this stuff and give it to idealougs who seek to rip apart what legislatures have passed.
That's not how it works.
So if the public/legislature of Mississippi passed a resolution that reinstated slavery, the courts should just stand aside?


by Greater Beggnig » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:52 pm

by Inzijard » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:52 pm
Seno Zhou Varada wrote:Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
God could also force people to not watch pornography or tell white lies, 'small stuff' like that. But he doesn't; it's a matter of free will. God does not have zombies serving him.
So basically your using the free will argument? Let me tell you that if your god really cared about his creations he would help them not leave them hanging in slavery, genocide, discrimination, all that stuff.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Ameriganastan, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Heavenly Assault, Klubetya, Necroghastia, New Temecula, Nyoskova, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rostavykhan, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement