DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:This is just another "ban X" because it offends me / I do not like it moments.
So basically, 75% of IM's threads.
Advertisement

by Arglorand » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:52 am

by The Scientific States » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:53 am


by United States of Cascadia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:55 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Max called the light “RP forums,” and the darkness he called “NSG.”
Risottia wrote:The heterosexuals want a pride march so they can look at other half-naked heterosexuals of the same sex without feeling guilty.
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:I want my sperm to taste like peanut butter and jelly, because I am firmly of the belief that what is holding me back in life is my penis not being sufficiently appealing to six year olds.
Other people wrote:

by Arglorand » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:56 am

by Christiaanistan » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:04 am
Nope. The dog the OP was talking about probably just wanted to lick her face, but apparently she was bitten by a dog when when she was a child, probably while doing something she had been told not to do, and decided that every dog in existence is just waiting for a chance to murder her.Draica wrote:Is this satire..?

by The Batorys » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:09 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Yesterday, while I was taking a walk by the harbor, a vicious white dog suddenly barked in my direction. Within seconds it was chasing me down the lenght of the harbor and I was running for my life. I never knew I could run that fast but I managed to emerge from the incident, unscathed. This isn't the first time this sort of thing has happened to me; in fact as a little kid dogs have attacked me on many occasions throughout various cities around the world. I also cannot stand the sight of dog droppings on the sidewalk.
I have come to the conclusion that dogs should be banned. And its not just because I personally don't like them. Here are some reasons why it would benefit public policy to outlaw them.
1. They are dangerous
Dogs are very dangerous because they can bite people. Owners can try to control their dogs but the fact of the matter is, they can't always keep everything under control; accidents will happen. Dogs are a safety hazard, not just to the people who buy them but also to everyone else. When guests come to a house with dogs their lives may be in danger; when dogs are taken out for walks, pedestrians are in danger. Its not right that someone can buy a dog and then endanger other people.
The power of dog bites must not be underestimated. Some dogs have so much power that they can bite human fingers off; they are a carnivorous species after all. I've heard some horror stories about dogs going crazy and maiming people. If a dog attacks you and bites you and then you get infected by disease, you could die if not treated. Sure, dog owners are liable and you can go after them for what their dogs do. But the system is imperfect (you need to prove stuff, courts are slow). Also, if a dog attacks you and you lose your fingers or a hand... do you REALLY think an owner can adequately compensate you for your loss with money (your body parts are priceless)? If dogs did not exist, the danger would not be there.
2. The Dog Droppings
People have a right to walk down sidewalks and throughout parks without having to worry about stepping on dog droppings. People should not have to contend with these sights. Yes in theory owners are supposed to clean up after their dogs but in my experience, too many owners don't and its costing the rest of us. I suppose if you accidentally step on dog droppings you could go after the owner and try to sue him but there are obviously problems with this (1. the courts aren't likely to award you sufficient damages 2. you don't know who the owner is, you just know that you've just stepped on some serious crap). If dogs were not around in society, there would be no dog droppings. I think we could adopt an approach similar to Singapore, where they have a no tolerance policy towards chewing gum on the floor in public areas with respect to the dog dropping problem.
___
So NSG, what do you think?
Is it time to outlaw dogs? Make our streets safe from droppings and random dog attacks?

by Viritica » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:19 am

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:21 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by United Marxist Nations » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:38 am
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Great Kleomentia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:46 am

by Christiaanistan » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:00 pm
Actually, I wonder what the OP's thoughts might be on the carolina dog, which is effectively America's "dingo." Most people didn't know about them until a few years ago, but it's gradually being more widely realized that the carolina dog is a true "pariah dog" that apparently came here with the Indians.United Marxist Nations wrote:Dogs aren't particularly dangerous. If a (domestic) dog is dangerous, you're doing something wrong.

by Berdanvia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:03 pm

by Lordieth » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:12 pm

by Hladgos » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:26 pm

by Arglorand » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:27 pm
Hladgos wrote:This is the most unintelligent thread I have ever thrown up on in the history of my life.

by Hladgos » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:29 pm

by Arglorand » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:31 pm

by Hladgos » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:34 pm

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:34 pm
Hladgos wrote:This is the most unintelligent thread I have ever thrown up on in the history of my life.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by United Regions of Verona » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:35 pm

by Sheltopolis » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:35 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:People have a right to walk down sidewalks and throughout parks without having to worry about stepping on dog droppings

by Arglorand » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:37 pm
Hladgos wrote:Arglorand wrote:You just wait. You just wait.
I wouldn't be surprised in a "ban food" thread at this point.
I was almost destroyed by a massive burger at Mcdonalds earlier today, and I came to the rash conclusion that all food must be dangerous because of this, and needs to be immediately banned.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Brunis, Dumb Ideologies, Duvniask, Gravlen, New haven america, Soviet Haaregrad, Terminus Station, Valehart, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement