NATION

PASSWORD

Riots in St. Louis after Police kill Teen

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Blasted Craigs
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1146
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasted Craigs » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:45 am

Organized States wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:It looked like a war zone.

That's not what a war zone looks like. Anyone who says that has no idea what they're talking about.

Image
This is a war zone. Not roughed up suburbs.

I agree. People that claim it is a war zone IMHO are either trying to sensationalize the situation or are trying to make the people rioting look less than human and seem like savages, justifying any retaliation the police take. America has not known a true "war zone" on her streets since it fought for independence.
The government in America can best be described with an analogy. The two political parties are two cats, the elite is a rat, power is the cheese, and the common people is the floor. The floor feels two cats can guard the cheese better than one. But the cats fight each other, and the rat makes off with the cheese in glee. The floor cannot leave, and soon both cats serve the rat, because the rat has the all powerful cheese, and gives the cats a small bit of it. So the floor gets crapped on by all three, as they eat the cheese together.

User avatar
OMGeverynameistaken
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12437
Founded: Jun 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby OMGeverynameistaken » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:51 am

Blasted Craigs wrote:
Organized States wrote:That's not what a war zone looks like. Anyone who says that has no idea what they're talking about.

Image
This is a war zone. Not roughed up suburbs.

I agree. People that claim it is a war zone IMHO are either trying to sensationalize the situation or are trying to make the people rioting look less than human and seem like savages, justifying any retaliation the police take. America has not known a true "war zone" on her streets since it fought for independence.

Uh, the Civil War? The Battle of Atlanta springs to mind.
I AM DISAPPOINTED

User avatar
Vamtrl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vamtrl » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:52 am

So what's the deal with the kids death, any new information crop up yet?

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25601
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:53 am

Or, say, the Bonus March, where actual tanks were used against peaceful protesters?
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Calisu
Diplomat
 
Posts: 948
Founded: Aug 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Calisu » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:53 am

Vamtrl wrote:So what's the deal with the kids death, any new information crop up yet?

Was involved in a strong armed robbery, cop shot him multiple times while unarmed.

User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31410
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:54 am

Blasted Craigs wrote:
Organized States wrote:That's not what a war zone looks like. Anyone who says that has no idea what they're talking about.

Image
This is a war zone. Not roughed up suburbs.

I agree. People that claim it is a war zone IMHO are either trying to sensationalize the situation or are trying to make the people rioting look less than human and seem like savages, justifying any retaliation the police take. America has not known a true "war zone" on her streets since it fought for independence.

Uhhh...what about the American Civil War?

User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31410
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:55 am

OMGeverynameistaken wrote:
Blasted Craigs wrote:I agree. People that claim it is a war zone IMHO are either trying to sensationalize the situation or are trying to make the people rioting look less than human and seem like savages, justifying any retaliation the police take. America has not known a true "war zone" on her streets since it fought for independence.

Uh, the Civil War? The Battle of Atlanta springs to mind.

Along with the rest of Sherman's March to the Sea.

User avatar
Vamtrl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vamtrl » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:58 am

Calisu wrote:
Vamtrl wrote:So what's the deal with the kids death, any new information crop up yet?

Was involved in a strong armed robbery, cop shot him multiple times while unarmed.


lmfao strong armed robbery, so much for innocent.

User avatar
Blasted Craigs
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1146
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasted Craigs » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:58 am

Quintium wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:yeah I just watched the video on tv. he pushed the guy around and left the store with merchandise he didn't pay for.

SO WHAT?


So, he was a violent criminal, and not the gentle giant he's made out to be in the media.
He did do sumfing, even though the people around him - at least one of them also involved in that robbery - said he didn't do nuffin.

Sooooooo... if I make one mistake in my life, say I use too much of the blue paint in Kindergarten and scream at the teacher, thats grounds for justifying my execution later in life.

This infuriates me to no end. How in the nine hells does a past action justify the killing they recieve later in life. I will say the same thing I said when people claimed the "Thug" photos of Trayvon showed he was a violent thug that deserved to get shot, photos that coincidentally were later to be found to be of someone else.

I do not care if this "kid" was the hardest, most badass villain from the most depraved Quenton Taratino movie. If he was doing nothing wrong, they did not deserve to be shot and killed. Just because I thought the bullies at my school in my high school days were violent thugs did not mean I had the right to kill them, and if I did, it would not be justified. If I was a cop, it would still not justify the killing of them if they did nothing to deserve being killed.

I have worked in law enforcement in the past. Training must have changed, because back then we were taught there must be capability, jeopardy, and opportunity before I use lethal force. If a person has a knife, and is across the room, the have two, but opportunity is weak. As they close distance, then opportunity rises. I guess we dropped opportunity in this assessment of whether we defend the actions of lethal force from what I have seen lately in the news.

Batman is a great, awesome imaginary character in comics. In real life he would deserve to go to prison.
The government in America can best be described with an analogy. The two political parties are two cats, the elite is a rat, power is the cheese, and the common people is the floor. The floor feels two cats can guard the cheese better than one. But the cats fight each other, and the rat makes off with the cheese in glee. The floor cannot leave, and soon both cats serve the rat, because the rat has the all powerful cheese, and gives the cats a small bit of it. So the floor gets crapped on by all three, as they eat the cheese together.

User avatar
Calisu
Diplomat
 
Posts: 948
Founded: Aug 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Calisu » Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:59 am

Vamtrl wrote:
Calisu wrote:Was involved in a strong armed robbery, cop shot him multiple times while unarmed.


lmfao strong armed robbery, so much for innocent.

still didn't deserve what he got but the people making him out to be a saint are a bit much.

User avatar
Blasted Craigs
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1146
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasted Craigs » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:00 am

The Orson Empire wrote:
Blasted Craigs wrote:I agree. People that claim it is a war zone IMHO are either trying to sensationalize the situation or are trying to make the people rioting look less than human and seem like savages, justifying any retaliation the police take. America has not known a true "war zone" on her streets since it fought for independence.

Uhhh...what about the American Civil War?

:oops: Oh my gosh... You are right, totally forgot for some reason. Nothing can be said. Thanks for the correction. :blush:
The government in America can best be described with an analogy. The two political parties are two cats, the elite is a rat, power is the cheese, and the common people is the floor. The floor feels two cats can guard the cheese better than one. But the cats fight each other, and the rat makes off with the cheese in glee. The floor cannot leave, and soon both cats serve the rat, because the rat has the all powerful cheese, and gives the cats a small bit of it. So the floor gets crapped on by all three, as they eat the cheese together.

User avatar
Vamtrl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vamtrl » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:01 am

Calisu wrote:
Vamtrl wrote:
lmfao strong armed robbery, so much for innocent.

still didn't deserve what he got but the people making him out to be a saint are a bit much.


If the previous part about him going for the cop in the car is true then he did deserve it.

User avatar
Calisu
Diplomat
 
Posts: 948
Founded: Aug 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Calisu » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:01 am

Vamtrl wrote:
Calisu wrote:still didn't deserve what he got but the people making him out to be a saint are a bit much.


If the previous part about him going for the cop in the car is true then he did deserve it.

no proof so far

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25601
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:02 am

So, he was a violent criminal, and not the gentle giant he's made out to be in the media.
He did do sumfing, even though the people around him - at least one of them also involved in that robbery - said he didn't do nuffin.


Look.

I realize that in a technical sense pushing a guy and leaving the store with some merchandize - qualifies as a strongarmed robbery.

But it is not in any way similar to the actions of some thug that beats down on a store owner.

Even if it were.

EVEN IF. This man were walking down the middle of the street, half-naked, tattooed from head to toe in gang tattoos, while carrying a NAMBLA membership card in one hand and a KKK membership card in the other.

In no way does this justify killing him.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Vamtrl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vamtrl » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:08 am

Calisu wrote:
Vamtrl wrote:
If the previous part about him going for the cop in the car is true then he did deserve it.

no proof so far


but with this revelation, I am going to stick with the cops story until internal affairs or FBI{?} says otherwise.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:13 am

Vamtrl wrote:
Calisu wrote:Was involved in a strong armed robbery, cop shot him multiple times while unarmed.


lmfao strong armed robbery, so much for innocent.

He wasn't perpetrating a robbery when shot and the police weren't attempting to arrest him at the time.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Blasted Craigs
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1146
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasted Craigs » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:19 am

Allanea wrote:
So, he was a violent criminal, and not the gentle giant he's made out to be in the media.
He did do sumfing, even though the people around him - at least one of them also involved in that robbery - said he didn't do nuffin.


Look.

I realize that in a technical sense pushing a guy and leaving the store with some merchandize - qualifies as a strongarmed robbery.

But it is not in any way similar to the actions of some thug that beats down on a store owner.

Even if it were.

EVEN IF. This man were walking down the middle of the street, half-naked, tattooed from head to toe in gang tattoos, while carrying a NAMBLA membership card in one hand and a KKK membership card in the other.

