Advertisement
by The Vekta-Helghast Empire » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:39 am
by United States of Cascadia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:39 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Sulania wrote:Then you're not even eliminating the problem that you claim Is there. You're contradicting it, dogs are still dangerous then. Wild dogs are more dangerous than domestic ones too.
Everything you are proposing is lunacy, I'm sorry, it is. Your solution is not a solution, to a problem that is not so much a problem. Your whole reasoning is flawed, and your solution doesn't solve what you're trying to solve. It's only slightly limiting it, slightly.
Obviously wild dogs would not be allowed in human population centers.
The Archregimancy wrote:Max called the light “RP forums,” and the darkness he called “NSG.”
Risottia wrote:The heterosexuals want a pride march so they can look at other half-naked heterosexuals of the same sex without feeling guilty.
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:I want my sperm to taste like peanut butter and jelly, because I am firmly of the belief that what is holding me back in life is my penis not being sufficiently appealing to six year olds.
Other people wrote:
by Tulacia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:39 am
Norstal wrote:Tulacia wrote:
You're seriously using CoD as your reasoning? CoD and most FPS games are unrealistic. OP, you are seriously insane. I have a 3-month-old Chocolate Lab. Are you suggesting that one day he's going to up and bite the hell out of someone simply because he's a dog? That is absolute bullcrap.
Hey now. CoD had somewhat realistic reloading animations.
by Infected Mushroom » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:39 am
Viritica wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
why do you think the military has used many specialized attack dog units both in the present and in the past?
Dogs are a carnivorous species. Their teeth have not evolved to eat grass, they are sharp and strong, good for tearing through flesh.
Call of Duty is not by any stretch of the imagination a realistic interpretation of how the military operates, let alone how it uses dogs.
by Forsher » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:39 am
by Roski » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:39 am
Wisconsin9 wrote:Fun fact: every year, around four and a half million Americans are bitten by dogs. 0.002% of them -- a grand total of nine -- die.
by Partially Blind People » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:41 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Viritica wrote:Call of Duty is not by any stretch of the imagination a realistic interpretation of how the military operates, let alone how it uses dogs.
so they just made attack dogs up?
if dogs can be trained to attack people, they may in some unpredictable circumstances use some of that potential to try and harm people (and I've seen it happen plenty of times, leash or no leash).
Vulkanas wrote:And so, after many months of fighting, squabbling, and not doing much else, nothing was accomplished.
THE END
by Cordyceps » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:41 am
Viritica wrote:You ran because a dog barked at you? That's really rather silly. A dog barking doesn't make it viscous. Dogs can't speak like you and me. Barking is one of the ways they communicate.
And no, dogs shouldn't be banned. Dogs are some of the most loyal and caring creatures humanity has ever known. And they can be used for more than just pets. They are used by our police to sniff out drugs and bombs and they are used by our military as scouts.
If you want my dogs you can take them over my dead body.
by Infected Mushroom » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:41 am
by Constaniana » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:41 am
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.
by Washington Resistance Army » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:41 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Viritica wrote:Call of Duty is not by any stretch of the imagination a realistic interpretation of how the military operates, let alone how it uses dogs.
so they just made attack dogs up?
if dogs can be trained to attack people, they may in some unpredictable circumstances use some of that potential to try and harm people (and I've seen it happen plenty of times, leash or no leash).
by Infected Mushroom » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:42 am
Partially Blind People wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
so they just made attack dogs up?
if dogs can be trained to attack people, they may in some unpredictable circumstances use some of that potential to try and harm people (and I've seen it happen plenty of times, leash or no leash).
People can be madre to attack people. Let's ban people, it will bring fsr more benefit to the world than banning dogs.
by Torisakia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:42 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Viritica wrote:Call of Duty is not by any stretch of the imagination a realistic interpretation of how the military operates, let alone how it uses dogs.
so they just made attack dogs up?
if dogs can be trained to attack people, they may in some unpredictable circumstances use some of that potential to try and harm people (and I've seen it happen plenty of times, leash or no leash).
[TNN] A cargo ship belonging to Torisakia disappeared off the coast of Kostane late Wednesday evening. TBI suspects foul play. || Congress passes a T$10 billion aid package for the Democratic Populist rebels in Kostane. To include firearms, vehicles, and artillery.
by Olthar » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:42 am
by Viritica » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:42 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Viritica wrote:Call of Duty is not by any stretch of the imagination a realistic interpretation of how the military operates, let alone how it uses dogs.
so they just made attack dogs up?
if dogs can be trained to attack people, they may in some unpredictable circumstances use some of that potential to try and harm people (and I've seen it happen plenty of times, leash or no leash).
by Sun Wukong » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:42 am
Wisconsin9 wrote:Fun fact: every year, around four and a half million Americans are bitten by dogs. 0.002% of them -- a grand total of nine -- die.
by Fascist Russian Empire » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:42 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Obviously wild dogs would not be allowed in human population centers.
by Dracoria » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:42 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
so they just made attack dogs up?
if dogs can be trained to attack people, they may in some unpredictable circumstances use some of that potential to try and harm people (and I've seen it happen plenty of times, leash or no leash).
So should we ban anything that could hurt people?
by Connori Pilgrims » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:43 am
Partially Blind People wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
so they just made attack dogs up?
if dogs can be trained to attack people, they may in some unpredictable circumstances use some of that potential to try and harm people (and I've seen it happen plenty of times, leash or no leash).
People can be madre to attack people. Let's ban people, it will bring fsr more benefit to the world than banning dogs.
by Viritica » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:43 am
by Partially Blind People » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:43 am
Vulkanas wrote:And so, after many months of fighting, squabbling, and not doing much else, nothing was accomplished.
THE END
by Marcurix » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:43 am
by Doperland » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:43 am
Yedmnrutika Gavr wrote:da dopeste fiend
by Viritica » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:43 am
Roski wrote:Wisconsin9 wrote:Fun fact: every year, around four and a half million Americans are bitten by dogs. 0.002% of them -- a grand total of nine -- die.
http://www.gatesnotes.com/~/media/Images/Articles/Health/Most-Lethal-Animal-Mosquito-Week/BiggestKillers_final_v8_no-logo.ashx
by Tulacia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:44 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:United States of Cascadia wrote:And that does what? India doesn't allow feral dogs in towns, and yet they still remain a serious problem.
that's because in India (presumably) dogs as domestic pets is still being allowed. So there could be confusion by the authorities about which dogs are wild and which ones are owned by people but on the run. The authorities don't want to face legal action by accidentally taking out the wrong dogs.
With my plan, there would be no such conclusion. Decisive action can be taken.
Also, India does not have the world's most effective law enforcement.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bronzite, Immoren, Likhinia, The Archregimancy, The Jamesian Republic, Tungstan, Valyxias, Zurkerx
Advertisement