NATION

PASSWORD

On the genetic engineering of babies, and IVF

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What is your opinion on the genetic engineering of children?

I fully support this technology, risks be damned.
10
15%
It should be used once it's proven safe and effective.
31
46%
I'm not sure.
7
10%
Some things are better left to Mother Nature.
9
13%
I am vehemently against this technology.
10
15%
 
Total votes : 67

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:02 pm

WestRedMaple wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:I've explained before that I don't apply this logic to most things.



So, you're saying it isn't so much that you are operating on a principle of people shouldn't have anything unless everyone can afford it as you are operating on a principle of what people should be permitted to have should be based on your whim

read the sig.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
WestRedMaple
Minister
 
Posts: 3068
Founded: Aug 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WestRedMaple » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:03 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
WestRedMaple wrote:

Genetic engineering doesn't purchase you life. You ALREADY have life.

suppose your child has a preventable genetic disease which will kill them within 6 months. Curing it costs more than you could possibly pay. That's where life could be bought.



No, it isn't. They already have life. Life is not something you can purchase. Medical care is not the same thing as life.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11114
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:03 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
WestRedMaple wrote:

Genetic engineering doesn't purchase you life. You ALREADY have life.

suppose your child has a preventable genetic disease which will kill them within 6 months. Curing it costs more than you could possibly pay. That's where life could be bought.


If it was preventable why would the child get it, it was preventable. Maybe an incurable genetic disease is what you meant?

User avatar
WestRedMaple
Minister
 
Posts: 3068
Founded: Aug 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WestRedMaple » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:03 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
WestRedMaple wrote:

So, you're saying it isn't so much that you are operating on a principle of people shouldn't have anything unless everyone can afford it as you are operating on a principle of what people should be permitted to have should be based on your whim

read the sig.



You're free to continue avoiding the question, and I am free to continue asking it.

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:04 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:suppose your child has a preventable genetic disease which will kill them within 6 months. Curing it costs more than you could possibly pay. That's where life could be bought.


If it was preventable why would the child get it, it was preventable. Maybe an incurable genetic disease is what you meant?

no, because then it wouldn't be curable and the analogy breaks down.
I guess "curable" is the word I meant.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:04 pm

WestRedMaple wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:read the sig.



You're free to continue avoiding the question, and I am free to continue asking it.

indeed.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
Great Kleomentia
Minister
 
Posts: 3499
Founded: Aug 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Kleomentia » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:04 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
Great Kleomentia wrote:Don't attempt to twist the definition of logic with pseudo-philosophy.

how on blurf do you think logic is defined? "the mindset with swhich to approach all problems"? If everyone approached every problem in the exact same way every time, we'd be in a sorry mess.

Your strawman seems to be catching fire. You can't apply a rule in only one specter of a field. What you are stating is the equivalent of saying that humans die after being decapitated but only when you think that's ok.
hue

User avatar
Esternial
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54394
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:05 pm

I reckon tampering with genes that have a significant effect on a child's mental development may raises valid questions regarding ethics.

Though a degree of 'designer' genetic engineering, mostly applying to physical properties, is not impossible.

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:05 pm

Pandeeria wrote:Genetic Engineering of Babies is ok if it's safe and reasonable. For instance if your baby is going to be born with a mental or physical disability, it would be perfectly fine to have that fixed. However changing trivial things such as hair color and such I'm not sure about.


Yeah, I don't think we should be messing with our genetics too much. Sounds ridiculous, but I just think this wouldn't end well and we should leave genetics up to evolution. Using it to get rid of mental or physical disabilities sounds fine though. Makes things easier for everyone.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:05 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
WestRedMaple wrote:

So, you're saying it isn't so much that you are operating on a principle of people shouldn't have anything unless everyone can afford it as you are operating on a principle of what people should be permitted to have should be based on your whim

read the sig.


No one should then take you seriously.

Also, why do you hold that belief?
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Great Kleomentia
Minister
 
Posts: 3499
Founded: Aug 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Kleomentia » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:06 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:read the sig.


No one should then take you seriously.

Also, why do you hold that belief?

Because he can.
hue

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:07 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:read the sig.


No one should then take you seriously.

Also, why do you hold that belief?

If nobody takes me seriously then they're missing out on a lot.
I hold that belief because everyone secretly does.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
Gaiserin
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1026
Founded: Jun 22, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaiserin » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:07 pm

Esternial wrote:Though a degree of 'designer' genetic engineering, mostly applying to physical properties, is not impossible.

So no cat girls then?
Bollocks.
■■▀■▀■▀■▀▀▀■■■

User avatar
Great Kleomentia
Minister
 
Posts: 3499
Founded: Aug 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Kleomentia » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:08 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
No one should then take you seriously.

Also, why do you hold that belief?

If nobody takes me seriously then they're missing out on a lot.
I hold that belief because everyone secretly does.

:roll:
hue

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:08 pm

Great Kleomentia wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:If nobody takes me seriously then they're missing out on a lot.
I hold that belief because everyone secretly does.

:roll:

O rly? when's the last time you questioned your fundamental beliefs of right and wrong?
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:09 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
No one should then take you seriously.

Also, why do you hold that belief?

If nobody takes me seriously then they're missing out on a lot.
I hold that belief because everyone secretly does.


No, not everyone hold that belief. You should at least prove that everyone has said belief.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Great Kleomentia
Minister
 
Posts: 3499
Founded: Aug 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Kleomentia » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:10 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
Great Kleomentia wrote: :roll:

O rly? when's the last time you questioned your fundamental beliefs of right and wrong?

I do that pretty much every single day. You on the other hand seem to be stuck in your mud-pool of hypocrisy and ignorance.
hue

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:11 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:If nobody takes me seriously then they're missing out on a lot.
I hold that belief because everyone secretly does.


No, not everyone hold that belief. You should at least prove that everyone has said belief.

Improvable. Just a speculation, and it aligns with most behaviour I've witnessed.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:12 pm

Great Kleomentia wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:O rly? when's the last time you questioned your fundamental beliefs of right and wrong?

I do that pretty much every single day. You on the other hand seem to be stuck in your mud-pool of hypocrisy and ignorance.

Wow, you're a rare exception among people. You ought to be a professional philosopher.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:14 pm

Gaiserin wrote:
Esternial wrote:Though a degree of 'designer' genetic engineering, mostly applying to physical properties, is not impossible.

So no cat girls then?
Bollocks.


Way to go crushing my dreams.

User avatar
WestRedMaple
Minister
 
Posts: 3068
Founded: Aug 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WestRedMaple » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:15 pm

Great Kleomentia wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
No one should then take you seriously.

Also, why do you hold that belief?

Because he can.



Not really. If your ability to do something was the reason for doing it, then you'd get locked in a loop once you started considering two mutually exclusive options and never break free.

Because I/she/he/they/we can do it is just an attempt to avoid answering

User avatar
Great Kleomentia
Minister
 
Posts: 3499
Founded: Aug 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Kleomentia » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:15 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
Great Kleomentia wrote:I do that pretty much every single day. You on the other hand seem to be stuck in your mud-pool of hypocrisy and ignorance.

Wow, you're a rare exception among people. You ought to be a professional philosopher.

Philosophy shouldn't be made into a job. Philosophy is something that everyone should inspect out of interest. But we digress.
hue

User avatar
Gaiserin
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1026
Founded: Jun 22, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaiserin » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:15 pm

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Gaiserin wrote:So no cat girls then?
Bollocks.


Way to go crushing my dreams.

There's still hope..Cosmetic surgery, maybe?

/Puts cat ears on you.
( •̀ω•́ )
Last edited by Gaiserin on Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
■■▀■▀■▀■▀▀▀■■■

User avatar
Great Kleomentia
Minister
 
Posts: 3499
Founded: Aug 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Kleomentia » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:16 pm

WestRedMaple wrote:
Great Kleomentia wrote:Because he can.



Not really. If your ability to do something was the reason for doing it, then you'd get locked in a loop once you started considering two mutually exclusive options and never break free.

Because I/she/he/they/we can do it is just an attempt to avoid answering

That's exactly what's happening here.
hue

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:16 pm

Great Kleomentia wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:Wow, you're a rare exception among people. You ought to be a professional philosopher.

Philosophy shouldn't be made into a job. Philosophy is something that everyone should inspect out of interest. But we digress.

True.
I've put my 3 cents in, I'm out.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cretie, Elejamie, Foxyshire, Kreigsreich of Iron, La Cocina del Bodhi, Lunayria, Lycom, Tarsonis, The Black Forrest, The New York Nation, Tungstan, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads