NATION

PASSWORD

Does God (Christian) exist (Try No.2)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Does the Christian God exist?

Yes
162
40%
No
151
37%
Possibly
35
9%
Probably not
57
14%
 
Total votes : 405

User avatar
The Prophet
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 21
Founded: Nov 09, 2011
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby The Prophet » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:48 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
The Prophet wrote:
Sounds like he's agnostic...


Theism: Believes in God(s)
Atheism: Doesn't Believe in God(s)
Agnostic: Unsure of the existence of God(s)

Those are generally the three default choices..


Nope, again
theism: believing in god
atheism: not theism

gnosticism: knowing absolutely there or is not a god. (there are gnostic atheists and gnostic theists)
agnosticism: not gnosticism (there are agnostic atheists and theists)


The definition of atheism isn't "not theism", it's "rejection of belief in the existence of deities." Go check your dictionary, or google, wiki, etc.

If your gonna minimize your choices as such, then your left with Yes, No, and Maybe. For those are always the most rudimentary answers.
The Church of Eris We work to spread the positive chaos of the playful Goddess and the wisdom of Discordianism.

Holy Text: Principia Discordia

Dedicated to The Prettiest One.

A Discordian is Prohibited of Believing what he reads.
IT IS SO WRITTEN! SO BE IT. HAIL DISCORDIA! PROSECUTORS WILL BE TRANSGRESSICUTED.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72179
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:48 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Galloism wrote:I would further argue that if you do not accept the religious tenants of Buddhism, or your particular branch of Buddhism, you are not a Buddhist.

If an atheist went to church every Sunday and confessed his sins to a priest, I wouldn't call him a catholic.


Weeellll, no. As the philosophy behind Buddhism has 3 schools of thought. None of which follows exactly the same path. And you can definitely apply Buddhist tenets to your daily life. I have met Christians who also identify as Buddhist.

If you apply a tenant or two (or ten) of a religion to your personal life for your personal benefit, does it make you a member of that religion, even if you don't accept any of the rest of it?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:49 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Arkolon wrote:The beginning of time is parallel to the beginning of matter. The reaction that caused matter to be created, and therefore time as well, was caused by something that transcends both time and matter. The existence of the creator-being cannot ever be known, because we can only see the material world and the world with, therefore, time. The existence of the creator-being, therefore, can only be sealed with Belief (for we cannot know the truth), so now it is doubly impossible to know whether or not the creator god exists.

I believe that there's something that transcends time and matter, yes. Does that make me a theist?


Nope.

Believing in a creator god doesn't make you a theist?

Is it a slow week at the Atheism Recruitment Agency HQ? Are you guys whoring the definition of "atheism" out as to totally encompass the theists, too?
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Talonis
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 358
Founded: Mar 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Talonis » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:50 pm

Arkolon wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Nope.

Believing in a creator god doesn't make you a theist?

Is it a slow week at the Atheism Recruitment Agency HQ? Are you guys whoring the definition of "atheism" out as to totally encompass the theists, too?

Well, they already balled rocks in, so...
Trade Agreements:
Seveth
Matta
The Dominion of the Z-Lands
Also known as Hexidecimark.
I'm pro choice for everything... except abortion.
The issue with people that think the Bible is socialist is that they fail to see it's PEOPLE helping people, not GOVERNMENT.
My only issue with socialism is that it fails. Looks good on paper, though, gotta give you that.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:50 pm

Galloism wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Weeellll, no. As the philosophy behind Buddhism has 3 schools of thought. None of which follows exactly the same path. And you can definitely apply Buddhist tenets to your daily life. I have met Christians who also identify as Buddhist.

If you apply a tenant or two (or ten) of a religion to your personal life for your personal benefit, does it make you a member of that religion, even if you don't accept any of the rest of it?

That depends on the tenant. I mean, I think it's pretty obvious that when it comes to religion, some are more important than others.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:50 pm

Galloism wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Weeellll, no. As the philosophy behind Buddhism has 3 schools of thought. None of which follows exactly the same path. And you can definitely apply Buddhist tenets to your daily life. I have met Christians who also identify as Buddhist.

If you apply a tenant or two (or ten) of a religion to your personal life for your personal benefit, does it make you a member of that religion, even if you don't accept any of the rest of it?


Yes. Christians from every sect do it constantly. Your problem is that you're being too much of a purist in a world that is anything but.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Utah and Deseret
Secretary
 
Posts: 38
Founded: Jun 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Utah and Deseret » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:50 pm

The Prophet wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Nope, again
theism: believing in god
atheism: not theism

gnosticism: knowing absolutely there or is not a god. (there are gnostic atheists and gnostic theists)
agnosticism: not gnosticism (there are agnostic atheists and theists)


The definition of atheism isn't "not theism", it's "rejection of belief in the existence of deities." Go check your dictionary, or google, wiki, etc.

If your gonna minimize your choices as such, then your left with Yes, No, and Maybe. For those are always the most rudimentary answers.


My google says
a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods.

So, that means all non theists are a form of atheist.
My knowldge of etymology tells me it is from the prefix "a" meaning "not a" and the word "theist" meaning "believer in some form of deity"
So all non believers of some form of deity are atheists.

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:51 pm

Arkolon wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Nope.

Believing in a creator god doesn't make you a theist?

Is it a slow week at the Atheism Recruitment Agency HQ? Are you guys whoring the definition of "atheism" out as to totally encompass the theists, too?

i believe in God, Maker of Heaven and Earth. Who is outside the space-time world we exist in.
This clearly makes me an atheist. Or, I suppose, to be precise, a non-theist. Which is, of course, an atheist.
Last edited by Occupied Deutschland on Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72179
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:52 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Galloism wrote:If you apply a tenant or two (or ten) of a religion to your personal life for your personal benefit, does it make you a member of that religion, even if you don't accept any of the rest of it?


Yes. Christians from every sect do it constantly. Your problem is that you're being too much of a purist in a world that is anything but.

I know a shit ton of Christian atheists.

Awkward.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:53 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Believing in a creator god doesn't make you a theist?

Is it a slow week at the Atheism Recruitment Agency HQ? Are you guys whoring the definition of "atheism" out as to totally encompass the theists, too?

i believe in God, Maker of Heaven and Earth. Who is outside the space-time world we exist in.
This clearly makes me an atheist.

I CAN NEVER TELL IF YOUR POSTS ARE SARCASTIC AND FIGURATIVELY COCKED AT ME OR IF YOU'RE CONCURRING WITH MY SENTIMENTS
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:53 pm

Galloism wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Yes. Christians from every sect do it constantly. Your problem is that you're being too much of a purist in a world that is anything but.

I know a shit ton of Christian atheists.

Awkward.

I'm afraid I'm going to have to put you on my Foe list for bringing back memories of Bluth.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:54 pm

Arkolon wrote:
Occupied Deutschland wrote:i believe in God, Maker of Heaven and Earth. Who is outside the space-time world we exist in.
This clearly makes me an atheist.

I CAN NEVER TELL IF YOUR POSTS ARE SARCASTIC AND FIGURATIVELY COCKED AT ME OR IF YOU'RE CONCURRING WITH MY SENTIMENTS

Usually concurring, sometimes sarcastic just for the sake of it.

In that case, I was concurring. His usage doesn't make much sense to me as it could, literally, include me as an atheist.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72179
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:54 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Galloism wrote:If you apply a tenant or two (or ten) of a religion to your personal life for your personal benefit, does it make you a member of that religion, even if you don't accept any of the rest of it?

That depends on the tenant. I mean, I think it's pretty obvious that when it comes to religion, some are more important than others.

Fair enough.

What would you say is the most important tenant in Buddhism?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:55 pm

Galloism wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Yes. Christians from every sect do it constantly. Your problem is that you're being too much of a purist in a world that is anything but.

I know a shit ton of Christian atheists.

Awkward.


Do you deny Christians do this?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The Prophet
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 21
Founded: Nov 09, 2011
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby The Prophet » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:57 pm

Utah and Deseret wrote:
The Prophet wrote:
The definition of atheism isn't "not theism", it's "rejection of belief in the existence of deities." Go check your dictionary, or google, wiki, etc.

If your gonna minimize your choices as such, then your left with Yes, No, and Maybe. For those are always the most rudimentary answers.


My google says
a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods.

So, that means all non theists are a form of atheist.
My knowldge of etymology tells me it is from the prefix "a" meaning "not a" and the word "theist" meaning "believer in some form of deity"
So all non believers of some form of deity are atheists.


Anyone who doesn't believe in God(s) is an atheist, and all those who do believe in God(s) are theist.

But someone who is unsure of the existence of God doesn't fit into either category, which is why the term agnostic exist.

Yes, No, Maybe. Are always the three choices.

Maybe doesn't mean yes or no, and you can't argue that it does.
The Church of Eris We work to spread the positive chaos of the playful Goddess and the wisdom of Discordianism.

Holy Text: Principia Discordia

Dedicated to The Prettiest One.

A Discordian is Prohibited of Believing what he reads.
IT IS SO WRITTEN! SO BE IT. HAIL DISCORDIA! PROSECUTORS WILL BE TRANSGRESSICUTED.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:58 pm

The Prophet wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Nope, again
theism: believing in god
atheism: not theism

gnosticism: knowing absolutely there or is not a god. (there are gnostic atheists and gnostic theists)
agnosticism: not gnosticism (there are agnostic atheists and theists)


The definition of atheism isn't "not theism", it's "rejection of belief in the existence of deities." Go check your dictionary, or google, wiki, etc.

If your gonna minimize your choices as such, then your left with Yes, No, and Maybe. For those are always the most rudimentary answers.


Go ahead and you look it up. Atheism is a lack of belief in god, which is not theism. It is not the rejection of belief in god

Oxford: Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.
And for an existence claim you are left with yes or no, maybe is not an option since something either exists or id does not exist So again you are wrong. Also by etymology you are compltely wrong, a means not so atheism means not theism.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:58 pm

Galloism wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:That depends on the tenant. I mean, I think it's pretty obvious that when it comes to religion, some are more important than others.

Fair enough.

What would you say is the most important tenant in Buddhism?

That spends on how complex you want me to get. Simplified version: The Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path. The complex version? Fuck, I'd have to ask one of the Venerable Masters at the temple I go to. :p
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72179
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:59 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Galloism wrote:I know a shit ton of Christian atheists.

Awkward.


Do you deny Christians do this?

I deny that every person who is faithful to his wife/husband and opposed to drunkenness is a Christian. Yes.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:59 pm

Arkolon wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Nope.

Believing in a creator god doesn't make you a theist?

Is it a slow week at the Atheism Recruitment Agency HQ? Are you guys whoring the definition of "atheism" out as to totally encompass the theists, too?


If you believe in a creator god then you are a theist. Again atheism is not theism, and theism is believing in a god. Believing there is something outside of space and time however does not mean you believe in a god.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Utah and Deseret
Secretary
 
Posts: 38
Founded: Jun 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Utah and Deseret » Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:00 pm

The Prophet wrote:
Utah and Deseret wrote:
My google says
So, that means all non theists are a form of atheist.
My knowldge of etymology tells me it is from the prefix "a" meaning "not a" and the word "theist" meaning "believer in some form of deity"
So all non believers of some form of deity are atheists.


Anyone who doesn't believe in God(s) is an atheist, and all those who do believe in God(s) are theist.

But someone who is unsure of the existence of God doesn't fit into either category, which is why the term agnostic exist.

Yes, No, Maybe. Are always the three choices.

Maybe doesn't mean yes or no, and you can't argue that it does.


Person A: Do you believe in a God
Person B: Maybe.
Person A: Maybe?
Person B: Well I'm not sure there is one.
Person A: Oh, do you think there is one?
Person B: I am literally 50/50 on the entire thing.
Person A: Fair enough.

Huh, I guess it is possible.
But most people wouldn't be true agnostics then.

User avatar
The Prophet
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 21
Founded: Nov 09, 2011
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby The Prophet » Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:01 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
The Prophet wrote:
The definition of atheism isn't "not theism", it's "rejection of belief in the existence of deities." Go check your dictionary, or google, wiki, etc.

If your gonna minimize your choices as such, then your left with Yes, No, and Maybe. For those are always the most rudimentary answers.


Go ahead and you look it up. Atheism is a lack of belief in god, which is not theism. It is not the rejection of belief in god

Oxford: Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.
And for an existence claim you are left with yes or no, maybe is not an option since something either exists or id does not exist So again you are wrong. Also by etymology you are compltely wrong, a means not so atheism means not theism.


That's semantics, define it how you like, but Anyone who doesn't believe in God(s) is an atheist, and all those who do believe in God(s) are theist.

But someone who is unsure of the existence of God doesn't fit into either category, which is why the term agnostic exist.

Yes, No, Maybe. Are always the three choices.

Maybe doesn't mean yes or no, and you can't argue that it does.
The Church of Eris We work to spread the positive chaos of the playful Goddess and the wisdom of Discordianism.

Holy Text: Principia Discordia

Dedicated to The Prettiest One.

A Discordian is Prohibited of Believing what he reads.
IT IS SO WRITTEN! SO BE IT. HAIL DISCORDIA! PROSECUTORS WILL BE TRANSGRESSICUTED.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72179
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:02 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Galloism wrote:Fair enough.

What would you say is the most important tenant in Buddhism?

That spends on how complex you want me to get. Simplified version: The Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path. The complex version? Fuck, I'd have to ask one of the Venerable Masters at the temple I go to. :p

Well, let's do the four noble truths.

The origin of suffering is ignorance to the true nature of things, correct?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:02 pm

The Prophet wrote:
Utah and Deseret wrote:
My google says
So, that means all non theists are a form of atheist.
My knowldge of etymology tells me it is from the prefix "a" meaning "not a" and the word "theist" meaning "believer in some form of deity"
So all non believers of some form of deity are atheists.


Anyone who doesn't believe in God(s) is an atheist, and all those who do believe in God(s) are theist.

But someone who is unsure of the existence of God doesn't fit into either category, which is why the term agnostic exist.

Yes, No, Maybe. Are always the three choices.

Maybe doesn't mean yes or no, and you can't argue that it does.


No agnostic exists as an adjective of theist or atheist. It does not answer the question do you believe, it answers the question how strongly do you believe. There are cases where there is no maybe option, exists claims are on of those times. Someone who is unsure still sits on one side or the other, even if they repeatedly cross the line.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:02 pm

Galloism wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Do you deny Christians do this?

I deny that every person who is faithful to his wife/husband and opposed to drunkenness is a Christian. Yes.


I see we're nitpicking, but fine. Tell me, do you deny that Christians from every sect pick and choose what they follow or apply to their lives? Do Catholics and Jehovah's Witnesses believe the same way, exactly?

See, I get it, yes, I shouldn't have said that just because you apply a tenet of Buddhism or any other religion to your life that that makes you a Buddhism adherent. Touche. But you seem to be ignoring my question. And in that light, is it so hard to see how someone can call themselves a Buddhist Christian?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Shaggai
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9342
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shaggai » Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:02 pm

Arkolon wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Nope.

Believing in a creator god doesn't make you a theist?

Is it a slow week at the Atheism Recruitment Agency HQ? Are you guys whoring the definition of "atheism" out as to totally encompass the theists, too?

Transcending time and space does not a god make. Math, for example, could be seen as transcending time and space. And yet math is not a god.
piss

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Anti-Byzantine Empire, Arvenia, Brapil, CapitalistBlack, Celritannia, Eternal Algerstonia, Ethel mermania, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, Insaanistan, Lazarian, Lysset, Moltian, Peoples Republic of Joyea, Rynese Empire, Skaijalar, The Huskar Social Union, The Two Jerseys, Yuldo, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads