Riots in St. Louis after Police kill Teen

[MERIZoC]

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/personal-incredulity

Unmoved.

Okay…..

Good to know you admit you're wrong.

[The UK in Exile]

Given the local time of 13:39 and an ambient temperature of 29 degrees centigrade, I would hazard a guess that they are either at work or out in a park somewhere.

so in other words, you're just bullshitting and have no idea who saw what?

The witnesses, the ones cited by every news report and quoted in pages linked in this thread.

[Tarsonis Survivors]

so in other words, you're just bullshitting and have no idea who saw what?

The witnesses, the ones cited by every news report and quoted in pages linked in this thread.

the two witness that offer incomplete and contradictory statements? oh okay.

[Mavorpen]

Sorry, but there was more than one witness.

except your own source says they didn't witness the shooting, just the initial confrontation.

and actually the second witness completely refutes the first witness. Yup, open and shut case.

What does this have to do with my post?

[Gauthier]

For people who still claim Brown deserved to be shot for participating in robbery I bring up the case of Texas Sovereign Citizen Douglas LeGuin (a white man of course) who set fire to a dumpster in a gated community to lure fire and police so he could ambush them with an AK-47. And even after he shot at them, the SWAT team let LeGuin surrender rather than gunning him down like a zombie as would have been the case if he had been an unarmed black man.

[The UK in Exile]

The witnesses, the ones cited by every news report and quoted in pages linked in this thread.

the two witness that offer incomplete and contradictory statements? oh okay.

both pretty consistent on whether he tried to take the officers gun. (hint: he didn't.)

[Vamtrl]

Unmoved.

Okay…..

Good to know you admit you're wrong.

Is "I win, thanks for conceding" an actual debate tactic allowed here? lmao, so childish. Your side has shown absolutely no evidence and yet you and people like you keep badgering about police brutality

[Boston and Surrounding Provinces]

For people who still claim Brown deserved to be shot for participating in robbery I bring up the case of Texas Sovereign Citizen Douglas LeGuin (a white man of course) who set fire to a dumpster in a gated community to lure fire and police so he could ambush them with an AK-47. And even after he shot at them, the SWAT team let LeGuin surrender rather than gunning him down like a zombie as would have been the case if he had been an unarmed black man.

You realize Texas and Missouri are two separate places, right?

[MERIZoC]

Okay…..

Good to know you admit you're wrong.

Is "I win, thanks for conceding" an actual debate tactic allowed here? lmao, so childish. Your side has shown absolutely no evidence and yet you and people like you keep badgering about police brutality

Says the guy who blatantly admits to committing a logical fallacy.

[Gauthier]

For people who still claim Brown deserved to be shot for participating in robbery I bring up the case of Texas Sovereign Citizen Douglas LeGuin (a white man of course) who set fire to a dumpster in a gated community to lure fire and police so he could ambush them with an AK-47. And even after he shot at them, the SWAT team let LeGuin surrender rather than gunning him down like a zombie as would have been the case if he had been an unarmed black man.

You realize Texas and Missouri are two separate places, right?

New York is supposed to be a blue state but it's the Stop and Frisk capital of America. Your point being?

[Tarsonis Survivors]

except your own source says they didn't witness the shooting, just the initial confrontation.

and actually the second witness completely refutes the first witness. Yup, open and shut case.

What does this have to do with my post?

I'm sorry,... I thought that was obvious. Point is you're wrong,and should feel bad about being so wrong. At this point there are no credible witnesses that can verify "Your version" of how the events went down.

[Boston and Surrounding Provinces]

You realize Texas and Missouri are two separate places, right?

New York is supposed to be a blue state but it's the Stop and Frisk capital of America. Your point being?

I believe the city of New York is the culprit in that case.

The police don't want another 9/11, and will do whatever it costs to prevent it. They're simply shaken.

[Vamtrl]

Is "I win, thanks for conceding" an actual debate tactic allowed here? lmao, so childish. Your side has shown absolutely no evidence and yet you and people like you keep badgering about police brutality

Says the guy who blatantly admits to committing a logical fallacy.

First off, admits?
Second here have a slice of hypocrisy: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/composition-division

[Gauthier]

New York is supposed to be a blue state but it's the Stop and Frisk capital of America. Your point being?

I believe the city of New York is the culprit in that case.

The police don't want another 9/11, and will do whatever it costs to prevent it. They're simply shaken.

Because blacks and Latinos were the hijackers. Yeah, we forgot about that part.

[Mavorpen]

What does this have to do with my post?

I'm sorry,... I thought that was obvious. Point is you're wrong,and should feel bad about being so wrong. At this point there are no credible witnesses that can verify "Your version" of how the events went down.

Wrong about what? Nothing in that post contradicts my claim that there was more than one witness.

Family members and some witnesses disputed the police account. They say Brown had his hands up in surrender when he was shot.

There is no "my version." I've only stated facts about what's been claimed by witnesses. I wasn't there. I can't have my own version of something I did not personally see.

[Tarsonis Survivors]

I believe the city of New York is the culprit in that case.

The police don't want another 9/11, and will do whatever it costs to prevent it. They're simply shaken.

Because blacks and Latinos were the hijackers. Yeah, we forgot about that part.

Damn right,... they hijack hearts.

[Vamtrl]

I believe the city of New York is the culprit in that case.

The police don't want another 9/11, and will do whatever it costs to prevent it. They're simply shaken.

Because blacks and Latinos were the hijackers. Yeah, we forgot about that part.

Lots of black terrorists. Underwear bomber, black.

[Gauthier]

Because blacks and Latinos were the hijackers. Yeah, we forgot about that part.

Lots of black terrorists. Underwear bomber, black.

One bomber = lots

I love new math.

[Boston and Surrounding Provinces]

I believe the city of New York is the culprit in that case.

The police don't want another 9/11, and will do whatever it costs to prevent it. They're simply shaken.

Because blacks and Latinos were the hijackers. Yeah, we forgot about that part.

Ever heard "See something, say something?"

That applies to EVERYONE.

[Gauthier]

Because blacks and Latinos were the hijackers. Yeah, we forgot about that part.

Ever heard "See something, say something?"

That applies to EVERYONE.

But applies to blacks and Latinos the most. *nod nod*

[The UK in Exile]

Because blacks and Latinos were the hijackers. Yeah, we forgot about that part.

Ever heard "See something, say something?"

That applies to EVERYONE.

What happened to loose lips sink ships?

[Boston and Surrounding Provinces]

Ever heard "See something, say something?"

That applies to EVERYONE.

But applies to blacks and Latinos the most. *nod nod*

'murica.

Ever heard "See something, say something?"

That applies to EVERYONE.

What happened to loose lips sink ships?

Don't know. That just didn't apply to a terrorist attack, unless you were the terrorist, and didn't want to let out the plans.

[Tarsonis Survivors]

I'm sorry,... I thought that was obvious. Point is you're wrong,and should feel bad about being so wrong. At this point there are no credible witnesses that can verify "Your version" of how the events went down.

Wrong about what? Nothing in that post contradicts my claim that there was more than one witness.

Family members and some witnesses disputed the police account. They say Brown had his hands up in surrender when he was shot.

There is no "my version." I've only stated facts about what's been claimed by witnesses. I wasn't there. I can't have my own version of something I did not personally see.

You've been sourcing their claims as "facts" for rebuttal, but they're all unreliable. You know nothing about what actually happened because no one currently involved does except the Cop and the dead guy. There's no credible evidence at this to give us any idea of how exactly the shooting occurred. Yet you are trying to argue for a certain version of the events, because it's what you want to believe not because it's substantiated by reality (at this time).

No what he was doing was struggling with the officer for his gun. Dumb ass that he was.

Again, wrong. He wasn't struggling with the officer for the gun when he was killed.

-Unknown, first witness not credible, second witness did not witness shooting.

His friend, an unreliable witness like his family who claimed their son was innocent. Turned out he wasnt.

Sorry, but there was more than one witness.

Your multiple witness claim doesn't hold up because of the two witnesses 1 admits they didn't see the shooting. The one who presumably did, is also not a credible witness. So this is worthless at this point.

[The UK in Exile]

Wrong about what? Nothing in that post contradicts my claim that there was more than one witness.

There is no "my version." I've only stated facts about what's been claimed by witnesses. I wasn't there. I can't have my own version of something I did not personally see.

You've been sourcing their claims as "facts" for rebuttal, but they're all unreliable. You know nothing about what actually happened because no one currently involved does except the Cop and the dead guy. There's no credible evidence at this to give us any idea of how exactly the shooting occurred. Yet you are trying to argue for a certain version of the events, because it's what you want to believe not because it's substantiated by reality (at this time).

Again, wrong. He wasn't struggling with the officer for the gun when he was killed.

-Unknown, first witness not credible, second witness did not witness shooting.

Sorry, but there was more than one witness.

Your multiple witness claim doesn't hold up because of the two witnesses 1 admits they didn't see the shooting. The one who presumably did, is also not a credible witness. So this is worthless at this point.

You know who the least credible witness to a shooting is right? the guy who did the shooting.

[Vamtrl]

Lots of black terrorists. Underwear bomber, black.

One bomber = lots

I love new math.

Just an example, cant refute my claim?