The Republican party is 89% white.
Advertisement

by Othelos » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:03 am

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:06 am

by Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:09 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Geilinor » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:10 am

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:11 am

by Othelos » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:12 am

by Ashmoria » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:13 am
Geilinor wrote:Othelos wrote:That's not the problem. The problem is that the GOP itself favors whites. A token person from a minority doesn't change party policy; in fact, it's kind of insulting, because it shows that Republicans think they'll attract minorities just by having someone of a minority run, as if political issues don't matter to them.
The problem is also that Paul opposes Title II of the Civil Rights Act.

by Othelos » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:15 am

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:23 am

by The Black Forrest » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:33 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Winning the female vote is the only reason we know who Sarah Palin is. The McCain people somehow thought that Hillary's supporters would abandon Obama is they put a woman on the ticket with McCain.
I thought it was because Johnny Mac was attracted to Palin and imagined late night sessions at the Oval Office with her. He has a history of cheating and it seemed more logical than any other reason I could think of. For a man of his age, Palin is very attractive. Your idea is the safer one to make public though.
Perhaps Rand Paul could place a minority on the ticket as a way to show republicans are not just for whites. Dr. Walter Williams (respected African-American economist) would be a possible choice if he wanted to accept it. This could help him get the minority vote. I can't think of any good female choices though.

by Freiheit Reich » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:35 am
Kelinfort wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:
You don't think some women voted for JFK over Nixon in 1960 based on his youthful looks? Looks matter quite a bit. Ron Paul's looks are one reason his vote count was so small in past primaries (it certainly aren't his policies which were much better than policies of all the other candidates).
Of course some guys voted for McCain cause of the hawt Sarah Palin, amirite?

by The Black Forrest » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:36 am

by Freiheit Reich » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:37 am
Geilinor wrote:Othelos wrote:That's not the problem. The problem is that the GOP itself favors whites. A token person from a minority doesn't change party policy; in fact, it's kind of insulting, because it shows that Republicans think they'll attract minorities just by having someone of a minority run, as if political issues don't matter to them.
The problem is also that Paul opposes Title II of the Civil Rights Act.

by Conigsberg » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:38 am

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:38 am

by The Black Forrest » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:40 am

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:42 am

by The Black Forrest » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:51 am

by Death Metal » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:57 am

by Lerodan Chinamerica » Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:16 pm
Santa Susanna wrote:No. I hope that Hillary wins.
Because all the republican presidents are far to warlike.
Give me a moderate Democratic president.
Bush was a very bad president,
thanks to him, ISIS exists,
if Bush didn't kill Sadam Hussain, then ISIS wasn't so powerfull as now.
And Iraq would be modern, and not so instable as it now is.
The only problem that I have with Obama: He had to clean up the mess Bush, he couldn't make his promises because of Bush.
Long live the Democrats.


by Atlanticatia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:17 pm
Geilinor wrote:Arkolon wrote:Back story, please?
Rand Paul has plagiarized parts of his speeches from Wikipedia. http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2013/nov/01/rachel-maddow/rachel-maddow-says-rand-pauls-gattaca-speech-was-t/
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/05/us/politics/senator-rand-paul-faces-new-charges-of-plagiarism.html?_r=0

by Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:19 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Lerodan Chinamerica » Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:19 pm
Kelinfort wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:
Is this a good reason to win or did it simply cheapen the award? I will find it hard to respect the award now. He is basically another Bush anyways (just as Hillary will be). He took his sweet time leaving Iraq and he still has kept us in Afghanistan and he opposes civil liberties (look at his comments about the great patriot Snowden). They need to apologize for giving him the award.
Everyone on Fox is pissed he left Iraq "too early."

by Death Metal » Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:21 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Des-Bal, Doichtland, Elthize, Fahran, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Nantoraka, Ostroeuropa, Port Caverton, Smudges Followers, Stenise Tum
Advertisement