Advertisement

by Captiotia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:17 pm
The Sanguinian Islands wrote:Captiotia wrote:I'm glad you have never felt oppressed due to your gender, but lots of women have. Not just "felt," but been outright visibly oppressed and exploited. Lots of minorities and women of marginalized groups, especially. WOC and trans women. Women in countries exploited by imperialism. Rape victims. Rape victims who are WOC and/or trans. Murder victims who are WOC and/or trans!
Why do you think gender exists?
what the fuck stop don't speak for us

by Nazi Flower Power » Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:30 pm
Captiotia wrote:Nazi Flower Power wrote:Respecting someone's rights is different than being sexually attracted to them.
Yeah, this is true. I find it weird to make so many generalizations and blanket statements though. Why wouldn't you date a trans person? Their gender identity or their genitals? If genitals is the issue, there are post-op trans people. Also, there are nonbinary or agender trans people, like me, who might have the genitals you'd prefer. Also, bigender trans people and more.

by Captiotia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:36 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Captiotia wrote:Yeah, this is true. I find it weird to make so many generalizations and blanket statements though. Why wouldn't you date a trans person? Their gender identity or their genitals? If genitals is the issue, there are post-op trans people. Also, there are nonbinary or agender trans people, like me, who might have the genitals you'd prefer. Also, bigender trans people and more.
For me, it would depend on the individual. The only category of trans people that I can't imagine ever being attracted to, even if I was very close to them as a friend, are FtM. I'm not attracted to people who go out of their way to be masculine. That applies to cis men that try to hard to be macho, and it also applies to FtM transsexuals. MtF and nonbinary people, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of dating them, but it'd probably take me a while to get used to the whole gender identity thing.

by The Sanguinian Islands » Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:36 pm
Captiotia wrote:The Sanguinian Islands wrote:what the fuck stop don't speak for us
If by "us," you mean binary women, I'm sorry, but there are arguments on the side of trans people like me which support the existence of a transmisogynistic patriarchy.
If you mean WOC, I'm very very sorry and you're right.
by Othelos » Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:37 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:For me, it would depend on the individual. The only category of trans people that I can't imagine ever being attracted to, even if I was very close to them as a friend, are FtM. I'm not attracted to people who go out of their way to be masculine. That applies to cis men that try to hard to be macho, and it also applies to FtM transsexuals.

by Nazi Flower Power » Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:40 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:Liriena wrote:It worries me just how ignorant that sentence is.
Transsexuals are probably closet homosexuals. A man wants to become a woman and probably is also attracted to men. Why not just be a drag queen and date gay men instead? He wouldn't need a complex surgery and he has the option to dress properly when visiting his family (so they don't know his other lifestyle). He also wouldn't be lying to straight men that have no interest in dating a transsexual.
I am not trying to be rude, it just seems unnecessary to change ones sex and it is really sad when they have children and change sex later. It shames the family (especially in the case when a public official did it). He had a 15 year old son at the time of divorce, I am curious if the son was upset about the situation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Stanton
http://www.tampabay.com/news/localgover ... end/784680

by Captiotia » Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:41 pm
The Sanguinian Islands wrote:Captiotia wrote:If by "us," you mean binary women, I'm sorry, but there are arguments on the side of trans people like me which support the existence of a transmisogynistic patriarchy.
If you mean WOC, I'm very very sorry and you're right.
You are a pathetic person, sorry, but I cannot believe you are being serious right now

by Qubec » Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:43 pm

by Grenartia » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:20 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Captiotia wrote:Yeah, this is true. I find it weird to make so many generalizations and blanket statements though. Why wouldn't you date a trans person? Their gender identity or their genitals? If genitals is the issue, there are post-op trans people. Also, there are nonbinary or agender trans people, like me, who might have the genitals you'd prefer. Also, bigender trans people and more.
For me, it would depend on the individual. The only category of trans people that I can't imagine ever being attracted to, even if I was very close to them as a friend, are FtM. I'm not attracted to people who go out of their way to be masculine. That applies to cis men that try to hard to be macho, and it also applies to FtM transsexuals. MtF and nonbinary people, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of dating them, but it'd probably take me a while to get used to the whole gender identity thing.

by Lies and Ignorance » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:22 pm

by Murkwood » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:47 pm
Destiny Island wrote:God I really reaaally support trans rights, amd I really beat myself up about the fact that I think I couldn't date a trans person.
I feel like a very shallow and horrible person every time I think about it.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Conkerials » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:49 pm

by Sun Wukong » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:49 pm

by Murkwood » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:49 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Murkwood » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:50 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Murkwood » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:50 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Threlizdun » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:55 pm

by Murkwood » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:57 pm
Threlizdun wrote:
So they could identify as female and be physically female but because their sex at birth is male they aren't female to you even when everything else about them is? Why not just declare that no one ever actually ages? After all, we are born infants, so just because we stop identifying as infants and don't have the bodies of infants clearly doesn't have any bearing when we were born as infants right?
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Sun Wukong » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:01 pm
Murkwood wrote:Threlizdun wrote:So they could identify as female and be physically female but because their sex at birth is male they aren't female to you even when everything else about them is? Why not just declare that no one ever actually ages? After all, we are born infants, so just because we stop identifying as infants and don't have the bodies of infants clearly doesn't have any bearing when we were born as infants right?
Ageing is something we all do.
Sex-change isn't.

by Murkwood » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:01 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Sun Wukong » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:02 pm

by Murkwood » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:04 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fractalnavel, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement