Advertisement

by Socialist Czechia » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:06 am
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

by Dalcaria » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:12 am
) was extremely well organized. I don't exactly here about much combat in Crimea now, do you?
by 12 year olds » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:22 am

by Jinwoy » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:27 am
12 year olds wrote:I've always wondered why the French word for Russian (Russe) was so similar to the word for deception (ruse). They are pronounced the same, and French was the diplomatic language of Europe for quite a while.
Any linguists here?

by Kibbehstan » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:29 am
12 year olds wrote:I've always wondered why the French word for Russian (Russe) was so similar to the word for deception (ruse). They are pronounced the same, and French was the diplomatic language of Europe for quite a while.
Any linguists here?

by Costa Fierro » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:45 am

by Costa Fierro » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:48 am
12 year olds wrote:I've always wondered why the French word for Russian (Russe) was so similar to the word for deception (ruse). They are pronounced the same, and French was the diplomatic language of Europe for quite a while.
Any linguists here?

by Dalcaria » Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:41 am
Constantinopolis wrote:Dalcaria wrote:Wait, has that seriously been confirmed?Because if they are, how many of us were calling that like last year!
No, it hasn't been "confirmed", because it's not true, and it was precisely because some of you were "calling that last year" (i.e. stereotypically assuming that only Russians could be pro-Russian) that I asked a moderator to confirm the opposite at one point:

by West Aurelia » Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:24 am
_REPUBLIC OF WEST AURELIA_
Official factbook
#Valaransofab

by Costa Fierro » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:50 am
West Aurelia wrote:Former pro-Yanukovych deputy shot dead. This seems very similar to the killing of Nemtsov - a politician who opposes the current government is shot dead following other mysterious deaths of opposition figures - although I doubt anyone will be calling this an assassination.

by United Marxist Nations » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:22 am
Teemant wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:In that case, it should be surprising when, in polls, Ukrainians are more likely to look back on the Soviet Union positively:
http://www.pewglobal.org/2011/12/05/con ... iet-union/
http://www.gallup.com/poll/166538/forme ... eakup.aspx
Also, dismissing an entire population's political view as "nostalgic and idiotic" is so stupid in and of itself that I don't even have words for it. I mean, really, get off your fucking high horse. You'd be nostalgic for it too if your country collapsed and everything went to shit.
I think results would be entirely different when asked this year. Confidence in democracy is definitely risen because it was ordinary people who were behind Maidan.


The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Socialist Czechia » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:27 am
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

by United Marxist Nations » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:33 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:So, according to Putin, russians and ukrainians are one same nation. Finally. Which is totally true. Same as bavarians and berliners or french and occitans or sicilians and savoians are same peoples.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Landenburg » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:35 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:So, according to Putin, russians and ukrainians are one same nation. Finally. Which is totally true. Same as bavarians and berliners or french and occitans or sicilians and savoians are same peoples.

by Slobozhanshchyna » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:41 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:So, according to Putin, russians and ukrainians are one same nation. Finally. Which is totally true. Same as bavarians and berliners or french and occitans or sicilians and savoians are same peoples.

by Socialist Czechia » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:46 am
Landenburg wrote:Socialist Czechia wrote:So, according to Putin, russians and ukrainians are one same nation. Finally. Which is totally true. Same as bavarians and berliners or french and occitans or sicilians and savoians are same peoples.
That comparison is not quite correct.
Bavarians and Berliners both speak German.
Ukrainians speak Ukrainian and Russians speak Russian.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

by Socialist Czechia » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:57 am
Slobozhanshchyna wrote:Socialist Czechia wrote:So, according to Putin, russians and ukrainians are one same nation. Finally. Which is totally true. Same as bavarians and berliners or french and occitans or sicilians and savoians are same peoples.
So from your point of view Ukrainian is a dialect of Russian?
Also, since we're using this type of rhetoric here, Bosnians are Serbians.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

by United Marxist Nations » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:03 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:Landenburg wrote:That comparison is not quite correct.
Bavarians and Berliners both speak German.
Ukrainians speak Ukrainian and Russians speak Russian.
difference is tiny, like between saxon german and austrian german or like between occitan french and norman french. Cultural difference as a whole is even less different from other examples - compare culture of savoyards and sicilians - yet there are all italians.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by United Marxist Nations » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:04 am
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Imperial City-States » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:44 am

by Herargon » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:46 am
Imperial City-States wrote:For those nostalgic about the Soviet Union
And for those who are realistic about the Soviet Union.
Note: I just like Reagan's speech..
How scifi alliances actually work.Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.

by Imperial City-States » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:47 am
Herargon wrote:Imperial City-States wrote:For those nostalgic about the Soviet Union
And for those who are realistic about the Soviet Union.
Note: I just like Reagan's speech..
Excuse me, but this is not a Soviet Union discussion thread. This is about the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and those involved.

by Bratislavskaya » Thu Apr 16, 2015 8:52 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Chile's one did. Allende was removed, Pinochet installed. Huge amounts of torture and gross human rights violations followed accompanied by strong economic growth and surprising domestic stability, especially when you consider it's neighbors were suffering from left-wing insurgencies (Peru), multiple military coups (Bolivia) or losing fruitless wars and suffering harsh economic hardship under a military government run by numpties (Argentina).
It doesn't justify what Pinochet did or make Pinochet a great leader, but Chile benefited immensely from the policies instituted under his regime. I'd say it went smoothly and be (loosely) called a success.
Dalcaria wrote:we found it very difficult to believe that anyone who paid attention tounbiasedPro-Western media sources could remotely support Putin.
Imperial City-States wrote:For those nostalgic about the Soviet Union
And for those who are realistic about the Soviet Union.
Note: I just like Reagan's speech..
West Aurelia wrote:Former pro-Yanukovych deputy shot dead. This seems very similar to the killing of Nemtsov - a politician who opposes the current government is shot dead following other mysterious deaths of opposition figures - although I doubt anyone will be calling this an assassination.

by Novus America » Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:27 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:So, according to Putin, russians and ukrainians are one same nation. Finally. Which is totally true. Same as bavarians and berliners or french and occitans or sicilians and savoians are same peoples.

by Blakk Metal » Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:50 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Bratislavskaya wrote:The original point was that US funded coup's don't always go smoothly.
Chile's one did. Allende was removed, Pinochet installed. Huge amounts of torture and gross human rights violations followed accompanied by strong economic growth and surprising domestic stability, especially when you consider it's neighbors were suffering from left-wing insurgencies (Peru), multiple military coups (Bolivia) or losing fruitless wars and suffering harsh economic hardship under a military government run by numpties (Argentina).
It doesn't justify what Pinochet did or make Pinochet a great leader, but Chile benefited immensely from the policies instituted under his regime. I'd say it went smoothly and be (loosely) called a success.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andsed, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Five Pebbles, Gun Manufacturers, Ifreann, Imperatorskiy Rossiya, Incelastan, Lord Dominator, Port Caverton, Saiwana, Scytharum, Shrillland, Sorcery, Spirit of Hope, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Two Jerseys, Umeria, Workers Republic of Prestes Order
Advertisement