Bill O'Reilly Denies then Proves White Privilege

[Murkwood]

You point was that Asians are not a monolitic group so o'reillies data is wrong. .

No, it wasn't. Again, come back when you do understand it.

Instead of saying "you don't understand", how about you respectfully tell him what you think is the difference?

[Slavonian kingdom]

Every month is American history Month.

Oh I see. You aren't even in High School yet, huh? Otherwise, you would know that high school students also take World History.

Silly me, I'll just go ahead and read your posts with that context.

What is the problem about World history? It teachs all other histories besides American.

[Kelinfort]

Oh I see. You aren't even in High School yet, huh? Otherwise, you would know that high school students also take World History.

Silly me, I'll just go ahead and read your posts with that context.

What is the problem about World history? It teachs all other histories besides American.

America didn't exist as a nationstate 250 years ago.

[Mavorpen]

Oh I see. You aren't even in High School yet, huh? Otherwise, you would know that high school students also take World History.

Silly me, I'll just go ahead and read your posts with that context.

What is the problem about World history? It teachs all other histories besides American.

...What? When did I say I have a problem with World History?

[Slavonian kingdom]

So dont complain about him ignoring that Asians are "a wide variety of nationalities" when whites are also

Fairer skin complexion receives less attention from the authorities, however.

Asians come in all shades. Caucasians come in one shade, with a few tanner varieties, such as Armenians or Sicilians.

So, you can see differences between a Chinese and Vietnamese?

There skins are both the same. It is culture what makes them different just like other groups pf whites.

[Slavonian kingdom]

What is the problem about World history? It teachs all other histories besides American.

...What? When did I say I have a problem with World History?

Why did you mention World history than?

In all schools around the world there is world and national history.

[Kelinfort]

Fairer skin complexion receives less attention from the authorities, however.

Asians come in all shades. Caucasians come in one shade, with a few tanner varieties, such as Armenians or Sicilians.

So, you can see differences between a Chinese and Vietnamese?

There skins are both the same. It is culture what makes them different just like other groups pf whites.

You can, however, see the difference between an Indian, who are commonly and mistakenly called "Arabs" and A Chinese individual.

The point is, darker skin tones face more harassment from at large law enforcement than lighter skin tones.

[Mavorpen]

...What? When did I say I have a problem with World History?

Why did you mention World history than?

In all schools around the world there is world and national history.

Because you said "every month is American History month," which is nonsense considering that World History also exists in American schools.

[Slavonian kingdom]

Why did you mention World history than?

In all schools around the world there is world and national history.

Because you said "every month is American History month," which is nonsense considering that World History also exists in American schools.

Yes. Because you said that every month is White history month implying that American history is the same as White history.

[Kelinfort]

Because you said "every month is American History month," which is nonsense considering that World History also exists in American schools.

Yes. Because you said that every month is White history month implying that American history is the same as White history.

Well in terms of mainly Western European Caucasians, it is.

We don't teach much if any African or Native cultural heritage.

Of course, it isn't the history of all white people.

[Mavorpen]

Yes. Because you said that every month is White history month implying that American history is the same as White history.

No, I didn't imply that. Not one bit. I'm arguing the exact opposite. Are you even reading my posts?

[Slavonian kingdom]

So, you can see differences between a Chinese and Vietnamese?

There skins are both the same. It is culture what makes them different just like other groups pf whites.

You can, however, see the difference between an Indian, who are commonly and mistakenly called "Arabs" and A Chinese individual.

The point is, darker skin tones face more harassment from at large law enforcement than lighter skin tones.

But O'Reily by Asians his data specificslly meant thoose people with the typicall East Asian race. He said that thoose are even priveleged than the Whites which disproves that there is White privelege in America.

[Kelinfort]

You can, however, see the difference between an Indian, who are commonly and mistakenly called "Arabs" and A Chinese individual.

The point is, darker skin tones face more harassment from at large law enforcement than lighter skin tones.

But O'Reily by Asians his data specificslly meant thoose people with the typicall East Asian race. He said that thoose are even priveleged than the Whites which disproves that there is White privelege in America.

No, my friend. It does not. Per capita income may be higher, but those with more Americanised names and lighter skin tone have better chances of getting a job or avoiding law enforcement scrutiny, respectively.

[Mavorpen]

You can, however, see the difference between an Indian, who are commonly and mistakenly called "Arabs" and A Chinese individual.

The point is, darker skin tones face more harassment from at large law enforcement than lighter skin tones.

But O'Reily by Asians his data specificslly meant thoose people with the typicall East Asian race. He said that thoose are even priveleged than the Whites which disproves that there is White privelege in America.

No it fucking doesn't. He claimed that Asians on average have higher median earnings. He then made the logical jump that this means they are privileged. This is not true. If you actually compare apples to apples instead of apples to oranges, you understand that Bill's conclusion is just plain fucking wrong. Asians with similar education, background, etc to whites actually make on average LESS. Bill uses data in an incredibly dishonest way. And you fell for it.

[Slavonian kingdom]

Yes. Because you said that every month is White history month implying that American history is the same as White history.

Well in terms of mainly Western European Caucasians, it is.

We don't teach much if any African or Native cultural heritage.

Of course, it isn't the history of all white people.

We would if they had a written history. Also, even if they did they never influenced the US cultural spectrum. Without the English there would not be a US as we know.

[Mavorpen]

We would if they had a written history.

Except, they fucking do. And even if they didn't, things passed down or recorded orally can be just as, or more valid than written records.

Also, even if they did they never influenced the US cultural spectrum. Without the English there would not be a US as we know.

You DO know what slavery is, right?

[Slavonian kingdom]

We would if they had a written history.

Except, they fucking do. And even if they didn't, things passed down or recorded orally can be just as, or more valid than written records.

Also, even if they did they never influenced the US cultural spectrum. Without the English there would not be a US as we know.

You DO know what slavery is, right?

Writing system of Africa has nothing to do with America. We are here debating why many think American history=White history as you clearly demonstrated.

That is the true. Slaves did not influenced anything besides providing cheap labour. If same sailor went from Africa to the Americas to start a colony than you would be right.

[Mavorpen]

Writing system of Africa has nothing to do with America. We are here debating why many think American history=White history as you clearly demonstrated.

Cool, so you admit you were wrong. Got it.

That is the true. Slaves did not influenced anything besides providing cheap labour.

And that cheap labor largely drove the United States economy. And the existence of those slaves spurred the Civil War. And the descendants of those slaves contributed to the American culture significantly with innovations in music and the arts in general.

Thank you for demonstrating WHY people need to be taught this. Because otherwise, they make downright stupid claims like the one you've just made.

[Slavonian kingdom]

No, it is just that I see slavery as a social process that existed for milleniums. You are the one who sees slavery=blacks. Well since race is a social.construct blacks shoukd not be upset about slavery. Since race is a social construct black history month must be abolished.

[Mavorpen]

No, it is just that I see slavery as a social process that existed for milleniums. You are the one who sees slavery=blacks. Well since race is a social.construct blacks shoukd not be upset about slavery. Since race is a social construct black history month must be abolished.

Okay, given that you've just decided to post gibberish instead of actually responding to what I posted, I'll take that as a concession. Wish I could say it was enjoyable discussing this with you, but, not really.

[Kelinfort]

No, it is just that I see slavery as a social process that existed for milleniums. You are the one who sees slavery=blacks. Well since race is a social.construct blacks shoukd not be upset about slavery. Since race is a social construct black history month must be abolished.

Slavery in the United States was decidedly based on race.

[Mavorpen]

No, it is just that I see slavery as a social process that existed for milleniums. You are the one who sees slavery=blacks. Well since race is a social.construct blacks shoukd not be upset about slavery. Since race is a social construct black history month must be abolished.

Slavery in the United States was decidedly based on race.

Again, I can't help but feeling it's just a really bad Poe and that he's trying to play the role of someone really really ignorant of U.S. history.

I can dream, right?

[Kelinfort]

Slavery in the United States was decidedly based on race.

Again, I can't help but felling it's just a really bad Poe and that he's trying to play the role of someone really really ignorant of U.S. history.

I can dream, right?

I wish, but if he is a Poe, he's yet to make me angry yet.

[Slavonian kingdom]

No, it is just that I see slavery as a social process that existed for milleniums. You are the one who sees slavery=blacks. Well since race is a social.construct blacks shoukd not be upset about slavery. Since race is a social construct black history month must be abolished.

Slavery in the United States was decidedly based on race.

Race does not exist. It is a social construct.

[Kelinfort]

Slavery in the United States was decidedly based on race.

Race does not exist. It is a social construct.

Slavery in the US was based on the social construct of race.