He's alright. His political policies are fine, but he seems a bit unexperienced, and he doesn't seem very bright, to be honest. Regardless, I'd pick him over Mulclair and Harper if I was a Canadian voting in 2015.
Advertisement
by The Scientific States » Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:13 pm
by Nation of Quebec » Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:21 pm
by The Scientific States » Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:23 pm
by Alf Landon » Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:28 pm
by Alf Landon » Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:29 pm
by Nation of Quebec » Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:29 pm
by MERIZoC » Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:36 pm
by Alf Landon » Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:45 pm
by Angleter » Sun Aug 03, 2014 5:02 pm
Avenio wrote:Angleter wrote:
I wish Britain had a Prime Minister (or government) for whom the biggest complaints were environment policy and defence procurement.
It's one of those interesting things about Canadian politics. Not to sound arrogant or anything, but we're about 5-10 years 'ahead' of most other Anglophone countries in terms of social politics - same-sex marriage laws were passed in 2005, our abortion laws were found unconstitutional in 1988, and immigration has largely become something to encourage and take advantage of as a political party rather than to disparage and fight against. All of those things have been around long enough that they're politically untouchable - as much as Harper would probably like to re-open the same-sex marriage debate or the possibility of restricting abortion, those issues are so fundamentally toxic to his party that doing so would very likely cost him the PM'ship, his parliamentary majority and probably re-open the internal civil war that raged through the Tories in the 90's and which he fought very hard to end in the early 2000's.
So he's forced to exert his conservatism in pretty much the only fields left open to him - foreign policy, the environment and government policy, which are much more the field of the policy wonks and are therefore less likely to lead to the same sort of backlash as if he went for tackling social issues.
by Talanzaar » Sun Aug 03, 2014 5:22 pm
by Fanosolia » Sun Aug 03, 2014 5:37 pm
Kazirstan wrote:Pierre Trudeau of course. He took none of Quebec's bullshit.
by Nation of Quebec » Sun Aug 03, 2014 7:02 pm
by Saint-Thor » Sun Aug 03, 2014 10:34 pm
Commonwealth of Hank the Cat wrote:Steven Harper does nothing to help anything. John A. Macdonald, in my opinion was a racist. Personally, I think Mackenzie King was also a Racist, and a Moron, but he was admitly good with the Economy. In my opinion.
by Infected Mushroom » Sun Aug 03, 2014 11:37 pm
by Atlanticatia » Sun Aug 03, 2014 11:48 pm
by Solaray » Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:14 am
by Napkiraly » Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:26 am
Solaray wrote:Deifenbaker or King. Harper was alright, a few years ago, but he's gone totally nuts lately. Trudeau wasn't bad, but he was kind of a prick. Pearson was a good one. His flag was neat.
by Solaray » Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:30 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]
Advertisement