NATION

PASSWORD

Can Rand Paul beat Hillary?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Calisu
Diplomat
 
Posts: 948
Founded: Aug 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Calisu » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:13 am

Geilinor wrote:
Calisu wrote:If he was white would as many people hate him so much?

They wouldn't have as much fodder to throw at him, for one. No "he's a Muslim!" or "he must be born in Kenya!"

No more birthers

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:13 am

Murkwood wrote:
Calisu wrote:If he was white would as many people hate him so much?

Yes... they would.

Of course, Rush would play "Barack the magic cracker" not to mention, plenty of people would call him a monkey all the time. Or mock his middle name. Or call him not an American. Or a Kenyan Anti-Colonialist. Or call him a Muslim.
Last edited by Kelinfort on Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:13 am

Geilinor wrote:
Calisu wrote:If he was white would as many people hate him so much?

They wouldn't have as much fodder to throw at him, for one. No "he's a Muslim!" or "he must be born in Kenya!"

That was a very small minority. Like, really small. It's like the Bush did 9/11 crowd, only that one is bigger.
Last edited by Murkwood on Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:14 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Murkwood wrote:Because I like seeing brown people tortured, right?

While that might be true, I was referring to the fact that you think "enhanced interrogation techniques" have value.

You can end torture while keeping Guantanamo intact.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159035
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:14 am

Murkwood wrote:
Calisu wrote:If he was white would as many people hate him so much?

Yes... they would.

Well that's just ridiculous. Whatever you may think about Obama, you can't deny that there are people who just hate black people, and thus hate Obama more than they would hate a white president who did the exact same things.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:15 am

Ifreann wrote:
Murkwood wrote:Yes... they would.

Well that's just ridiculous. Whatever you may think about Obama, you can't deny that there are people who just hate black people, and thus hate Obama more than they would hate a white president who did the exact same things.

But there are more people who love Obama and defend him precisely because he is black!
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:15 am

Murkwood wrote:
Geilinor wrote:They wouldn't have as much fodder to throw at him, for one. No "he's a Muslim!" or "he must be born in Kenya!"

That was a very small minority. Like, really small. It's like the Bush did 9/11 crowd, only that one is bigger.

Not nearly as small as you'd like to think (nor as small as it should be).
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:17 am

Murkwood wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Well that's just ridiculous. Whatever you may think about Obama, you can't deny that there are people who just hate black people, and thus hate Obama more than they would hate a white president who did the exact same things.

But there are more people who love Obama and defend him precisely because he is black!

Only as a reaction to those who hate him because he's black.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:17 am

Norstal wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:While that might be true, I was referring to the fact that you think "enhanced interrogation techniques" have value.

You can end torture while keeping Guantanamo intact.

True, but having a detention center overseas serves no purpose.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159035
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:19 am

Murkwood wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Well that's just ridiculous. Whatever you may think about Obama, you can't deny that there are people who just hate black people, and thus hate Obama more than they would hate a white president who did the exact same things.

But there are more people who love Obama and defend him precisely because he is black!

And you think all those people would hate a white president who was otherwise identical to Obama?

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:20 am

Ifreann wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
She will also get a Noble Prize just for that accomplishment. Tell me again why Obama won a Noble Prize?

They're Nobel Prizes, for one. And Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for not being Bush, basically.


Is this a good reason to win or did it simply cheapen the award? I will find it hard to respect the award now. He is basically another Bush anyways (just as Hillary will be). He took his sweet time leaving Iraq and he still has kept us in Afghanistan and he opposes civil liberties (look at his comments about the great patriot Snowden). They need to apologize for giving him the award.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:20 am

Ifreann wrote:
Murkwood wrote:But there are more people who love Obama and defend him precisely because he is black!

And you think all those people would hate a white president who was otherwise identical to Obama?

Maybe not hate, but they wouldn't like him as much.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:21 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Ifreann wrote:They're Nobel Prizes, for one. And Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for not being Bush, basically.


Is this a good reason to win or did it simply cheapen the award? I will find it hard to respect the award now. He is basically another Bush anyways (just as Hillary will be). He took his sweet time leaving Iraq and he still has kept us in Afghanistan and he opposes civil liberties (look at his comments about the great patriot Snowden). They need to apologize for giving him the award.

> great patriot
> Edward Snowden
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:21 am

Murkwood wrote:
Ifreann wrote:And you think all those people would hate a white president who was otherwise identical to Obama?

Maybe not hate, but they wouldn't like him as much.

Something tells me they wouldn't say something like this.

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:22 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Ifreann wrote:They're Nobel Prizes, for one. And Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for not being Bush, basically.


Is this a good reason to win or did it simply cheapen the award? I will find it hard to respect the award now. He is basically another Bush anyways (just as Hillary will be). He took his sweet time leaving Iraq and he still has kept us in Afghanistan and he opposes civil liberties (look at his comments about the great patriot Snowden). They need to apologize for giving him the award.

