Advertisement

by Santa Susanna » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:30 am

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:31 am

by Geilinor » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:31 am
Santa Susanna wrote:No. I hope that Hillary wins.
Because all the republican presidents are far to warlike.
Give me a moderate Democratic president.
Bush was a very bad president,
thanks to him, ISIS exists,
if Bush didn't kill Sadam Hussain, then ISIS wasn't so powerfull as now.
The only problem that I have with Obama: He had to clean up the mess Bush, he couldn't make his promises because of Bush.
Long live the Democrats.

by Geilinor » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:32 am

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:32 am

by Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:33 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:33 am
Geilinor wrote:Santa Susanna wrote:No. I hope that Hillary wins.
Because all the republican presidents are far to warlike.
Give me a moderate Democratic president.
Bush was a very bad president,
thanks to him, ISIS exists,
if Bush didn't kill Sadam Hussain, then ISIS wasn't so powerfull as now.
The only problem that I have with Obama: He had to clean up the mess Bush, he couldn't make his promises because of Bush.
Long live the Democrats.
If Bush didn't kill Saddam Hussein, then there would be a Shia version of ISIS right now.

by Santa Susanna » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:33 am
Geilinor wrote:Santa Susanna wrote:No. I hope that Hillary wins.
Because all the republican presidents are far to warlike.
Give me a moderate Democratic president.
Bush was a very bad president,
thanks to him, ISIS exists,
if Bush didn't kill Sadam Hussain, then ISIS wasn't so powerfull as now.
The only problem that I have with Obama: He had to clean up the mess Bush, he couldn't make his promises because of Bush.
Long live the Democrats.
If Bush didn't kill Saddam Hussein, then there would be a Shia version of ISIS right now.

by Kelinfort » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:34 am

by Freiheit Reich » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:34 am

by Geilinor » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:35 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Calisu wrote:So just blame the black guy for the mistakes bush made?
Yes, if the Mulatto (not pure black) candidate renewed these policies and didn't make efforts to change things after 6 years. Obama deserves blame for Afghanistan and the Patriot Act because he didn't try to overturn them (and even renewed the Patriot Act). He also criticized Bush for raising the national debt and then asked for it to be raised again (proving he is a hypocrite).

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:37 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:[He also criticized Bush for raising the national debt and then asked for it to be raised again (proving he is a hypocrite).


by Norstal » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:39 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Santa Susanna » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:39 am


by Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:40 am
Farnhamia wrote:Murkwood wrote:All those who died under Saddam beg to differ.
Perhaps but we were told that Saddam was a direct menace to the United States. He wasn't. No one disputes that he was a tyrant and a murderer. He was thoroughly under the thumb of the US and the coalition that beat him in 1992. He was playing the only game he had, jerking around the UN nuclear inspectors. There was no reason to invade Iraq. Saddam hated al-Qaeda and the jihadists as much as we do because he was only religious when it suited him and they knew it. There was no way Bin Laden and Saddam were going to be buddies or work together.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:40 am
Geilinor wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:
Yes, if the Mulatto (not pure black) candidate renewed these policies and didn't make efforts to change things after 6 years. Obama deserves blame for Afghanistan and the Patriot Act because he didn't try to overturn them (and even renewed the Patriot Act). He also criticized Bush for raising the national debt and then asked for it to be raised again (proving he is a hypocrite).
He criticized Bush for raising the debt ceiling because he never wanted the Iraq War.

by Freiheit Reich » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:40 am

by Norstal » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:41 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Murkwood wrote:Actually, I'm glad he hasn't followed through on that.
Why? It is costing taxpayers a fortune. We should give them a quick military trial in Afghanistan and punish them there (if they are guilty). Bullet to the head or hanging or amputation, these are much cheaper methods than detention in Guantanamo. I doubt the Taliban would be nice to American soldiers they catch during battle. At least we will be quick about it and we will even give them a trial (something I doubt the Taliban would do).
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:42 am
Calisu wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Raising the debt ceiling was automatic before 2009. The problem with Bush's "management" of his wars is that he basically charged both of them, borrowing every penny.
As a mod you should get this thread back on topic. It's about Rand Paul and Hilary Clinton not bush or obama.
You're a mod set a better example.

by Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:42 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Murkwood wrote:Actually, I'm glad he hasn't followed through on that.
Why? It is costing taxpayers a fortune. We should give them a quick military trial in Afghanistan and punish them there (if they are guilty). Bullet to the head or hanging or amputation, these are much cheaper methods than detention in Guantanamo. I doubt the Taliban would be nice to American soldiers they catch during battle. At least we will be quick about it and we will even give them a trial (something I doubt the Taliban would do).
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:43 am
Calisu wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Raising the debt ceiling was automatic before 2009. The problem with Bush's "management" of his wars is that he basically charged both of them, borrowing every penny.
As a mod you should get this thread back on topic. It's about Rand Paul and Hilary Clinton not bush or obama.
You're a mod set a better example.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Freiheit Reich » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:43 am
Calisu wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Well, he's making people buy health insurance, for one. That's pretty bad. He hasn't bombed people who need to be bombed and he's bombed other people without asking permission. He bowed to the Saudi king. He wants to take away everyone's guns. He plays golf. He doesn't drink enough beer. He should have slashed taxes so the Job Creators could create jobs and he didn't. He gave lots of money to that Solyndra outfit and they wasted it. He said he would close the Guantanamo detention center and he didn't. Should I go on?
Not to mention he's black.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Concejos Unidos, Gun Manufacturers, Neu California
Advertisement