NATION

PASSWORD

Your gender identity and sexual orientation?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

read the thread title

male
954
43%
female
110
5%
other gender identity
72
3%
heterosexual
644
29%
bisexual
187
8%
pansexual
70
3%
homosexual
131
6%
other sexual orientation
71
3%
 
Total votes : 2239

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:02 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:The structure of the brain is not correlated simply with sex, but with gender. Brain scans of transgender individuals have found their brains to appear more similar to those of the gender they identify as than to cisgender members of their own sex. There absolutely does appear to be a physical basis for gender.

No, they appear more similar to those of the opposite sex. There is not brain structure associated with a particular gender, only a particular sex. Genders are then imposed onto said sexes. In a "transgender" person, they have the brain structure associated with the opposite sex. This results in the perception that the body they have is of the wrong sex, thus the rejection of the body and thus the gender stereotype associated with it.
This would be a reasonable hypothesis were it not for the fact that many transgender people do not encounter body dysphoria and possess no desire to change their sex. If the characteristics of a certain gender seem to be exclusively tied to the brain structure of those who identify as that gender, then it makes sense to presume it is the gender, not the sex, that describes such personality aspects. Gender developed to aid sexes in fulfilling evolutionary beneficial tasks. This is true, but the fact that people identify as the gender their brain tells them to identify as rather than their sex shows that the notion that gender is nothing more than the social aspects of sex is demonstrably false. Gender evolved to serve such a role, but it is not exclusive to it, otherwise transgender individuals would not exist.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:04 pm

On the subject of Otherkin I think they are wrongfully lumped into the whole Identity thing, they're really more religious/spiritual. Or at least that's the impression I got from them.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:05 pm

Olivaero wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Genders seem to be little more than stereotypes imposed on the biological sexes.

If this were true then Gender Dysphoria wouldn't exist. A social construct is more than a stereotype.

What?
Firstly, stereotypes are a social construct.
Secondly, what I've said is entirely compatible with the existing of gender dysphoria.
Genders are then imposed onto the sexes. In a "transgender" person, they have the brain structure associated with the opposite sex. This results in the perception that the body they have is of the wrong sex, thus the rejection of the body and thus the gender stereotype associated with it. That is the cause of
Thirdly, gender dysphoria has nothing to do with social construct.
Last edited by Conscentia on Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The United Remnants of America
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17599
Founded: Mar 09, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby The United Remnants of America » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:11 pm

I'm assuming metrosexual is not an official gender, so I'll just go with heterogeneous, then.
By any means necessary. Call me URA
Winner of 2015 Best of P2TM Awards: Best Roleplayer - War
"I would much rather be with you than against you, you're way too imaginative."
"URA New Confucius 2015."- Organized States
"Congrats. You just won the second place prize for Not Giving a Fuck. First Place, of course, always goes to Furry."
"He's an 8 Ball, DEN. You can't deal with an 8 Ball." - Empire of Donner land
"This Rp is flexible with science and so will you." - Tagali Federation
"I'm confused as to your tactic but I'll trust you." - Die erworbenen Namen
"Unfiltered, concentrated, possibly weaponized stupidity."
Thafoo, Leningrad Union: DEAT'd for your sins.
Discord: Here

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:11 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Conscentia wrote:No, they appear more similar to those of the opposite sex. There is not brain structure associated with a particular gender, only a particular sex. Genders are then imposed onto said sexes. In a "transgender" person, they have the brain structure associated with the opposite sex. This results in the perception that the body they have is of the wrong sex, thus the rejection of the body and thus the gender stereotype associated with it.
This would be a reasonable hypothesis were it not for the fact that many transgender people do not encounter body dysphoria and possess no desire to change their sex. If the characteristics of a certain gender seem to be exclusively tied to the brain structure of those who identify as that gender, then it makes sense to presume it is the gender, not the sex, that describes such personality aspects. Gender developed to aid sexes in fulfilling evolutionary beneficial tasks. This is true, but the fact that people identify as the gender their brain tells them to identify as rather than their sex shows that the notion that gender is nothing more than the social aspects of sex is demonstrably false. Gender evolved to serve such a role, but it is not exclusive to it, otherwise transgender individuals would not exist.

Okay, you're going to have to clarify what you're saying.
Did this study people who did not conform to the stereotypes, or people who with gender dysphoria? Because to me, transgender refers to a person with gender dysphoria, while those simply not conforming to the gender stereotypes imposed onto their sex is referred to by other terms.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:13 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Olivaero wrote:If this were true then Gender Dysphoria wouldn't exist. A social construct is more than a stereotype.

What?
Firstly, stereotypes are a social construct.
Secondly, what I've said is entirely compatible with the
existing of gender dysphoria.
Genders are then imposed onto the sexes. In a "transgender" person, they have the brain structure associated with the opposite sex. This results in the perception that the body they have is of the wrong sex, thus the rejection of the body and thus the gender stereotype associated with it. That is the cause of

However people of non binary gender suffer from gender dysphoria too... How can non binary genders exist as stereotypes when they exist largely from gender dysphoric people experimenting to find where their mid point is between male and female?

EDIT: yeah I derped a bit a bit on saying social constructs are more than stereotypes what I meant is that some social constructs are more biologically rooted than others Like family compared to stereotypes for example.
Last edited by Olivaero on Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:16 pm

Olivaero wrote:
Conscentia wrote:What?
Firstly, stereotypes are a social construct.
Secondly, what I've said is entirely compatible with the
existing of gender dysphoria.
Genders are then imposed onto the sexes. In a "transgender" person, they have the brain structure associated with the opposite sex. This results in the perception that the body they have is of the wrong sex, thus the rejection of the body and thus the gender stereotype associated with it. That is the cause of

However people of non binary gender suffer from gender dysphoria too... How can non binary genders exist as stereotypes when they exist largely from gender dysphoric people experimenting to find where their mid point is between male and female?

"Non-binary" is a term invented in rejection of the stereotypes.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:21 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Olivaero wrote:However people of non binary gender suffer from gender dysphoria too... How can non binary genders exist as stereotypes when they exist largely from gender dysphoric people experimenting to find where their mid point is between male and female?

"Non-binary" is a term invented in rejection of the stereotypes.

Then why do they suffer dysphoria until they "Reject stereotypes" but stop suffering from it before they have had SRS?
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:27 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:This would be a reasonable hypothesis were it not for the fact that many transgender people do not encounter body dysphoria and possess no desire to change their sex. If the characteristics of a certain gender seem to be exclusively tied to the brain structure of those who identify as that gender, then it makes sense to presume it is the gender, not the sex, that describes such personality aspects. Gender developed to aid sexes in fulfilling evolutionary beneficial tasks. This is true, but the fact that people identify as the gender their brain tells them to identify as rather than their sex shows that the notion that gender is nothing more than the social aspects of sex is demonstrably false. Gender evolved to serve such a role, but it is not exclusive to it, otherwise transgender individuals would not exist.

Okay, you're going to have to clarify what you're saying.
Did this study people who did not conform to the stereotypes, or people who with gender dysphoria? Because to me, transgender refers to a person with gender dysphoria, while those simply not conforming to the gender stereotypes imposed onto their sex is referred to by other terms.

This is a study on ftm transgender individuals
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2 ... _47_-29LCQ
And this is one of mtf individuals
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v3 ... 068a0.html

"Transgender" simply recognizes that one possess a gender identity that does not match their physical sex. It is a very broad term that may or may not include body dysphoria. Many however do not have body dysphoria and possess no desire to undergo any body modification. "Transsexual" meanwhile implies body dysphoria and the need to transition sexes to accommodate one's gender identity. They can be explained a bit further here.
http://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:32 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Olivaero wrote:However people of non binary gender suffer from gender dysphoria too... How can non binary genders exist as stereotypes when they exist largely from gender dysphoric people experimenting to find where their mid point is between male and female?

"Non-binary" is a term invented in rejection of the stereotypes.

No, non-binary individuals are entirely capable of possessing body dysphoria pertaining to their sex. Non-binary individuals who possess developed breasts often wear chest binders for example. Some may took hormones or undergo plastic surgery to reach a look they are comfortable with. Most are adamant about being referred to using their preferred pronoun and become very upset and uncomfortable when they are misgendered. It is a serious identity, not just a rejection of stereotypes.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65248
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:35 pm

Lies and Ignorance wrote:I'm non-binary and totally gay.

You areone of them hexadecimal people, aren't you? :p
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:14 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Conscentia wrote:"Non-binary" is a term invented in rejection of the stereotypes.

No, non-binary individuals are entirely capable of possessing body dysphoria pertaining to their sex. Non-binary individuals who possess developed breasts often wear chest binders for example. Some may took hormones or undergo plastic surgery to reach a look they are comfortable with. Most are adamant about being referred to using their preferred pronoun and become very upset and uncomfortable when they are misgendered. It is a serious identity, not just a rejection of stereotypes.


Non-binary individual here. Confirming I have dysphoria.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15869
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:25 pm

Othelos wrote:3. From google:

sexual orientation - a person's sexual identity in relation to the gender to which they are attracted; the fact of being heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual.

Asexuality exists, my point is just that it doesn't count as an orientation, because it's the lack of one.

According to your own definition, pansexual isn't an orientation either.

Sun Wukong wrote:
Immoren wrote:Obviously human should be like that species of fish that start their life's as females, but transition into male as they reach certain age.
Or vice versa. *nods*

We should be brightly colored and build our homes in anemone?

I think those fish change from male to female. Or was it seabass? One or the other. Either way, I'd be perfectly happy changing from female to male naturally, even if I had to live in an anemone. :P

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I must say I feel a kinship, but not because I identify as an elf or some other mythical creature. I'm very much a human being. But because I understand how you can feel other than human at times.

I think this sounded too strange.

Don't be silly, Nanatsu, you're a perfectly non-strange kittycat. :hug:

Conscentia wrote:Between different genders? Explainable through environmental causes, and because they correlate with the sexes which demonstrate sexual dimorphism in brain structure anyway. Doesn't mean there is anything physical about genders. They are stereotypes imposed on the sexes.

Threlizdun already said some of this.

There are physical "male" brain structures and physical "female" brain structures, but any gender/sex/orientation-combination can have either or both for each bit. There's no really "male brain" or "female brain" (except size in some cases - males often have bigger head, thus bigger brain, but females have higher neuron density, so it averages to as many connections for each sex), just "more male/female on [function that requires central nervous system input]".

Those differences exist. They don't always conform to stereotypes, but (and I'm not putting in the percentage, because I'm too tired to go trawling for the research report I read (some) year(s) ago) for many people they do. This isn't to say that upbringing couldn't make you more apt at something, even if your brain's wiring didn't predispose you into being good at it, just that the differences do exist.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:41 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Othelos wrote:3. From google:

sexual orientation - a person's sexual identity in relation to the gender to which they are attracted; the fact of being heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual.

Asexuality exists, my point is just that it doesn't count as an orientation, because it's the lack of one.

According to your own definition, pansexual isn't an orientation either.

Sun Wukong wrote:We should be brightly colored and build our homes in anemone?

I think those fish change from male to female. Or was it seabass? One or the other. Either way, I'd be perfectly happy changing from female to male naturally, even if I had to live in an anemone. :P

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I must say I feel a kinship, but not because I identify as an elf or some other mythical creature. I'm very much a human being. But because I understand how you can feel other than human at times.

I think this sounded too strange.

Don't be silly, Nanatsu, you're a perfectly non-strange kittycat. :hug:

Conscentia wrote:Between different genders? Explainable through environmental causes, and because they correlate with the sexes which demonstrate sexual dimorphism in brain structure anyway. Doesn't mean there is anything physical about genders. They are stereotypes imposed on the sexes.

Threlizdun already said some of this.

There are physical "male" brain structures and physical "female" brain structures, but any gender/sex/orientation-combination can have either or both for each bit. There's no really "male brain" or "female brain" (except size in some cases - males often have bigger head, thus bigger brain, but females have higher neuron density, so it averages to as many connections for each sex), just "more male/female on [function that requires central nervous system input]".

Those differences exist. They don't always conform to stereotypes, but (and I'm not putting in the percentage, because I'm too tired to go trawling for the research report I read (some) year(s) ago) for many people they do. This isn't to say that upbringing couldn't make you more apt at something, even if your brain's wiring didn't predispose you into being good at it, just that the differences do exist.


Cat is the next stage in evolution, Arara. :p
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Lies and Ignorance
Minister
 
Posts: 2632
Founded: Nov 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lies and Ignorance » Wed Aug 27, 2014 5:48 pm

Immoren wrote:
Lies and Ignorance wrote:I'm non-binary and totally gay.

You areone of them hexadecimal people, aren't you? :p

Sure, why not?
✡☭♀

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:32 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Othelos wrote:3. From google:

sexual orientation - a person's sexual identity in relation to the gender to which they are attracted; the fact of being heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual.

Asexuality exists, my point is just that it doesn't count as an orientation, because it's the lack of one.

According to your own definition, pansexual isn't an orientation either.

The actual definition of sexual orientation is the important part, not the examples of it.
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15869
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Aug 28, 2014 1:28 am

Othelos wrote:
Othelos wrote:3. From google:

sexual orientation - a person's sexual identity in relation to the gender to which they are attracted; the fact of being heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual.

Asexuality exists, my point is just that it doesn't count as an orientation, because it's the lack of one.

The actual definition of sexual orientation is the important part, not the examples of it.

Alright, if that's your stance, then that is what your source says. Still doesn't define pan (as that doesn't mean being attracted to a specific gender or genders, from what pan individuals here have said). If you're using that as an excuse to say asexual isn't an orientation, you're going to have to find a better excuse, because, like I said before, it doesn't even acknowledge pansexual as being an orientation.

Why can't you just accept they both are just as valid as being bi/gay/straight?
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:19 am

Threlizdun wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Okay, you're going to have to clarify what you're saying.
Did this study people who did not conform to the stereotypes, or people who with gender dysphoria? Because to me, transgender refers to a person with gender dysphoria, while those simply not conforming to the gender stereotypes imposed onto their sex is referred to by other terms.

This is a study on ftm transgender individuals
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2 ... _47_-29LCQ
And this is one of mtf individuals
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v3 ... 068a0.html

"Transgender" simply recognizes that one possess a gender identity that does not match their physical sex. It is a very broad term that may or may not include body dysphoria. Many however do not have body dysphoria and possess no desire to undergo any body modification. "Transsexual" meanwhile implies body dysphoria and the need to transition sexes to accommodate one's gender identity. They can be explained a bit further here.
http://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender

Those studies are about transsexual individuals, not transgender individuals.
Threlizdun wrote:
Conscentia wrote:"Non-binary" is a term invented in rejection of the stereotypes.

No, non-binary individuals are entirely capable of possessing body dysphoria pertaining to their sex. Non-binary individuals who possess developed breasts often wear chest binders for example. Some may took hormones or undergo plastic surgery to reach a look they are comfortable with. Most are adamant about being referred to using their preferred pronoun and become very upset and uncomfortable when they are misgendered. It is a serious identity, not just a rejection of stereotypes.

The rejection of pre-existing stereotypes implies association with an alternative identity. None of that is incompatible with what I've said.
Last edited by Conscentia on Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:22 am

Grenartia wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:No, non-binary individuals are entirely capable of possessing body dysphoria pertaining to their sex. Non-binary individuals who possess developed breasts often wear chest binders for example. Some may took hormones or undergo plastic surgery to reach a look they are comfortable with. Most are adamant about being referred to using their preferred pronoun and become very upset and uncomfortable when they are misgendered. It is a serious identity, not just a rejection of stereotypes.

Non-binary individual here. Confirming I have dysphoria.

Well Ra did seem more androgynous than the other goa'uld...
Araraukar wrote:
Conscentia wrote:Between different genders? Explainable through environmental causes, and because they correlate with the sexes which demonstrate sexual dimorphism in brain structure anyway. Doesn't mean there is anything physical about genders. They are stereotypes imposed on the sexes.

Threlizdun already said some of this.

There are physical "male" brain structures and physical "female" brain structures, but any gender/sex/orientation-combination can have either or both for each bit. There's no really "male brain" or "female brain" (except size in some cases - males often have bigger head, thus bigger brain, but females have higher neuron density, so it averages to as many connections for each sex), just "more male/female on [function that requires central nervous system input]".

Those differences exist. They don't always conform to stereotypes, but (and I'm not putting in the percentage, because I'm too tired to go trawling for the research report I read (some) year(s) ago) for many people they do. This isn't to say that upbringing couldn't make you more apt at something, even if your brain's wiring didn't predispose you into being good at it, just that the differences do exist.

That would be why I said "associated with".
Last edited by Conscentia on Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29246
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:48 am

Libertarian California wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I, for one, find it very odd that these identities you speak of are only ever mentioned on NSG by people like you.


They're generally mentioned on Tumblr, and they are a good source of material for humor. The cultural left of NSG need to lighten up every once in a while before returning to their lives of self-loathing and hormone-driven rage.

Teenagers trying to mock something they think is stupid with all the wit of their schoolmates yelling homophobic slurs at people beating them in COD. It's almost as though the problem isn't pre-teens on Tumblr making up contrived bullshit, it's you desperately trying to be cooler than them.


No, I just enjoy their reactions when they realize that no one cares about what they've made up. Their little temper tantrums are so cute.


*** Libertarian California deleted for continued trolling and clear unwillingness to abide by site rules. ***

User avatar
Valica
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1527
Founded: Feb 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valica » Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:28 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Libertarian California wrote:
They're generally mentioned on Tumblr, and they are a good source of material for humor. The cultural left of NSG need to lighten up every once in a while before returning to their lives of self-loathing and hormone-driven rage.



No, I just enjoy their reactions when they realize that no one cares about what they've made up. Their little temper tantrums are so cute.


*** Libertarian California deleted for continued trolling and clear unwillingness to abide by site rules. ***


Thank God. I was getting sick of that dude on so many levels.
I'm a cis-het male. Ask me about my privilege.


Valica is like America with a very conservative economy and a liberal social policy.



Population - 750,500,000



Army - 3,250,500
Navy - 2,000,000
Special Forces - 300,000



5 districts
20 members per district in the House of Representatives
10 members per district in the Senate


Political affiliation - Centrist / Humanist



Religion - Druid



For: Privacy, LGBT Equality, Cryptocurrencies, Free Web, The Middle Class, One-World Government



Against: Nationalism, Creationism, Right to Segregate, Fundamentalism, ISIS, Communism
( -4.38 | -4.31 )
"If you don't use Linux, you're doing it wrong."

User avatar
Valica
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1527
Founded: Feb 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valica » Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:29 am

The United Remnants of America wrote:I'm assuming metrosexual is not an official gender, so I'll just go with heterogeneous, then.


Metrosexuality is hard to define.
How often do you get hit on by gay dudes?
Last edited by Valica on Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm a cis-het male. Ask me about my privilege.


Valica is like America with a very conservative economy and a liberal social policy.



Population - 750,500,000



Army - 3,250,500
Navy - 2,000,000
Special Forces - 300,000



5 districts
20 members per district in the House of Representatives
10 members per district in the Senate


Political affiliation - Centrist / Humanist



Religion - Druid



For: Privacy, LGBT Equality, Cryptocurrencies, Free Web, The Middle Class, One-World Government



Against: Nationalism, Creationism, Right to Segregate, Fundamentalism, ISIS, Communism
( -4.38 | -4.31 )
"If you don't use Linux, you're doing it wrong."

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111675
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:33 am

Valica wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
*** Libertarian California deleted for continued trolling and clear unwillingness to abide by site rules. ***


Thank God. I was getting sick of that dude on so many levels.

*** Gloating over punishments handed out to other players is not acceptable. ***
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Thu Aug 28, 2014 6:55 am

Araraukar wrote:
Othelos wrote:The actual definition of sexual orientation is the important part, not the examples of it.

Alright, if that's your stance, then that is what your source says. Still doesn't define pan (as that doesn't mean being attracted to a specific gender or genders, from what pan individuals here have said). If you're using that as an excuse to say asexual isn't an orientation, you're going to have to find a better excuse, because, like I said before, it doesn't even acknowledge pansexual as being an orientation.

Why can't you just accept they both are just as valid as being bi/gay/straight?

When did I say that they weren't as valid?

I never argued that.

Also, pan is a sexual orientation because pan people are oriented to all sexes/genders. Asexual is the lack of an orientation, because it means that the person isn't oriented towards anyone.
Last edited by Othelos on Thu Aug 28, 2014 6:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
Lies and Ignorance
Minister
 
Posts: 2632
Founded: Nov 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lies and Ignorance » Thu Aug 28, 2014 7:20 am

Othelos wrote:Also, pan is a sexual orientation because pan people are oriented to all sexes/genders. Asexual is the lack of an orientation, because it means that the person isn't oriented towards anyone.

I kind of disagree that asexuality is the "lack" of a sexual orientation. You're correct that it means lack of sexual attraction (i.e. attraction to no genders) but as per being a description of an individual's relationship to others, it's still a normal sexual orientation.
✡☭♀

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Dimetrodon Empire, Dumb Ideologies, Eahland, Ethel mermania, Fahran, Federated Sapphirian Isles, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Insaanistan, New Mongol Republic, Nocturus Terra, Rary, Rusticus I Damianus, Siimyardo, The Astral Mandate, The Grand Duchy of Muscovy, Yokron pro-government partisans

Advertisement

Remove ads