Bi Pride.
Advertisement

by The New Sea Territory » Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:20 pm
| Ⓐ ☭ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᚨ ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

by Nazi Flower Power » Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:13 pm
Burleson wrote:There are only two actual genders, male and female. You are the gender that were born with, you can't choose it.

by Neutraligon » Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:20 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Female and prefer men, but I'm not a girly girl and the preference for men is not that strong.Burleson wrote:There are only two actual genders, male and female. You are the gender that were born with, you can't choose it.
And people who are born with ambiguous sex organs?
Even if you don't subscribe to the idea that there are dozens of genders and gender is separate from sex, there are still people who don't fit neatly in the categories of male or female.

by Constantinopolis » Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:07 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Well, more like "puppy love crushes" but that's common here in the U.S. and in other parts of the American continent.
Distruzio wrote:He considers himself a "ladies man." He's 7. So, in his mind, she's his girlfriend if he likes her. She doesn't actually need to know about their relationship.

by Arztoztka » Tue Sep 16, 2014 5:03 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Sep 16, 2014 5:05 am
Arztoztka wrote:For me, gender isn't a big whooping rainbow from where you can choose your gender. For me, you're just in a black and white world: you're either male or female, no middle ground.
Regarding sexuality, I accept heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality and tolerate pansexuality.
Transsexualism for me is plain wrong, and I already stated my reason.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Linux and the X » Tue Sep 16, 2014 5:36 am
Arztoztka wrote:For me, gender isn't a big whooping rainbow from where you can choose your gender. For me, you're just in a black and white world: you're either male or female, no middle ground.
Regarding sexuality, I accept heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality and tolerate pansexuality.
Transsexualism for me is plain wrong, and I already stated my reason.

by DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:18 am
The New Sea Territory wrote:There is a difference between bisexual and pansexual....ok? Bisexual would mean one is attracted to two genders, while pansexual means one is attracted to "pan" or all genders. Considering there are 200+ genders, and I've only seen about 6, I can't fully say I am anything more than bisexual, maybe "trisexual".
I'm biologically male, but really a genderless being. I do a few things considered masculine, a few things considered feminine, but not really enough to make me either, so I just say I am genderless.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

by DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:21 am
Constantinopolis wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:Well, more like "puppy love crushes" but that's common here in the U.S. and in other parts of the American continent.
Huh. Interesting. When I was growing up, boys and girls mostly did not want to play with each other and had their own separate "subcultures", so to speak. We treated each other as "rival teams" - sometimes literally, in sports and other games.
Of course, puberty changed all that.Distruzio wrote:He considers himself a "ladies man." He's 7. So, in his mind, she's his girlfriend if he likes her. She doesn't actually need to know about their relationship.
Ah. Well... you should consider explaining that it's not supposed to work like that...
Also, IMO, no boy should ever believe that being a "ladies man" is a good thing. I know he's only 7, but that's old enough that his opinions should be taken seriously, and corrected with persuasive arguments if they are wrong.
I don't have children of my own, but I do remember my childhood very well, and I know that some broad aspects of my outlook on life had already been formed by the time I was 7. For example, then, as now, I believed that my life has to be dedicated to a grand cause or purpose in order to be worth living. The "causes" I took up as a child were silly, of course, but the core idea that life must be purpose-driven was already there, and that is still what I believe today.
The intellectual abilities of children should also not be underestimated. When I was 8 or 9 I sat down with my father and explained to him that I had concluded Santa Claus could not possibly exist, despite him and my mother continuously claiming the contrary, and told him I didn't like being lied to. At first he didn't take me seriously, but when all his arguments for Santa Claus failed to persuade me, he gave up and admitted the truth.
To this day my parents and I laugh about the fact that I had "the Santa talk" with them.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Kiruri » Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:40 am

by Kiruri » Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:45 am
Distruzio wrote:Othelos wrote:Hey!
7 is really old to still be sleeping with parents, whether it's a boy or a girl, imo.
I'm glad we agree. My fiance thinks I'm making too big an issue over nothing - but she babies him. Then again, I baby him when it comes to girls and friendships. We both have our particular flavor of dealing with childhood drama. She lets him cry and cuddles him if he gets a booboo. I let him cry and cuddle him when his latest girlfriend likes a new boy (with kids these things change daily).
But I guess it's just me and how I was raised and what I was taught to expect from parent-child relationships after the age of 5/6 or specifically father/son relationship.
by The Sanguinian Islands » Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:05 am

by Distruzio » Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:33 am
Also, IMO, no boy should ever believe that being a "ladies man" is a good thing. I know he's only 7, but that's old enough that his opinions should be taken seriously, and corrected with persuasive arguments if they are wrong.

by Costa Fuar » Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:37 am

by Neutraligon » Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:27 am
Arztoztka wrote:For me, gender isn't a big whooping rainbow from where you can choose your gender. For me, you're just in a black and white world: you're either male or female, no middle ground.
Regarding sexuality, I accept heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality and tolerate pansexuality.
Transsexualism for me is plain wrong, and I already stated my reason.

by The 502nd SS » Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:30 am

by Immoren » Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:31 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Zottistan » Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:31 am
The 502nd SS wrote:wtf is another gender identity?

by The 502nd SS » Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:32 am

by Immoren » Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:34 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Olivaero » Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:39 am
Constantinopolis wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:Well, more like "puppy love crushes" but that's common here in the U.S. and in other parts of the American continent.
Huh. Interesting. When I was growing up, boys and girls mostly did not want to play with each other and had their own separate "subcultures", so to speak. We treated each other as "rival teams" - sometimes literally, in sports and other games.
Of course, puberty changed all that.Distruzio wrote:He considers himself a "ladies man." He's 7. So, in his mind, she's his girlfriend if he likes her. She doesn't actually need to know about their relationship.
Ah. Well... you should consider explaining that it's not supposed to work like that...
Also, IMO, no boy should ever believe that being a "ladies man" is a good thing. I know he's only 7, but that's old enough that his opinions should be taken seriously, and corrected with persuasive arguments if they are wrong.
I don't have children of my own, but I do remember my childhood very well, and I know that some broad aspects of my outlook on life had already been formed by the time I was 7. For example, then, as now, I believed that my life has to be dedicated to a grand cause or purpose in order to be worth living. The "causes" I took up as a child were silly, of course, but the core idea that life must be purpose-driven was already there, and that is still what I believe today.
The intellectual abilities of children should also not be underestimated. When I was 8 or 9 I sat down with my father and explained to him that I had concluded Santa Claus could not possibly exist, despite him and my mother continuously claiming the contrary, and told him I didn't like being lied to. At first he didn't take me seriously, but when all his arguments for Santa Claus failed to persuade me, he gave up and admitted the truth.
To this day my parents and I laugh about the fact that I had "the Santa talk" with them.

by The 502nd SS » Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:39 am

by Dyakovo » Tue Sep 16, 2014 11:27 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bruhssians, Ecotoria, El Lazaro, Galloism, Greater Arab State, Ifreann, Imperiul romanum, Lord Dominator, Ryemarch, Valyxias
Advertisement