That's what I'm here for.
Advertisement
by New Frenco Empire » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:10 pm
by Communal Earth » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:10 pm
New Frenco Empire wrote:Communal Earth wrote:Ban the practice all together. It will never be consensual. The male will always regret it because it decreases sensitivity and comfort and the practice itself is archaic and totally unneeded.
I wouldn't ban it. Consenting adults should be able to mutilate themselves as they please. Infants, however, should not.
by Ashyaria » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:11 pm
Political Wisdom wrote:I'm against it, unless it is done for medical reasons, because it is an unnatural mutilation and completely unnecessary. It has its origin in Jewish and Muslim religion, although a majority of people from the USA still mistakenly believe circumcision is required for genital hygiene.
by Benuty » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:12 pm
ODMS Babel wrote:I want my goddamn foreskin back. That is my view.
by Communal Earth » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:13 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:14 pm
Communal Earth wrote:Ban the practice all together. It will never be consensual. The male will always regret it(1) because it decreases sensitivity (2) and comfort (3) and the practice itself is archaic and totally unneeded (4).
by UBS » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:14 pm
Communal Earth wrote:New Frenco Empire wrote:I wouldn't ban it. Consenting adults should be able to mutilate themselves as they please. Infants, however, should not.
I agree, consenting adults should be able mutilate themselves but the practice with infants should be entirely banned. #pissedthatIwasmutilated
by The Underground Movement Union » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:15 pm
by UBS » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:16 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Communal Earth wrote:Ban the practice all together. It will never be consensual. The male will always regret it(1) because it decreases sensitivity (2) and comfort (3) and the practice itself is archaic and totally unneeded (4).
1) This is not the case.
2) This is scientifically proven to not be the case.
3) I have seen nothing to prove this, and the results of the similar claim in point #2 (and the anti-circs 'side' history of not paying attention to the science on point #2) leads me towards skepticism.
4) *shrug*
by New Frenco Empire » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:16 pm
The Underground Movement Union wrote:religious
by ESTU » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:20 pm
UBS wrote:ESTU wrote:Since abandoning Christianity, I really don't see the point of circumcision. I'd have to do some research on it before I make a full decision. As of this point, I'm not for it or against. If I were to have boy at this time, I'd probably have him circumcised just because I am. Keep things consistent.
Eh that is a pretty bad reason,seems like a little to much hassle just for that reason
by Page » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:20 pm
by Communal Earth » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:20 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Communal Earth wrote:Ban the practice all together. It will never be consensual. The male will always regret it(1) because it decreases sensitivity (2) and comfort (3) and the practice itself is archaic and totally unneeded (4).
1) This is not the case.
2) This is scientifically proven to not be the case.
3) I have seen nothing to prove this, and the results of the similar claim in point #2 (and the anti-circs 'side' history of not paying attention to the science on point #2) leads me towards skepticism.
4) *shrug*
by Benuty » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:21 pm
Page wrote:Benuty wrote:Then sue your parents, and/or the doctor who performed the circumcision for violation of bodily rights.
I really can't blame my parents or my doctor for doing something society has largely convinced them is totally harmless if not necessary. And a lawsuit won't bring back one's foreskin.
by New Frenco Empire » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:22 pm
UBS wrote:New Frenco Empire wrote:Why? There is no guarantee the child will grow up to be the same religion as you.
Yes and there is no guarantee a kid will stay in the USA,but you still have to say the pledge (at least to my understanding, I only came to america in high school,and they stop the pledge in high school)
by Benuty » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:23 pm
Sisterhood wrote:we'll never do that to our males in this empire...
by Greed and Death » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:24 pm
by UBS » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:24 pm
Communal Earth wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:1) This is not the case.
2) This is scientifically proven to not be the case.
3) I have seen nothing to prove this, and the results of the similar claim in point #2 (and the anti-circs 'side' history of not paying attention to the science on point #2) leads me towards skepticism.
4) *shrug*
I heard differently.
by Pelestria » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:24 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ethel mermania, Hidrandia, Ineva, Keltionialang, Kostane, Plan Neonie, Shrillland, Talibanada, Taosun, Trump Almighty, Tungstan, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement