NATION

PASSWORD

Public Opinion on Transgender Persons

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

How do you feel about transgender persons?

I have no problem with it.
339
54%
It's a little odd but it's none of my business.
173
27%
It makes me uncomfortable.
34
5%
I think it's wrong and/or unnatural.
86
14%
 
Total votes : 632

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159048
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:09 pm

The Genoese Cromanatum wrote:I believe that you are born male if you have a penis, and vice versa

And your belief is wrong.


Murkwood wrote:
Linux and the X wrote:(Image)


I call dibs!


You have 'em; the point is to get rid of 'em. :P

That .png has seriously made me reconsider my views on this important matter.

Said no one ever.

That you have a response to that png, but not any of the arguments put to you? Rather telling, though, not terribly surprising.
Last edited by Ifreann on Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:11 pm

Ifreann wrote:
The Genoese Cromanatum wrote:I believe that you are born male if you have a penis, and vice versa

And your belief is wrong.


Murkwood wrote:That .png has seriously made me reconsider my views on this important matter.

Said no one ever.

That you have a response to, but not any of the arguments put to you? Rather telling, though, not terribly surprising.

I'm on my phone, and I'm half-asleep. Excuse me for not meeting your expectations. I'll try and get to them tomorrow.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159048
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:12 pm

Murkwood wrote:
Ifreann wrote:And your belief is wrong.



That you have a response to, but not any of the arguments put to you? Rather telling, though, not terribly surprising.

I'm on my phone, and I'm half-asleep. Excuse me for not meeting your expectations. I'll try and get to them tomorrow.

If you say so.

User avatar
Neema
Senator
 
Posts: 3548
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Neema » Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:12 pm

I am in full support of transpeople, I've several friends who are.
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Anarchism, Socialism or Communism post this capitalist.

http://riserevolt.wordpress.com/

E#;B

User avatar
Zercera
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 57
Founded: Dec 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Zercera » Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:23 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Zercera wrote:Honestly, for a long time I had a huge problem with transgender people. I just couldn't understand how it worked. I believed that a person was whatever sex/gender they were assigned at birth. But then, for the first time in my life, I actually met a Transgender person. And I realized that this person was actually just as nice and interesting and real as any other person, regardless of gender identity. But the most important thing I realized that I don't have to necessarily understand something to be okay with it or the people who practice it. I mean, I'll probably never understand the little details about what makes a person transgender, and that's okay, because I recognize that it's really something very hard to understand for people who have not personally been through it, but that shouldn't stop anyone from treating Trans people with the respect they deserve as a fellow human being. In the end, their gender identity doesn't hurt anyone or make them a worse person, so I see no reason to persecute them for it.

(Although one thing I feel should be changed is the general grouping of sexual identity issues with gender identity issues. I feel like, while I can understand some similarities between them, they are culturally and psychologically very different issues, and deserve to be treated as such.)


Let me ask you this, If tomorrow you woke up in a body that was the opposite sex your sex today, would you feel that your body is wrong? Would you try and change your body back to how it was?


Would I feel that it was wrong? Not necessarily wrong, but weird, and not really what I'm used to. Though I would try to change it back to how it was, it would just be more what I'm used to.

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:33 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Kiruri wrote:I'm already impressed with what science has managed up to that point. I think the experiment was concluded in 2009. Anyway, we're still some long ways away from doing the same to female rabbits, but at least stuff's moving along.

Well, considering they used autologous cells - the male rabbit's own cells, and basically gave them the framework to grow into, with all the recent-ish similar feats (I think there was a group who managed to regrow a pig's heart, one that beat and kept to the rhythm), managing to recreate a male organ out of male cells is a bit "meh". Even the whole preamble just talked about regrowing/restoring men's penis tissues. Probably male researchers, I didn't check.

But to manage the same with female cells? Now that'd be something, since the cells lack the "instructions" to grow penile tissue. (I know, not that simple, hence the quotation marks.)

There's only one gene that determines sex, and it's one of the few remaining coding genes on the Y chromosome. I think it's safe to say that when it comes to the finer points of male anatomy, the instructions are there whether the cell is male or female. They simply must be activated based on the right hormonal environment, under the right conditions.

Sex expression is mostly determined hormonally, which is why men with androgen insensitivity will appear female morphologically. In the cases of total androgen insensitivity, they will be externally indistinguishable from a normal woman, and the only morphological difference will be the absence of a uterus, and testes in roughly the same place as woman's ovaries would be.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Papal Republics
Attaché
 
Posts: 98
Founded: Aug 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Papal Republics » Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:38 pm

I believe in the love and acceptance of all human beings.
God Bless the U.S.A.
Freedom is first, always.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:50 pm

Papal Republics wrote:I believe in the love and acceptance of all human beings.

Hitler. :p
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15869
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Aug 28, 2014 1:33 am

The Genoese Cromanatum wrote:I believe that you are born male if you have a penis, and vice versa, however what mental decisions you choose to make are your own.

Oh, yeay! I totally decided to feel so uncomfortable in my own body that I'm willing to brave ridicule and possibly horrible side-effects of any possible future treatments to do as I chose!

...when did you choose to be your gender (which I assume is male, from the insensitivity of the comment - see? I can stereotype too), if I may ask?
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Logic and Reason
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Aug 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Logic and Reason » Thu Aug 28, 2014 1:53 am

Araraukar wrote:
The Genoese Cromanatum wrote:I believe that you are born male if you have a penis, and vice versa, however what mental decisions you choose to make are your own.

Oh, yeay! I totally decided to feel so uncomfortable in my own body that I'm willing to brave ridicule and possibly horrible side-effects of any possible future treatments to do as I chose!

...when did you choose to be your gender (which I assume is male, from the insensitivity of the comment - see? I can stereotype too), if I may ask?


To ask that question is to ask "When did you choose to be a human?".

If one is going to say he is born to be one way, than that, in turn, would mean that he is born not to be another way. The entire argument of transsexualism is this,

I was born to be a woman, but I'm a man.
I feel uncomfortable in my own body because I have the urges of a woman.
I then become emotionally distressed because I am not who I was born to be.
In order to feel comfortable in my own body, I transform it into a woman.
Little do I realize that it is the exact same body I have had the entire time.
The only difference is it looks and feels different, like a sweater or a shoe.
In the end, it's a male body. The only difference is the way the mind thinks about the body.

Now replace "woman" with cat, and you're in the nuthouse.
Last edited by Logic and Reason on Thu Aug 28, 2014 1:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sumshchyna
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: May 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sumshchyna » Thu Aug 28, 2014 1:55 am

As poll says, "It makes me uncomfortable."

☦ REMEMBER ODESSA ☦ ПОМНИТЕ ОДЕССА ☦ ПАМ'ЯТАЙТЕ ОДЕСА ☦

Site of the government of Novorossia

User avatar
Corumm
Envoy
 
Posts: 249
Founded: May 11, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Corumm » Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:03 am

Several years ago I was making my way home after a late night movie, on reaching a certain street corner I was hailed by a pair of shemales in skimpy outfits who proceeded to attempt to entice me with their misplaced charms.

I raised the palm of my hand so that it faced them and politely yet firmly said "Nyet". I then resumed my walk home.

User avatar
Larassa
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Aug 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Larassa » Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:03 am

Murkwood wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Kim Petras is a girl, and her parents were supportive of their child. Are you one of those people that would disown a gay kid, too?

No, being gay is real. Being trans is not.

If you had a really giant mole on your face, you would want that removed, right?

Now, Imagine if that mole was in the place where your genitals are supposed to be. You would want that removed too, wouldn't you?

User avatar
Logic and Reason
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Aug 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Logic and Reason » Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:13 am

Larassa wrote:
Murkwood wrote:No, being gay is real. Being trans is not.

If you had a really giant mole on your face, you would want that removed, right?

Now, Imagine if that mole was in the place where your genitals are supposed to be. You would want that removed too, wouldn't you?


I'm no expert, but I believe that there is a definable difference between removing a mole and removing the most sensitive pleasure center of the male human body. While were at it, why not remove our nipples, because, after all, there really only brown-stained ring worms.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:52 am

Murkwood wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Kim Petras is a girl, and her parents were supportive of their child. Are you one of those people that would disown a gay kid, too?

No, being gay is real. Being trans is not.


Except it is, in the same way the Earth is an oblate spheroid. You can say "being trans isn't real" until the cows come home, but it doesn't make you any less wrong than the people who say "the Earth is flat".
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Thu Aug 28, 2014 3:04 am

Corumm wrote:Several years ago I was making my way home after a late night movie, on reaching a certain street corner I was hailed by a pair of shemales in skimpy outfits who proceeded to attempt to entice me with their misplaced charms.

I raised the palm of my hand so that it faced them and politely yet firmly said "Nyet". I then resumed my walk home.


Just an FYI, the underlined word is a highly offensive slur, and I'll politely and firmly ask you not to use it in the future.

Logic and Reason wrote:
Larassa wrote:If you had a really giant mole on your face, you would want that removed, right?

Now, Imagine if that mole was in the place where your genitals are supposed to be. You would want that removed too, wouldn't you?


I'm no expert, but I believe that there is a definable difference between removing a mole and removing the most sensitive pleasure center of the male human body. While were at it, why not remove our nipples, because, after all, there really only brown-stained ring worms.


Im 12 and wat.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Revanchism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1846
Founded: Dec 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Revanchism » Thu Aug 28, 2014 3:26 am

Logic and Reason wrote:
Larassa wrote:If you had a really giant mole on your face, you would want that removed, right?

Now, Imagine if that mole was in the place where your genitals are supposed to be. You would want that removed too, wouldn't you?


I'm no expert, but I believe that there is a definable difference between removing a mole and removing the most sensitive pleasure center of the male human body. While were at it, why not remove our nipples, because, after all, there really only brown-stained ring worms.

Someone named "Logic and Reason" really shouldn't be using fallacies and should probably do some research on whatever it is they're discussing. Also, if they recognize they're not an expert, belief shouldn't even enter the equation.
I'm back for a bit
Norstal wrote:You ever watched a bad movie that is so bad, that it's enlightening? Like, you start asking yourself, "why did I watched this movie. What is the meaning of life after I watched this movie."
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Excuse me, I believe that the proper term is Satanic-American.
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Does Queen Elsa have a partnership with the Rothschild family in the film?
Kolmya wrote:

Should have been titled A Trve Friend.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
The Rodina wrote:It was american is hardly an argument.
It's the only argument I need.

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Thu Aug 28, 2014 3:43 am

Revanchism wrote:Someone named "Logic and Reason" really shouldn't be using fallacies and should probably do some research on whatever it is they're discussing.

Yeah, but anyone who has something in their nation name probably isn't that thing.

I mean, do I look like a badly-spelled demigod to you?
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Gelgisith
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 397
Founded: Dec 10, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby Gelgisith » Thu Aug 28, 2014 3:51 am

Though i don't think i'll ever understand transsexualism, i have no real problem with it. The only problem i have is not really knowing whether to use male or female pronouns for someone who physically looks like one sex/gender, but is dressed and made up like the other, since i never know whether (s)he is a transvestite, or a transsexual...
My Political Compass

tunizcha wrote:Religion is an oak tree. It has many, many branches, and it's full of nuts.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:24 am

Jormengand wrote:
Revanchism wrote:Someone named "Logic and Reason" really shouldn't be using fallacies and should probably do some research on whatever it is they're discussing.

Yeah, but anyone who has something in their nation name probably isn't that thing.

I mean, do I look like a badly-spelled demigod to you?


Yeah, its pretty much the First Law of NS that if somebody's nation name is a good concept, they're pretty much guaranteed to be the opposite. And that if their nation name is a bad concept, its guaranteed that the concept accurately describes them.

I.E., Somebody named "Nazi Douchebags" is assuredly going to be a Nazi Douchebag. Somebody named "Good and Intelligent People" is going to be an utterly stupid cunt.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Republic of munster
Envoy
 
Posts: 246
Founded: Mar 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of munster » Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:27 am

Do i have a problem with transgender people, no i have no problem with the person. I believe that they are a human being and should be treated as such before the eyes of the law. While personally i don't really agree with the idea of gender, i really only believe in sex in that you are what you are born and that gender is really just (and increasingly so but not originally) a political term. But like I said they are humans and should be treated as such even if what they do is quiet odd and not something i agree with.

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45248
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:38 am

Grenartia wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Yeah, but anyone who has something in their nation name probably isn't that thing.

I mean, do I look like a badly-spelled demigod to you?


Yeah, its pretty much the First Law of NS that if somebody's nation name is a good concept, they're pretty much guaranteed to be the opposite. And that if their nation name is a bad concept, its guaranteed that the concept accurately describes them.

I.E., Somebody named "Nazi Douchebags" is assuredly going to be a Nazi Douchebag. Somebody named "Good and Intelligent People" is going to be an utterly stupid cunt.


...

Hmph. Well.

That's another person for my list.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:40 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Yeah, its pretty much the First Law of NS that if somebody's nation name is a good concept, they're pretty much guaranteed to be the opposite. And that if their nation name is a bad concept, its guaranteed that the concept accurately describes them.

I.E., Somebody named "Nazi Douchebags" is assuredly going to be a Nazi Douchebag. Somebody named "Good and Intelligent People" is going to be an utterly stupid cunt.


...

Hmph. Well.

That's another person for my list.


Exception that proves the rule. You're notable in that you do not follow the trend.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45248
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:42 am

Grenartia wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
...

Hmph. Well.

That's another person for my list.


Exception that proves the rule. You're notable in that you do not follow the trend.


SICK RECOVERY~!

:p
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Imperium Sidhicum
Senator
 
Posts: 4324
Founded: May 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperium Sidhicum » Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:01 am

I think it's a terrible affliction, to be dissociated from one's body and sex. I pity the people confused about their gender and think they should be given professional assistance to help them come to terms with their biological sex.
Freedom doesn't mean being able to do as one please, but rather not to do as one doesn't please.

A fool sees religion as the truth. A smart man sees religion as a lie. A ruler sees religion as a useful tool.

The more God in one's mouth, the less in one's heart.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Andsed, Arikea, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Camelone, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Galloism, Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, Immoren, La Xinga, Lord Dominator, Narland, Ostroeuropa, Perchan, Port Caverton, Raskana, Riviere Renard, Saiwana, The Archregimancy, The Jamesian Republic, The Snazzylands, The Two Jerseys, Trollgaard, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads