War on white people?

by **Yumyumsuppertime** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:15 am

Arglorand wrote:
The UDSS wrote:I actually identify as purple and the lack of this choice on the poll offends me.

The joke would've been okay if not for "Other" being an option.

Don't make fun. His people have been through enough after that one-eyed, one-horned monster nearly wiped them out.

by **The UDSS** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:35 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Arglorand wrote:The joke would've been okay if not for "Other" being an option.

Don't make fun. His people have been through enough after that one-eyed, one-horned monster nearly wiped them out.

This man understands our struggle.

by **Narthakka** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:53 am

Benuty wrote:Ah yes "race" we have long dismissed such superstitious pseudoscience.

by **Dyakovo** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:54 am

Narthakka wrote:
Benuty wrote:Ah yes "race" we have long dismissed such superstitious pseudoscience.

http://minerva.stkate.edu/people.nsf/fi ... cience.pdf

by **Holy Trek** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:56 am

The Orson Empire wrote:Man, the Republican Party is just an embarrassment to the United States.

Could've told you that.
Thank God I'm a Democrat :lol:

by **Narthakka** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:58 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Narthakka wrote:

http://minerva.stkate.edu/people.nsf/fi ... cience.pdf

Wow 20+ plus whole pages in large text making an appeal to emotion. 'Whitey don't exist' then like magic 'White be evil n sheeit' bravo!

by **Holy Trek** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:00 am

Being from Alabama, I can only conclude that this is the view of the majority in the GOP......yet you can't call them out on it, or else they'll cry "RACE CARD" and go on and on about how they had/have minority friends......like that really helps their case when they vote for these racist GOP idiots.

by **Ifreann** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:02 am

Narthakka wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:http://minerva.stkate.edu/people.nsf/fi ... cience.pdf

Wow 20+ plus whole pages in large text making an appeal to emotion. 'Whitey don't exist' then like magic 'White be evil n sheeit' bravo!

Go home, Narthakka, you're drunk.

by **Dyakovo** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:08 am

Narthakka wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:http://minerva.stkate.edu/people.nsf/fi ... cience.pdf

Wow 20+ plus whole pages in large text making an appeal to emotion. 'Whitey don't exist' then like magic 'White be evil n sheeit' bravo!

You obviously didn't bother to actually read it.

by **Stallanstan** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:10 am

I think that there is some definite positive discrimination going on in modern western society, but its hardly a 'war' on white people

by **Narthakka** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:12 am

Dyakovo wrote:You obviously didn't bother to actually read it.

I did. Everything apart from the references (which I will look at) is useless. The rest however can be summed up as 'whitey is evil'.

by **Dyakovo** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:13 am

Narthakka wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:You obviously didn't bother to actually read it.

I did. Everything apart from the references (which I will look at) is useless. It can be summed up as 'whitey is evil'.

Thank you for confirming you didn't read it.

by **Ifreann** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:15 am

Narthakka wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:You obviously didn't bother to actually read it.

I did. Everything apart from the references (which I will look at) is useless. The rest however can be summed up as 'whitey is evil'.

You read it in the four minutes between here and here?

by **Narthakka** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:23 am

Ifreann wrote:
Narthakka wrote:
I did. Everything apart from the references (which I will look at) is useless. The rest however can be summed up as 'whitey is evil'.

You read it in the four minutes between here and here?

1st page: a graphic
2nd page: the authors
3rd page: overview
4th page: another graphic
5th page: a quote (with no sources to back it or anything)
6th page: more useless quotes
7th page: useless rhetoric
8th page: Gee, still nothing actually disapproving the existence of race, imagine that!
9th page: see pages 5, 6 and 7
10th: whitey be evil
11th and 12th: graphics
etc etc do you get the idea?

Only the references are useful.

by **Dyakovo** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:27 am

Narthakka wrote:
Ifreann wrote:You read it in the four minutes between here and here?

1st page: a graphic
2nd page: the authors
3rd page: overview
4th page: another graphic
5th page: a quote (with no sources to back it or anything)
6th page: more useless quotes
7th page: useless rhetoric
8th page: Gee, still nothing actually disapproving the existence of race, imagine that!
9th page: see pages 5, 6 and 7
10th: whitey be evil
11th and 12th: graphics
etc etc do you get the idea?

Only the references are useful.

Yes. You didn't actually read it,

by **Kelinfort** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:29 am

Narthakka wrote:
Ifreann wrote:You read it in the four minutes between here and here?

1st page: a graphic
2nd page: the authors
3rd page: overview
4th page: another graphic
5th page: a quote (with no sources to back it or anything)
6th page: more useless quotes
7th page: useless rhetoric
8th page: Gee, still nothing actually disapproving the existence of race, imagine that!
9th page: see pages 5, 6 and 7
10th: whitey be evil
11th and 12th: graphics
etc etc do you get the idea?

Only the references are useful.

Take a good long look, buddy.

by **Dyakovo** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:30 am

Kelinfort wrote:
Narthakka wrote:
1st page: a graphic
2nd page: the authors
3rd page: overview
4th page: another graphic
5th page: a quote (with no sources to back it or anything)
6th page: more useless quotes
7th page: useless rhetoric
8th page: Gee, still nothing actually disapproving the existence of race, imagine that!
9th page: see pages 5, 6 and 7
10th: whitey be evil
11th and 12th: graphics
etc etc do you get the idea?

Only the references are useful.

Take a good long look, buddy.

He won't actually look at that source either.

by **Narthakka** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:31 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Narthakka wrote:
1st page: a graphic
2nd page: the authors
3rd page: overview
4th page: another graphic
5th page: a quote (with no sources to back it or anything)
6th page: more useless quotes
7th page: useless rhetoric
8th page: Gee, still nothing actually disapproving the existence of race, imagine that!
9th page: see pages 5, 6 and 7
10th: whitey be evil
11th and 12th: graphics
etc etc do you get the idea?

Only the references are useful.

Yes. You didn't actually read it,

Oh, I'm sorry, was I supposed to be guilt tripped by poetry into believing race doesn't exist? Only the references at the bottom two pages are useful in supporting your argument. A photo of a lynching and quotes with no sources whatsoever, isn't going to cut it.

by **Kelinfort** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:32 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Take a good long look, buddy.

He won't actually look at that source either.

I'll just copy and paste it then. If he's going to act like a petulant child, so be it. He can't ignore evidence once it's on the page, otherwise, I'll just ignore what he has to say.

by **Dyakovo** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:33 am

Narthakka wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Yes. You didn't actually read it,

Oh, I'm sorry, was I supposed to be guilt tripped by poetry into believing race doesn't exist? Only the references at the bottom two pages are useful in supporting your argument. A photo of a lynching and quotes with no sources whatsoever, isn't going to cut it.

The quotes do have sources. If you had actually read it rather than just scrolling through, you'd have realized that.

by **Narthakka** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:35 am

Dyakovo wrote:
He won't actually look at that source either.

I will.

by **Ifreann** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:55 am

Narthakka wrote:
Ifreann wrote:You read it in the four minutes between here and here?

1st page: a graphic
2nd page: the authors
3rd page: overview
4th page: another graphic
5th page: a quote (with no sources to back it or anything)
6th page: more useless quotes
7th page: useless rhetoric
8th page: Gee, still nothing actually disapproving the existence of race, imagine that!
9th page: see pages 5, 6 and 7
10th: whitey be evil
11th and 12th: graphics
etc etc do you get the idea?

I get that you're reading it now to cover that you didn't initially.

by **Gaiserin** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 8:09 am

no, nope. There is no "war on white people."

Although, the phrase and mindset that; "Only white people are racist" has gotten more popular.

by **Dyakovo** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 8:13 am

Gaiserin wrote:no, nope. There is no "war on white people."

Although, the phrase and mindset that; "Only white people are racist" has gotten more popular.

Well, to be fair, it depends upon how you define racism.
If the following is the definition of racism that you use, then it isn't true.
"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."
On the other hand, if you use this next definition (and you're referring to a place like the US), then it is accurate.
"a highly organized system of 'race'-based group privilege that operates at every level of society and is held together by a sophisticated ideology of color/'race' supremacy."

by **Gaiserin** » Sat Aug 09, 2014 8:18 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Gaiserin wrote:no, nope. There is no "war on white people."

Although, the phrase and mindset that; "Only white people are racist" has gotten more popular.

Well, to be fair, it depends upon how you define racism.
If the following is the definition of racism that you use, then it isn't true.
"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."
On the other hand, if you use this next definition (and you're referring to a place like the US), then it is accurate.
"a highly organized system of 'race'-based group privilege that operates at every level of society and is held together by a sophisticated ideology of color/'race' supremacy."

So.. Are you trying to justify the phrase; "Only white people are racist" ..?

War on white people?

what do you identify as?

Who is online