NATION

PASSWORD

Riots in St. Louis after Police kill Teen

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Calisu
Diplomat
 
Posts: 948
Founded: Aug 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Calisu » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:22 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Calisu wrote:So it's safe to assume this racist cop knew he wouldn't get into trouble, which he hasn't for murdering a black guy for jaywalking

Please demonstrate he was racist.

Then show us why that would make self defense void.

So you're saying that because he's racist he shouldn't be charged with murder?

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:23 am

Calisu wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Please demonstrate he was racist.

Then show us why that would make self defense void.

So you're saying that because he's racist he shouldn't be charged with murder?

No, I'm saying that being racist doesn't magically make your rights as a citizen or a cop, void.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:23 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:

As to the question, If the account that support defense were given earlier, then why has the media not bothered to report them as they were received? There are several possibilities: the media only recently received them (and reported them as they came in), or they sat on them for some reason.

Er, no. The news reports that there are eyewitness reports supporting Wilson's story came from this tweet. And the twitter...er got that information from police sources. Police sources had to have released this information, so even if the police sources had this information days earlier, news outlets couldn't report on them unless the police released them.


I find the timing of these reports to be highly suspicious. However, they must be taken into account.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42345
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:24 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Calisu wrote:So you're saying that because he's racist he shouldn't be charged with murder?

No, I'm saying that being racist doesn't magically make your rights as a citizen or a cop, void.


And you aren't saying he is racist.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Germanic Templars
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20685
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Germanic Templars » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:25 am

Calisu wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Please demonstrate he was racist.

Then show us why that would make self defense void.

So you're saying that because he's racist he shouldn't be charged with murder?


Proof that he is racist besides going off he killed a black guy.

  • INTP
  • All American Patriotic Constitutionalist/Classic libertarian (with fiscal conservatism)
  • Religiously Tolerant
  • Roman Catholic
  • Hoplophilic/ammosexual
  • X=3.13, Y=2.41
  • Supports the Blue


I support Capitalism do you? If so, put this in your sig.

XY = Male, XX = Female

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:25 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Er, no. The news reports that there are eyewitness reports supporting Wilson's story came from this tweet. And the twitter...er got that information from police sources. Police sources had to have released this information, so even if the police sources had this information days earlier, news outlets couldn't report on them unless the police released them.


I find the timing of these reports to be highly suspicious. However, they must be taken into account.

I don't find it suspicious per say. I see it as more of the police force fucking up once again and not being good at organizing and distributing information in coherent manners. I mean, the QuikTrip video thing was just embarrassing.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:25 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Calisu wrote:So you're saying that because he's racist he shouldn't be charged with murder?

No, I'm saying that being racist doesn't magically make your rights as a citizen or a cop, void.


Your words were clear. I don't see how anyone could have misunderstood them. Intentionally twisting them is another story.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Calisu
Diplomat
 
Posts: 948
Founded: Aug 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Calisu » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:25 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Calisu wrote:So you're saying that because he's racist he shouldn't be charged with murder?

No, I'm saying that being racist doesn't magically make your rights as a citizen or a cop, void.

It should. If you murder someone based on their skin colour you don't deserve the same rights and freedoms as the rest of us.

User avatar
Serksis Federation
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Serksis Federation » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:26 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Personally, I think that we should put cams in each of the police cars and on each of the officers. That would do a helluva lot to prevent future Fergusons.


Where would the data be stored. I can see it for the cop cars, but that's a lot of data being stored per cop.

Data warehouses aren't a new thing.
No Law Can Set You Free

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:26 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No, I'm saying that being racist doesn't magically make your rights as a citizen or a cop, void.


And you aren't saying he is racist.

I don't think I've ever said he was racist.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:27 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
I find the timing of these reports to be highly suspicious. However, they must be taken into account.

I don't find it suspicious per say. I see it as more of the police force fucking up once again and not being good at organizing and distributing information in coherent manners. I mean, the QuikTrip video thing was just embarrassing.


I will have to review the vid.

The timing of the reports could be incompetence/ a mistake, or it could be an attempted cover-up. Again, we do not have enough information.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:27 am

Calisu wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No, I'm saying that being racist doesn't magically make your rights as a citizen or a cop, void.

It should. If you murder someone based on their skin colour you don't deserve the same rights and freedoms as the rest of us.

See, that's the thing. Being a racist also doesn't mean that he murdered the guy because of his skin color. That's the entire point.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:28 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No, I'm saying that being racist doesn't magically make your rights as a citizen or a cop, void.


And you aren't saying he is racist.

We don't know.
Last edited by Geilinor on Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Calisu
Diplomat
 
Posts: 948
Founded: Aug 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Calisu » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:28 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Calisu wrote:It should. If you murder someone based on their skin colour you don't deserve the same rights and freedoms as the rest of us.

See, that's the thing. Being a racist also doesn't mean that he murdered the guy because of his skin color. That's the entire point.

Provide proof he didn't murder Brown

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42345
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:28 am

Calisu wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No, I'm saying that being racist doesn't magically make your rights as a citizen or a cop, void.

It should. If you murder someone based on their skin colour you don't deserve the same rights and freedoms as the rest of us.


First prove he murdered someone. Second prove he did so based on that person's skin color. Third explain exactly what rights and freedoms should be removed for said act and explain why.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:28 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:I don't find it suspicious per say. I see it as more of the police force fucking up once again and not being good at organizing and distributing information in coherent manners. I mean, the QuikTrip video thing was just embarrassing.


I will have to review the vid.

The timing of the reports could be incompetence/ a mistake, or it could be an attempted cover-up. Again, we do not have enough information.

Personally I'm significantly more interested in the FBI investigation at this point.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:29 am

Calisu wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:See, that's the thing. Being a racist also doesn't mean that he murdered the guy because of his skin color. That's the entire point.

Provide proof he didn't murder Brown

I.... I'm not even arguing that he didn't murder Brown.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:29 am

Calisu wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No, I'm saying that being racist doesn't magically make your rights as a citizen or a cop, void.

It should. If you murder someone based on their skin colour you don't deserve the same rights and freedoms as the rest of us.


If you murder period you do not deserve the same rights, That is why we have courts to determine if it was murder, and why we incarcerate (thus depriving the guilty of their rights) the guilty.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42345
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:29 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
I will have to review the vid.

The timing of the reports could be incompetence/ a mistake, or it could be an attempted cover-up. Again, we do not have enough information.

Personally I'm significantly more interested in the FBI investigation at this point.


It is a dangerous thing for a police department to lose the trust of the public. They will have to work very hard to regain it.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:29 am

Calisu wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:See, that's the thing. Being a racist also doesn't mean that he murdered the guy because of his skin color. That's the entire point.

Provide proof he didn't murder Brown

That's not how it works. "Presumed innocent until proven guilty" is how trials work.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:30 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
I will have to review the vid.

The timing of the reports could be incompetence/ a mistake, or it could be an attempted cover-up. Again, we do not have enough information.

Personally I'm significantly more interested in the FBI investigation at this point.


The further the investigation can be removed for suspicion of bias, the better. Agreed.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:30 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Personally I'm significantly more interested in the FBI investigation at this point.


It is a dangerous thing for a police department to lose the trust of the public. They will have to work very hard to regain it.

Thing is though, they seem to have lost that trust a long time ago, and this event is the one that broke the camels back and made the community's collective anger and frustration be released at once.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:31 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Personally I'm significantly more interested in the FBI investigation at this point.


It is a dangerous thing for a police department to lose the trust of the public. They will have to work very hard to regain it.

Getting dashboard cameras installed would help.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:31 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Personally I'm significantly more interested in the FBI investigation at this point.


The further the investigation can be removed for suspicion of bias, the better. Agreed.

Stop agreeing, we're going to break space-time. :p
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:31 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Personally I'm significantly more interested in the FBI investigation at this point.


It is a dangerous thing for a police department to lose the trust of the public. They will have to work very hard to regain it.


If they ever can regain it, or had it in the first place.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Europa Undivided, New Heldervinia, Ohnoh, Page, Shrillland, Tesseris

Advertisement

Remove ads