There are witnesses that go against the officers story too
Advertisement
by Geilinor » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:08 am
by Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:09 am
by Geilinor » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:09 am
by Kouralia » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:09 am
by Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:10 am
by Geilinor » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:11 am
by Germanic Templars » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:11 am
by Big Jim P » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:12 am
Mavorpen wrote:Big Jim P wrote:
I did not. ALL the eyewitness reports we are receiving have come through new channels.
Which doesn't make them one in the same. You do realize that the eye witness reports don't have to have been gathered on the exact SAME day as they were reported in the news, right?
And in fact, I find that extremely hard to buy. Want to cite that?
by Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:12 am
Germanic Templars wrote:Side note related to the thread, I think there should be a poll about whether the situation is either self-defense or murder, just to see where NS is at on it.
by Geilinor » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:13 am
by Calisu » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:14 am
Geilinor wrote:Calisu wrote:Where is the dash cam footage? If it didn't see what happened it would have still recorded the conversation.
Ferguson PD doesn't have dash cams. http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2014/08/momentum_grows_for_police_dashboard_cameras_body_cams_in_wake_of_ferguson.php
by Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:14 am
Big Jim P wrote:Of course they don't have to hit the news the day they were reported.
Big Jim P wrote: However, we only learn of them when the new reports them. Why would the media would sit on reports supporting self defense?
by Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:15 am
Calisu wrote:Geilinor wrote:Ferguson PD doesn't have dash cams. http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2014/08/momentum_grows_for_police_dashboard_cameras_body_cams_in_wake_of_ferguson.php
Oh what a coincidence the one piece of evidence that would have been more than a random persons word.
by Big Jim P » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:17 am
Mavorpen wrote:Big Jim P wrote:Of course they don't have to hit the news the day they were reported.
Which is the reason behind my initial confusion. At some point you muddled the two to the point where they became indistinguishable, and it really makes no sense to claim that the witness reports are more "current" unless you know when they were given to the police force.Big Jim P wrote: However, we only learn of them when the new reports them. Why would the media would sit on reports supporting self defense?
I don't understand the question, sorry.
by Neutraligon » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:20 am
Big Jim P wrote:Mavorpen wrote:No, that's not a coincidence. Why would it be a coincidence for a cop car to not have a dashcam in an area that has no police car dashcams ?
Personally, I think that we should put cams in each of the police cars and on each of the officers. That would do a helluva lot to prevent future Fergusons.
by Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:21 am
Big Jim P wrote:
As to the question, If the account that support defense were given earlier, then why has the media not bothered to report them as they were received? There are several possibilities: the media only recently received them (and reported them as they came in), or they sat on them for some reason.
by Mavorpen » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:22 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: East Leaf Republic, Google [Bot], The Xenopolis Confederation, X3-U
Advertisement