http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic
Not seeing it.
Advertisement

by Great Kleomentia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:01 pm

by Smoya » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:01 pm
Greater Weselton wrote:More states are falling to this. Our great country is no longer what it used to be.The Domino Theory appears to be correct. People during the Red Scare would have never imagined this. Our nation is closer to communism than ever.

by Neo Rome Republic » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:01 pm

by Othelos » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:01 pm

by Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:01 pm

by Socialist Abania » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:02 pm
-The Unified Earth Governments- wrote:Greater Weselton wrote:More states are falling to this. Our great country is no longer what it used to be.The Domino Theory appears to be correct. People during the Red Scare would have never imagined this. Our nation is closer to communism than ever.
....
Oh shut up...
Everyday in NSG
by Burleson » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:02 pm
Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:Burleson wrote:Great, another state denied its 10th amendment rights. Last time I checked, you can't force people to have something that the majority of them don't want in a Democracy.
Last time I checked, you couldn't deny people of their 14th amendment rights.
[b]OOC
God Bless America
NSG's resident homophobic, islamophobic, transphobic, redneck99% - Republican Party
97% - Conservative Party
92% - Constitution Party
62% - Libertarian Party
4% - Democratic Party
1% - Green Party
1% - Socialist Party
http://www.isidewith.com

by Pandeeria » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:02 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

by Liberal PC Brigade » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:02 pm
by Nerotysia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:02 pm

by Socialist Abania » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:03 pm
In 2004, a lot of controversy began to swirl around the topic of marriage as homosexual marriage entered the news once again. In 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ordered that the state must make accommodations for gay unions, bringing the issue into the public eye. Vermont created civil unions as a result. In 2004, the Massachusetts Supreme Court went a step further, and ruled that the state must accommodate not just an institution equal to marriage, as civil union was designed to be, but that gay marriage itself must be offered in the state. Subsequently, mayors in New York and California began to offer gay marriage in their towns and cities, citing civil rights concerns. Those opposed to gay marriage began to urge that an amendment to the Constitution be created to define marriage as being between a man and a woman only. Opponents of the amendment pointed to the failed Prohibition Amendment as a reason why such social issues should stay out of the Constitution. In the absence of any such amendment, however, marriage is not mentioned in the Constitution at any point. More information is available on the Marriage Topic Page.

by Burleson » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:03 pm
[b]OOC
God Bless America
NSG's resident homophobic, islamophobic, transphobic, redneck99% - Republican Party
97% - Conservative Party
92% - Constitution Party
62% - Libertarian Party
4% - Democratic Party
1% - Green Party
1% - Socialist Party
http://www.isidewith.com

by Pandeeria » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:03 pm
Great Kleomentia wrote:Pandeeria wrote:
There defintily is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic
Not seeing it.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

by Christainville » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:03 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Christainville wrote:I live in the state, two times the people voted on this, our state leaders did it once. It was passed and we made up our own mind on how we wanted this to be handled. At all times in this state the majority of people you talked to said they were against it. Yet, one court knocks down our law. They can knock down a law, but they will never knock us down. They can never change how we feel and change our views on things. Call us haters, call us homophobic, even call us un American. Because this fight isn't over. We will fight, and fight to have our views heard and our state ran the way we want it. No law will stop us, nothing will stop us. We chose our view and that was final. Enough of one person changing the view of the mass, but we will fight back. A few gays can marry but it will never be accepted by the mass public, no matter what law they pass. Our views or just that our own, and this fight isn't over.
You don't get to vote away people's rights.

by Rikatan » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:03 pm
Greater Weselton wrote:I have no proof.

by Great Kleomentia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:03 pm

by Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:03 pm

by Socialist Abania » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:04 pm

by Burleson » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:04 pm
Socialist Abania wrote:Burleson wrote:Gay marriage is not a 14th amendment right.
Marriage is no right either.
I don't see it the constitution.In 2004, a lot of controversy began to swirl around the topic of marriage as homosexual marriage entered the news once again. In 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ordered that the state must make accommodations for gay unions, bringing the issue into the public eye. Vermont created civil unions as a result. In 2004, the Massachusetts Supreme Court went a step further, and ruled that the state must accommodate not just an institution equal to marriage, as civil union was designed to be, but that gay marriage itself must be offered in the state. Subsequently, mayors in New York and California began to offer gay marriage in their towns and cities, citing civil rights concerns. Those opposed to gay marriage began to urge that an amendment to the Constitution be created to define marriage as being between a man and a woman only. Opponents of the amendment pointed to the failed Prohibition Amendment as a reason why such social issues should stay out of the Constitution. In the absence of any such amendment, however, marriage is not mentioned in the Constitution at any point. More information is available on the Marriage Topic Page.
[b]OOC
God Bless America
NSG's resident homophobic, islamophobic, transphobic, redneck99% - Republican Party
97% - Conservative Party
92% - Constitution Party
62% - Libertarian Party
4% - Democratic Party
1% - Green Party
1% - Socialist Party
http://www.isidewith.com

by Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:04 pm

by Archeuland and Baughistan » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:04 pm
Smoya wrote:Greater Weselton wrote:More states are falling to this. Our great country is no longer what it used to be.The Domino Theory appears to be correct. People during the Red Scare would have never imagined this. Our nation is closer to communism than ever.
God accepts people who for who they are as long as they live a good life.

by Othelos » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:04 pm

by Krasny-Volny » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:05 pm

by Great Kleomentia » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:05 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alt Capitalist Britain, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, Fartsniffage, Google [Bot], Kaskalma, Kubra, Port Caverton, Rusozak, Tarsonis
Advertisement