JesusOfNazareth wrote:If white privilege were a fact, then the U.S. wouldn't have a black man for its President.
It may surprise you to know this isn't how it works.
This isn't what white privilege is.
Advertisement
by Imperializt Russia » Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:45 am
JesusOfNazareth wrote:If white privilege were a fact, then the U.S. wouldn't have a black man for its President.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Little Flowers » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:12 am
by Mavorpen » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:13 am
Little Flowers wrote:You shouldn't even post in this thread unless you held a job. It is obvious 80% haven't.
I was denied 18 jobs because I was a single white male after i graduated. A few even asked me why I bothered applying since I was a white single male because the job ad said EOO. This was before political correctness or the plethora of lawsuits pertaining to discrimination in the workplace.
Is there discrimination? Yes. Everyone discriminates. Chinese favor Chinese, Jews favor Jews, blacks favor blacks, etc. I've observed it in every country I have been to, every religion and every race I have encountered.
Get over yourselves.
Judge not lest ye be judged.
I love how the least expeienced people feel they can judge everybody.
Once people learn they can vote themselves money democracy will falter. We are well on our way.this is what you are doing.
Try to stop complaining about every little thing you think is unfair and go out and earn your merit.
Life isn't fair. The sooner you get used to it the better off you will be.
by Othelos » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:13 am
Little Flowers wrote:You shouldn't even post in this thread unless you held a job. It is obvious 80% haven't.
I was denied 18 jobs because I was a single white male after i graduated. A few even asked me why I bothered applying since I was a white single male because the job ad said EOO. This was before political correctness or the plethora of lawsuits pertaining to discrimination in the workplace.
Is there discrimination? Yes. Everyone discriminates. Chinese favor Chinese, Jews favor Jews, blacks favor blacks, etc. I've observed it in every country I have been to, every religion and every race I have encountered.
Get over yourselves.
Judge not lest ye be judged.
I love how the least expeienced people feel they can judge everybody.
Once people learn they can vote themselves money democracy will falter. We are well on our way.this is what you are doing.
Try to stop complaining about every little thing you think is unfair and go out and earn your merit.
Life isn't fair. The sooner you get used to it the better off you will be.
by New Chalcedon » Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:54 pm
Little Flowers wrote:I was denied 18 jobs because I was a single white male after i graduated. A few even asked me why I bothered applying since I was a white single male because the job ad said EOO. This was before political correctness or the plethora of lawsuits pertaining to discrimination in the workplace.
Is there discrimination? Yes. Everyone discriminates. Chinese favor Chinese, Jews favor Jews, blacks favor blacks, etc. I've observed it in every country I have been to, every religion and every race I have encountered.
Applicants with white names need to send about 10 resumes to get one callback, whereas applicants with African-American names need to send about 15 resumes to achieve the same result.
In addition, race greatly affects how much applicants benefit from having more experience and credentials. White job applicants with higher-quality resumes received 30 percent more callbacks than whites with lower-quality resumes. Having a higher-quality resume has a much smaller impact on African-American applicants, who experienced only 9 percent more callbacks for the same improvement in their credentials.
by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:57 pm
by Zanubiyala » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:06 pm
by Othelos » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:08 pm
Zanubiyala wrote:"White privilege" is just race baiting, its created to divide the country.
In reality White privallage is just as prevalent as black on white crimes.
its just an excuse to “divide and conquer"
by Kelinfort » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:10 pm
Nationes Pii Redivivi wrote:Bill O'Reilly is a confirmed Paddy douchebag reactionary hypocrite. This is news because...?
by Zanubiyala » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:12 pm
Othelos wrote:Zanubiyala wrote:"White privilege" is just race baiting, its created to divide the country.
In reality White privallage is just as prevalent as black on white crimes.
its just an excuse to “divide and conquer"
explain symbolic racism, then, and why it permeates the rhetoric of many conservatives.
by Getrektistan » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:13 pm
JesusOfNazareth wrote:If white privilege were a fact, then the U.S. wouldn't have a black man for its President.
O'Reilly is dead right in that it's the values of a subculture that more accurately predict that groups success.
The most visible images of modern black culture are hatred of whites (followed by hispanics) and black on black crime.
Mushet wrote:That's just a disingenuous equivalance you can't just point a crucifix at somebody and blast their brains out, that's a big difference.
-Arabiyyah- wrote:I don't even understand the insult you are just calling me a spear with meat and onions?
Alyakia wrote:i think you're giving her too much credit for turning a racist extremist party into a racist extremist party except we sorta hide it now
Dakini wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:
I understand it perfectly. I'm sorry you apparently can't handle reality.
I'm sorry that you can't handle the English language.
by Condunum » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:13 pm
Zanubiyala wrote:Othelos wrote:explain symbolic racism, then, and why it permeates the rhetoric of many conservatives.
Symbolic racism?
Lol again, racism is just a liberal and zionist excuse these days.
Black racists like to call conservatives racist for disliking Obama.
Jewish racists call anyone who opposes Rouge State of Israel racist.
In reality its just division that hurts the unity of the nation.
by Mushet » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:13 pm
Zanubiyala wrote:"White privilege" is just race baiting, its created to divide the country.
In reality White privallage is just as prevalent as black on white crimes.
its just an excuse to “divide and conquer"
by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:14 pm
Zanubiyala wrote:"White privilege" is just race baiting, its created to divide the country.
In reality White privallage is just as prevalent as black on white crimes.
its just an excuse to “divide and conquer"
by Zanubiyala » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:16 pm
by The United Colonies of Earth » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:16 pm
Skappola wrote:Socialist Tera wrote:Here's the video unedited: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeEIZswvRVU
Thank you, there are few sources more biased than a Huffington Post opinion piece.
To get this out of the way: O'reilly doesn't believe in Asian Privelage, obviously. It was just to prove a point.
__________________________________________________________________________________
I really don't believe White Privilege is a big problem today. The problem is less that Whites get more privileges than other ethnic groups, but that a selection of ethnic groups get discriminated against in specific areas. Hispanics will occasionally get glared at near the border and Blacks will occasionally get discriminated against in parts of the South, but Blacks are usually treated equally in SoCal and Hispanics are usually treated normally in the South. However, calling this "White Privilege" suggests that Whites everywhere in the US discriminate against all other races, which isn't true. These days, no one other than the extremely racist believe that Whites are inherently better than all other races/ethnicities and should be given more privileges. The problem is lingering stereotypical views against specific ethnicities in specific areas. In that sense, I think O'reilly is right.
by Zanubiyala » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:16 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Zanubiyala wrote:"White privilege" is just race baiting, its created to divide the country.
In reality White privallage is just as prevalent as black on white crimes.
its just an excuse to “divide and conquer"
Then explain the resume studies linked to in this thread, the tendency of police to stop young black men more often than young white men despite there being no increased chance of finding anything incriminating on them, the tendency of young black men to be charged with marijuana related offenses when young white men smoke it at the same rate, the tendency of black people to be in the first wave of layoffs during economic downturns, the lack of access in school to advanced placement and college prep courses, and the constant negative stereotypes of black people in the media?
by Imperializt Russia » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:17 pm
Zanubiyala wrote:Othelos wrote:explain symbolic racism, then, and why it permeates the rhetoric of many conservatives.
Symbolic racism?
Lol again, racism is just a liberal and zionist excuse these days.
Black racists like to call conservatives racist for disliking Obama.
Jewish racists call anyone who opposes Rouge State of Israel racist.
In reality its just division that hurts the unity of the nation.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Alcase » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:17 pm
Zanubiyala wrote:Morgan Freeman said the cure to racism, is to stop talking about it.
I believe if we stop talking about racism, and maybe crackdown on racist groups be it La Raza and Mecha, the ADL/JDL/Banai Brith, the New Black Panthers, Nation of Islam, and the KKK and neo-nazis.
Then you will not need to worry about racism.
by Zanubiyala » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:18 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Zanubiyala wrote:
Symbolic racism?
Lol again, racism is just a liberal and zionist excuse these days.
Black racists like to call conservatives racist for disliking Obama.
Jewish racists call anyone who opposes Rouge State of Israel racist.
In reality its just division that hurts the unity of the nation.
Pretty much the only reason conservatives dislike Obama, besides not being a conservative (despite being a centre-right politician - neither a communist nor socialist), is for being an uppity black. Which is, fundamentally, racist. The birther movement was an explicitly racist movement, as it was based on the premise that a black man being born in the US was absurd.
by Imperializt Russia » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:19 pm
Zanubiyala wrote:Morgan Freeman said the cure to racism, is to stop talking about it.
I believe if we stop talking about racism, and maybe crackdown on racist groups be it La Raza and Mecha, the ADL/JDL/Banai Brith, the New Black Panthers, Nation of Islam, and the KKK and neo-nazis.
Then you will not need to worry about racism.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Zanubiyala » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:19 pm
Alcase wrote:Zanubiyala wrote:Morgan Freeman said the cure to racism, is to stop talking about it.
I believe if we stop talking about racism, and maybe crackdown on racist groups be it La Raza and Mecha, the ADL/JDL/Banai Brith, the New Black Panthers, Nation of Islam, and the KKK and neo-nazis.
Then you will not need to worry about racism.
He's horribly wrong, and so are you.
Speaking about racism, which may in turn bring public awareness of it, is one of the most effective methods at lessening the amount of racism in the world. It can never be eradicated, but can certainly be suppressed.
by Zanubiyala » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:20 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Zanubiyala wrote:Morgan Freeman said the cure to racism, is to stop talking about it.
I believe if we stop talking about racism, and maybe crackdown on racist groups be it La Raza and Mecha, the ADL/JDL/Banai Brith, the New Black Panthers, Nation of Islam, and the KKK and neo-nazis.
Then you will not need to worry about racism.
I believe what Morgan Freeman actually meant was to stop talking about race.
Basically calling racists stupid for believing race matters.
by Skappola » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:21 pm
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Skappola wrote:Thank you, there are few sources more biased than a Huffington Post opinion piece.
To get this out of the way: O'reilly doesn't believe in Asian Privelage, obviously. It was just to prove a point.
__________________________________________________________________________________
I really don't believe White Privilege is a big problem today. The problem is less that Whites get more privileges than other ethnic groups, but that a selection of ethnic groups get discriminated against in specific areas. Hispanics will occasionally get glared at near the border and Blacks will occasionally get discriminated against in parts of the South, but Blacks are usually treated equally in SoCal and Hispanics are usually treated normally in the South. However, calling this "White Privilege" suggests that Whites everywhere in the US discriminate against all other races, which isn't true. These days, no one other than the extremely racist believe that Whites are inherently better than all other races/ethnicities and should be given more privileges. The problem is lingering stereotypical views against specific ethnicities in specific areas. In that sense, I think O'reilly is right.
You and Bill obviously don't understand white privilege. Sometimes I forget I'm black and I think I have it, then I feel ashamed...
by Kelinfort » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:21 pm
Zanubiyala wrote:Alcase wrote:He's horribly wrong, and so are you.
Speaking about racism, which may in turn bring public awareness of it, is one of the most effective methods at lessening the amount of racism in the world. It can never be eradicated, but can certainly be suppressed.
The more you speak about racism, the more racism you will get.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Ifreann, Kerwa, Minoa, Port Carverton, San Lumen, The Archregimancy, The Jamesian Republic, WorthleticsElite
Advertisement