Advertisement

by Yukonastan » Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:32 pm

by Autonomous Titoists » Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:34 pm
Yukonastan wrote:I am *so* glad I live in Canada, where the .22lr's flow like water.

by Arcturus Novus » Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:38 pm

by Autonomous Titoists » Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:40 pm
Arcturus Novus wrote:My dad and I just bought a Ruger 10/22 a couple of weeks ago. Burned a hundred rounds through it in one go, only jammed twice. That's reliability.

by Mallaska » Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:43 pm

by Arcturus Novus » Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:46 pm
Autonomous Titoists wrote:Arcturus Novus wrote:My dad and I just bought a Ruger 10/22 a couple of weeks ago. Burned a hundred rounds through it in one go, only jammed twice. That's reliability.
It is a good gun but it gets really bad when dirty, which sounds obvious but my Remington 1100 only jams on crap shells after 3 months of not being cleaned. The Ruger after roughly 100-150 rounds gets really bad.

by Autonomous Titoists » Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:48 pm
Arcturus Novus wrote:Autonomous Titoists wrote:It is a good gun but it gets really bad when dirty, which sounds obvious but my Remington 1100 only jams on crap shells after 3 months of not being cleaned. The Ruger after roughly 100-150 rounds gets really bad.
I mean, considering they were range rounds, I was thoroughly impressed. But hey, it's a cheap gun. I'm not expecting it to magically stay clean or anything.

by Arcturus Novus » Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:52 pm
Autonomous Titoists wrote:Arcturus Novus wrote:I mean, considering they were range rounds, I was thoroughly impressed. But hey, it's a cheap gun. I'm not expecting it to magically stay clean or anything.
Ya it's solid for the price and if you really want you can empty the magazine in a couple of seconds. My uncle used to take it and hold the handle in one hand, take the other and shove his finger in the trigger guard, and just go back and forth. His neighbors thought he had a machine gun, its a fun little gun.

by Autonomous Titoists » Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:55 pm
Arcturus Novus wrote:Autonomous Titoists wrote:Ya it's solid for the price and if you really want you can empty the magazine in a couple of seconds. My uncle used to take it and hold the handle in one hand, take the other and shove his finger in the trigger guard, and just go back and forth. His neighbors thought he had a machine gun, its a fun little gun.
Great, now the government can file .22 LR's as assault weapons. Thanks, Uncle Tito.

by Yukonastan » Mon Feb 09, 2015 6:52 pm
Autonomous Titoists wrote:Arcturus Novus wrote:I mean, considering they were range rounds, I was thoroughly impressed. But hey, it's a cheap gun. I'm not expecting it to magically stay clean or anything.
Ya it's solid for the price and if you really want you can empty the magazine in a couple of seconds. My uncle used to take it and hold the handle in one hand, take the other and shove his finger in the trigger guard, and just go back and forth. His neighbors thought he had a machine gun, its a fun little gun.

by Big Jim P » Mon Feb 09, 2015 6:59 pm
Yukonastan wrote:Autonomous Titoists wrote:Ya it's solid for the price and if you really want you can empty the magazine in a couple of seconds. My uncle used to take it and hold the handle in one hand, take the other and shove his finger in the trigger guard, and just go back and forth. His neighbors thought he had a machine gun, its a fun little gun.
Heh, I'm probably getting a few of those 120rd drums for the ruger, and probably make/get a bump stock on it as well (depending on how legal it is). Would be surprising for people at the backwoods range I go to.

by Korva » Mon Feb 09, 2015 6:59 pm

by Spreewerke » Mon Feb 09, 2015 7:36 pm
But that is negligible considering it fires a 4-10 and if you manage to miss 5 times you should probably have a real gun like I don't know a fully automatic M60 belt fed with a 250 round belt wrapped around your body.

by Yukonastan » Mon Feb 09, 2015 7:50 pm
Spreewerke wrote:Autonomous Titoists wrote:Taurus got some things right. Like the Judge, if you remember Smith and Wesson ripped it off with the Governor, basically the same but had 1 more round.
Both are pretty pointless and useless handguns, really. Since the bore is rifled, any .410 shot is going to be incredibly inaccurate, and at that, you are putting .45LC or .410 slugs through a revolver. There really isn't much of a point to it other than "look at what we done did," or, at the very least, use as a snake gun.But that is negligible considering it fires a 4-10 and if you manage to miss 5 times you should probably have a real gun like I don't know a fully automatic M60 belt fed with a 250 round belt wrapped around your body.
There have been instances of people being shot multiple times in the chest with a .357 Magnum and not dying.
Korva wrote:You could just hook your finger through your belt loop.

by Korva » Mon Feb 09, 2015 8:03 pm
Autonomous Titoists wrote:
Taurus got some things right. Like the Judge, if you remember Smith and Wesson ripped it off with the Governor, basically the same but had 1 more round. But that is negligible considering it fires a 4-10 and if you manage to miss 5 times you should probably have a real gun like I don't know a fully automatic M60 belt fed with a 250 round belt wrapped around your body.

by Spreewerke » Mon Feb 09, 2015 8:19 pm
Korva wrote:Autonomous Titoists wrote:Taurus got some things right. Like the Judge, if you remember Smith and Wesson ripped it off with the Governor, basically the same but had 1 more round. But that is negligible considering it fires a 4-10 and if you manage to miss 5 times you should probably have a real gun like I don't know a fully automatic M60 belt fed with a 250 round belt wrapped around your body.
5 shots is hardly enough, especially when you could have a pistol with similar dimensions carrying 3x as many rounds

by Paddy O Fernature » Tue Feb 10, 2015 6:19 pm

by The Freeholds » Tue Feb 10, 2015 6:42 pm

by Spreewerke » Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:33 pm
The Freeholds wrote:I don't know why, but I am probably going to have to say the Colt 727.
I just love the retro look with the detachable carry handle, and especially of it is painted camo.

by Imperial City-States » Wed Feb 11, 2015 11:44 am

by Korva » Wed Feb 11, 2015 11:59 am


by Autonomous Titoists » Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:19 pm
Imperial City-States wrote:So just a general note,
Does anyone have any experience with a Bushmaster ACR? I've been thinking about buying one but haven't been able to talk to anyone who can give me a good summery of how the rifle preforms and any particular pro's and cons of it.

by Autonomous Titoists » Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:21 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Neu California, Upper Ireland
Advertisement