NATION

PASSWORD

SWB: Shopping While Black

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Iron Dog
Diplomat
 
Posts: 820
Founded: Jul 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Iron Dog » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:52 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Iron Dog wrote:Or you could be smart and not wave something that looks remarkably like a real gun at the police.

Being stupid is not a capital offense, last I checked.

If a police officer orders you to drop a weapon or something that looks like one, and you refuse, then you should win a Darwin Award.

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:53 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Iron Dog wrote:Or you could be smart and not wave something that looks remarkably like a real gun at the police.

Being stupid is not a capital offense, last I checked.

Heat of the moment dude. They were just following training, and an on duty cop isn't as calm as someone just sitting in front of a computer.

It doesn't justify it, but it's why it happened.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:53 pm

Iron Dog wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:Being stupid is not a capital offense, last I checked.

If a police officer orders you to drop a weapon or something that looks like one, and you refuse, then you should win a Darwin Award.

Maybe, but that doesn't mean a cop has a right to make it happen.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:53 pm

Iron Dog wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:Being stupid is not a capital offense, last I checked.

If a police officer orders you to drop a weapon or something that looks like one, and you refuse, then you should win a Darwin Award.

Being stupid is not a capital offense. Not even being exceptionally stupid.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:53 pm

Polkopia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:And I can injure people with a bat. Guess I should just expect the cops to be called on me should I ever decide to buy a bat at walmart because I'm black, right?


There's a huge difference with carrying a bat around, and carrying a gun around.

Except, we're not talking about a gun. We're talking about a TOY gun. And quite frankly, I could do a shit ton more damage with a bat.

Polkopia wrote:And yes, if you're waving a bat at people in a threatening manner, you should be expecting the cops to be called on you.

And since there is no legitimate evidence of the man doing this, this is irrelevant as hell.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Other Thafoo
Minister
 
Posts: 2511
Founded: Mar 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Other Thafoo » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:54 pm

but you know what we can all agree on no matter our politics

that it is a bad thing that a person died, no one likes it when a person dies

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:54 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:Being stupid is not a capital offense, last I checked.

Heat of the moment dude. They were just following training, and an on duty cop isn't as calm as someone just sitting in front of a computer.

It doesn't justify it, but it's why it happened.

If a cop can't handle the "heat of the moment" then that training was a failure. If you're trained well you should be as calm on duty as a cop as you are in front of a computer, if you're not or you can't accomplish that feat then you shouldn't be on the force.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:54 pm

Since it seems WalMarts are open carry stores, a test would be in order. Have two men walk in at the same time, both open carrying the exact same firearm. One white, one black. And see who gets the cops called on him.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Benian Republic
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9583
Founded: Dec 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Benian Republic » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:54 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Condunum wrote:The best part is that if he was white, Ritchie would have probably just considered him a patriotic american defending his second amendment right by open carrying. Because if you're white, you can carry weapons in a wal-mart. But fuck me, don't let that n_gger touch the air guns.

Well it's just as the Founding Fathers intended. They only have access to 3/5s of the Constitution.

Black people didn't count back then
Pro: United Ireland, IRA, Allan Ryan, Palestine, Malvinas, Ukraine, Hamas-Fatah cooperation, legalized Gay marriage, Tibetan Resistance, Atheism.
Anti: English Imperialism, Nazism, communism, Israel, Zionism, Margret thatcher, Martin McGuinness, good Friday agreement.
Proud to be Irish, please telegram me I enjoy getting them.
Casualties showing why supporting Israel is morally corrupt: http://www.countthekids.org/

*The People's Republic of Aryan Union of Celts
*Was Aryan Union of Celts

User avatar
Iron Dog
Diplomat
 
Posts: 820
Founded: Jul 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Iron Dog » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:55 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Polkopia wrote:
There's a huge difference with carrying a bat around, and carrying a gun around.

Except, we're not talking about a gun. We're talking about a TOY gun. And quite frankly, I could do a shit ton more damage with a bat.

Polkopia wrote:And yes, if you're waving a bat at people in a threatening manner, you should be expecting the cops to be called on you.

And since neither did this man do this, this is irrelevant as hell.

Um read the other links that have been posted, they says he was waving it around.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:55 pm

Benian Republic wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Well it's just as the Founding Fathers intended. They only have access to 3/5s of the Constitution.

Black people didn't count back then


Actually blacks counted as 3/5th of white people for votes.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Earth in Roughly 1000 Years
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 463
Founded: Aug 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Earth in Roughly 1000 Years » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:55 pm

Condunum wrote:I didn't "flip out", please don't use a tone argument. I'm assuming they didn't feel threatened, because there is nothing to tell me they felt threatened, because no one said they felt threatened. Since no one claimed to feel threatened, I don't have reason to think they felt threatened.

Yeah, you did. Right but your original argument was that they didn't feel threatened, not that you assumed they didn't. Two different things. Thanks for conceding your argument though.
And did that somehow impede you from attempting to describe the situation to the police? Because that's what we're talking about.

Yes, absolutely, I was unable to talk at all for a few hours.
You haven't shown be why they would feel judged.

I don't need to, I my argument was that just because they didn't report it doesn't mean they didn't feel threatened.

Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.67
Political Spectrum:
Left: 0.49
Libertarian: 4.06
Non-Interventionist: 4.4
Cultural Liberal: 3.29
Political Test
http://oi57.tinypic.com/erifc1.jpg
Social Attitude Test:
http://oi57.tinypic.com/2dj1btf.jpg
Political Survey:
http://politics.beasts.org/scripts/resu ... 1915620368

If you think your shit doesn't stink it's only because your sense of smell does.

_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Sig.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:56 pm

Iron Dog wrote:Um read the other links that have been posted, they says he was waving it around.

No, the guy who called the cops CLAIMS he was waving it around. And since we have no other witnesses (witnesses he CLAIM were being threatened by it) verifying his claim, we can assume he's full of shit.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Earth in Roughly 1000 Years
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 463
Founded: Aug 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Earth in Roughly 1000 Years » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:56 pm

Other Thafoo wrote:but you know what we can all agree on no matter our politics

that it is a bad thing that a person died, no one likes it when a person dies

Agreed.

Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.67
Political Spectrum:
Left: 0.49
Libertarian: 4.06
Non-Interventionist: 4.4
Cultural Liberal: 3.29
Political Test
http://oi57.tinypic.com/erifc1.jpg
Social Attitude Test:
http://oi57.tinypic.com/2dj1btf.jpg
Political Survey:
http://politics.beasts.org/scripts/resu ... 1915620368

If you think your shit doesn't stink it's only because your sense of smell does.

_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Sig.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:56 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Iron Dog wrote:Um read the other links that have been posted, they says he was waving it around.

No, the guy who called the cops CLAIMS he was waving it around. And since we have no other witnesses (witnesses he CLAIM were being threatened by it) verifying his claim, we can assume he's full of shit.


not really, we can't assume it

maybe they were distracted by other things

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:56 pm

Condunum wrote:You'd think the title is a joke, but it's not.

22 year old John Crawford was shot and killed by police, in an Ohio Walmart store.

His crime? Shopping for an air gun in the store. His sentence? Death by cop.


Poor guy. :(

Should the dumbass who called the police face time for this?


No. He did not shoot the guy and had no way of knowing the cops would handle it so badly. Being probably racist is not a crime, he honestly misunderstood the situation, and there is nothing wrong with calling the cops to report something that you think is a crime in progress.

This is the cops' fault for shooting first and asking questions later.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:57 pm

Gauthier wrote:Since it seems WalMarts are open carry stores, a test would be in order. Have two men walk in at the same time, both open carrying the exact same firearm. One white, one black. And see who gets the cops called on him.

I smell a "What Would You Do?" premise here...

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:57 pm

Maurepas wrote:
The Sotoan Union wrote:Heat of the moment dude. They were just following training, and an on duty cop isn't as calm as someone just sitting in front of a computer.

It doesn't justify it, but it's why it happened.

If a cop can't handle the "heat of the moment" then that training was a failure. If you're trained well you should be as calm on duty as a cop as you are in front of a computer, if you're not or you can't accomplish that feat then you shouldn't be on the force.

I don't think you know what it's like to have people point guns at you. Or the horrible feeling of quickly trying to decide whether what looks like a gun is a gun or not, and why is this man not putting down the gun, and you were told in training that hesitating in these situations can be extremely dangerous, and HOLY SHIT WHY ISN'T THIS MAN PUTTING DOWN THE FUCKING GUN!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:57 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No, the guy who called the cops CLAIMS he was waving it around. And since we have no other witnesses (witnesses he CLAIM were being threatened by it) verifying his claim, we can assume he's full of shit.


not really, we can't assume it

maybe they were distracted by other things

What the actual fuck? You're telling me he's the ONLY one who noticed a person supposedly waving around a "real gun"? Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:59 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Maurepas wrote:If a cop can't handle the "heat of the moment" then that training was a failure. If you're trained well you should be as calm on duty as a cop as you are in front of a computer, if you're not or you can't accomplish that feat then you shouldn't be on the force.

I don't think you know what it's like to have people point guns at you. Or the horrible feeling of quickly trying to decide whether what looks like a gun is a gun or not, and why is this man not putting down the gun, and you were told in training that hesitating in these situations can be extremely dangerous, and HOLY SHIT WHY ISN'T THIS MAN PUTTING DOWN THE FUCKING GUN!

You're right, I don't, that's why I'm not a cop. A cop has to be used to it, has to be prepared for it, and has to be able to tell the difference between a toy and an actual weapon, and be calm and collected enough to do it.

If they're not able to accomplish that feat, then they shouldn't be cops. They can do as I do and sit on a computer and talk about cops, because that's all they're good for with regard to police work.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:59 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Maurepas wrote:If a cop can't handle the "heat of the moment" then that training was a failure. If you're trained well you should be as calm on duty as a cop as you are in front of a computer, if you're not or you can't accomplish that feat then you shouldn't be on the force.

I don't think you know what it's like to have people point guns at you. Or the horrible feeling of quickly trying to decide whether what looks like a gun is a gun or not, and why is this man not putting down the gun, and you were told in training that hesitating in these situations can be extremely dangerous, and HOLY SHIT WHY ISN'T THIS MAN PUTTING DOWN THE FUCKING GUN!


this is a good point

the police have to make life-and-death decisions on a regular basis. Its a very stressful job, given the situation (they were called in about a suspect armed with a gun), and the fact that he refused to drop the gun while waving it around... I think they made a reasonable, if ultimately wrong call.

No one should face any prosecution because there was no malice on the part of anyone (I'm sure the person did not prank call the police, he felt genuinely threatened). The death is regretable though.

User avatar
Polkopia
Minister
 
Posts: 2892
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Polkopia » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:59 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Polkopia wrote:
There's a huge difference with carrying a bat around, and carrying a gun around.

Except, we're not talking about a gun. We're talking about a TOY gun. And quite frankly, I could do a shit ton more damage with a bat.

Polkopia wrote:And yes, if you're waving a bat at people in a threatening manner, you should be expecting the cops to be called on you.

And since there is no legitimate evidence of the man doing this, this is irrelevant as hell.


How is it irrelevant? The only eyewitness who spoke out so far claims he was waving it.

Plus, the gun shot BB's and pellets. I'm pretty sure you could deal quite a bit of damage with one of those if used right.
Anthem (Instrumental) Factbook Embassy
Check out the Polkopian Premier League

1st place: 8 Times (WV25, WV30, WV35 WV39, WV44, WV48, WV50, WV75)
2nd place: 2 Times (WV26, WV34)
3rd place (8 Times: WV27, WV31, WV32, WV37, WV54, WV59, WV70, WV72)

User avatar
Earth in Roughly 1000 Years
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 463
Founded: Aug 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Earth in Roughly 1000 Years » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:59 pm

The Remnants of Kobol wrote:
Earth in Roughly 1000 Years wrote:I do know how google works, when someone ask you for a source, all you have to do is provide it. Snarkiness is not required, especially when no one was snarky to you in the first place.

By starting with "I'm not calling you a liar but", the second half is implied to be read "But I'm calling you a liar". I don't like being called a liar.

Edit: I just saw your edit. I see you thought I was referring to the OP case and misread my post. In that case, I'm sorry for the confusion we both faced. Peace?

Yeah, sorry about that. I never mean to sound uncivil when inquiring initially, I am not the best writer though.

Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.67
Political Spectrum:
Left: 0.49
Libertarian: 4.06
Non-Interventionist: 4.4
Cultural Liberal: 3.29
Political Test
http://oi57.tinypic.com/erifc1.jpg
Social Attitude Test:
http://oi57.tinypic.com/2dj1btf.jpg
Political Survey:
http://politics.beasts.org/scripts/resu ... 1915620368

If you think your shit doesn't stink it's only because your sense of smell does.

_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Sig.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:00 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
not really, we can't assume it

maybe they were distracted by other things

What the actual fuck? You're telling me he's the ONLY one who noticed a person supposedly waving around a "real gun"? Yeah, keep telling yourself that.


i'm sure we all have experienced instances in our lives where we were the only ones in the room to notice something, even something quite extraordinary
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:00 am

Polkopia wrote:
How is it irrelevant? The only eyewitness who spoke out so far claims he was waving it.

Right, and not a single person has verified that claim, despite the fact that the guy was supposedly pointing it at people.
Polkopia wrote:Plus, the gun shot BB's and pellets. I'm pretty sure you could deal quite a bit of damage with one of those if used right.

And?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belarusball, Dimetrodon Empire, Escalia, Eurocom, EuroStralia, Glomb, Necroghastia, Port Caverton

Advertisement

Remove ads