In no way does this justify killing him.

My sentiments exactly. People that smugly say this child deserved to be killed because of what was on this video IMHO are really saying he deserved to be shot for not being white enough in America. They just grasp at straws for any reason to say "yep, that's why I defend his murder, not because of his skin color. I'm not racist, just sayin'."
The government in America can best be described with an analogy. The two political parties are two cats, the elite is a rat, power is the cheese, and the common people is the floor. The floor feels two cats can guard the cheese better than one. But the cats fight each other, and the rat makes off with the cheese in glee. The floor cannot leave, and soon both cats serve the rat, because the rat has the all powerful cheese, and gives the cats a small bit of it. So the floor gets crapped on by all three, as they eat the cheese together.

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:21 am

This shit is Trayvon Martin again. I want to be angry. White America wants to be angry. But we're tired of seeing this shit play out the same way over and over again, and we're tired of being blamed for it all.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:23 am

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:This shit is Trayvon Martin again. I want to be angry. White America wants to be angry. But we're tired of seeing this shit play out the same way over and over again, and we're tired of being blamed for it all.

...Whut?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vamtrl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vamtrl » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:27 am

Geilinor wrote:He wasn't perpetrating a robbery when shot and the police weren't attempting to arrest him at the time.


No what he was doing was struggling with the officer for his gun. Dumb ass that he was.

Blasted Craigs wrote:My sentiments exactly. People that smugly say this child deserved to be killed because of what was on this video IMHO are really saying he deserved to be shot for not being white enough in America. They just grasp at straws for any reason to say "yep, that's why I defend his murder, not because of his skin color. I'm not racist, just sayin'."


Lmao, please. No. Just no.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:27 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:This shit is Trayvon Martin again. I want to be angry. White America wants to be angry. But we're tired of seeing this shit play out the same way over and over again, and we're tired of being blamed for it all.

...Whut?


presumably he's of the "why are people so outraged about unarmed people being shot in self defence?" crowd.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:28 am

Vamtrl wrote:
Geilinor wrote:He wasn't perpetrating a robbery when shot and the police weren't attempting to arrest him at the time.


No what he was doing was struggling with the officer for his gun. Dumb ass that he was.

Again, wrong. He wasn't struggling with the officer for the gun when he was killed.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vamtrl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vamtrl » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:30 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Vamtrl wrote:
No what he was doing was struggling with the officer for his gun. Dumb ass that he was.

Again, wrong. He wasn't struggling with the officer for the gun when he was killed.


No presumably he was too busy bleeding to death. :roll:

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:30 am

Vamtrl wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Again, wrong. He wasn't struggling with the officer for the gun when he was killed.


No presumably he was too busy bleeding to death. :roll:

...What?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Blasted Craigs
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1146
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasted Craigs » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:31 am

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:This shit is Trayvon Martin again. I want to be angry. White America wants to be angry. But we're tired of seeing this shit play out the same way over and over again, and we're tired of being blamed for it all.

Okay, (begin Sarcasm Mode)
are you mad things like this happen? Or mad people have the gall to complain kids are being shot with impunity, and think they should quietly just go about their business and not "bother" white America with this "Nonsense". Meanwile, the Republicans scream bloody murder at the injustice of the fact they were audited in a discriminate manner by the IRS, now there is a real crime worthy of public outrage, and WHY ARE NOT MORE PEOPLE OUTRAGED!?!? Conservatives are the true victims, dontcha know? (End Sarcasm)

If you are outraged children are shot and killed in American streets and nothing is done, then I agree. It is a travesty, not just this one incident, but also the many similar cases that happen every year. And not just to minorities, but all the poor. Remember the teen that opened the door holding a wii remote, the cop didn't say anything or identify herself when she knocked, and just gunned him down? Was white but poor, obviously of no use to society, and the cop was right, right?

It kills me this type of shit happens ALL THE TIME, yet there are still many who say there is not a problem.
The government in America can best be described with an analogy. The two political parties are two cats, the elite is a rat, power is the cheese, and the common people is the floor. The floor feels two cats can guard the cheese better than one. But the cats fight each other, and the rat makes off with the cheese in glee. The floor cannot leave, and soon both cats serve the rat, because the rat has the all powerful cheese, and gives the cats a small bit of it. So the floor gets crapped on by all three, as they eat the cheese together.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Greco-Prussia, Kitsuva, Majestic-12 [Bot], Necroghastia, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads