NATION

PASSWORD

Riots in St. Louis after Police kill Teen

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:15 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:I'm not sure why this is surprising to anyone. Body cameras, to me, seems to be one of the most obvious solutions to this problem. And they do work. Of course, it won't necessarily address the central problems of being poorly trained and such, but it's a nice step forward.

What are the odds that we'll be able to make body-cameras a requirement for the police, though? Considering how adamantly many police oppose civilians filming them, particularly when they are beating people, can we really expect to ever make body-cameras standard?



It is more of a budget issue than an individual officer opinion issue.

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:16 pm

Does anyone know why there wasn't a dashcam? I mean, it probably wouldn't have actually been in frame, but we would at least have audio to go off of.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:19 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:I'm not sure why this is surprising to anyone. Body cameras, to me, seems to be one of the most obvious solutions to this problem. And they do work. Of course, it won't necessarily address the central problems of being poorly trained and such, but it's a nice step forward.

What are the odds that we'll be able to make body-cameras a requirement for the police, though? Considering how adamantly many police oppose civilians filming them, particularly when they are beating people, can we really expect to ever make body-cameras standard?

Thing is, it wouldn't be up to the individual police officers.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:21 pm

Merizoc wrote:
Scomagia wrote:What are the odds that we'll be able to make body-cameras a requirement for the police, though? Considering how adamantly many police oppose civilians filming them, particularly when they are beating people, can we really expect to ever make body-cameras standard?

Thing is, it wouldn't be up to the individual police officers.

I imagine administrators would likely be quite obstinate as well.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:24 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Merizoc wrote:Thing is, it wouldn't be up to the individual police officers.

I imagine administrators would likely be quite obstinate as well.

Lawmakers could force them into it.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:38 pm

Merizoc wrote:
Scomagia wrote:I imagine administrators would likely be quite obstinate as well.

Lawmakers could force them into it.

Provided we could actually get our lawmakers to cooperate on this.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25601
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:42 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Scomagia wrote:What are the odds that we'll be able to make body-cameras a requirement for the police, though? Considering how adamantly many police oppose civilians filming them, particularly when they are beating people, can we really expect to ever make body-cameras standard?



It is more of a budget issue than an individual officer opinion issue.


Cameras are comparatively cheap compared to the existing expenditures per police officer. Not to mention the expenses related to lawsuits from people whom the police officers have beat up.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Olavoland
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olavoland » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:42 pm

Distruzio wrote:"The police are fucked up! How can we possibly address this?"
"... lets destroy shit!"
"That sounds like a good plan!"


It worked well the last 956 times, right?
Formerly known as Estado Paulista.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:54 pm

"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:00 pm

Calisu wrote:
Organized States wrote:Don't need too. The Police Captain in charge is telling the protesters that they are perfectly allowed to demonstrate, just those who fire upon police officers and National Guardsmen, and attempt to assault them will be arrested.

Shooting at someone is attempted murder and should be charged as such.


Not necessarily. Shooting at someone in self defense is not attempted murder.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:03 pm



This just announces that the autopsy is complete and confirms the six rounds. They still have to release the full report.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:06 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Scomagia wrote:What are the odds that we'll be able to make body-cameras a requirement for the police, though? Considering how adamantly many police oppose civilians filming them, particularly when they are beating people, can we really expect to ever make body-cameras standard?



It is more of a budget issue than an individual officer opinion issue.

More of a blue code of silence issue, actually.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:08 pm

Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:10 pm

Big Jim P wrote:LMFAO!

Funny.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:41 pm


User avatar
Vamtrl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vamtrl » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:53 pm



Sounds like a troll provoking the police for a reaction. Amusing.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:04 pm

The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:

I am so, so, so, so, so glad you are not a peace officer.

Never thought I'd say this, but maybe anonymous is right. Maybe we should get body cameras.


The police should have body cameras, not only for the protection of civilians, but theirs as well.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
DesAnges
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31807
Founded: Nov 02, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby DesAnges » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:06 pm

Big Jim P wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Never thought I'd say this, but maybe anonymous is right. Maybe we should get body cameras.


The police should have body cameras, not only for the protection of civilians, but theirs as well.

Also for the occasional leaked dogging footage.
My name is Kim-Jong Ayatollah, and I'm a big boy. I'm ten and three-quarters. I have high levels of respect for this man. <3<32 NSG, two pages into a debate
@Iseabbv Don't @ me

User avatar
Conservative California
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Aug 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Conservative California » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:37 pm

What exactly are these people 'fighting' for? Regardless, let's, for a minute, pretend they even know. How exactly are they going to achieve it by destroying other peoples' property and throwing Molotovs at the police. These riots are clearly not about justice for Michael Brown's family; they're just an excuse for people to do whatever they want to do and go unpunished. The African-American community has let me down, once again, with their stupid victimism and violent and senseless overreaction to events.
Last edited by Conservative California on Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:39 pm

Conservative California wrote:What exactly are these people 'fighting' for? Regardless, let's, for a minute, pretend they even know. How exactly are they going to achieve it by destroying other peoples' property and throwing Molotovs at the police. These riots are clearly not about justice for Michael Brown's family; they're just an excuse for people to do whatever they want to do and go unpunished. The African-American community has let me down, once again, with their stupid victimism and violent and senseless overreaction to events.

Have anything that's ground in reality and knowledge of the topic rather than childishly racist stereotypes?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:40 pm

Conservative California wrote:What exactly are these people 'fighting' for? Regardless, let's, for a minute, pretend they even know. How exactly are they going to achieve it by destroying other peoples' property and throwing Molotovs at the police. These riots are clearly not about justice for Michael Brown's family; they're just an excuse for people to do whatever they want to do and go unpunished. The African-American community has let me down, once again, with their stupid victimism and violent and senseless overreaction to events.

You make the false assumption that most of the protesters are rioters, or that most of the rioters are looters. A large majority of the people out there want justice and reformation—it's just that some people try and take advantage of current events.

User avatar
Conservative California
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Aug 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Conservative California » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:40 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Conservative California wrote:What exactly are these people 'fighting' for? Regardless, let's, for a minute, pretend they even know. How exactly are they going to achieve it by destroying other peoples' property and throwing Molotovs at the police. These riots are clearly not about justice for Michael Brown's family; they're just an excuse for people to do whatever they want to do and go unpunished. The African-American community has let me down, once again, with their stupid victimism and violent and senseless overreaction to events.

Have anything that's ground in reality and knowledge of the topic rather than childishly racist stereotypes?


What I said is just not based on reality for people who refuse to acknowledge uncomfortable facts.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:41 pm

Conservative California wrote:What exactly are these people 'fighting' for? Regardless, let's, for a minute, pretend they even know. How exactly are they going to achieve it by destroying other peoples' property and throwing Molotovs at the police. These riots are clearly not about justice for Michael Brown's family; they're just an excuse for people to do whatever they want to do and go unpunished. The African-American community has let me down, once again, with their stupid victimism and violent and senseless overreaction to events.

I love how you've turned a minority of rioters into a representation of the black community as a whole. That takes skill.
Last edited by Scomagia on Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:41 pm

Merizoc wrote:
Conservative California wrote:What exactly are these people 'fighting' for? Regardless, let's, for a minute, pretend they even know. How exactly are they going to achieve it by destroying other peoples' property and throwing Molotovs at the police. These riots are clearly not about justice for Michael Brown's family; they're just an excuse for people to do whatever they want to do and go unpunished. The African-American community has let me down, once again, with their stupid victimism and violent and senseless overreaction to events.

You make the false assumption that most of the protesters are rioters, or that most of the rioters are looters. A large majority of the people out there want justice and reformation—it's just that some people try and take advantage of current events.

Also, he must not pay attention to the news much, considering that the "white community" has rioted over far stupider shit.

http://gawker.com/video-of-violent-riot ... -954939719
http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/4 ... anada.html
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:42 pm

Conservative California wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Have anything that's ground in reality and knowledge of the topic rather than childishly racist stereotypes?


What I said is just not based on reality for people who refuse to acknowledge uncomfortable facts.

I realize racists have their own alternate reality where facts aren't facts and vice versa, but surely you can do better than this and at least try to ATTEMPT to back up these "facts."
Last edited by Mavorpen on Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Greco-Prussia, Kitsuva, Majestic-12 [Bot], Necroghastia, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads