Advertisement
by Ainin » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:05 pm
Wisconsin9 wrote:Ainin wrote:Well you'd practically have no upper house anymore, which would probably be good for the whole Congress inaction thing.
I'm not sure what's worse, current Congressional gridlock or the thought of a single house that also plays a major role in who heads the executive branch.
by Allet Klar Chefs » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:05 pm
Alyakia wrote:Alyakia wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bx2khkkCUAA92K3.jpg
also i'm not sure if this means anything at all, but it still looks funny (yee is the top box, no is the bottom)
https://twitter.com/YesDundee/status/512750627626049536
oh well that settles that
rip conspiracy theories
by The New World Oceania » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:06 pm
by The balkens » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:06 pm
Allet Klar Chefs wrote:Alyakia wrote:
https://twitter.com/YesDundee/status/512750627626049536
oh well that settles that
rip conspiracy theories
No we need to get Alex Jones in on this.
by Wisconsin9 » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:06 pm
Ainin wrote:Wisconsin9 wrote:I'm not sure what's worse, current Congressional gridlock or the thought of a single house that also plays a major role in who heads the executive branch.
The distinction between executive and legislative is very small in the Westminster system. They're extremely intertwined, so one choosing the other is a natural conclusion from that.
by Olivaero » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:08 pm
Alyakia wrote:Olivaero wrote:The first noted use of it was by a scot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Britain when he inherited the crowns of England and Wales. The Isle of Great Britain was called so before the UK was formed, Maybe they named it the same thing to spite seperatists I wasn't in the room at the time and frankly neither were you. They named the country after what it included, the only example you've given to contradict this is Ireland which isn't really related to the UK government in any way and actually actively avoids being so. Did the USA get named so that they could claim the entirety of America? Maybe the EU some day wants to absorb Russia? just the European bit though, they didn't think far enough ahead to call themselves the Eurasian Union! Now they have no claim on it!
But all this is pretty by the by, I don't care really if you don't call yourself a Brit or what on forms or whatever. I care a good deal more if a UKIPer doesn't call themselves European, what I do object to is going out of your way to do so, Why the fuck does ethnicity matter so much? I object to any classification any dividing line any arbitrary grouping that is put between people, And thats what insisting your scottish not British is. United we stand divided we fall should be the ultimate goal of any left wing movement and I know your left wing but instead of trying to reclaim the word British in a not so South East of England Focused way your just hopping off and calling yourself Scottish not British. And that just perpetuates the Divide.
why aren't we called kingdomers?
yes ireland is the much more clear cut example and the more controversial one, and the one i was focusing more upon
because it's not ethnicity. or geography. it's a political distinction, and it matters. would you go and unite with russia right now, because we need to get rid of our divisions and be true leftists? i'm going to guess no.
by The Fascist American Empire » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:15 pm
Greater-London wrote:The New World Oceania wrote:How is the vote counted? Is it taken like an election, the straight majority, or are they doing 50%+1?
Now, I understand one vote determining everything is wildly unlikely, but just in case, what do they choose in a tie? Is the default noes? Yeses? Unanswered questions going on here, perhaps they could ask the Queen.
Its a straight majority, even if there was one vote either way that would swing the election. There also not allowed to recount on the basis of "the referendum is close"; whilst this is unlikely if No wins by 50 votes Yes Scotland won't be allowed to ask for a recount unless it genuinely looks like there's been a mistake. In the unlikely event of being completely tied, and I'm not making this up. Coin Toss.
You obviously do since you posted a response like the shifty little red velvet pseudo ant you are. Yes I am onto your little tricks you hissing pest you exoskeleton brier patch you. Now crawl back in to that patch of grass you call hell and hiss some more. -Benuty
by Greed and Death » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:16 pm
by Angleter » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:17 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Angleter wrote:Someone in Canada's come up with a benchmarks table for what Yes needs in each council area (obviously if it does better in one it can afford an under par perfomance in another) to win. Interesting, anyway.
That's very interesting. Might keep this open.
by The Nihilistic view » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:18 pm
Angleter wrote:Turnout in Dundee at 79%. Not good news at all for Yes.
by Angleter » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:19 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:20 pm
Angleter wrote:Oooooooooooooooooooh, the Clackmannanshire result might be in soon.
by NERVUN » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:22 pm
The Fascist American Empire wrote:Greater-London wrote:
Its a straight majority, even if there was one vote either way that would swing the election. There also not allowed to recount on the basis of "the referendum is close"; whilst this is unlikely if No wins by 50 votes Yes Scotland won't be allowed to ask for a recount unless it genuinely looks like there's been a mistake. In the unlikely event of being completely tied, and I'm not making this up. Coin Toss.
A coin toss deciding the fate of an entire nation?
I have officially heard it all.
by The Nihilistic view » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:22 pm
Angleter wrote:Oooooooooooooooooooh, the Clackmannanshire result might be in soon.
Meanwhile, some possibly appropriate music.
by The Nihilistic view » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:23 pm
The Fascist American Empire wrote:Greater-London wrote:
Its a straight majority, even if there was one vote either way that would swing the election. There also not allowed to recount on the basis of "the referendum is close"; whilst this is unlikely if No wins by 50 votes Yes Scotland won't be allowed to ask for a recount unless it genuinely looks like there's been a mistake. In the unlikely event of being completely tied, and I'm not making this up. Coin Toss.
A coin toss deciding the fate of an entire nation?
I have officially heard it all.
by Wisconsin9 » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:24 pm
by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:24 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Angleter wrote:Oooooooooooooooooooh, the Clackmannanshire result might be in soon.
Meanwhile, some possibly appropriate music.
Something more appropriate them. It's got bagpipes and shit!
by Voltrovia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:25 pm
Thanatttynia wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Nothing has been thought through.
Nothing is guaranteed.
Everything has been handwaved or dismissed like a bad II RP.
Why the fuck has anyone voted for independence?
This is the most disturbing thing about the referendum. Alex Salmond has done all of this and people are still voting for him, because of his tactics - preying on Scots, making them feel guilty about voting No, and rekindling misguided patriotism. He could say that Scotland would be guaranteed a place on the Security Council and free pounds will fall from the top of Ben Nevis every Tuesday and Thursday weather-permitting, and no one would challenge it, because "it's a time for change".
by Angleter » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:26 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Angleter wrote:Oooooooooooooooooooh, the Clackmannanshire result might be in soon.
Meanwhile, some possibly appropriate music.
Something more appropriate them. It's got bagpipes and shit!
by Constaniana » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:27 pm
Voltrovia wrote:Thanatttynia wrote:
This is the most disturbing thing about the referendum. Alex Salmond has done all of this and people are still voting for him, because of his tactics - preying on Scots, making them feel guilty about voting No, and rekindling misguided patriotism. He could say that Scotland would be guaranteed a place on the Security Council and free pounds will fall from the top of Ben Nevis every Tuesday and Thursday weather-permitting, and no one would challenge it, because "it's a time for change".
People are voting Salmond because the man has a terrifying ability to catch-up at the last minute as a result of injecting wild levels of fervour into his campaigns. He did this in 2011, and has managed to renege on most of his policy pledges since then. Look at the NHS. He has essentially followed the Coalition's line on spending and mimicked the reorganisations while vigourously attacking Westminster. Oh, by the way, all of the post-independence policies have changed - five years ago iScotland was going to be totally nuclear free in five years flat (?!?), out of Nato, on the euro, without the Queen, without any SDF to speak of, not that the present proposals are something to speak of...the list goes on.
Also, the RAF and the Navy are unlikely to be keen on yielding so much as a jet trainer or a dinghy at the moment. i.e. Salmond will not get any of his demands, from Defence, to Currency, to Debt, to the World Stage.
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.
by Voltrovia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:27 pm
by Allet Klar Chefs » Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:28 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Elsywer, Heldervin, Ineva, Likhinia, Markovna, Maximum Imperium Rex, Norse Inuit Union, Pasong Tirad, Stratonesia, The Black Forrest, The Bluest of Fish, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement