Ganos Lao wrote:Novus America wrote:
They would probably prefer their own separate government after years of oppression by Sunni Saddam. Probably a rump version of the current Iraqi government they currently control, basically little would change. It seems to be supported by a majority of Shia.
They could make whatever democratic change they want to though.
If you think Jordan should annex the Sunni majority areas, why not suggest Iran annexing the Shia majority areas? Then you could let the rest go to the Kurds or something, right?
Well they could vote to join Iran, but I doubt they would. See the majority of Iran is Persian, and the Shia Arabs in Iran sometimes rebel, so it would probably not work. Jordan is Sunni Arab, so Sunni Iraq would work well in union with Jordan, having the same language and basic ethnic identity. (And again the Hashemites have a special legitimacy amongst their tribes) However Shia Iraq does not have a common language or ethnicity with the majority of Iran.
So I think they would prefer to be an independent state allied to Iran but it would be their choice.
The Kurds certainly deserve their own independent state, which they already have de facto, so little would change for them, except they get recognition, their government would remain the same.
Also I would think rather than having Jordan outright annex Iraq, a United Arab Kingdom, something like a federal UK should be created, with one king, military and federal government but the constituent kingdoms (Jordan, Sunni Iraq and Sunni Syria, possibly Palestine) would each have their own parliament with broad autonomous powers over domestic matters.




