I'd still rather have him successfully running a country while being a dick rather than someone who ruins the country's efficiency and fucks up the secularism brought up by the former government.
Advertisement

by Kvatchdom » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:16 am
by Adab » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:18 am
Kvatchdom wrote:I wonder what happened to that guy in Iraq who kept the zealots in bay.

by Organized States » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:20 am
Kvatchdom wrote:Organized States wrote:We freedom'd the shit out of him. Twice.
Still, he had to go either way. It didn't matter if he kept this guys at bay, Saddam was a murdering a-hole.
I'd still rather have him successfully running a country while being a dick rather than someone who ruins the country's efficiency and fucks up the secularism brought up by the former government.

by Allet Klar Chefs » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:20 am
Upper America wrote:Where's Russia in all of this? Out of all the countries you'd expect to come to the aid of Syria, it would be Russia.

by Kvatchdom » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:21 am
Organized States wrote:Kvatchdom wrote:I'd still rather have him successfully running a country while being a dick rather than someone who ruins the country's efficiency and fucks up the secularism brought up by the former government.
Doesn't matter, either way, Saddam, would go. IS would have shown up eventually. The Arab Spring would start a civil war in Iraq, and IS would come in.
The US overthrows Saddam. IS comes in.
Iraq needs to be three different damn countries.

by Organized States » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:24 am
Kvatchdom wrote:Organized States wrote:Doesn't matter, either way, Saddam, would go. IS would have shown up eventually. The Arab Spring would start a civil war in Iraq, and IS would come in.
The US overthrows Saddam. IS comes in.
Iraq needs to be three different damn countries.
Arab Spring my ass. Turning a fuck lot of countries from efficient but bad governments into complete shitholes isn't what I think the people who started that movement had in mind.
Iraq needs to be Iraq with a good leader.

by Allet Klar Chefs » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:25 am
Kvatchdom wrote:Turning a fuck lot of countries from efficient but bad governments into complete shitholes isn't what I think the people who started that movement had in mind.

by Kvatchdom » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:26 am
Allet Klar Chefs wrote:Kvatchdom wrote:Turning a fuck lot of countries from efficient but bad governments into complete shitholes isn't what I think the people who started that movement had in mind.
The reason the Arab Spring started was because the bad governments were also inept. There was massive youth unemployment that governments were doing too little about. That's what the Tunisians, Algerians and Egyptians were protesting about. An ossified military establishment that was depriving them of a positive future.
Organized States wrote:Kvatchdom wrote:Arab Spring my ass. Turning a fuck lot of countries from efficient but bad governments into complete shitholes isn't what I think the people who started that movement had in mind.
Iraq needs to be Iraq with a good leader.
No, Iraq needs to be three damn countries, like it was before the goddamned Europeans and Ottomans came in and screwed that country the hell up. The US just threw flames on the fire.

by Allet Klar Chefs » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:28 am
Kvatchdom wrote:Indeed, and the countries ain't doing much better.

by Organized States » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:28 am

by Blakk Metal » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:29 am
Organized States wrote:Think they'll just deploy the Danish Army on them like the US did during the LA Riots?
Organized States wrote:Kvatchdom wrote:Arab Spring my ass. Turning a fuck lot of countries from efficient but bad governments into complete shitholes isn't what I think the people who started that movement had in mind.
Iraq needs to be Iraq with a good leader.
No, Iraq needs to be three damn countries, like it was before the goddamned Europeans and Ottomans came in and screwed that country the hell up. The US just threw flames on the fire.

by Allet Klar Chefs » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:30 am
Organized States wrote:No, Iraq needs to be three damn countries, like it was before the goddamned Europeans and Ottomans came in and screwed that country the hell up. The US just threw flames on the fire.

by Organized States » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:33 am
Blakk Metal wrote:Organized States wrote:Think they'll just deploy the Danish Army on them like the US did during the LA Riots?
Don't be silly, this isn't Denmark, it's Low Germany.Organized States wrote:No, Iraq needs to be three damn countries, like it was before the goddamned Europeans and Ottomans came in and screwed that country the hell up. The US just threw flames on the fire.
For much of Iraq's history it was part of a big ass empire. It had no problem then. Furthermore, many countries can handle different ethnicities and religions just fine.

by Scholmeria » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:35 am
Quintium wrote:Scholmeria wrote:WTF. Wiki says he is a former PVV politican. It seems like punch in the face for Wilders.
They love to parade that fact around, but he was never really influential and he basically just left the party because Wilders wouldn't put him in an electable position for some election.
A while after that, he converted to Islam while on trial for a whole range of crimes, and immediately became the pet politician of the Saudi authorities.

by Organized States » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:35 am

by Allet Klar Chefs » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:35 am
Organized States wrote:I'm simply suggesting that Iraq be Balkanized (Kurdistan for example should be a separate country).

by Rio Cana » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:36 am
Upper America wrote:Allet Klar Chefs wrote:The US is effectively working with the Syrian and Egyptian governments at this point, yes.
Ok.
Where's Russia in all of this? Out of all the countries you'd expect to come to the aid of Syria, it would be Russia. Putin needs to get his head out of his ass and realize that his ally is under attack, and has been under attack by ISIS for months now. Ukraine shouldn't be Russia's main concern, it should be Syria.

by Blakk Metal » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:37 am
Organized States wrote:Blakk Metal wrote:Don't be silly, this isn't Denmark, it's Low Germany.
For much of Iraq's history it was part of a big ass empire. It had no problem then. Furthermore, many countries can handle different ethnicities and religions just fine.
That was primarily due to the fact that the different ethnic groups and religions were allowed maintain their own identities, and were separated from the other groups.
I'm simply suggesting that Iraq be Balkanized (Kurdistan for example should be a separate country).

by Organized States » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:38 am

by Scholmeria » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:39 am
Quintium wrote:http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/22949841/__Telegraaf_belaagd_in_Schilderswijk__.html
Here's a video of one journalist being attacked.

by Organized States » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:42 am
Blakk Metal wrote:Organized States wrote:That was primarily due to the fact that the different ethnic groups and religions were allowed maintain their own identities, and were separated from the other groups.
I'm simply suggesting that Iraq be Balkanized (Kurdistan for example should be a separate country).
If they are Balkanized, they'll just engage in wars with each other.

by Blakk Metal » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:44 am

by Geilinor » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:44 am
Kvatchdom wrote:Organized States wrote:Doesn't matter, either way, Saddam, would go. IS would have shown up eventually. The Arab Spring would start a civil war in Iraq, and IS would come in.
The US overthrows Saddam. IS comes in.
Iraq needs to be three different damn countries.
Arab Spring my ass. Turning a fuck lot of countries from efficient but bad governments into complete shitholes isn't what I think the people who started that movement had in mind.

by Geilinor » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:45 am

by Blakk Metal » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:46 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Comfed, Dtn, Narland, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Terminus Station, The Orson Empire
Advertisement