NATION

PASSWORD

Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What Type of Jew are You?

Orthodox
24
8%
Modern Orthodox
5
2%
Conservative
45
15%
Reform
56
19%
Irreligious
108
36%
Other
44
15%
Karaite
10
3%
Reconstructionist
6
2%
 
Total votes : 298

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Sun May 24, 2020 4:23 pm

Hope you all didn't forget Hallel, Burchi Nafshi, and Mussaf today.
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Menassa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33851
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Menassa » Sun May 24, 2020 9:15 pm

Solomons Land wrote:
Menassa wrote:That's because Misnagdim are so gargantuanly better.


Hey, what do you have against Chasidim?

They remind me of my father .... I hated my father.
Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey --- Do not Forget!
Their hollow inheritance.
This is my god and I shall exalt him
Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ
"A missionary uses the Bible like a drunk uses a lamppost, not so much for illumination, but for support"
"Imagine of a bunch of Zulu tribesmen told Congress how to read the Constitution, that's how it feels to a Jew when you tell us how to read our bible"
"God said: you must teach, as I taught, without a fee."
"Against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings..."

User avatar
Solomons Land
Diplomat
 
Posts: 975
Founded: May 16, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Solomons Land » Sun May 24, 2020 10:18 pm

Menassa wrote:
Solomons Land wrote:
Hey, what do you have against Chasidim?

They remind me of my father .... I hated my father.


https://www.sefaria.org/Exodus.20.12?la ... l&lang2=en
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_ ... Mother.htm
Generation 31: enter this into your signature and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
This statement is false.

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 5:53 am

Menassa wrote:
Solomons Land wrote:
Hey, what do you have against Chasidim?

They remind me of my father .... I hated my father.

Respect the father?
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129514
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Mon May 25, 2020 6:44 am

La xinga wrote:
Menassa wrote:They remind me of my father .... I hated my father.

Respect the father?

What if the father is abusive?
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63226
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon May 25, 2020 6:46 am

Ethel mermania wrote:
La xinga wrote:Respect the father?

What if the father is abusive?


Oh right, old testament :lol2:
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Dylar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7116
Founded: Jan 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Dylar » Mon May 25, 2020 7:20 am

Menassa wrote:
Solomons Land wrote:
Hey, what do you have against Chasidim?

They remind me of my father .... I hated my father.

[insert Dark Knight Joker meme]
St. Albert the Great wrote:"Natural science does not consist in ratifying what others have said, but in seeking the causes of phenomena."
Franko Tildon wrote:Fire washes the skin off the bone and the sin off the soul. It cleans away the dirt. And my momma didn't raise herself no dirty boy.

Pro: Life, Catholic, religious freedom, guns
Against: gun control, abortion, militant atheism
Interests: Video Games, Military History, Catholic theology, Sci-Fi, and Table-Top Miniatures games
Favorite music genres: Metal, Drinking songs, Polka, Military Marches, Hardbass, and Movie/Video Game soundtracks

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 7:23 am

Ethel mermania wrote:
La xinga wrote:Respect the father?

What if the father is abusive?

Rashi says what respect is:

Serve him food and drink, put on his shoes and clothing, escort him in and out.

If you go close to him and he hits you, then you should avoid that! :lol2:
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 9:12 am

They should make a FORUM7 thread: Which trope of the Torah represents the AN?

UCP is definitely a Shalsheles!
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Solomons Land
Diplomat
 
Posts: 975
Founded: May 16, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Solomons Land » Mon May 25, 2020 9:18 am

La xinga wrote:They should make a FORUM7 thread: Which trope of the Torah represents the AN?

UCP is definitely a Shalsheles!


I worry that could come too close to proselytization. I think this thread is OK, as it is clear it is meant for Jews, anyone else is excepted, but not invited. With something like that, it may seem as if we are trying to teach Goyim that do not want to learn about Torah.
Generation 31: enter this into your signature and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
This statement is false.

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 9:46 am

Solomons Land wrote:
La xinga wrote:They should make a FORUM7 thread: Which trope of the Torah represents the AN?

UCP is definitely a Shalsheles!


I worry that could come too close to proselytization. I think this thread is OK, as it is clear it is meant for Jews, anyone else is excepted, but not invited. With something like that, it may seem as if we are trying to teach Goyim that do not want to learn about Torah.

I know! It was meant as a joke.
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Solomons Land
Diplomat
 
Posts: 975
Founded: May 16, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Solomons Land » Mon May 25, 2020 10:41 am

La xinga wrote:
Solomons Land wrote:
I worry that could come too close to proselytization. I think this thread is OK, as it is clear it is meant for Jews, anyone else is excepted, but not invited. With something like that, it may seem as if we are trying to teach Goyim that do not want to learn about Torah.

I know! It was meant as a joke.


On an unrelated note, what does "and Marrabuk said to Larasi" mean?
Last edited by Solomons Land on Mon May 25, 2020 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Generation 31: enter this into your signature and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
This statement is false.

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 10:44 am

Solomons Land wrote:
La xinga wrote:I know! It was meant as a joke.


On an unrelated note, what does "and Marrabuk said to Larasi" mean?

Region stuff.
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Solomons Land
Diplomat
 
Posts: 975
Founded: May 16, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Solomons Land » Mon May 25, 2020 2:38 pm

I know some Modern Orthodox men have been saying that transgender cross-dressing is permissible. What do you guys think?
Generation 31: enter this into your signature and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
This statement is false.

User avatar
Hanafuridake
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5532
Founded: Sep 09, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hanafuridake » Mon May 25, 2020 2:53 pm

Dylar wrote:
Menassa wrote:They remind me of my father .... I hated my father.

[insert Dark Knight Joker meme]


"You wanna know how I got these payot?"
Nation name in proper language: 花降岳|पुष्पद्वीप
Theravada Buddhist
李贽 wrote:There is nothing difficult about becoming a sage, and nothing false about transcending the world of appearances.
Suriyanakhon's alt, finally found my old account's password

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 3:12 pm

Solomons Land wrote:I know some Modern Orthodox men have been saying that transgender cross-dressing is permissible. What do you guys think?

As an Orthodox person, no. No way. Learn Achrei Mos, all those "ervas" pesukim. NO NO NO. Not tznius, and in Devarim Perek 22 Pasuk 5 it says:

לֹא־יִֽהְיֶ֤ה כְלִי־גֶ֨בֶר֙ עַל־אִשָּׁ֔ה וְלֹֽא־יִלְבַּ֥שׁ גֶּ֖בֶר שִׂמְלַ֣ת אִשָּׁ֑ה כִּ֧י תֽוֹעֲבַ֛ת יְהֹוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶי֖ךָ כָּל־עֹ֥שֵׂה אֵֽלֶּה:
English:
A man's attire shall not be on a woman, nor may a man wear a woman's garment because whoever does this is an abomination to Hashem, your God.
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42328
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 25, 2020 3:15 pm

La xinga wrote:
Solomons Land wrote:I know some Modern Orthodox men have been saying that transgender cross-dressing is permissible. What do you guys think?

As an Orthodox person, no. No way. Learn Achrei Mos, all those "ervas" pesukim. NO NO NO. Not tznius, and in Devarim Perek 22 Pasuk 5 it says:

לֹא־יִֽהְיֶ֤ה כְלִי־גֶ֨בֶר֙ עַל־אִשָּׁ֔ה וְלֹֽא־יִלְבַּ֥שׁ גֶּ֖בֶר שִׂמְלַ֣ת אִשָּׁ֑ה כִּ֧י תֽוֹעֲבַ֛ת יְהֹוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶי֖ךָ כָּל־עֹ֥שֵׂה אֵֽלֶּה:
English:
A man's attire shall not be on a woman, nor may a man wear a woman's garment because whoever does this is an abomination to Hashem, your God.

Is a man a man because he has a penis or because god gave him a spirit that is that of a man?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 3:17 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
La xinga wrote:As an Orthodox person, no. No way. Learn Achrei Mos, all those "ervas" pesukim. NO NO NO. Not tznius, and in Devarim Perek 22 Pasuk 5 it says:

לֹא־יִֽהְיֶ֤ה כְלִי־גֶ֨בֶר֙ עַל־אִשָּׁ֔ה וְלֹֽא־יִלְבַּ֥שׁ גֶּ֖בֶר שִׂמְלַ֣ת אִשָּׁ֑ה כִּ֧י תֽוֹעֲבַ֛ת יְהֹוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶי֖ךָ כָּל־עֹ֥שֵׂה אֵֽלֶּה:
English:
A man's attire shall not be on a woman, nor may a man wear a woman's garment because whoever does this is an abomination to Hashem, your God.

Is a man a man because he has a penis or because god gave him a spirit that is that of a man?

There are sometimes cases that a female neshama is put into the guf of a male, or the oppisite. Are you asking that?
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42328
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 25, 2020 3:18 pm

La xinga wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:Is a man a man because he has a penis or because god gave him a spirit that is that of a man?

There are sometimes cases that a female neshama is put into the guf of a male, or the oppisite. Are you asking that?

Yes, since that is what a trans person is, a female soul in a male or a male in a female.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 3:21 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
La xinga wrote:There are sometimes cases that a female neshama is put into the guf of a male, or the oppisite. Are you asking that?

Yes, since that is what a trans person is, a female soul in a male or a male in a female.

Isn't a trans person a person who wants to be the other gender for reasons?

But to your question, I'd say that they'd be considered what their body is, but i'm not a rav, so I cannot say clearly. I'm reasoning this because you cannot know for sure what soul you have, and there are no mistakes in heaven, so clearly Hashem wanted the neshama to go to a body of someone else's gender.
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42328
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 25, 2020 3:24 pm

La xinga wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:Yes, since that is what a trans person is, a female soul in a male or a male in a female.

Isn't a trans person a person who wants to be the other gender for reasons?

But to your question, I'd say that they'd be considered what their body is, but i'm not a rav, so I cannot say clearly. I'm reasoning this because you cannot know for sure what soul you have, and there are no mistakes in heaven, so clearly Hashem wanted the neshama to go to a body of someone else's gender.


A trans person is a person who does not identify as the sex they where assigned at birth. Since identity is core part of who a person is, is in essence, the soul of the person, then a trans person is someone whose body and soul do not align. So the question is, which dictates the dress of a person, the body (which can be changed using modern medicine), or the soul.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 3:25 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
La xinga wrote:Isn't a trans person a person who wants to be the other gender for reasons?

But to your question, I'd say that they'd be considered what their body is, but i'm not a rav, so I cannot say clearly. I'm reasoning this because you cannot know for sure what soul you have, and there are no mistakes in heaven, so clearly Hashem wanted the neshama to go to a body of someone else's gender.


A trans person is a person who does not identify as the sex they where assigned at birth. Since identity is core part of who a person is, is in essence, the soul of the person, then a trans person is someone whose body and soul do not align. So the question is, which dictates the dress of a person, the body (which can be changed using modern medicine), or the soul.

Since clothing is physical, and the body is physical, I'd say the body, don't forget there are also Atheist trans people! ;)
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42328
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 25, 2020 3:26 pm

La xinga wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
A trans person is a person who does not identify as the sex they where assigned at birth. Since identity is core part of who a person is, is in essence, the soul of the person, then a trans person is someone whose body and soul do not align. So the question is, which dictates the dress of a person, the body (which can be changed using modern medicine), or the soul.

Since clothing is physical, and the body is physical, I'd say the body, don't forget there are also Atheist trans people! ;)

Of course there are atheist trans people, but if a god exists, then regardless of their belief they are a soul in the wrong body. As to since clothes and the boy are both physical do it to the body, then you harm the soul by denying it. If god intentionally placed a male soul in a female body, why do you ignore the soul for the body? It would seem to me that intentionally placing a male soul in a female body, as you claim god makes no mistakes, would mean that god focus's on the soul. In which case it is the soul that should determine dress.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Mon May 25, 2020 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
La Xinga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5560
Founded: Jul 12, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Xinga » Mon May 25, 2020 3:30 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
La xinga wrote:Since clothing is physical, and the body is physical, I'd say the body, don't forget there are also Atheist trans people! ;)

Of course there are atheist trans people, but if a god exists, then regardless of their belief they are a soul in the wrong body. As to since clothes and the boy are both physical do it to the body, then you harm the soul by denying it. If god intentionally placed a male soul in a female body, why do you ignore the soul for the body? It would seem to me that intentionally placing a male soul in a female body, as you claim god makes no mistakes, would mean that god focus's on the soul. In which case it is the soul that should determine dress.

The soul didn't want to come to earth in the first place. We actually don't know who's soul is whos, so we cannot assume: This guy is actually female.
Food Discussion Thread (II)
I use NS stats if I like them.

-My RMB Quotebook!-
-When the SCOTUS is sus-
"[L]aw, without equity, though hard and disagreeable, is much more desirable for the public good, than equity without law;
which would make every judge a legislator, and introduce most infinite confusion.
"

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42328
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 25, 2020 3:31 pm

La xinga wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:Of course there are atheist trans people, but if a god exists, then regardless of their belief they are a soul in the wrong body. As to since clothes and the boy are both physical do it to the body, then you harm the soul by denying it. If god intentionally placed a male soul in a female body, why do you ignore the soul for the body? It would seem to me that intentionally placing a male soul in a female body, as you claim god makes no mistakes, would mean that god focus's on the soul. In which case it is the soul that should determine dress.

The soul didn't want to come to earth in the first place. We actually don't know who's soul is whos, so we cannot assume: This guy is actually female.

You think we cannot actually know about our own soul, even the smallest bit? As to not wanting to come to earth in the first place, why does that matter, the fact remains god placed a male soul in a female body.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Inferior, Ors Might, Stellar Colonies, Uiiop, Varsemia

Advertisement

Remove ads