Does God Exist?

[Ostroeuropa]

No, you don't get it.
This purple unicorn, we don't know the properties of it, therefore we can't disprove it.

But we do know the properties of the christian god because of the bible. If you can prove that the bible is wrong, then the god of the bible is wrong

I don't have to prove them wrong. They have to prove that they are in fact a purple unicorn which they can't

Well what do you call that selfie then?
And do you have to prove your claims too?

[The Jasminia Islands]

I'm a purple unicorn. Prove me wrong.


Incidentally, most of those gods can be disproven.

No, you don't get it.
This purple unicorn, we don't know the properties of it, therefore we can't disprove it.

But we do know the properties of the christian god because of the bible. If you can prove that the bible is wrong, then the god of the bible is wrong

But how can you know the properties of the Christian God? I don't think you can.

[New Boozland]

I already proved you wrong because purple unicorns don't exist. You can't prove it either

If that's true then what do you call this selfie I took?
http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/ ... 4gtyan.png

Clearly, my claims are exactly as good as your creationist ones.

That is a drawing. There is actual evidence of God

[Ostroeuropa]

If that's true then what do you call this selfie I took?
http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/ ... 4gtyan.png

Clearly, my claims are exactly as good as your creationist ones.

That is a drawing. There is actual evidence of God

Oh really? Can you PROVE it's just a drawing?!
What evidence? Can you show me?
And tell me what the difference is?

[Farnhamia]

If that's true then what do you call this selfie I took?
http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/ ... 4gtyan.png

Clearly, my claims are exactly as good as your creationist ones.

That is a drawing. There is actual evidence of God

Such as?

[Washington Resistance Army]

If that's true then what do you call this selfie I took?
http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/ ... 4gtyan.png

Clearly, my claims are exactly as good as your creationist ones.

That is a drawing. There is actual evidence of God

No, there isn't. There are things people attribute to a number of different gods but nothing that gives firm evidence of one.

[Risottia]

Waiting for you to list them. Go on!

Most of them are in the link I posted

Which is a discredited site, as it relied on a blatant fallacy (aka strong anthropic principle).

Anything more serious?

[Alexandreon]

Generally speaking, I consider myself a pantheist with sympathy towards certain deities from different mythologies. I also kinda identify myself with visions stated by Stanisław Lem in his series of stories called "The Star Diaries", in one of them Lem created an interesting concept of a deity, which in order to preserve its omnipotence, does nothing, silently and meekly agreeing to everything that happens. It is becasue the every single intervention, miraculous act, may be debunked and ultimately it is impossible to the Deity to do anything, as doing Anything will mean reduction of itself.

That being said, I'd rather consider entire world as "sacred" or "divine", yet rather lacking a personality or will, and rather not in need to be worshipped, apart from simple enjoyment of the life.

[Creepoc Infinite]

No, you don't get it.
This purple unicorn, we don't know the properties of it, therefore we can't disprove it.

But we do know the properties of the christian god because of the bible. If you can prove that the bible is wrong, then the god of the bible is wrong

I don't have to prove them wrong. They have to prove that they are in fact a purple unicorn which they can't

I know, but what i'm saying is the bible's definition of god can't be true because the the properties the bible defines as god are false, plagiarised contradictory to science, history and logic.

[Risottia]

That is a drawing. There is actual evidence of God

Oh really? Can you PROVE it's just a drawing?!

And by the way, what about claiming that it was drawn according to the divine inspiration of the Purple Unicorn?

[Ostroeuropa]

I don't have to prove them wrong. They have to prove that they are in fact a purple unicorn which they can't

I know, but what i'm saying is the bible's definition of god can't be true because the the properties the bible defines as god are false, plagiarised contradictory to science, history and logic.

Precisely this.
Omnipotence is self-contradictory.
Omniscience is self-contradictory.
Any entity to which either of these attributes are given cannot exist.

[Risottia]

No, you don't get it.
This purple unicorn, we don't know the properties of it, therefore we can't disprove it.

But we do know the properties of the christian god because of the bible. If you can prove that the bible is wrong, then the god of the bible is wrong

I don't have to prove them wrong. They have to prove that they are in fact a purple unicorn which they can't

Now apply this reasoning to YOUR OWN deities and creed.

[Creepoc Infinite]

No, you don't get it.
This purple unicorn, we don't know the properties of it, therefore we can't disprove it.

But we do know the properties of the christian god because of the bible. If you can prove that the bible is wrong, then the god of the bible is wrong

But how can you know the properties of the Christian God? I don't think you can.

The bible claims to. our understanding of what the christian god is is based off the dogma and philosophy and description found in the bible.

If god isn't matching the attributes laid out by the bible, it isn't the christian god by definition.

[New Boozland]

I'm going to go ahead and leave this thread due to the fact that no one will bother to try to refute my points and simply says that "God isn't real" without giving any evidence.

[Creepoc Infinite]

I'm going to go ahead and leave this thread due to the fact that no one will bother to try to refute my points and simply says that "God isn't real" without giving any evidence.

What are you talking about?
ask your questions, if i haven't replied that means i already answered to someone else

[New Boozland]

I don't have to prove them wrong. They have to prove that they are in fact a purple unicorn which they can't

Now apply this reasoning to YOUR OWN deities and creed.

Already did. You just won't read my claims nor bother to refute them

[Ostroeuropa]

Now apply this reasoning to YOUR OWN deities and creed.

Already did. You just won't read my claims nor bother to refute them

You havn't bothered to refute my claims about being a unicorn either. Maybe there is something ridiculous and stupid about the evidence we're both providing.
But that can't be right...

[New Boozland]

I'm going to go ahead and leave this thread due to the fact that no one will bother to try to refute my points and simply says that "God isn't real" without giving any evidence.

What are you talking about?
ask your questions, if i haven't replied that means i already answered to someone else

I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about the purple unicorn idiots

[Farnhamia]

I'm going to go ahead and leave this thread due to the fact that no one will bother to try to refute my points and simply says that "God isn't real" without giving any evidence.

What are you talking about?
ask your questions, if i haven't replied that means i already answered to someone else

He posted some links to pages pruporting to prove the existence of God and I believe he'd like a point-by-point refutation of those.

[Humo]

I'm going to go ahead and leave this thread due to the fact that no one will bother to try to refute my points and simply says that "God isn't real" without giving any evidence.

but it literally impossible to disprove god.

[New Boozland]

Already did. You just won't read my claims nor bother to refute them

You havn't bothered to refute my claims about being a unicorn either. Maybe there is something ridiculous and stupid about the evidence we're both providing.
But that can't be right...

Yes I did several times

[The Jasminia Islands]

But how can you know the properties of the Christian God? I don't think you can.

The bible claims to. our understanding of what the christian god is is based off the dogma and philosophy and description found in the bible.

If god isn't matching the attributes laid out by the bible, it isn't the christian god by definition.

The Bible is limited because it is written by humans. It can only try to describe God but it is impossible for humans to define or comprehend God because he is so un-human. While the Bible tries its best to present God as what he is, it is always going to fall short.

[Ostroeuropa]

I'm going to go ahead and leave this thread due to the fact that no one will bother to try to refute my points and simply says that "God isn't real" without giving any evidence.

but it literally impossible to disprove god.

Omnipotent -> Impossible. Rock too heavy.
Omniscient -> Impossible. Unknown Unknowns and whether they are known.

[New Boozland]

I'm going to go ahead and leave this thread due to the fact that no one will bother to try to refute my points and simply says that "God isn't real" without giving any evidence.

but it literally impossible to disprove god.

Which would mean that he does exist

[Pan-America under the United States]

/popcorn