Everyone on Fox is pissed he left Iraq "too early."

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:23 am

Kelinfort wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
Is this a good reason to win or did it simply cheapen the award? I will find it hard to respect the award now. He is basically another Bush anyways (just as Hillary will be). He took his sweet time leaving Iraq and he still has kept us in Afghanistan and he opposes civil liberties (look at his comments about the great patriot Snowden). They need to apologize for giving him the award.

Everyone on Fox is pissed he left Iraq "too early."

And he did.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159035
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:24 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Ifreann wrote:They're Nobel Prizes, for one. And Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for not being Bush, basically.


Is this a good reason to win or did it simply cheapen the award? I will find it hard to respect the award now.

Somehow I can't imagine you respected it very much before Obama won it.
He is basically another Bush anyways (just as Hillary will be). He took his sweet time leaving Iraq and he still has kept us in Afghanistan and he opposes civil liberties (look at his comments about the great patriot Snowden). They need to apologize for giving him the award.

No, they don't.


Murkwood wrote:
Ifreann wrote:And you think all those people would hate a white president who was otherwise identical to Obama?

Maybe not hate, but they wouldn't like him as much.

So if he was white, fewer people would hate him.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:24 am

Murkwood wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
She will also get a Noble Prize just for that accomplishment. Tell me again why Obama won a Noble Prize?

The mainstream media will also be forbidden from criticizing Hillary for fear of being labeled anti-woman. They will also blame all of Hillary's problems on the poor legacy Bush left her because Obama never made any bad decisions, he just had to deal with bad problems Bush left him.

I'm tired of all this Bush blaming. Putting aside the fact that I liked him, blaming Bush is such a cop-out.


I hate Bush but I agree with you. Blaming Bush in the first year made sense but his bad policies could have been overturned (or at least efforts could have been made to overturn them).

I bet that Hillary will follow many of Bush's policies (while criticizing republicans) while adding even more regulations and perhaps getting us involved in another 'peacekeeping mission.' What is funny is that many Bush bashers will vote for Hillary over Rand Paul thinking that Hillary is the pro-freedom candidate.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:25 am

Murkwood wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Everyone on Fox is pissed he left Iraq "too early."

And he did.

To be honest, I don't give a shit about Iraq anymore. Though, it is fun to bomb ISIS with the drones. Yeah...

But besides that, useless waste of time and money, along with life.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:26 am

Murkwood wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Well that's just ridiculous. Whatever you may think about Obama, you can't deny that there are people who just hate black people, and thus hate Obama more than they would hate a white president who did the exact same things.

But there are more people who love Obama and defend him precisely because he is black!

Who's defending him for being black? Do people who like Reagan defend him for being white?
Oh, wait...
Not serious, just a sarcastic joke.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:27 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Murkwood wrote:I'm tired of all this Bush blaming. Putting aside the fact that I liked him, blaming Bush is such a cop-out.


I hate Bush but I agree with you. Blaming Bush in the first year made sense but his bad policies could have been overturned (or at least efforts could have been made to overturn them).

I bet that Hillary will follow many of Bush's policies (while criticizing republicans) while adding even more regulations and perhaps getting us involved in another 'peacekeeping mission.' What is funny is that many Bush bashers will vote for Hillary over Rand Paul thinking that Hillary is the pro-freedom candidate.

Pro-freedom? Unless we are talking Bernie Sanders and Economic freedom, most politicians are pro-freedom.
Last edited by Murkwood on Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:27 am

Kelinfort wrote:
Murkwood wrote:And he did.

To be honest, I don't give a shit about Iraq anymore. Though, it is fun to bomb ISIS with the drones. Yeah...

But besides that, useless waste of time and money, along with life.

All those who died under Saddam beg to differ.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:28 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:What is funny is that many Bush bashers will vote for Hillary over Rand Paul thinking that Hillary is the pro-freedom candidate.

If Rand Paul is even an option in 2016. He probably won't get the nomination.
Last edited by Geilinor on Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:29 am

Murkwood wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:To be honest, I don't give a shit about Iraq anymore. Though, it is fun to bomb ISIS with the drones. Yeah...

But besides that, useless waste of time and money, along with life.

All those who died under Saddam beg to differ.

All those who died during the invasion, occupation, insurgency, and ISIL occupation beg to differ, as well.

You end up with the same number dead, with a few Americans sprinkled in. Waste of our time.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:29 am

Murkwood wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:To be honest, I don't give a shit about Iraq anymore. Though, it is fun to bomb ISIS with the drones. Yeah...

But besides that, useless waste of time and money, along with life.

All those who died under Saddam beg to differ.

He said, "anymore". Which implies he once gave a shit but no longer does.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Concejos Unidos, Gun Manufacturers, Neu California

Advertisement

Remove ads