NATION

PASSWORD

Riots in St. Louis after Police kill Teen

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:37 pm

So he was supposedly stealing cigars and that apparently justifies everything for the person sitting across me. Anyone care to restore my disfaith in the police?
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:37 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Saruhan wrote:Given that the officer was in hospital for his injuries, use of force was justified.

How is using lethal force on a person who was fleeing and is now surrendering justified?

Didn't you just say, "Witnesses tend to not remember things exactly as they see them?"
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:37 pm

Saruhan wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:How is using lethal force on a person who was fleeing and is now surrendering justified?

What his friend said. Not proven.

No, what his friend and multiple witnesses said.
Mavorpen wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:2. that witness has been refuted by other witnesses. statement not credible

No he hasn't. At least two other witnesses have confirmed that Brown had surrendered when he was killed.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 68278.html
http://abcnews.go.com/US/witness-missou ... d=24920358
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:38 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:How is using lethal force on a person who was fleeing and is now surrendering justified?

Didn't you just say, "Witnesses tend to not remember things exactly as they see them?"

Yes, and?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:38 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Didn't you just say, "Witnesses tend to not remember things exactly as they see them?"

Yes, and?

The witnesses you're quoting could be mistaken.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:38 pm

Saruhan wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:How is using lethal force on a person who was fleeing and is now surrendering justified?

What his friend said. Not proven.

Multiple eyewitness testimonies state he was surrendering. You have nothing to stand on except a shaky police report.
password scrambled

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:39 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes, and?

The witnesses you're quoting could be mistaken.

No shit. And?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:39 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes, and?

The witnesses you're quoting could be mistaken.

All three of them? Maybe. Then again, probably not.
Last edited by Condunum on Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
password scrambled

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:39 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes, and?

The witnesses you're quoting could be mistaken.


Well shit, Maybe he's still alive then?
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40533
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:39 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes, and?

The witnesses you're quoting could be mistaken.


As could the cop. The fact that what the witness said is backed up by multiple witnesses tends to give it more credence.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:40 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Geilinor wrote:The witnesses you're quoting could be mistaken.

No shit. And?

Your opinion on the shooting rests solely on those eyewitness accounts. I'm simply saying that we don't have strong enough information to decide exactly what occurred.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:41 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No shit. And?

Your opinion on the shooting rests solely on those eyewitness accounts. I'm simply saying that we don't have strong enough information to decide exactly what occurred.

Again, no shit. And?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:41 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No shit. And?

Your opinion on the shooting rests solely on those eyewitness accounts. I'm simply saying that we don't have strong enough information to decide exactly what occurred.

I can guarantee you without a doubt in my mind the vast majority of the unreleased witness testimonies are either more incriminating or equally incriminating of the officer. (assuming more than three can be gathered)
Last edited by Condunum on Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
password scrambled

User avatar
Vamtrl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vamtrl » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:47 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Your opinion on the shooting rests solely on those eyewitness accounts. I'm simply saying that we don't have strong enough information to decide exactly what occurred.

Again, no shit. And?


Well you stay on yo side, while I stay on my side. Justice for the police!

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:58 pm

Saruhan wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:How is using lethal force on a person who was fleeing and is now surrendering justified?

What his friend said. Not proven.

here's a story about someone who had no reason to lie about what he saw.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/i-just-s ... -shooting/
whatever

User avatar
Organized States
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8426
Founded: Apr 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Organized States » Fri Aug 15, 2014 7:07 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Organized States wrote:So which witnesses are making conflicting statements?

I heard something along those lines.

Making some conflicting statements shouldn't be surprising to anyone used to witness reports. Witnesses tend to not remember things exactly as they see them.

Not surprising.
Thank God for OS!- Deian
"In the old days, the navigators used magic to make themselves strong, but now, nothing; they just pray. Before they leave and at sea, they pray. But I, I make myself strong by thinking—just by thinking! I make myself strong because I despise cowardice. Too many men are afraid of the sea. But I am a navigator."-Mau Piailug
"I regret that I have only one life to give to my island." -Ricardo Bordallo, 2nd Governor of Guam
"Both are voyages of exploration. Hōkūle‘a is in the past, Columbia is in the future." -Colonel Charles L. Veach, USAF, Astronaut and Navigation Enthusiast

Pacific Islander-American (proud member of the 0.5%), Officer to be

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Fri Aug 15, 2014 7:28 pm

Arkolon wrote:So he was supposedly stealing cigars and that apparently justifies everything for the person sitting across me. Anyone care to restore my disfaith in the police?

He supposedly beat the police officer who shot him.

The officer did seek treatment at the hospital, for a swollen face (which sounds like a non-medical term to me so that tells me it was someone who saw him go to the hospital that reported that).

Could the officer's use of force be reasonable ? Maybe maybe not. If in the course of the fight the officer received injuries that blurred his vision so he could not distinguish a man holding his hands up in surrender or a man preparing to leap at him again, the use of force may well have been reasonable. Am I saying it is reasonable ? No. Just stringing together how I might defend him in court.

Really we would need a full investigation to be certain. Now the riot has pretty much ensured that if there is a trial there will be a change of venue and given Missouri's Demographics it is now pretty well assured he will get a trial with a jury of white men, likely from a rural area. Another thing the riot may have done is destroyed evidence.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Aug 15, 2014 8:43 pm

Anonymous shared the dispatch tapes from the Ferguson PD around the event.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/08/15 ... -dispatch/
Last edited by Condunum on Fri Aug 15, 2014 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
password scrambled

User avatar
Ravenflight
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9070
Founded: Jan 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ravenflight » Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:30 am

Condunum wrote:Anonymous shared the dispatch tapes from the Ferguson PD around the event.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/08/15 ... -dispatch/

They've been doing that for days...seriously are none of you on twitter. Google. #opFerguson
I'm PANGENDER
ONE NATION TORIES ARE 1% SUPPORTERS
By our Ancestors, For our Children. Join the Viking Party
My Political Beliefs
Senator Daniel Björn

User avatar
Ravenflight
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9070
Founded: Jan 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ravenflight » Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:31 am

Also they stopped protesting...the governor or something is stepping in
I'm PANGENDER
ONE NATION TORIES ARE 1% SUPPORTERS
By our Ancestors, For our Children. Join the Viking Party
My Political Beliefs
Senator Daniel Björn

User avatar
Scholmeria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1354
Founded: Mar 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholmeria » Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:50 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Quintium wrote:
I'm not really sure if his death is a loss to the world, though.
If all violent robbers, thieves, rapists and murderers in the world dropped dead today, we'd have peace tomorrow.



Bullshit. I also know plenty of people who did bad things, but there are 'bad things' and then there are things like rioting, arson, looting, violent robbery and severe physical assault.
If you think those are normal things for 18-year-olds to do, then I suggest you get 'straight outta Compton' and find a place where people are normal.

he stole some freaking cigars and pushed the employee around to do it. geez where do YOU live that young men don't do stupid things like this?

If he went to court than his defence would be that he is young, black and his familiy were slaves. It "caused him unjust so he must somewhere to release his anger"

That are normal thing for 18-year-old. Pot, sex and parting sure are but robbing not.
GAZA 2014
For the brave Israeli soldiers <3

User avatar
Aurulie
Diplomat
 
Posts: 828
Founded: Jul 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurulie » Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:57 am

Great, so why aren't blacks rioting when another black kills them, just because a white person kills a black person doesn't mean it's racism.

User avatar
Aurulie
Diplomat
 
Posts: 828
Founded: Jul 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurulie » Sat Aug 16, 2014 7:00 am

And these riots are doing nothing but driving the businesses away from blacks.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40533
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sat Aug 16, 2014 7:07 am

Aurulie wrote:Great, so why aren't blacks rioting when another black kills them, just because a white person kills a black person doesn't mean it's racism.


Because more often then not those crimes don't involve police officers.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat Aug 16, 2014 7:09 am

Scholmeria wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:he stole some freaking cigars and pushed the employee around to do it. geez where do YOU live that young men don't do stupid things like this?

If he went to court than his defence would be that he is young, black and his familiy were slaves. It "caused him unjust so he must somewhere to release his anger"

That are normal thing for 18-year-old. Pot, sex and parting sure are but robbing not.


*shrug*

18 year olds do lots of stupid things. except for underage drinking and pot smoking none are "normal" on their own but breaking the law in general is common. joyriding in a car that isn't your own, drag racing on city streets, assault, tagging, shoplifting, destruction of property, and other things of this type are common enough in young men that it means little in relation to the kind of men they will be in 10 years.
whatever

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies

Advertisement

Remove ads